(Summit meeting of the Government of the Hygis of 11 January 2010 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 4 of 15 January 2010 by the Government of the Hygiene People, effective 1 April 2010)

Chapter I General

Article 1, in order to regulate procedures for the development of administrative normative documents, improve the quality of administrative normative documents, preserve national rule of law, develop this approach in line with the relevant legal, regulatory provisions.

Article 2

The internal management system developed by the executive branch, the technical course of operation, the staff member's non-decision, the communication, notification and documents such as administrative processing decisions are not applicable.

Article 3

(i) The composition of the Government of the city;

(ii) The Government of the city's institutions and institutions;

(iii) Laws, regulations or regulations authorize other municipal government agencies that develop normative documents.

Interim institutions established by the Government of the city to complete a specific mandate, the institutions administered by the functioning of the Government of the Turkmen State, and the institutions established by the previous units shall not be developed and published in the name of the institution.

The drafting, review, decision and publication of normative documents apply.

Article 5 establishes normative documents that should follow the spirit of scientific development and the openness of reform, scientific normative administrative behaviour and promote changes in government functions.

The development of normative documents should be guided by the legitimate, appropriate and coordinated principles that render normative documents incompatible with the normative documents of legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior administrative organs.

The development of normative documents should be consistent with the principles of simplification, harmonization and effectiveness, streamlining administrative procedures, reducing administrative costs and improving administrative efficiency.

Article 6 establishes normative documents that should reflect the principle of the harmonization of rights and obligations, requiring citizens, legal persons and other organizations to fulfil their obligations and should provide for ways to guarantee the realization of their rights.

The development of normative documents should reflect the principle of harmonization between competence and responsibility and guarantee the exercise of the functions of the executive branch and should provide for its competence, procedures and responsibilities.

Article 7.

Normative documents developed for the implementation of regulations, regulations and superior administrative bodies can be found in the term “implementation”.

The normative document developed by the Government's work sector should be made available in the title of the executive branch.

Article 8. Normative documents can be made in the form of a provision or in the form of a paragraph. The name of the normative document is “Pervention” and generally refers to the form of provisions.

Normative documents are generally not subject to chapters or sections, but the provisions are more complex.

The wording of normative documents should be regulated, accurate, concise and serious, and the use of words and symbols should be correct and regulated.

Drafting

Article 9. The Government of the city has developed normative documents that can determine whether one or several of its working sector organizations are to be drafted or drafted.

The Government's work sector has developed normative documents that can define one or several of its institutions.

Article 10 Drafts normative documents that should be studied in depth, summarize practical experience and widely listen to the views of the social parties. The hearings can be carried out in a variety of ways, such as written requests for advice, colloquiums, hearings and hearings.

The drafting of normative documents dealing with major complex issues could be invited to participate.

The normative document drafted involves major complex issues and legal issues, and should be invited to intervene in advance by the rule of law institutions.

Article 11. The drafting of normative documents dealing with the responsibilities of other sectors of the city's Government or with the responsibilities of other sectors of the city's Government should be fully consulted by the drafting sector.

Article 12. The drafting of normative documents, which should clear the same content or the relevant existing normative documents, shall provide for the repeal of sexual provisions in the draft normative document.

The drafting of the normative paper prepared by the Government of the city, which was drafted by the principal heads of the various sectors, should be reviewed by the body within which they seek to conduct the review, which was adopted at the sectoral office meeting and signed by their main heads, in accordance with chapter III; and the drafting of a joint drafting by several working sectors, should be sent under Chapter III.

Chapter III Review

Article 14. The draft normative document of the Government of the People of the city is subject to the legitimacy, appropriateness and coordination of the rule of law institutions of the city before the decisions of the Government.

Article 15. Normative documents developed by the Government's work sector are subject to the legitimacy, appropriateness and coordination of the body within which it is sought prior to publication.

The normative documents developed by the Government's work sector, and the relevant leadership of the municipal government considers it necessary to require a review by the municipal authorities of the rule of law, should be sent to the Government's rule of law institutions for legitimacy, appropriateness and coordination.

