Advanced Search

Liaoning Provincial Administration Assessment Methods

Original Language Title: 辽宁省依法行政考核办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Excellencies of the law of the executive review

(The 30th ordinary meeting of the Eleventh People's Government, held on 21 November 2009, considered the adoption of the Decree No. 239 of 15 December 2009, published on 10 January 2010)

In order to fully advance the administration of the law, to build the rule of law, to serve the Government, to guarantee the full revitalization and scientific development of the vastenin, and to develop this approach in line with the relevant provisions of the Department of State's Comprehensive Framework for the Implementation of the Law and the State Department's Decision on Strengthening the Administration of the Municipalities.

Article 2

Article 3 of this approach refers to the implementation by the archaeological organs of the archaeological authorities of the archaeological application of the archaeological executive framework of the State Department, the decision of the Department of State to strengthen the administration of the municipality and the activities of the Government of the Plurinational State of the Greaten Province to strengthen the executive opinion of the municipalities in accordance with the law and to the promotion of the conduct of investigations, evaluation and awards in accordance with the law.

Article IV. Provincial, municipal, district (at the district level, area) is aligned with the Government to lead the legal administrative conduct in the present administrative area. The specific work of the study is carried out by the current Government to fully advance the implementation of the legislative executive leadership team. The Office of the Leadership Group assumes the day-to-day work of the legislative executive review.

The Government's rule of law, inspection, human resources and social security, preparation and financial services are governed by its respective responsibilities and are governed by the executive review.

Article 5 of the provincial government is responsible for the Government of the archipehutu and the Government at the level of government; the municipal government is responsible for the archipelagic government and the Government at the level of government.

The following vertically managed sectors of the province are carried out by their superior management and are fully consulted by local governments, with the results of which are reproduced in the Office of the Leadership Group of Local Governments under the law.

The dual-managed sector, conducted by the host Government and fully listened to the views of its senior management, was copied to its superior management.

High-level Governments should strengthen the guidance and oversight of the lower-level government's administrative conduct.

Article 6. The performance appraisal system of the Government, the Government and its staff should be incorporated in accordance with the legislative executive review.

Article 7 shall be subject to the principles of truth, public justice, public participation, unity of organization and parenthood.

Article 8

(i) Establish mechanisms for sound science-policy decision-making;

(ii) Change in Government functions;

(iii) Enhanced system-building;

(iv) Managing administrative law enforcement;

(v) Preventing administrative disputes and social contradictions;

(vi) Enhance administrative oversight;

(vii) Implementation of organizational leadership and responsibilities for the administration of justice;

(viii) Other requirements identified by the archaeological body.

Article 9 establishes basic requirements for a sound science-policy decision-making mechanism:

(i) Clear administrative decision-making authority, improve administrative decision-making rules and regulate administrative decision-making processes;

(ii) To implement systems such as hearings, hearings, review of legality and collective discussions;

(iii) Establish a post-assessment system for major administrative decision-making;

(iv) Establish and implement a system of accountability for administrative decision-making to harmonize decision-making and decision-making responsibilities.

Article 10 Basic requirements for the transformation of government functions:

(i) To define and regulate the functions and powers of the executive organs in accordance with the law, to promote separation, political separation, political separation and the legalization of duties, institutions and institutions;

(ii) Improve the financial security mechanisms of the administration of justice, introduce a centralized public financial system, clean-up and regulation of government non-levant revenue, such as administrative fees, and strictly implement the “payments-of-payments” system, and administrative funds are guaranteed in the financial budget, with the introduction of a pool of payments;

(iii) Reform of administrative practices, regulation of administrative licences, reduction of administrative licences (approval) projects, role in administrative planning, administrative guidance, administrative contracts, accelerated e-government construction, the introduction of a transparent operation of the administrative power online, the expansion of the Government's online office, the establishment of an e-monitoring network, the implementation of administrative licences (approval) for administrative organs?

