(The 60th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the city of jewell, 29 April 2008, considered the adoption of Decree No. 67 of 27 February 2009, of the Decree No. 67 of the People's Government of the jewell City of 27 February 2009, effective 1 April 2009)

Chapter I General

Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the People's Republic of China tenders bill and the relevant laws and regulations to regulate tendering activities for construction works.

Article 2

The construction works described in this approach refer to various types of housing buildings and municipal infrastructure works, transportation works, water engineering, electricity works and related subsidiary facilities, construed lines, pipelines, equipment installation works, and engineering works for dressing.

This approach refers to solicitation for construction projects that are all types of construction works, survey, design, price counselling, solicitation, treasury, construction, equipment and material procurement and other projects related to construction.

Article 3. The municipal development reform sector is responsible for the guidance and coordination of tendering activities for construction works across the city.

The city-building administrative authority is the administrative oversight department for the construction of tendering activities across the city and is responsible for the supervision of tendering activities across the city and for the management of the solicitation services.

The relevant industry authorities, such as urban transport, water and electricity, assist the municipal authorities in the construction of administrative authorities to oversee the construction of tenders in the relevant industry.

The Urban Centre for Public Resources Transactions is responsible for overseeing the management of the Centre for Construction of Engineering Transactions, coordinating the relationship of the Centre for Construction of Engineering Exchanges with the relevant sectors, responsible for the creation, management and evaluation of the training, research and evaluation of bid experts' pool.

The municipal administration inspectorate, in accordance with the law, conducts inspections of State bodies, business units, State-owned enterprises and their staff involved in tendering activities, and conducts inspections on the performance of their duties with the relevant departments and their staff to investigate violations.

Article IV, in accordance with this approach, shall be subject to tendering activities for construction works, which shall be carried out at the municipal construction engineering transaction centre.

The Centre is responsible for providing facilities, information and advisory services for tendering activities.

The Urban Construction Engineering Exchange Centre should collect and maintain relevant information on tendering activities.

Article 5. The solicitation activities should be guided by the principles of public, fair, fair, optional and good credit, and oppose malicious low-cost competition.

In accordance with this approach, the tenderer shall make the proposed budget for construction work, the budget, tendering, major changes in the construction process, the completion inspection, the settlement of payments, and, within ten working days of the date of the work concerned or completion, the social oversight through the Government-designated website.

In accordance with this approach, the construction works that should be solicited, the solicitation, the bidder and the bidder, the statutory representative of the moderate, the project manager assumes life-long responsibility for the quality of the construction in accordance with their respective responsibilities.

No unit or individual shall interfere in the solicitation activities in any way.

Chapter II

Article 7.

Article 8 uses construction works for State, collective funding or national financing, as well as medium or priority basic construction projects included in national, grass-roots plans, in line with one of the following conditions, and shall be solicited:

(i) The total contract and construction of a single contractor contract amounting to more than one million dollars;

(ii) A single service contract amount of more than 150,000 dollars for the award and solicitation;

(iii) A single contract amount of more than 50 million dollars for construction of engineering equipment and material procurement, construction of engineering surveys, design, treasury and other projects related to construction works.

The construction works of government investment in the various sectors (including economic functional areas) should be carried out in accordance with 50 per cent of the amount of the above-mentioned contract, and construction work in the town government investment should be carried out in accordance with 20 per cent of the amount of the above-mentioned contract, with the exception of the provision of price advice, solicitation services, and the joint investment of the multi-tier government, which is determined by the subject of the project implementation.

In accordance with the relevant laws, regulations, services such as designated mandatory review, testing, mapping, etc. may not be solicited.

Article 9 should solicit the full use of state-owned, collective or state-owned, collective funding or ownership, as well as the inclusion of large-scale or priority infrastructure projects in national, broad-based plans.

Article 10 shall solicit the construction work of tenders and, subject to approval by the municipal development reform sector, shall be subject to the following conditions:

(i) Technical complexity or special professional technical requirements, with only a small number of potential bidders being able to choose;

(ii) The national security sector, the confidential sector, which is determined to involve national security, State secret, the appropriate solicitation but not the appropriateness of open tendering;

(iii) Restrictions on natural resources or environmental conditions;

(iv) Partial use of State, collective funds and State-owned, collective funding does not constitute a control unit or lead;

(v) The laws, administrative regulations or other provisions of the State Department.

Article 11 should be solicited for construction works, which are confirmed by the municipal development reform sector as one of the following conditions, and may be subject to tenders following approval by the municipal development reform sector:

(i) The municipal security sector determines that it relates to national security or the municipality's confidential sector, which determines that the State is not competent to make tenders;

(ii) Restructuring construction after construction or downsizing, and no change in the marker;

(iii) Business or unit self-exploitation, and the enterprise or unit of its full-exploited enterprise or unitary level is in line with self-building requirements;

(iv) The use of specific patents or specialized technologies;

(v) Indivisibility of minor or subject matter-based works in construction works, and the original markers still have contractual capacity;

(vi) The failure of two tenders under the prescribed procedure;

(vii) The laws, administrative regulations or other provisions of the Department of State.

Article 12. Construction of tenders may not be carried out, and construction units should be self-selected to the contractor in accordance with the principles of openness, equity and impartiality.

Government investment construction works and construction units should be sent out of fifteen days from the date of contracting contracts, as well as contractual contracts to peer development reform departments and the financial sector.

The development reform sector and the financial sector should suspend project implementation or suspend the allocation of funds after the contract was concluded.

The development reform sector should be approved by law in the form of solicitation organizations for construction works, the scope of tendering and the manner of tendering.

The feasibility study needs to be approved at the approval stage of the feasibility study; the work on tenders must be carried out before the approval of the feasibility study or the feasibility study is approved separately. The development reform sector should complete the approval process within ten working days alone.

After approval, the form of solicitation organizations, the scope of tendering and the manner in which tenders should be reorganized.

The development reform sector should reproduce the approval of documents within three working days from the date of approval.

No unit or person in Article 14 shall make the construction work that must be solicited into zero or otherwise circumvention of tenders.

Any unit or individual would be required to distract from the construction work that would be required to be tendered into a number of tenders other than the scope of the solicitation or a number of single contracts would be considered to be circumvented.

Chapter III

Article 15. The solicitation shall be in accordance with the following conditions, and shall be free to organize tenders:

(i) The qualifications or legal personality of project legal persons;

(ii) Specialized technical power in economic, technical, financial and regulatory areas that are adapted to the scale and complexity of tendering projects;

(iii) Persons with specialized solicitation bodies or more persons familiar with the solicitation work;

(iv) The ability to prepare solicitation documents and to organize tenders;

(v) Be familiar with relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

The bidder cannot meet the above conditions and shall be delegated to the agent of the solicitation body with corresponding qualifications.

No unit or person shall be compelled to entrust the solicitation agent to the designated solicitation body.

Article 16 is a legal or other organization with the qualifications of the solicitation agent granted by the administrative authorities.

In addition to the special mention, the provisions of this approach concerning the solicitation agent apply equally to the solicitation agent.

Article 17 The solicitation agent shall enter into a written award contract with the solicitation agent to pay the royalties in accordance with the provisions and the agreement between the parties.

