Advanced Search

Guangzhou City, Guangzhou Municipal People's Government On The Amendments To The Administrative Enforcement Evaluation By Way Of A Decision

Original Language Title: 广州市人民政府关于修改《广州市行政执法评议考核办法》的决定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Decision of the Government of the Hiroshima to amend the Approval of Administrative Law Enforcement in the City of Hiroshima

(Summit No. 98 of the 13th Annual Conference of the People's Government of the Grand State of 23 November 2009 to consider the adoption of the Decree No. 28 of 1 February 2010 on the date of publication)

The 1398 Standing Committee of the Municipal Government decided to amend the archaeological Review of Administrative Law in the City of Hiroshima as follows:

i. Article 2: “The administrative law enforcement review, as referred to in this approach, refers to the changes made by the Government of the Municipalities to the administrative law enforcement sector in which it belongs, and ...” to “the administrative law enforcement review mission referred to in the present approach, which refers to the executive law enforcement branch of the city's government in respect of the district, the city-level people's government and the municipal government, and ...”.

Article 4, paragraph 1, amends the application of this approach to “the administration of justice in the local, district-level and municipal government-owned administrative law enforcement sectors”.

Article 5, paragraph 1, was amended to read “Organization of the Government of the Municipalities responsible for the administration of justice, the law and regulations authorized by the commune government (Organization of the executive law enforcement branch, legal regulations and regulations authorized by the municipal government), which is the executive law enforcement evaluation of the judicial sector and is responsible for monitoring and guidance on the administrative law evaluation of the Government of the lower people.”

Article 7, paragraph 1, provides for the main elements of the executive review of the archaeological examination by the municipal government in the district, district-level municipalities, which is revised to read “The Government of the urban population undertakes administrative law review of the population in the district, district level, including: (i) the performance of its mandated duties under the law; (ii) the establishment of a system of excellence in the archaeological law; (iii) the construction and implementation of the administrative review system; (iv) the establishment of a legal review system for major administrative decision-making; (v) the establishment of the executive system; and (vi) the strengthening of the rule of law;

The main elements of the commune government's conduct of administrative law enforcement review missions are: (i) whether the subject of administrative law enforcement is in accordance with the provisions; (ii) whether administrative law enforcement is in compliance with the law enforcement authority; (iii) whether administrative law enforcement procedures are regulated; (iv) whether administrative law enforcement procedures are lawful; (v) whether the content of administrative law enforcement decisions is legitimate and appropriate; (vi) administrative review and administrative proceedings of administrative law enforcement decisions; (vii) quality of administrative law enforcement volumes; (vi) compliance with the statutory responsibilities of the executive branch; (ix) administrative accountability; and relevant legislative clearance; and implementation of the implementation of the implementation of the implementation of the implementation plans; and administrative clearance of the implementation of the implementation of the implementation of legislation.

In Article 10, “The Government of the city evaluates the administrative law enforcement sector to which it belongs” has been amended to read: “The Government of the city, the municipality's government, the executive branch”.

Article 11, paragraphs 2, 3 were amended to read “in the course of the administrative law enforcement review of the appraisal of the conduct of the examination of the examination of the nuclear work of the executive, the Government of the people who have been rated as excellent, district-level, administrative law enforcement and administrative law enforcement officials are recognized in accordance with the relevant provisions.

In the course of the administrative law enforcement review, it was criticized by the Government of the communes of the people who have been rated as being non-qualified, district-level and district-level municipalities, who have been judged by a non-qualified administrative law enforcement department, which is criticized by the Government of the people at this level and removed the qualifications of the sector and its principal heads or heads of sub-offices for the current year; in the last two years, they have been rated as non-qualified sectors, the executive heads and the heads of subsidiaries are advised by the prescribed procedures.”

Article 12 amends to read “Review of the nuclear body shall notify the archaeological findings in writing of the archaeological findings, the communal government of the district level and the administrative law enforcement sector. The commune, district-level government and the administrative law enforcement sector have contested the evaluation of the results of the examination, which can provide written advice to the Government of the city within five working days from the date of receipt of the administrative law enforcement review. The Government of the city shall, within 15 working days of the date of receipt of written observations, verify and make a final decision to maintain, modify or withdraw the evaluation of the nuclear standards in accordance with the annual administrative law enforcement.”

This decision is implemented since the date of publication.

A review of administrative law enforcement in the city of Hiroshima was re-published in accordance with this decision.

Annex: Administrative Law Enforcement Appraisal Appraisal Approach (Amendment 2010)

(Act No. 2 of the Decree No. 2 of 20 April 2007 of the People's Government of the State, No. 28 of 1 February 2010)

Article 1, in order to fully implement administrative law enforcement responsibilities, strengthen administrative law enforcement oversight, guarantee enforcement of laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, facilitate the implementation of the law-making system, and develop this approach in line with the provisions of the Regulations on Administrative Law Enforcement in the Province of Hiroshima and the Office of the State Department of State on the application of administrative law enforcement responsibilities.

Article II refers to the administrative law enforcement review, which refers to a system of inspection and evaluation of administrative law enforcement by the commune government in respect of the rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations in the area of district, district-level and municipal administration, as well as administrative law enforcement in the administrative law enforcement branch of the executive law enforcement agencies, subordinate executive law enforcement agencies and administrative law enforcement officials.

Article 3. The executive law enforcement review shall be subject to fair, fair and public principles.

Article IV provides a review of the application of this approach by the commune government of the administration of justice in the local, district-level and municipal administration sectors.

