Advanced Search

Harbin Municipal People's Government On The Revision Of The City New Homes Delivered The Decision Of The Management Pilot Scheme

Original Language Title: 哈尔滨市人民政府关于修改《哈尔滨市新建住宅交付使用管理试行办法》的决定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Decision of the Government of the city of Harhama on the revision of the pilot approach to the management of new residential delivery in the city of Hara

(Adopted by the 46th ordinary meeting of the Government of the city of Halara on 9 April 2009, No. 203 of 15 April 2009, by the People's Government Order No. 203 of 15 April 2009)

The Government of the city has decided to amend the pilot approach to the management of new residential delivery in the city of Harhama as follows:

Article IV amends as follows: “The management of the new construction of homes and upholds the principles of government regulation and social oversight”.

Article 6 (i) was amended to read: “The main engineering and accompanying facilities are verified by the urban and rural planning sector to meet planning requirements”;

Paragraph (x) was amended to read: “The construction of parallel facilities, such as the greenization, roads, lighting, is in line with design requirements and is qualified for experience, which cannot be delivered in parallel with the work of the subject, and the construction of facilities such as temporary road, temporary lighting, etc.”

Delete subparagraph (XIV).

Article 7 amends as follows: “The relevant administrations with regulatory responsibilities for the construction of new homes shall be governed by the law and, in accordance with the principles of who are responsible, who approves and who is responsible, conduct full-scale regulatory and dynamic management of construction projects and promptly halt and correct violations of planning and construction requirements”.

Article 12, paragraph 1 (i), was amended to read: “The approved project planning maps and certified documents that are consistent with the planning requirements”;

This paragraph adds to subparagraph (iii): “Guidebook for the project for the development of property that has been tested;”

Delete paragraph (viii).

Paragraph 2 of this article amends the “greening, roads, lighting” facilities such as the construction of new homes, which cannot be delivered in parallel with the construction of new homes for seasonal reasons, as well as the documentation completed by facilities such as temporary road, temporary lighting, and the signing of a book on the use of the facilities accompanying the new residential chamber. The guarantee shall contain such elements as the time and the criteria to be met in the delivery of the facilities accompanying the Chamber.”

Article 22, paragraph 1, and paragraph 2, are divided into two articles, respectively:

“Article 22 provides that construction units will be used without social evaluation or social evaluation for the delivery of unqualified new construction houses, which shall be discontinued by the administrative authorities of the city, the duration of delivery or the reprocessing of the evaluation process; a fine of up to €20,000 for failure to do so may be recommended that the relevant executive branch not proceed with the approval of new projects in accordance with the law.

Article 23. The construction unit, in violation of this scheme, does not provide for the construction of the facilities in line with the commitments of the new House of Commons for the delivery of the use of the Accreditation, to be converted by the municipal property administration authorities; Unadjusted and fines of more than 3,000 dollars, may recommend that the relevant administration authorities do not proceed with the approval of new projects in accordance with the law.”

Add a further article 26: “The designation of institutions, street offices and their staff members in violation of this approach is one of the following acts by organs with administrative disposition:

(i) Failure to organize social evaluation in accordance with prescribed time frames affecting the use of new homes;

(ii) Abuse of authority by requiring construction units to fulfil their obligations beyond legal, legislative and regulatory provisions and affect social evaluation;

(iii) Failure to participate or to withdraw from the social evaluation.”

In addition, in accordance with this decision, the order of the language and provisions of some provisions is modified and adjusted accordingly.

This decision has been implemented effective 20 May 2009.

The pilot approach to the management of new residential delivery in the city of Halkoham was released in accordance with this decision.

Annex: A pilot approach to the management of new residential delivery in Harhama City (as amended in 2009)

(Amended by the Decision of the Government of the Hilhama on 9 April 2009 on the revision of the pilot management approach for the construction of new homes in Harhama City)

Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations, in order to strengthen the management of new homes, regulate behaviour-building, guarantee the living conditions of the population after their residence.

Article 2, this approach applies to the delivery of new homes within the national land of the city planning area.

The construction of new homes in Article 3 should be in line with the planning design requirements to ensure the quality of the work and to meet the conditions of residence of the population.

Article IV establishes new residential delivery management and upholds the principles of government regulation and social oversight.

Article 5

The relevant administrations, such as the construction, urban and rural planning, urban management, public safety fire, human defence, environmental protection, heating, health, radio television and water services, should be co-ordinated in the management of new residential delivery in accordance with their respective responsibilities.