The solicitation agent shall not be entitled to activism, ultra vires, and may not be informed of the commissioning of a breach of the relevant provisions and shall not accept the solicitation solicitation project's solicitation and the bidding process and shall not transfer the solicitation agent operation.

Article 18 The solicitor shall prepare prequalification documents and solicitation documents, issue solicitation notices or invitations to tenders, accept tenders, organize tender qualifications reviews, determine the opening time and place, organize tenders, tenders, tenders and identify bids.

Article 19

The overall contract for construction projects and the survey, design, price counselling, solicitation and tendering shall be in accordance with the following conditions:

(i) Project approval documents already in line with the provisions for the development reform sector;

(ii) A solicitation, scope of tendering, approval of the form of solicitation organizations;

(iii) The corresponding source of funds has been implemented.

In addition to the above conditions, the construction work and the procurement of equipment and materials related to construction works should be in line with the following conditions:

(i) A construction engineering planning licence should be established in accordance with the provisions;

(ii) The design documents and technical information that are consistent with the requirements of tendering.

Article 20

In the prequalification document and the model text of the solicitation documents, the relevant elements that would be required under the solicitation should be in line with the relevant provisions of the scheme and the principles of openness, equity, justice and merit.

Article 21 shall send prequalification documents and solicitation documents to the municipal authorities for the construction of administrative authorities prior to the publication of the solicitation notice, which shall be completed within three working days.

The municipal authorities should review whether the prequalification documents and the solicitation documents are in compliance with the provisions of the law and identify that prequalification documents or solicitation documents are in violation of the provisions of the law and should inform the solicitor that the solicitor shall remedy them before the issuance of the prequalification documents or solicitation documents.

In accordance with the provision for re-exploitation, the solicitationer shall reproduce the prequalification documents and the solicitation documents.

Paragraphs Page

The prequalification documents or solicitation documents have been issued to all bidders at least five days before the deadline for prequalification applications or at least 15 days prior to the expiration of tenders.

Article 23. Public solicitation shall be issued by the solicitation notice in accordance with the provisions. The solicitation announcements should be made available at least on the jewell jewell City Building Engineering Information Network, which may not be less than five working days.

Inviting tenders, the bidder shall send a written invitation to more than three successful tenderers with the capacity to undertake tendering projects.

The bidder shall not terminate the solicitation. Special circumstances require the termination of tenders, and the bidder shall, in writing, explain the reasons for issuing a notice of termination of tenders after a request by the municipal authorities for construction, inform all bidders who have participated in tenders of discontinuing tenders and assume the responsibility arising from the termination of tenders.

Article 24

(i) The name, address, content, size, source of funds and status of the solicitation project;

(ii) Modalities for solicitation projects, assessment of tenders, budget estimates or budgetary prices, request for quotations, completion of time and quality requirements;

(iii) The qualifications of tenderers, the amount and manner of tender securities;

(iv) The time, address and manner of tendering;

(v) Time, address, cost of obtaining prequalification documents or solicitation documents;

(vi) The name and contact of the solicitation and the solicitation agent.

Article 25 The solicitor shall issue prequalification documents or solicitation documents in accordance with the time specified in the solicitation notice or the invitation to tender, without less than five working days.

The bidder may issue prequalification documents and solicitation documents through the construction information network in the jewell City.

Article 26 Investigators need to respond to questions by the solicitor at least three days before the deadline for prequalification applications or at least 10 days before the deadline for tendering.

The issue raised by the bidder to read prequalification documents, solicitation documents and on-site surveys should be answered in writing. Priorities should be reported to the municipal authorities for the construction of administrative authorities, the municipal construction of engineering transactions centres.

Answer shall be granted to all bidders who have obtained prequalification documents or solicitation documents at least two days prior to the deadline for prequalification applications or at least seven days before the deadline for tendering.

The bidder may issue questions through the construction information network in the city of jewell, and the bidder should be downloaded on its own.

The scope of the answer should include all relevant questions raised by the bidder.

Answer may not be contrary to the prequalification documents, the substance of the solicitation documents.

The duty of the bidder to make a judgement and decision based on the prequalification documents, solicitation documents, on-site surveys and questions is solely borne by the bidder.

The bidder's objection to prequalification documents or solicitation documents shall be submitted at least one working day prior to the deadline for the prequalification application or at least five working days prior to the deadline for tendering. In addition to cases where pre-qualification documents or solicitation documents are in place, municipal authorities are no longer admissible any objection to prequalification documents or solicitation documents.

Article 27 shall ensure fairness, impartiality and impartiality in the solicitation process and shall not disclose to others the names and quantity of tenderers who have obtained prequalification documents or solicitation documents, as well as other circumstances that affect fair competition, the bidder shall not be allowed to proceed on a separate or separate basis.

Article 28 shall reasonably determine the period of effectiveness of tenders, which shall be calculated from the date of the deadline for tendering.

There is a need to extend the period of effectiveness of tenders, and the bidder shall notify all bidders in writing before the expiry of the period of effectiveness of the original tender.

The bidder agreed that the extension should be accompanied by a corresponding extension of the period of effectiveness of the tender bonds; the bidder refused to extend, the bid failed and the bidder could recover the award.

Article 29 shall reasonably determine the time required for the preparation of prequalification applications and tender documents by tenderers:

(i) The time period for the preparation of a prequalification application from the date of the issuance of the prequalification document to the date of the submission of the application for prequalification by the tenderer, shall not be less than seven days;

(ii) The time period for the preparation of tender documents shall not be less than 20 days from the date of the issuance of the solicitation documents to the date of the submission.

The technical simple or special circumstances require the appropriate reduction of time, with written consent of all bidders who have obtained prequalification documents or solicitation documents.

Article 33 The solicitationer may request the bidder to submit the tender bonds. The amount of tender bonds is generally 2 per cent of the bid price ceiling, and the total contract, construction, equipment and material procurement for construction projects should not exceed 5 million dollars, while other tenders should not exceed one million. The period of effectiveness of tender bonds should be at least thirty days of the period of effectiveness of tenders.

The bidder may require the submission of the security of performance by the marker, which shall not generally be less than 10 per cent of the bid price ceiling.

The bidder may request the difference between the bidder's submission of the intermediate price and the bid price ceiling as a security for performance, which is less than 10 per cent of the medium price.

In addition to the balance-of-performance guarantees, the bidder requested that the marker provide the same security for performance and that the same amount of payments should be made simultaneously to the moderate marker.

The solicitation for the creation of services allows the bidder to request ten per cent of the total investment in the project.

Article 31 may require the bidder to provide security in the form of cash or non-removable bank letters.

Article 32: The solicitation shall be one of the following four awards:

(i) The lowest-prisoner approach applies to all tenders.

The lowest-prisoner approach refers to the identification of the lowest bidder for valid tenders.

The simple work of the technology, such as the exhumation, should use the lowest-prisoner approach.

(ii) A reasonable low-cost evaluation method applied to all tenders.

A reasonable low-cost evaluation method means a bidder that determines a less than and is most close to the average value of an effective tender.