Article 16 provides for the establishment or drafting of normative documents by the People's Government of the city (hereinafter referred to as the referral sector) and shall send the following materials to the Government's rule of law institutions:

(i) Communications signed by the main heads of departments for review or clearance;

(ii) Text of the draft normative document;

(iii) Annotations to the draft normative document;

(iv) Develop laws, regulations, regulations and national policy provisions on the basis of normative documents;

(v) Comments of the relevant units;

(vi) Other relevant materials.

A statement of the draft normative document should provide clarifications on key issues to be addressed in the development of normative documents and the need for normative documents and their important measures, the views of the relevant sectors and the coordination situation.

Article 18: The State's rule of law institutions shall submit written reviews or review opinions within 10 working days from the date of receipt of the draft normative document. There is a need to extend the review or the period of time, with the approval of the heads of the rule of law institutions of the Government of the city, but not more than 20 working days. With regard to the urgent need for normative documentation to be developed and implemented, the authorities of the Government of the city should reduce the time of review and improve the effectiveness of the review or review.

Draft normative documentation to be reviewed or reviewed by the rule of law institutions of the municipality shall be in accordance with the following conditions:

(i) In accordance with article 5 and article 6 of this approach;

(ii) To consult and conduct arguments in accordance with the provisions of this approach;

(iii) To seek institutional clearance within the sector;

(iv) Non-repetition and non-intervention with existing normative documents;

(v) Other elements are consistent with national legislation, regulations and regulations.

Article 20

(i) In accordance with article 19 of this approach, a review or review of “consistency” is submitted in writing;

(ii) In accordance with article 19 of this approach, the relevant review or review shall be submitted in writing.

The review or review of the rule of law institutions of the Government of the city may be subject to review by the former review body within 10 working days from the date of receipt of the review or review.

Article 21 has one of the following cases, and the authorities of the municipalities may return to the sector:

(i) The main issues to be addressed in the draft normative document, laws, regulations, or national policies will be subject to significant adjustments or norms;

(ii) There are significant differences between the relevant departments with regard to the principal system established in normative documents and the important measures taken, and the development of sectors that have not been agreed with their consultations or consultations;

(iii) When seeking advice from society, the public opinion is greater and the normative documents are not implemented;

(iv) The draft normative document reproduces the normative documents of the relevant legal, regulatory, and superior administrative organs without providing for systems and measures that can solve problems;

(v) The submission of material is not in accordance with the requirements set out in article 16 of this approach.

Article 22 states that, where necessary, the commune of the commune is of the view that a major complex issue under the draft normative document may be convened by representatives of interested parties and experts to hold a colloquium, an argument for the event, or to conduct a study to hear the views of the parties.

Following the receipt of the draft normative paper by the relevant departments, careful study and written observations should be made, and feedback within the requested time frame after the Gai chapter of the sector's public chapter should be carried out; and more than a request for time-bound feedback has not been provided.

Article 24 concerned different views on key issues such as the principal system, important measures, the management system, the division of responsibilities, etc., as set out in the draft normative document, and the Government of the city should coordinate and reach agreement; it should not be agreed upon and should be reported to the Government of the city.

Chapter IV Decisions and publication

Article 25 The normative document of the Executive Office of the People's Government should be determined by the relevant leadership of the Government.

The normative documents of the Government's work sector should be decided by the office of the People's Government.

Article 26 Normative documents should be made available to society through the Communiqué of the Government of the city, the Urban People's Government portal, but also through other e-government websites, the press or other accessible means.

Article 27 should be formulated in accordance with the law. The review of the relevant normative documents in the city provides for separate provisions by the Government of the city.

Article twenty-eighth normative documents were carried out after 30 days of the date of publication. However, the publication may not immediately be carried out or may result in significant losses, which may affect the operation of normative documents.

Chapter V

The process for the formulation of normative documents by the Governments of the Twenty-ninth Regions, municipalities and counties is governed by their own regulations. The various sectors of the Government of the city may establish the corresponding provisions in accordance with this approach.

Article 33