(Adopted by the Eleventh Ordinary Conference of the People's Government of the Province of Chiang Orientale on 12 October 2009, No. 140 of the Order of the People's Government of the Province of Chiang Mai, dated 27 October 2009, for publication, effective 1 January 2010)

Article 1, in order to enhance the protection of the mark, preserve the legitimate rights and interests of the arsenal rights of the A carrier.

Article 2 applies to all acts that have occurred in the administrative region of the province in connection with the mark.

Article 3. The above-ranking business administration sector is responsible for the protection of the Asian mark in this administrative area, in accordance with the provisions of this approach.

In accordance with their respective responsibilities, sectors such as the publication, intellectual property, public safety and security at the district level are protected by law by the mark of the Asian carrier in this administrative area.

The import and export of goods is suspected to be in violation of the mark of the Asian shipping, which is governed by the law.

Article IV.

(i) The name of the Asian Olympic Council (including full titles, briefs, translators and acronyms), coconomies, flags, es, gyms etc.);

(ii) The name, mark, slogan and other symbols of the 16th Asian Games;

(iii) The name, insignia and other symbols of the 16th Conference of Asian States;

(iv) The name of the 16th Asian Conference, the insignia, the egregious, oral, Google, flag and other symbols;

(v) The Statutes and Rules of the Council of Asia and the Pacific and the 16th Asian Conference host other marks related to the 16th Asian Conference.

The 16th Asian Olympics Organization body should regularly publish the mark of AACA and file with the provincial business administration sector.

Article 5 of the present approach refers to the Asian Cargo marker and to the institution of the Asian Olympic Council and the 16th Asian Games.

The Asian Olympics Council is structured in accordance with the rights of the 16th Asian Olympics Organization (AAC) bodies with regard to the Asian mark, and is established in accordance with the Statutes and Rules of the Council of Asia and the Pacific (AACA) and the 16th Asian Conference host city contracts.

Article 6. A marker rights have the exclusive right to mark an Asian carrier in accordance with this approach.

No organization or individual shall violate the exclusive right of the mark.

A violation of the mark is exclusive of the right to use the APS mark for commercial purposes (with potential commercial purposes, and with the consent of the Asignatory.

This approach refers to the use of sub-shipment symbols for commercial purposes, for purposes of profit.

(i) The use of an Asian mark for commodities, commodity packaging or containers and commodity trading instruments;

(ii) The use of Asian markers for service projects;

(iii) The mark of the Asian carrier for advertising, commercial exhibitions, business performance and other business activities;

(iv) The sale, importation, export of commodities containing markers;

(v) The manufacture or sale of an Asian mark;

(vi) Other acts that may result in the use of the mark by the author of the act as a sponsor or other support relationship between the author and the Asignatory.

For profit purposes, the manner indicated in the previous paragraph is used in the form of a mark that is similar to that of an Asian carrier as a mark for commercial purposes.

Article 8 does not use a mark for commercial purposes and shall be in compliance with the relevant provisions of the APLC governing the use of the mark.

In the case of failure to comply with the relevant provisions of the Accasional Signator's norms on the use of a mark, the APLC rights author has the right to require its transformation or cessation.

Any organization or person of Article 9 may report to the business administration or to the relevant administration.

Article 10 violates the exclusive right of the arsenal, triggers the settlement of the dispute by the parties; is not willing to consult or consult, and the Yam marker or stakeholder may be prosecuted by law to the People's Court or may request the business administration to be treated in accordance with the law.

At the request of the parties, the business administration can mediation in respect of the amount of compensation that violates the symbols of Ayiela; mediation is inconclusive and the parties can be prosecuted by law to the People's Court.

Article 11 violates the amount of compensation specifically entitled to the mark of the Asian carrier, which is determined in accordance with the interests of the infringer or the infringer as a result of the infringement, including reasonable expenses incurred in the suppression of violations; the loss of the infringer or the interests of the infringer; and the reasonable determination of the royalties in the light of the mark.

The sale does not know that it is a commodity that violates the exclusive right of the A carrier to prove that the commodity is a legitimate acquisition and clarification of the provider's liability.

Article 12. The business administration authorities are entitled to be examined by law for violations of the exclusive right to mark.

The business administration may exercise the following functions in accordance with the law, in accordance with the evidence that has been obtained by the law of the offence or the report of the investigation office of an alleged violation of the exclusive right of the mark:

(i) To ask the parties concerned to investigate cases relating to violations of the exclusive rights of the mark;

(ii) Access, reproduction of contracts, invoices, books and other relevant information relating to violations;

(iii) On-site inspection of places where the parties are suspected of violating the rights of the A carrier mark;

(iv) Examination of items related to violations; seizure or seizure of goods that are evidenced to violate the exclusive rights of the mark.

When the business administration exercises its functions under the law, the parties should assist, cooperate and refrain from denying, blocking.

Article 13, in violation of this approach, violates the exclusive right of the mark and is subject to suspension by the business administration; imposes a fine of up to 1,000 dollars for non-production operations; and imposes a criminal act on the proceeds of the offence for the production of an act of operation and a fine of $100,000.

Activities such as the use of an Asian mark for fraud constitute a crime and are criminalized by law.

In addition to the protection afforded under this approach, the Asian mark may also be protected in accordance with the provisions of the Act on Publications of the People's Republic of China, the Trademarks Act of the People's Republic of China, the People's Republic of China Anti-Madrid Competition Law, the Special Signity Management Regulations and administrative regulations.

Article 15. This approach has been implemented effective 1 January 2010.