For the first time, more than five valid bid bid bid bid bids are valued at the average value of the first valid tender price, two averages should be given to valid tenders for the first time, identifying bid holders who are less than and close to the average bid for the second valid tender price.

(iii) The two-phase approach is applicable to the overall contract of the project, the construction of the general contractor solicitation, and the construction of specialized contractors.

The two-phase approach means that, in the first phase, three top-ranking tenders identified through the evaluation of technical, performance, credibility tenders have entered the second phase of economic tenders, identifying the lowest bidder for effective tenders.

(iv) The integrated evaluation approach applies only to tendering for surveys, design, price counselling, treasury, equipment and materials and other projects related to construction.

The integrated evaluation approach refers to the identification of the highest evaluated bidder through technical, performance, credibility, economic evaluation.

The technical tenders for the two-phase approach and the integrated evaluation approach are generally implicit, and the content of the tender must not be marked or implied in relation to the identity of the bidder.

The tender price may refer to the evaluated tender price, which is developed by the municipal authorities.

The city-building administrative authorities may otherwise develop other evaluation methods that are simple or special.

Article 33 could foresee frequent maintenance of municipalities, transportation, water conservation, etc., and more than three qualified contractors should be selected for each year through open tendering, and specific contractors are required to be identified in an open manner.

Article 34 should prepare budget estimates and budget construction works, and the bidder should make public estimates and budgetary prices.

The cost estimates for construction work, the preparation of the budget should be implemented in the design document, in line with the principles of security, American view, environmental protection, energy efficiency, and basic economic construction, with full consideration to the impact of the various factors in the construction cycle.

To establish a monitoring inspection system for the preparation, evaluation of budget estimates and budget implementation of government investment construction projects by industry authorities.

Article 335 The construction solicitation shall apply the method of calculating the amount of the works.

The price methodology used for surveying, design, price counselling, solicitation services, treasury, equipment and material procurement and other project solicitation for construction works should be consistent with the relevant provisions.

A maximum of tenders, floor limits, would be required and the quota for tenders would not exceed budgetary prices. The application of the Government's guidance price should be in line with the relevant provisions.

The bidder's creation and use of pre-relead funds in the bid price should be in accordance with the relevant provisions and the proportion of funds retained shall not normally exceed 5 per cent of the budget price limit.

The solicitation documents should clarify the manner in which the contract price is paid and settled.

The construction should generally pay the contract price at a monthly rate in accordance with the construction progress, and other payments should be made on a regular basis in accordance with the progress made in the completion of the service or the delivery of the goods.

The settlement shall be completed within ninety days of the completion of the construction of the construction of the construction work, or the full delivery of the goods, and the proportion of payments shall not be less than 915 per cent of the settlement price.

Article 37 may use a prequalification or post-qualification review of the bidder by the solicitor, which shall be eligible for prequalification in a manner in which the evaluation is preferable, and the post-qualification shall be followed in a manner consistent with the review.

The Government's investment construction work solicitation can be used for pre-qualification, with a specific approach being developed by the municipality.

In addition to special mentions, the relevant provisions of this approach on tendering apply equally to prequalification and post-qualification.

Article 338 The prequalification documents should be based on the requirements of tendering, with the reasonable establishment of the necessary conditions of qualifications and conditionality.

The prequalification evaluation should be conducted at the municipal construction work transaction centre.

The number of prequalification evaluation committees should be more than three, with the exception of a solicitation representative, other members should be determined on an random basis within the ICG.

Article 39 Prequalification uses the following methods:

In accordance with the criteria for the evaluation of the qualifications required under the prequalification documents and with the eligibility conditions, the prequalification evaluation committee first evaluated whether the bidder meets the required qualifications.

The bidder to meet the required qualifications should be re-produced by less than six bidders; more than sixteen tenders to meet the required eligibility conditions are eligible tenderers; more than twelve, the solicitor may, in accordance with the eligibility conditions, be subject to a high-ranking to low-ranking order, not less than twelve bidder as qualified bidders.

The performance, credibility documents submitted by the bidder should be accompanied by an effective link between the administrative authorities that can provide a search. The bidder did not have an effective link according to the provisions and the relevant performance and credibility documents would be denied.

Following the completion of the prequalification, the bidder shall submit the evaluation report of all members of the prequalification evaluation board to the municipal construction work transaction centre for archiving, which shall include the following:

(i) List of bidders submitting prequalification requests;

(ii) The original evaluation records;

(iii) List of qualified bidders.

After the completion of the prequalification, the bidder shall send a prequalification notice to the bidder within three working days.

The bidder's objection to the prequalification outcome shall be submitted at least five working days before the deadline for the tender. In addition to cases where pre-qualified tenderers are in breach of article 50 of this approach or where prequalification activities exist, municipal authorities are no longer admissible any objection to the prequalification outcome.

Article 42 evaluates prequalification only as a basis for the selection of qualified tenderers at the prequalification stage, and no unit or individual shall be able to direct the evaluation of the bid board by the prequalification evaluation opinion.

Article 43, after the prequalification is completed, the bidder shall not conduct the evaluation of the performance and credibility of the bidder.

Following the completion of the prequalification, tenders should be re-exposed as the number of bidders who had been removed from tenders exceeded one of the total number of qualified bidders.

The bidder who had been removed from the tender was not allowed to participate in the solicitation project.

Article 44 quater shall not exclude or limit potential bidders, either by industrial or regional limitation, by raising the level of qualifications or by adding a professional contractor to the total contractor's qualifications, and require that tenderers have the same two qualifications and shall be allowed to make tenders.

In addition to the conditions required by the bidder to comply with the law, the creation of the terms of the tender should be in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Examination, design, price counselling, solicitation, treasury, and other project solicitation related to construction, setting the terms of reference for tendering only to the extent of the qualifications and hierarchy of enterprise or unit, the qualifications of the project manager and the type and hierarchy of professional technical functions;

(ii) The terms of reference for tendering established by the construction solicitation shall be limited only to the qualifications and hierarchy of enterprises or units, the type and hierarchy of project chiefs' qualifications and professional technical functions, the security production licence and the production of the licence;

(iii) The terms of tenders granted in the procurement of equipment and materials are limited only to the security production licence and the installation of licences for production.

The bidder may reject the existence of a collusion of tenders, the solicitation of tenders for serious offences, such as bribes, the misappropriation of tenders, and the effective time available within five years prior to the solicitation, to be calculated from the month of the date of the issuance of the solicitation notice.

Article 42 may create performance, credibility, project organization bodies, technical programmes, quantity and parameters of facilities equipment, supply of materials and transport distances, standing branches of the city and associated individuals, professional technical titles, performance and credibility as evaluation matters.

The evaluation matters, such as the performance and credibility of tenderers, should be closely linked to the completion of the solicitation project by the bidder, with an effective period of five years prior to the solicitation, business or unit performance and the effective time of the credibility for the three years prior to the solicitation, with an effective time beginning on the date of the issuance of the solicitation notice.

Performance, credibility evaluation criteria should be responsive to the nature and scale of the solicitation projects, with the exception of the lack of effective competition due to the exceptional or size of the solicitation projects.

The number and parameters of facilities established by the solicitationers, the availability of materials and the transport distance, the permanent branches of the city and the qualifications of the individual governing industry, professional technical titles may be evaluated only as a matter of excellence.