Article 6 provides for the use of new homes in the following conditions:

(i) The construction of major engineering and associated facilities is verified by the rural and urban planning sectors to meet planning requirements;

(ii) Surveys, designs, construction and treasury of works are consistent with the requirements of legal, regulatory and national mandatory standards, which are completed with qualifications and are established by administrative authorities;

(iii) Environmental protection facilities have been established and are eligible for accreditation in the environmental protection sector;

(iv) Living water facilities and water quality are in line with health, water-related standards, the integration of urban public water supplies into urban public water management networks and the formal supply of water;

(v) The drainage facilities meet the relevant standards and are eligible for experience, including rains, wastewater emissions into urban rains, sewage emission systems;

(vi) The inclusion of electricity in urban electricity networks and official electricity;

(vii) The heating system is in line with the heating set-up standards, the use of urban concentration for heat and the inclusion of urban concentration for heat networks;

(viii) Accreditation by completing the adequacy of indoor gas pipelines and the interface between thedoor gas pipeline;

(ix) Telecommunication lines and linear television lines are loaded to households, with linear television lines being integrated into the city's regional cable television network;

(x) The construction of parallel facilities such as the greenization, roads, lighting, etc. of the Chamber is in line with design requirements and has experienced qualifications that, for seasonal reasons, cannot be used in parallel with the work of the main subjects, the construction of facilities such as temporary road, temporary lighting, should be completed;

(xi) The establishment of a clean, complete and sub-delivery and shall take effective measures to separate the construction work area;

(xii) A pre-employment enterprise and a process of obtaining the receipt;

(xiii) Relevant public service accommodations and accompanying facilities should be in accordance with design requirements and procedures for receiving inspection;

(xiv) Other conditions under the laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 7. Relevant administrative departments with regulatory responsibilities for the construction of new homes should be subject to regulatory responsibility under the law, in accordance with the principles of who are responsible, who approves and who is responsible, to conduct full-scale regulatory and dynamic management of construction projects and to timely end and correct violations of planning and construction requirements.

Article 8 units such as electricity, water supply, drainage, heating, heating, telecommunications, cable television should guide, cooperate with the construction units in completing the construction of specific housing-related facilities. After the completion of the work, the construction units are required to carry out timely delivery tests to ensure the normal life needs of the population.

Prior to the use of new homes in Article 9, social evaluation should be carried out on whether the new building house meets the conditions of delivery. No use is delivered without social evaluation or social evaluation.

In the case of new homes that do not meet the conditions of delivery, the municipal housing administration does not deal with the current sale of commodity premises.

Social evaluation funds are included in the municipal financial budget.

Article 10 Social evaluation is carried out by the Evaluation Committee for the Use of Homes, consisting of representatives of owners of industry, relevant experts, business representatives of goods and services, the Government of the District and community representatives (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Committee).

The total number of evaluation committees is 9, of which three representatives of the owners and the relevant experts, each of whom are represented by the business sector, the people of the region and the community. At the same time, one member of the Director was elected from among the relevant experts and one member of the Deputy Director was elected from the owner. Each member of the Evaluation Committee has a right to vote.

The owners' representatives and the relevant experts were created by the Social Evaluation Organization Unit from the pool of experts established by the newly constructed houses and the municipal housing administration authorities. The drawing process and the results should be open and publicized on the body's site.

The creation of a system of avoidance by the members of the Evaluation Committee.

Article 11. Evaluation of the following:

(i) Whether the documents supporting the conditions for the delivery of new homes are ready;

(ii) Whether the evidence documents from the relevant departments and units are consistent with the reality.

The construction units shall apply for social evaluation to the municipal housing administration prior to the deployment of new homes and submit the following documents:

(i) The approved project planning map and certified documentation that is consistent with the planning requirements;

(ii) The documentation for the completion of the work reserve;

(iii) The manual for the project for the development of nuclear properties;

(iv) Access documents for environmental protection facilities;

(v) The documentation of engineering facilities such as electricity, water supply, drainage, heating, fuel, telephone communications and cable television to meet the conditions for delivery;

(vi) The documentation of the facilities accompanying the Chamber to meet the conditions for delivery;

(vii) The documents of the pre-professional service contract;

(viii) Receive access procedures for relevant public service accommodations and facilities;

(ix) Other documents provided for in laws, regulations and regulations.

The greenization, roads, lighting, etc. of new homes, which cannot be delivered in parallel with the construction of new homes for seasonal reasons, should also provide documentation of the completed facilities, such as temporary road, temporary lighting, and the signing of a book on the use of the facilities accompanying the new residential chamber. The guarantee shall include the time and the criteria to be met at the time of delivery of the facilities accompanying the Chamber.