(iv) To promote the public information of the Government and to establish a system of public information, research, social review, annual reports, accountability, etc., which should be made public in a timely and accurate manner, in accordance with the law, and facilitate access to government information;

(v) Establish early warning and emergency response mechanisms to continuously improve the scope of emergency preparedness, trigger mechanisms, procedures, time frames, publication, etc., to properly deal with emergencies.

Article 11. Basic requirements for strengthening system-building:

(i) The drafting or formulation of government regulations, normative documents should be consistent with the provisions of the law, legislation and strict compliance with statutory competence and statutory procedures;

(ii) The establishment of sound regulations, public participation in normative documents, expert advice, review of legitimacy, collective discussion decisions, hearings and adoption of notes of views, public disclosure;

(iii) Cost-benefit analysis and regular assessment of legislative projects;

(iv) Improvement of local legislation, government regulations, regulatory changes, repeal and clean-up systems, introduction of an effective normative document system, and implementation of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Control of the Excellencies of New York.

Article 12

(i) Reform of the administrative law enforcement system, the full implementation and regulation of relatively centralized administrative penalties, the active promotion of integrated administrative law enforcement pilots, the exploration of relatively centralized administrative licences and the establishment of administrative enforcement dispute coordination mechanisms;

(ii) To carry out administrative law enforcement responsibilities under the law, which are lawful, procedurally, accurate and appropriate, and in compliance with legal requirements;

(iii) Execution of an administrative law enforcement subject review system, and administrative law enforcement officers have access to law enforcement and accreditation through training examinations;

(iv) Execution of administrative law enforcement systems, law enforcement, authority, law enforcement, disciplinary standards, procedural steps, specific time frames, methods of oversight, etc. to the community;

(v) The establishment of an administrative law enforcement review system, the inspection records, evidence materials, law enforcement instruments, etc. of administrative sanctions, administrative licences, administrative enforcement activities, etc., should be archived, centralized management and periodic inspections;

(vi) Structural discretion for administrative penalties, the establishment and application of a baseline system for discretionary administrative penalties, the clarification system and the precedent regime, the strict implementation of the system for the separation of prisoners, the major administrative penalties, and the exploration of the exercise of the discretion to regulate administrative licences;

(vii) The introduction of an administrative law enforcement statistical analysis system and the timely issuance of annual statements such as administrative penalties, administrative licences;

(viii) The in-depth introduction of administrative law enforcement accountability and review of the conduct of administrative law enforcement responsibilities, the implementation of the provisions on administrative law enforcement responsibilities in the province of Excellence, strict compliance with the law, separation of law enforcement responsibilities, enforcement responsibilities, and the implementation of the relevant system, such as the administrative law enforcement appraisal, the accountability.

Article 13

(i) The establishment of a system for the establishment of a new mechanism for resolving civil disputes, which should be dealt with in a public, fair, fair and timely manner, in accordance with statutory competence and procedures, in accordance with the rules of procedure;

(ii) A fair and timely decision on administrative review, in accordance with the law, to perform the functions of participation in administrative review activities and to carry out administrative review decisions taken by the executive branch;

(iii) Improve administrative decisions and administrative conciliation procedures to deal with social disputes in an efficient, public and low-cost manner;

(iv) Improve the people's mediation system and actively support grass-roots organizations in their mediation efforts;

(v) Improve the system of correspondence visits, improve the quality and efficiency of the letter-of-mission agencies in the handling of the matter, resolve disputes through legal means.

Article 14. Basic requirements for enhanced administrative oversight:

(i) Self-recognize the supervision of the same-ranking and its Standing Committees and establish a system of administrative reporting under the law. Each year, the Governments of all levels report in writing to the Commission and the Government at the grass-roots level in accordance with the law, receive inquiries and seriously address the recommendations of the representative of the human person;

(ii) To be aware of the democratic monitoring of the political agreement and to hear its views and recommendations on the administration of the Government in accordance with the law, and to seriously address the proposal of the members of the Parliamentary Union;

(iii) Self-awaited judicial oversight and the establishment of the executive head to appear before the court. In administrative cases before the People's Court, the executive body should appear before the courts in accordance with the law and be aware of the entry into force of the People's Court;