The bidder shall provide the basis for the creation of the quantity and parameters of facilities equipment and the supply of material and the transport distance as a matter of evaluation.

The bidder has created the performance, credibility and permanent establishment of the bidder in this city, province as a profitable matter of evaluation, and should be guided by the principle of fairness and that the proportion of the value shall not have a significant impact on the determination of the marker.

Under the same conditions, the bidder's performance, credibility and standing may serve as the preferred choice of the bidder in the next option.

Article 46 shall not designate specific equipment, materials, technology. Special cases must be designated for specific equipment, materials, technology, which should provide more than three comparable standards for equipment, materials, technology allowing bidders to choose.

The bidder designated new and patented equipment, new materials and new technologies for extension by the State, the Province of Chiangong and the jewell City.

Article 47 gives tenderers less than six bidders, for example, the terms of reference, tender bonds, performance guarantees, contract price payments, evaluation of tenders, etc., as an exclusion or limitation of potential bidders, with the exception of the potential bidder that meets the relevant provisions.

Article 48 imposes full legal responsibility on the solicitation licensor for the preparation of the prequalification documents and the solicitation documents.

The municipal authorities have found that prequalification documents or solicitation documents issued by tenderers violate the laws, regulations, regulations and relevant provisions, whether or not the marker has been identified, may be converted by law.

Article 49 allows the bidder to collect reasonable expenses and information depositaries for the production of prequalification documents or solicitation documents, as prescribed by the provision, which shall be returned to the bidder.

Chapter IV

Article 50 is a legal person or other organization that responds to tenders, participates in tender competition, except as otherwise provided by law. The bidder shall be in line with the following conditions:

(i) In accordance with the terms of tender qualifications required by the solicitation documents;

(ii) No period within which tender eligibility is terminated;

(iii) No situation of suspension or insolvency;

(iv) There is no limitations on due conduct licensed by law.

Any subsidiary body of the solicitor or any legal entity and its subsidiary body that provided the construction work with a feasibility study, survey, design, price counselling, etc. shall not participate in the construction tender for the construction of the construction work.

The PO and its supervisory engineers are not allowed to participate in the treasury tender for the construction of the construction work, the construction unit, the equipment and the material supply unit.

The bidder with a subordinate relationship is prohibited to participate in the same construction work.

The same project heads or relevant technical heads are prohibited to participate in the construction of tenders for more than two construction works.

Article 50 allows more than two legal persons or other organizations to form a joint tenderer to make joint tenders in the capacity of a bidder.

The bidder shall not compel the bidder to make tenders.

Article 52 shall have the corresponding capacity to undertake tendering projects. The relevant provisions of the State or the solicitation documents provide for the qualifications of the bidder and the parties should have the corresponding qualifications required.

The same professional or category of bidder consists of a joint tenderer, setting a hierarchy of qualifications in accordance with the low level of qualifications.

The parties to the joint tender should enter into a common tender agreement signed by the statutory representative or the authorized author of the joint tenderer, specifying the tasks and responsibilities to be assumed by the parties.

The joint bidder shall submit a joint tender agreement to the solicitor without submitting a common tender agreement and the bidder shall reject the bidder's participation in the tender.

The parties to the joint tenderer shall jointly enter into a contract with the solicitor to share their responsibilities with the bidder in respect of the intermediate project.

A joint bidder may not make tenders for the same solicitation project either alone or in other joint bidders following a joint tender agreement.

Any change in the composition of the joint tenderer shall be subject to the written consent of the solicitor before the deadline for the submission.

After the change, the joint bidder's competitive ability to reduce or contain legal or other organizations that had previously not been subject to a prequalification review could refuse the bidder to participate in the tender.

The parties to article 55 should designate a hoster to authorize the hostr to act as host and coordinate the tender and the contract implementation phase on behalf of the co-signator. The sponsor shall submit to the solicitor the authorization documents of the legal representative of all members of the joint tenderer or the authorized author.

Article 56 shall submit tender bonds on behalf of the sponsor.

Article 57 tenders should be in accordance with the substantive requirements and conditions set forth in the solicitation documents.

The performance, credibility documents submitted by the bidder in the solicitation documents should be accompanied by an effective means of communication that can be provided. The bidder did not have an effective link according to the provisions, and the relevant performance and credibility documents would be denied.

Article 588 The bidder shall submit the tender bonds in accordance with the time, amount and manner specified in the solicitation documents before the deadline for the submission of tenders.

The use of cash to submit tender bonds must be transferred through bank transfers and must be made available to the bidders' accounts.

The bidder did not submit a tender bond as required, nor could it participate in the solicitation activities as an invalid tender document.

The bidder shall, prior to the deadline of the tender, send the solicitation documents sealed to the designated location, the person, in accordance with the solicitation documents. No unit or individual shall open tender documents before the opening of the tender.

The bidder shall refuse to accept the solicitation documents delivered by the bidder after the deadline for the tender, except that the solicitation documents provide for documents that may be submitted after the deadline for the tender.

The bidder may supplement, modify, replace or withdraw the submitted tender documents before the deadline for the submission of tenders, which are part of the solicitation documents.

The bidder shall not supplement, modify, replace or withdraw the tender documents after the deadline for the submission of tenders, but the solicitation documents provide for some of the documents that may be submitted after the deadline of the tender, the solicitation and the evaluation committee's commitment or minor preferences.

Article 61 shall not allow other units or individuals to make tenders in the name of the tenderer and shall not be tendered at less cost.

Article 62: The following conduct is a collusion between tenderers:

(i) A mutual agreement between the bidder;

(ii) To participate in tenders once the bidder has been identified;

(iii) The submission of tender bonds using cash means, with tender securities from different bidders from the same bidder or the same account;

(iv) The different bidder entrusts the same body or the same staff with prequalification applications or tender documents;

(v) Prequalification requests or solicitation documents of different bidders, in addition to other formats, content or a large number of mine identicals;

(vi) The errors in prequalification applications or tender documents of different bidders are unreasonably consistent;

(vii) Changes in the market price portions of tenders;

(viii) The same person is present in the project management course or other members of the different bidder's prequalification application or tender documents;

(ix) Other collusion of tenders.

The following conduct in article 63 is the collusion of tenders with tenderers:

(i) The solicitation owner and its close relatives manipulate tenders or represent the bidder;

(ii) The solicitation agents and their close relatives are involved in the preparation of prequalification requests or tender documents in violation of the relevant provisions;

(iii) In breach of the provision for the opening of prequalification applications or tender documents prior to the prequalification evaluation or opening of tenders, in violation of the provisions to communicate the prequalification application or the solicitation documents to other bidders, in violation of the provisions to assist the bidder to withdraw, modify the eligibility for prequalification requests or tender documents;

(iv) The bidder agreed with the bidder to submit tenders;

(v) The bidder predetermined the bidder;

(vi) Other collusion of tenders.

Chapter V

Article 64 requires the preparation of tenders for construction, such as technical, performance, credibility or economic tenders, and the bidder shall organize a review committee in accordance with the provisions.