Construction units should be responsible for the authenticity of the source of the application. The relevant departments or units should not be allowed to leave if the documents were to be false.

Article 13 provides for the approval of construction units by the municipal housing administration authorities and shall notify, within two working days, the designated institutions of the new housing project site for social evaluation and the transfer of relevant documents.

The designated institutions of the people of the region should be established within three working days.

Article 14. Upon the establishment of the Evaluation Committee, evidence documents from the relevant departments and units should be reviewed, field-based evaluations, and the organization of evaluation meetings to carry out evaluation findings based on evaluation. Construction units should be informed during the evaluation process.

In the course of the evaluation, the Evaluation Committee needs to be informed by the relevant departments and units or to access the relevant materials, and the relevant departments and units should not be denied and adduced.

The evaluation should be completed within five working days.

Article 15. The evaluation findings by the Evaluation Committee shall be adopted by more than six members (including 6 members).

The Evaluation Committee shall give the evaluation findings a letter of assessment of the use of social housing in the city of Harhama (hereinafter referred to as the Evaluation Opinion).

Article 16 The Evaluation Committee shall submit the evaluation opinion to the municipal authorities for the preparation of the municipal property.

Upon receipt of the documentation by the municipal housing administration authorities, the evaluation opinion book should be presented at the location of the new housing project. The relevant units and the owners of the industry have contested the evaluation opinion and can make complaints to the municipal housing administration authorities. The reasons for the objection were established and the evaluation committee was re-established. The findings of the re-evaluation are final.

Article 17 The members of the Evaluation Committee shall be responsible for the termination of the evaluation by providing for the social evaluation or the misrepresentation in the evaluation process; the evaluation shall be cancelled and the evaluation board shall be re-established.

The experts concerned were able to slacken their eligibility for social evaluation experts during the evaluation process.

Article 18 The evaluation has been completed and the municipal housing administration should withdraw the evaluation findings.

Article 19 shall be published in a timely manner in the media, such as newspapers, sites, etc., by the executive authorities of the municipal property. The evaluation of the non-qualified evaluation findings should also be made public at the same time as whether the evaluation of the non-qualified project and the name of the construction unit, the relevant sector and the supporting documents are authentic.

The post-public evaluation findings should be recorded in the corporate credit file.

Article 20 of the Commission evaluates non-qualified new housing projects, and construction units should be corrected in a timely manner and re-approperate applications for social evaluation, with costs borne by construction units.

Article 21, which cannot be completed at the same time as new houses, should be reported to the municipal housing administration.

Article 22 Construction units, in violation of this scheme, will be used without social evaluation or social evaluation for the non-qualified construction of new homes, which shall be discontinued by the administrative authorities of the municipal property, the duration of delivery or the reprocessing of the evaluation process; a fine of up to 500,000 dollars for overdue or reprocessing, may be recommended that the relevant administration authorities not proceed with the approval of new projects in accordance with the law.

In violation of this approach, the construction unit does not provide for the construction of the facilities in line with the commitments of the new House of Commons to deliver the use of the Accommodation, which are converted by the municipal property administration authorities, and is not reformed by a fine of more than 30,000 dollars, it may recommend that the relevant administration does not proceed with the approval of new projects in accordance with the law.

Article 24 provides that construction units violate the relevant laws, regulations and regulations, such as planning, construction, and are punishable by law by the relevant administration.

Article 25 In the evaluation process, the Evaluation Committee found that administrative organs and their staff were not regulated or regulated under statutory responsibilities and could be reflected to the supervisory organs.

Article 26

(i) Failure to organize social evaluation in accordance with prescribed time frames affecting the use of new homes;

(ii) Abuse of authority by requiring construction units to fulfil their obligations beyond legal, legislative and regulatory provisions and affect social evaluation;

(iii) Failure to participate or to withdraw from the social evaluation.

Article 27, relating to the administration of the administration and its staff, has not been regulated or regulated by the statutory responsibilities, and is accountable for the leadership in accordance with the relevant provisions of administrative accountability. Those directly responsible are disposed of by their units or by the inspection department in accordance with the relevant provisions. Crime constituted criminal liability by law.

Article 28 concerned the creation of false material by any department or unit, and the municipal property administration should be brought promptly to the supervisory authority. As a result of losses, liability is assumed by law.

The delivery of new homes in the district (market) is governed by this approach.

Article 33

Article 31 of this approach is implemented effective 1 March 2006.