(iv) Enhance oversight at the level of government, implement the provisions on administrative law enforcement in the Province of Excellence, and strengthen oversight of administrative behaviour in the subordinate executive organs;

(v) Sound regulations, normative documentation review system. The regulations developed, normative documents are presented on the basis of regulations and regulations that reinforce oversight of the use of administrative acts by the respective and lower-level governments;

(vi) Improvement and strict implementation of the administrative compensation system. Establishment of a sound administrative compensation system. Administrative compensation or administrative compensation that citizens, legal persons and other organizations should be paid in full, within the statutory period;

(vii) To support and cooperate with specialized oversight bodies, such as inspection, audit, to carry out monitoring independently of the law and to monitor the oversight decisions of the oversight bodies;

(viii) Improve the reporting system. The mechanism for the verification and timely processing of complaints by citizens, legal persons and other organizations, media-recorded issues is valid.

Article 15. Basic requirements for the implementation of organizational leadership and responsibilities in accordance with the law:

(i) To use the law as a basic norm for the functioning of the Government, in all its aspects and components;

(ii) Establish leadership, monitoring and coordination mechanisms for the sound administration of justice, perform the duties of the first responsible person, develop specific approaches and accompanying measures to advance the administration of the law, implement the legislative and administrative phases of deployment and annual work tasks, and establish a sound administrative oversight appraisal system in accordance with the law;

(iii) The establishment of an administrative accountability and performance appraisal nuclear management system, which is responsible for the organization, guidance and supervision of administrative accountability in government departments, and the Government determines that the institution is responsible for administrative error accountability;

(iv) Establish a well-led leadership and a system of staff in the executive organs to strengthen the legal training and conduct of administrative law enforcement officials, to strengthen the promotion of the law and the rule of law, to create a good environment for the full-fledged law and the right to justice;

(v) Strengthening the institution of the rule of law to support and promote the role of the Government's rule of law and sectoral rule of law institutions in the integrated planning, coordination, supervision, inspection and evaluation of the advancement of the legal administration.

Article 16 is carried out in a manner that is combined with the examination, qualitative evaluation and quantitative examination on the ground, in accordance with the law administration of the conduct of a daily archaeological examination with the annual archaeological, comprehensive appraisal and specialized examination.

Article 17 shall be based on this approach, in conjunction with the annual legal administrative priorities and key work objectives of the Government or the system, to establish an annual programme of administrative conduct under the law, specifying specific nuclear content, evaluation criteria, nuclear forms and sub-standards.

Article 18

(i) Self-assessment reports on the administration of justice;

(ii) The results and the basis of the individual special examinations;

(iii) To promote the record of meetings, documentation, statistical statements, etc., which are governed by the law;

(iv) Other material requested by the archaeological bodies.

Article 19 projects and standards shall be clear and specific and, according to the assessment, the results of the examination shall be divided at least three times. The criteria for the classification of such subsidiaries are determined by the archaeological body in accordance with the contents and requirements of the examination.

Article 20 is one of the following cases, and according to the archaeological programme, it is decided by the archaeological body to add or raise the following:

(i) The performance of the administration under the law has been highlighted and has been recognized and rewarded by the provincial (including provincial, sub-unitive);

(ii) Innovation initiatives under the law administration have been promoted by more than provincial authorities as experience;

(iii) The public information unit, which is reported by law, as a typical experience;

(iv) Other circumstances specified by the archaeological body.

Article 21 shall be communicated by the archaeological body to the results of the examination, to the extent that the award of excellence is not duly criticized, to provide written restatements and to recommend that the relevant authorities be held accountable for the persons concerned.

In order to detect serious violations of administrative conduct in the examination, the archaeological organs should initiate administrative accountability procedures to hold the responsibilities of the principal holder; in the case of crimes, to be transferred to the judiciary.

Article 22 provides for implementation by the provincial government of the indicators for the assessment of the performance of the various municipalities in accordance with the relevant provisions of the provincial government.

An executive review of the municipal, district and ethnic governments or institutions is conducted in accordance with the law.

Article 23 of this approach is implemented effective 10 January 2010.