The list of members of the evaluation board shall be determined prior to the opening of the mark, and the list of the members of the evaluation committee and the modalities of contact shall be confidential before the outcome is determined.

Article 55 Composition of the Competitive Examination Commission is composed of the solicitation representatives and experts in relevant technical, economic areas.

The number of members of the evaluation board should be more than five, and experts identified in an random manner within the IPR expert pool shall not be less than two thirds of the total membership, and the representatives of the solicitor shall not exceed two. The Government's investment construction works solicitation, which could only send a representative to the evaluation committee.

The representative of the solicitor shall have technical titles or work in the relevant area of the solicitation project for a period of more than eight years, and the solicitor shall submit the qualification certificate of the solicitor's representative to the municipal construction work transaction centre prior to the meeting.

The construction of special complex or special professional requirements for technology is not possible to provide the special engineering solicitation projects for the corresponding experts, which can be evaluated by the solicitor itself, and by the awardor, after approval by the Centre for Public Resources Transactions.

Article 66 of the Communiqué expert's treasury of construction works is required for less than 50 experts or for tendering projects, and the Centre for Public Resources Transactions may arrange for the use of experts on a different basis. Specific approaches were developed by the Urban Centre for Public Resources Transactions.

The following persons shall not serve as members of the Committee on Reviews:

(i) The solicitation agent and its close relatives, in addition to the solicitation representative;

(ii) The bidder and its close relatives;

(iii) The personnel of the project authority or the relevant administrative oversight department;

(iv) Persons with penalties relating to tendering activities;

(v) Other persons that should be avoided by law.

The members of the evaluation board should make an initiative to request a waiver.

Article 68 may recommend or elect a member of the evaluation committee as the head of the evaluation committee responsible for organizational coordination on the issue of evaluation.

Article 69 Members of the valuator shall strictly observe the discipline of the work of the evaluation and shall conduct an objective and impartial evaluation of each tender document in accordance with the evaluation criteria established in the solicitation documents. The members of the evaluation board bear personal responsibility for their respective evaluation observations.

Article 76 shall not be in private contact with any bidder or persons who benefit from the outcome of the solicitation or shall not accept the financial or other interests of the bidder, the intermediary, other persons of interest.

The review process needs to be discussed on matters that may affect the evaluation of tender documents, such as evaluation criteria, methods, etc., and should be organized by the heads of the evaluation board for a collective discussion.

Article 72 assesses the individual independent quantifiable evaluation of all members of the Commission, which is more than seven members of the Commission, and shall remove an average or aggregation of morphology after a maximum and a minimum.

The evaluation of the members of the evaluation board clearly runs away from the opinion of the majority of members, with an average of 30 per cent of the archaeological values that were overtaken by one of the highest and one of the lowest levels, and the reasons for the presentation should be given in writing.

The bidder considered that the terms of the solicitation documents should be clarified by the bidder, but clarified that the substance of the solicitation documents should not be removed from the solicitation documents.

The CRIC may request the bidder to provide the necessary clarification, clarification or satisfaction of the content of the inconsistency in the solicitation documents, but to clarify, clarify or fill the substance of the solicitation documents beyond the scope of the solicitation documents or to change the substance of the tender documents.

Article 74 requires that major evaluation matters, jointly confirmed by all members of the Commission, be taken to form a written resolution.

The resolution, which has been considered by more than one third of all members of the Commission, shall not be contrary to the basic principles laid down in the law, regulations, and solicitation documents, which shall be confirmed by the signature of all the members of the Commission.

Article 765 Members of the Examination Commission shall have objections to written resolutions or the outcome of the evaluation, and shall make written statements of different views. The rejection of signatures at the written resolution or the evaluation report and the rejection of the written presentation of the different views are considered to be in agreement with written resolutions or the findings of the evaluation. The Commission shall make a statement in the evaluation report.

In addition to legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions, any unit, individual shall not override the written resolutions and the findings of the evaluation committee.

Chapter VI

Article 76 shall be open in advance of the solicitation documents, and the opening time shall be the deadline for tendering.

Article 77 was opened by a bidder to invite all bidders to participate.

The legal representative of the bidder or the author of the award and the relevant head must participate in the opening of tenders in accordance with the provisions, with the specific approach being developed by the municipal authorities.

Article 78 shall be closed.

Prior to the publication of the evaluation findings, a unit or individual involved in the evaluation activity shall not be able to contact the bidder privately and shall not disclose to the bidder any information on the evaluation activity.

Article 79 should send staff to oversee the conduct of tendering, evaluation activities, in accordance with the prescribed procedures, and to correct violations of the relevant provisions in a timely manner, without expressing opinions or participating in the deliberations of the Committee.

The staff of the municipal construction work transaction centre should assist the bidder in the provision of legal, regulatory, and related documents, in accordance with the prescribed procedures, in order to point out violations of the procedures and disciplines in a timely manner, but shall not comment on the substance involved in the evaluation or participate in the deliberations of the Panel.

The special circumstances have led to the failure of the opening or evaluation of tenders, the existence of a breach of procedures and disciplinary actions by the persons concerned, which are still denied redress, the finding that tendering activities have other violations of the relevant provisions, and the timely reporting of the construction of administrative authorities in the city.

Article 810 All tender documents received by the solicitor prior to the deadline of tendering shall be subject to a public examination of the seals and, in addition to the provision of technical tenders for the implicit mark, the contents of the solicitation documents and the related elements to be read out in the solicitation documents.

The bidder may request the examination of the sealing of the tender document itself.

After the examination of the sealing of tender documents, no unit or individual may object to the sealing of tender documents.

Technical mark numbers and numbers should also be carried out by the staff of the municipal administration.

Article 81 shall provide the bidder with important information, data and questions raised by the Panel. The Commission should carefully study the solicitation documents and familiarize them with the following:

(i) The objective, scope and nature of tendering;

(ii) Basic requirements, standards set out in the solicitation documents;

(iii) The evaluation criteria, methods and related factors set out in the solicitation documents;

(iv) Evaluation of the relevant tables used.

Article 82 has one of the following cases, which is dealt with as invalid tender documents:

(i) The legal representative of the tenderer or the author of the award, the relevant head did not participate in the opening tender in accordance with the provisions, except as otherwise provided in the solicitation documents;

(ii) The solicitation documents are not submitted to designated locations and persons pursuant to the solicitation documents;

(iii) The solicitation documents are not sealed in accordance with the solicitation documents;

(iv) The content of tender documents by different bidders, the large number of data mined and the existence of a clear collusion of tenders;

(v) The bidder refused to make a difference;

(vi) The tender price is clearly below the cost or exceeds the Government's guidance;

(vii) The bidder has a violation of article 50 of this approach;

(viii) Other cases provided for by law, regulations and regulations.

Article 83 has one of the following cases, which is a significant difference, and is treated as an ineffective tender document:

(i) The bidder did not submit the tender bonds in accordance with the solicitation documents;

(ii) The solicitation documents do not add to the chapter of the bidder or the signature of a legal representative or a licensee, except for technical tenders that are implicit;

(iii) The solicitation documents are not prepared in accordance with the format specified in the solicitation documents, and the main content is not sufficiently complete or critical;

(iv) The designation or implied in relation to the identity of the bidder in accordance with the terms of the solicitation documents, the names of the relevant persons and other project names other than the solicitation project;

(v) The solicitation documents are not in accordance with the substantive requirements of the bid documents, the duration of work, quality, technical specifications, technical standards;

(vi) The solicitation documents contain conditions or false documents that the solicitor cannot accept;

(vii) Other significant differences in legal, regulatory, regulatory or solicitation documents.

Article 84 is simplistic to refer to the substantive response of tender documents to requests for solicitation documents, but there is no unfair outcome to other bidders in the event of a breakdown or technical information, data incompleteness.

The bidder or the valuator shall, in writing, request the bidder to fill a fine gap before the conclusion of the tender and, after the written consent of the bidder to add, shall be seen as an effective tender document.

Article 82 provides that valid tender documents are less than three and should be reproduced.

The two-phase approach was followed by an effective tender document identified in the second phase, which was less than three, could be replaced by a sub-operable option in accordance with the terms of the solicitation documents and the rating committee's determination in accordance with the terms of the solicitation documents.

Article 82, after the conclusion of the tender, shall not be dealt with as an invalid tender document for the opening of tenders, the evaluation period has been confirmed, in addition to the following circumstances:

(i) The presence of the marker in violation of article 50 of this approach;

(ii) The solicitation documents of the marker are the documents of the invalid tender;

(iii) There are cases of solicitation, evaluation and invalidity.

Article 87 shall submit a written evaluation report to the bidder after the completion of the evaluation, the proposed list of candidates and the order of listing, which shall be limited to three columns.

The bidder shall determine the ranking of the first bidder in accordance with the terms of the solicitation documents and the sequencing established by the Commission.

The bidder shall not negotiate with the bidder on the substance of the tender price, the tender programme, before determining the bidder. In the design of programme solicitation, the bidder may request the bidder to optimize the design of the programme in accordance with the solicitation opinion.

The bidder may conduct a field study of the bidder, which is restricted to the contents already contained in the solicitation documents, and the bidder decides to conduct a field study of the successful candidates, should include in advance the evaluation criteria and methods for field missions in the solicitation documents.

Field mission reports should include organizational bodies for field missions, evaluation standards and methods for field missions, and results for field missions.

Article 818 The bidder shall make at least two working days a presentation on the construction of engineering information in the jewell City. Without objection, a letter of assignment to be sent within three working days to the moderate marker, confirmed by the Centre for Construction of Engineering Exchanges, shall be communicated to all outstanding bidders.

After the issuance of the notice of the intermediate, the sub-signor has one of the following cases, which is considered to be a waiver, except for the contractual conditions that the bidder cannot accept in addition to the solicitation documents:

(i) Clearly indicate that the mark is abandoned;

(ii) An additional condition that the solicitationer cannot accept;

(iii) The submission of requests for changes in the solicitation documents or the substance of the contract to which the solicitor is unable to accept;

(iv) No contract with a bidder pursuant to the solicitation documents;

(v) No performance security shall be submitted to the solicitor in accordance with the solicitation documents.

The bidder may opt for the second, third and medium-sized candidates, in accordance with the terms of the solicitation documents and the sequencing established by the Commission.

The selection of candidates for sub-sixed second, third, as a marker, may result in a marked damage to the State's interests, the public interest or the legitimate rights or interests of others, should be re-produced.

A re-produced bidder shall not be allowed to participate in all tenders for the construction.

Article 90 shall enter into a written contract with the bidder within thirty days of the date of the notice of the intermediate tender, in accordance with the solicitation documents, the tender documents of the marker, the price of the mark, in violation of the terms of the solicitation documents, the bid papers of the marker, the terms of the contract or other agreement relating to the substance of the tender, the tender document of the mark price.

In addition to the force majeure, the head of the project or the relevant technical head of the project committed by the moderate owner in the solicitation documents shall not be replaced without any intentional change, except if the solicitor or the relevant supervisory authority considers that the person concerned is subject to the replacement of the marker in the performance of his/her functions. The performance, credibility, qualifications and qualifications of the personnel concerned after the replacement are not attributable to the original.

Article 90 should strictly perform the contract with the bidder and should not be construed to expand the scope of the contract, increase the costs or the price. There is a need to expand the scope of the contract, increase the cost or the price, and approval procedures should be governed by the law.

Government investment construction works, all eligible payments within the scope of the contract must be strictly enforced and, for unpredictable reasons, need to expand the scope of the contract, increase costs or prices, but remain within the scope of the budget estimates, according to the following:

(i) A single amount of up to five per cent of the price of one million yen or moderate tenders shall be applied by the solicitor, upon written approval by the relevant industry authorities;

(ii) A single amount of more than one million yen or less than five per cent of the mark price should be applied by the solicitor, with the consent of the relevant industry authorities, after the written approval of the same-level development reform sector.

Expansion, increase in part in accordance with the terms of tendering shall be subject to tendering.

The bidder shall, at the same time, redirect the application for the expansion of the scope of the contract, the increase of costs or the construction of the price to the same level of administrative inspection.

The bidder shall submit to the solicitor the security of implementation in accordance with the time, amount and manner specified in the solicitation documents.

Article 93 shall refund the tender bonds to the bidder who has not been identified as the successful candidate within five working days from the date of the letter of assignment, and the bid bonds for the successful candidates shall be returned within five working days from the date of the bidder's contract with the moderate marker.

The tender bonds must be returned to the bidders' accounts using cash to be submitted to tender bonds.

In the case of article XIV, the solicitor shall return to the tender securities within five working days:

(i) The termination of tendering;

(ii) The failure of tendering requires re-opening;

(iii) The bidder refused to extend the period of effectiveness of tenders after the expiry of the period of effectiveness of tenders.

Article 9.15 The establishment of administrative authorities in the city shall properly preserve the tender documents of all bidders during the presentation, after the expiry of the presentation, all bidders shall be transferred to the solicitation in addition to the information that is to be preserved by the Centre.

The bidder shall return the solicitation documents to the outstanding bidder within five working days from the date of the contract.

Article 96 requires the solicitation to use, in whole or in part, the technical results or technical programmes of the outstanding bidder, which shall be reimbursed with the written consent of the tenderer.

For the design of programme tenders, the solicitor may grant different levels of economic compensation to the bidder that meets the request for solicitation documents but does not appear to be tendered for the total cost of compensation not more than 10 per cent of the amount of the contract, and the solicitor shall clarify the scope of compensation and the criteria for compensation in the solicitation documents.

Chapter VII Complaints

Article 97 The bidder or other stakeholders consider that tendering activities violate legal, legislative, regulatory, and related provisions, may lodge complaints to the relevant administrative oversight bodies in accordance with the law.

Complaints should be made to the municipal authorities in connection with the violation of laws, regulations, regulations and related provisions by tenderers or tenderers.

In relation to the violation of laws, regulations, regulations and related provisions by the members of the Commission, complaints should be made to the Centre.

In relation to violations of laws, regulations, regulations and related provisions by State organs and their staff, complaints should be made to the municipal administration.

With respect to solicitation, tenderers, review boards, State bodies and their staff members, in violation of laws, regulations, regulations and related provisions, may be suspected of bribeing, bribeing or occupier criminal acts, and shall submit complaints or reports to the municipal prosecution authorities.

Other stakeholders refer to legal persons, other organizations or individuals who have direct or indirect interest in solicitation projects or tendering activities, in addition to tenderers.

Article 9.8 The complainant shall not be contested by the complaint as an exclusive competition, without false and malicious complaints, impeding the normal conduct of tendering activities.

In article 99, the complainant shall submit a written complaint within 10 days of the date of knowledge or knowledge of the violation of the rights or interests.

Article 101 Written complaints shall include the following:

(i) The name, location and effectiveness of the complainant;

(ii) Basic facts on the matter of complaints;

(iii) Related requests and claims;

(iv) Effective lineso and related supporting material.

The complainant is a legal person and must be signed by a statutory representative or the authorized holder, with a public chapter of the complaint; the complainant is an other organization or person, and must be signed by the head or the applicant himself, attaching an effective identity certificate.

Article 101: The complaint is inadmissible:

(i) The applicant has no stake in the solicitation activities of the complaint;

(ii) The absence of specific complaints and the absence of an effective line to justify them;

(iii) The complaint does not sign the true name of the complainant and the manner in which it is effectively connected, or, in the name of the legal person, the complaint does not have a legal representative or the author's signature and the non-exclusive chapter;

(iv) More than the time limit for the complaint;

(v) The decision has been taken to deal with the absence of new evidence by the complainant;

(vi) Complaints have entered administrative review or proceedings.

Article 101.2 After receipt of a complaint by the administrative oversight branch, a review shall be conducted within three working days, taking into account the following decisions in the different circumstances:

(i) The time frame, form and content of the complaint are not in accordance with the provisions, and the administrative oversight branch should inform the complainant of the grounds of the inadmissibility;

(ii) The time frame, form, content consistent with the provisions of the complaint, but not accepted by this sector, should inform the complainant of the complaint to other administrative oversight departments;

(iii) The time frame, form and content of the complaint are formalized.

The administrative oversight sector decides to be formally admissible and may notify, in writing, within three working days of the date of formal acceptance, of the suspension of tendering activities or the suspension of the contract by the municipal construction work transaction centre and the bidder.

Article 101 ter. The executive oversight branch conducts a legal investigation, in which the complainants, the complainants and the parties concerned with the matter of the complaint, such as the members of the Sub-Committee, shall cooperate with the parties concerned, such as the actual provision of information and information.

Article 101 quater before the decision is taken, the complainant's request for the withdrawal of the complaint should be submitted in writing on the grounds. The administrative oversight branch may decide whether to grant the withdrawal if:

(i) Clear violations have been identified and should not be withdrawn, and the administrative oversight component should continue to investigate until decisions are taken;

(ii) The withdrawal of the complaint does not undermine the legitimate rights or interests of the State, the public interest of the society or other parties, and should be granted, and the complaint shall be terminated. The complainant shall not file a complaint on the same facts and grounds.

Article 101.5 The administrative oversight branch shall conduct a review of the matter of the complaint in accordance with the circumstances of the investigation and the evidence obtained, taking a decision to deal with:

(i) The lack of factual or legal basis for the complaint and the rejection of the complaint;

(ii) The case of the complaint is true, and the solicitation activities are indeed in violation of the law, legislation, regulations and related provisions.

The administrative oversight department responsible for the admissibility of the complaint shall, within 20 days of the date of receipt of the complaint, decide on the matter of the complaint.

The situation is complex and cannot be resolved within the time frame, with appropriate extensions following approval by the executive heads. The administrative oversight branch should inform the complainant and the complainant of the extended decision.

Chapter VIII Legal responsibility

Article 101.7 The solicitation agent has one of the following acts, forfeiture proceeds of the violation and punishes them in accordance with the provisions:

(i) The tendering project shall be subject to a fine of up to ten thousand thousand dollars for the solicitation project, without the solicitation of the solicitation project.

(ii) The failure to make public tenders without open tendering shall be subject to a fine of up to three0,000 dollars after the deadline for submission of tender documents, in the event of serious and invalid tenders, in accordance with the content of approval or approval by the development reform sector;

(iii) Warns in violation of the relevant provisions for negotiations with tenderers on the substantive elements of tender price, tender programmes, etc.; the consequences of the above-mentioned conduct are null and void;

(iv) A fine of up to 50,000 dollars for potential bidders without reasonable conditions;

(v) The use of other criteria and methods of evaluation other than the provisions of the solicitation documents, setting the criteria and methods for evaluating tenders that contain a preference or exclusion of the content of the bidder and limiting the competition between the bidder and affecting the results of the evaluation, and the establishment and composition of the bid committees are not in accordance with the requirements, and the evaluation is null and void and fined up to three0,000 dollars;

(vi) Disclosure of tenders that should be confidential, with a fine of up to 1 million yen; the effect of the above-mentioned conduct is null and void;

(vii) A collusion of tenders with the bidder, with a fine of more than ten thousand dollars for the solicitation project; the moderate is the participant of the collusion of tenders and the mark is invalid;

(viii) Unless, in accordance with the provisions, the determination of the marker or, after the rejection of all tenders by the Commission, the mark shall be null and void and shall be fined up to ten thousand dollars of the sum of the medium-term project;

(ix) Without a contract based on the solicitation documents and the bid documents of the markers, the bid price of the mark, the agreement that departs from the substance of the contract was concluded and the provision of funds for the construction of the medium-term project is subject to a fine of up to ten thousand dollars in the amount of the mark project;

(x) No publication of the proposed budget for construction, budget, tendering, major changes in the construction process, completed inspection, settlement payments, etc., as prescribed by the Government, and no tender for construction works in accordance with the order provided for in the basic construction process, without obtaining approval by the industrial authorities or the development reform sector to expand the scope of the contract, increase the costs or the construction of the award;

(xi) Because of the apparent error of work, the misappropriation of the scope of the contract, the increase of costs or the construction of the price, and the imposition of a fine of more than one thousand dollars on the basis of the direct loss.

There are more than one of the actions of the solicitationers, which are directly responsible for administrative disposition by the competent and other directly responsible personnel; in the case of serious circumstances, the removal of administrative posts, which are not responsible for the construction of the work management within three years; and are criminally criminalized by law.

The bidder has more than one of the actions, and the development reform sector and the financial sector at all levels may suspend the project's implementation or suspend the disbursement of funds.

Article 101.8 The bidder refuses to enter into a contract with the moderate marker and shall return to the successful tender bonds twice; the failure to require the submission of tender bonds or the loss of the bidder exceeds the amount of the tender securities shall compensate the bidder.

Since the extension of the period of effectiveness of tenders has resulted in losses to the bidder, the bidder should be compensated, with the exception of the period of effectiveness of the tender.

Article 101.9 The solicitation agent has one of the following acts, forfeiture proceeds of the violation and punishes them in accordance with the provisions:

(i) The absence of a solicitation agent to engage in the solicitation agent operation with a fine of more than one million dollars;

(ii) Excluding the awarding operation at a level of excellence and imposing a fine of more than three thousand dollars;

(iii) The transfer of solicitation agent operations or the solicitation services, the solicitation advice, which is subject to fines of more than three thousand dollars; the circumstances are serious and the removal of the Officer-in-charge of tenders for six months;

(iv) Disclosure of tendering matters that should be confidential, with the solicitation, the bidder and the bidder, in collusion that undermines the interests of the State, the public interest or the legitimate rights or interests of others, imposes a fine of more than 250,000 dollars; in serious circumstances and dispels the appointment of a solicitation agent for one year; in the event of the result of the above-mentioned act, the invalidity of the mark; and in the event of loss of others, the legal liability.

In addition to the above-mentioned conduct, the solicitation agent has the same penalties as the solicitation agent, as set out in article 101 of this scheme, and in the event of a serious nature and the dismissal of an agent of tendering for one year, drawing the approval authority of the awarding authority to reduce or cancel the agent of the solicitation.

Article 101 quater has one of the following acts, forfeiture proceeds of the offence and punishes them in accordance with the provisions:

(i) A collusion of tenders or a collusion of tenders with tenderers, which are used by means of bribes, imposes a fine of up to ten thousand dollars in the solicitation project, in the event of a serious nature, and removes the qualifications of tenders below two years for a period of more than one year until the licence was revoked by the business administration authority; causes other losses and is liable under the law; and the marker is engaged in the conduct of the tender;

(ii) To allow other units or individuals to make tenders on behalf of tenderers or otherwise to circumvent tenders, subject to a fine of up to ten thousand dollars in the solicitation project; to the extent serious and to the cancellation of the qualifications of tenders for more than three years, until the licence of business administration has been revoked; other units or individuals on behalf of tenderers are subject to the same penalties as those involved in tenders; and to the extent that the mark is null and void;

(iii) The bidder shall participate in the different tenders in the same construction work, and the tenderer shall not participate in all tenders for the construction of the construction project in any of the tenders in subparagraphs (i) and (ii);

(iv) Unless contracts are concluded in accordance with the solicitation documents, tender documents and the Chinese tender price, the agreement that departs from the substance of the contract is subject to a fine of up to ten thousand thousands of dollars in the amount of the sub-item;

(v) The transfer of the medium-term project as a whole or part of the transfer shall be invalid and shall be subject to a fine of up to ten thousand dollars of the transfer's medium-term project; the circumstances are serious and shall be suspended until the licence of the business administration is revoked;

(vi) In the absence of a contract with the solicitor, the performance guarantee shall not be returned, the failure to submit a security of implementation or damage exceeding the amount of the security of the performance shall be compensated for the loss; the failure to fulfil its obligations under the contract with the solicitor shall, in the event of serious circumstances, be given a notice of the dismissal of the qualifications of tenders over five years, until the suspension of the licence by the business administration.

Since force majeure cannot perform the contract, the above-mentioned provisions are not applicable.

Article 101 quantify the bidder as one of the following acts: the bidder shall remove the qualifications of the bidder or the prequalification, forfeiture the tender securities; the bidder does not submit the tender bonds or losses that exceed the amount of the tender securities; and the bidder shall compensate the loss:

(i) There shall be no justification for abandoning the mark;

(ii) The withdrawal of tender documents after the deadline for tenders until the expiry of the period of time;

(iii) The exclusion of tenderers from tendering with tenderers, owing to the removal of tender qualifications or invalidity of tenders due to the breach.

Article 101, paragraph 1, of which the Commission and its members have one of the following acts, forfeiture proceeds of the violation and punishes them in accordance with the provisions:

(i) Examination of the dismissal of members of the Commission, affecting the normal conduct of tendering proceedings or the failure to carry out their duties objectively and impartially; in the event of serious fines of up to one million yen and the removal of the qualifications of the bid experts and the prohibition of participation in any solicitation project;

(ii) The members of the Commission shall accept the tenderer, the financial or other interests of other stakeholders, the disclosure of tenders that should be confidential, impose a fine of up to five thousand dollars and remove the qualifications of the bid experts and prohibit the participation in any solicitation project;

(iii) The use of other criteria and methods for evaluating tenders other than the provisions of the solicitation documents, the determination of the criteria and methods containing the content of a preference or exclusion of the bidder shall be avoided and the evaluation of the competitive impact of the bidder shall be nullified and void and the evaluation of the results of the evaluation of the breach during the tender period shall be nullified and void, subject to fines of up to three0,000 dollars; serious circumstances, and the removal of the qualifications of the bid expert, prohibiting the award of any solicitation project;

(iv) The members of the evaluation board participated in the collusion of tenders by fines of five thousand yen and by eliminating the qualifications of the bid experts, prohibiting the participation in any tendering project, which constituted criminal liability by law.

Article 113 of the complainant's intention to fabricate the facts and to falsely testify the material, the complaint should be dismissed and warned; the circumstances are serious and fined by a fine of one million.

Article 101, article XIV, the author of the complaint and the party concerned with the matter of the examination, cautioned against cooperating with the investigation; in the event of a serious fine of more than one million yen and removed the corresponding eligibility for participation in tendering activities for more than three years.

The complainants, the complainants, and the members of the Committee of Reviews are advised that the parties involved in the matter of the complaint are unable to make a reasonable explanation for their conduct.

Article 115 imposes a fine on the unit in accordance with the provisions, which may impose a fine of up to 10 per cent of the amount of the penalty on the statutory representative or head of the unit and the person directly responsible.

Article 1056 State staff involved in solicitation tendering activities favour private fraud, abuse of authority or negligence, and other units or individuals involved in solicitation activities in violation of the provisions of this scheme which do not constitute an offence and administrative disposition; constitute a crime and hold criminal responsibility under the law.

Article 101 Administrative penalties are imposed by the relevant administrative oversight authorities in accordance with their duties.

Article 108, in accordance with the provisions of this approach, shall be subject to the construction of tenders, shall be free of tenders by law, shall be subject to re-exploitation or re-exploitation by law, and shall be subject to restatement or re-exploitation by law, as a result of a breach such as collation of tenders, which clearly undermines the interests of the State, the public interest or the legitimate rights or interests of others, shall be reproposed.

The tenders, tenders, tenders, the bids and the contract signed were not legally valid, but did not affect the effectiveness of the relevant provisions of the dispute settlement within the contract.

Since the offence was subject to the removal of the corresponding eligibility for participation in tendering activities or the penalties imposed by the relevant administrative authorities for the suspension of the work, all solicitation activities, including the ongoing solicitation activities, were prohibited from the date of entry into force of the sanctions decision.

Chapter IX

Article 10019 of this approach is implemented effective 1 April 2009.

The provisions relating to tenders for construction works developed by the city prior to the promulgation of this scheme are inconsistent with this approach.

The review, identification, delivery kits, contracting, settlement and payment methods involving major political, external activities and emergency relief operations within the city are developed separately by the Government of the city.

The city-building administrative authorities should establish, in accordance with the law, information on tenders for construction works in the city, the authenticity of tenders, and the specific approach to the construction of administrative authorities.

A web-based construction work solicitation should be in line with the relevant provisions of the web solicitation, with a specific approach developed by the municipal authorities.

Article 102 of this approach is interpreted by the Government of the city.