The commune, district-level commune governments should develop administrative law enforcement appraisals based on this approach and the actual situation in the region, and conduct administrative law enforcement reviews of the respective administrative law enforcement authorities.

The administrative law enforcement sector should develop an administrative law enforcement review review, based on the actual situation in the sector, and conduct administrative law enforcement appraisals for administrative law enforcement agencies, subordinate executive law enforcement agencies and administrative law enforcement personnel.

Article 5

The executive law enforcement sector, which is vertically administered, is subject to a review by its superior sector, in accordance with the provisions of the Executive Office of the State Department for the implementation of a number of observations on administrative law enforcement responsibilities, and the Government of the city should reflect the situation in its superior sectors in a timely manner.

The administrative law enforcement sector, which is administered with a dual administration, is governed by the provisions of the Executive Office of the State Department of State for the implementation of the administrative law enforcement responsibilities, and in accordance with the division of management responsibilities, is reviewed by its superior authorities and the municipalities.

The executive law enforcement branch of the municipality is responsible for the establishment of administrative law enforcement agencies, subordinate executive law enforcement agencies and administrative law enforcement personnel in this sector.

Article 6. The Government of the city has established an executive law review body consisting of the municipal government office, personnel, inspection, the rule of law, and the preparation of the executive review body, under the leadership of the city's Government, specifically responsible for the organization of administrative law enforcement evaluation.

Members of the administrative law enforcement review board shall be avoided in the conduct of administrative law review missions to their respective departments.

Article 7

(i) Implementation of statutory duties by law;

(ii) The establishment of a system of excellence in science law;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement review of the construction and implementation of the appraisal nuclear system;

(iv) Establishment of a legal review system for major administrative decisions;

(v) The establishment of an administrative accountability system;

(vi) Strengthening the Government's rule of law institutions and the building of the workforce;

(vii) The development, review and clearance of normative documents;

(viii) Enhanced administrative review and administrative vetting;

(ix) Improve the implementation of the Government's legal administrative reporting system;

(x) Other administrative law enforcement appraisals.

The main elements of the commune government's conduct of the administrative law enforcement review mission are:

(i) The functionality of administrative law enforcement is in accordance with the provisions;

(ii) Administrative law enforcement is in compliance with the law enforcement authority;

(iii) The applicability of the law enforcement basis;

(iv) The legality of administrative law enforcement procedures;

(v) The legitimacy and appropriateness of the content of administrative law enforcement decisions;

(vi) Administrative review and administrative proceedings of administrative law enforcement decisions;

(vii) Quality of administrative law enforcement files;

(viii) Implementation of statutory duties by the administrative law enforcement authorities;

(ix) Implementation of administrative law enforcement and related systems;

(x) The development, review and clearance of normative documents;

(xi) Implementation of annual legislative plans;

(xii) Other administrative law enforcement appraisals.

Article 8. Administrative law enforcement review shall combine daily inspections with the annual review appraisal, and the internal review of the administrative law enforcement sector, in conjunction with external reviews, and the administrative law enforcement review is combined with the objective examination, post-responsibility review of the administrative law enforcement sector.

The Administrative Law Enforcement Review Examination shall be conducted by:

(i) A report on administrative law enforcement;

(ii) Inspection of documents, information and law enforcement files;

(iii) Legal quality testing of administrative law enforcement personnel;

(iv) Examination of complaints of administrative law enforcement;

(v) On-site inspection of administrative law enforcement;

(vi) Organizing specialized law enforcement investigations;

(vii) Hearing the views of the relative executive;

(viii) Hearing the views of the representatives, parliamentarians, expert scholars and various communities;

(ix) Other evaluation methods approved by the Government of the city.

Article 9

The municipality's rule of law institutions shall establish an administrative law enforcement review appraisal project in the second quarter of the year, identifying specific targets, content, methods and evaluation criteria for the year's executive review, and shall be submitted to the Government for approval.

The administrative law enforcement review appraisal project, approved by the Government of the city, is implemented by specific organizations of the executive law enforcement review board.

Article 10

Article 11. The administrative law enforcement review is carried out by hundreds of copies of four files of excellence, good, qualified and non-qualified values.

In the course of the administrative law enforcement review, the executive law enforcement and administrative law enforcement officials are recognized in accordance with the relevant provisions by the Government of the people who have been recognized as excellent, district- and district levels.

In the course of administrative law enforcement review, the Government of the people who have been seen as non-qualified, district-level municipalities has been criticized by the Government of the city, who has been judged as a non-qualified administrative law enforcement department, which has been criticized by the Government of the people at this level and removed the qualifications of the sector and its principal heads or heads of subsidiaries for the current year; in the last two years, they have been rated into a non-qualified sector, with the discretion given to the chief executive head and supervisors in accordance with the procedure.

Article 12. The archaeological body shall notify the archaeological findings in writing of the archaeological findings, the communal government of the district level and the administrative law enforcement sector. The commune, district-level government and the administrative law enforcement sector have contested the evaluation of the results of the examination, which can provide written advice to the Government of the city within five working days from the date of receipt of the administrative law enforcement review. The Government of the city shall conduct investigations within 15 working days of the date of receipt of written observations and shall make final decisions to maintain, modify or withdraw, in accordance with the annual administrative law enforcement evaluation nuclear standards.

Article 13, in the course of administrative law enforcement review, found that administrative law enforcement authorities and administrative law enforcement officials had no performance in the administration of justice or did not properly perform their statutory duties, were held accountable by the relevant authorities in accordance with the provisions of relevant legislation such as the administrative enforcement responsibility of the State of Hiroshima and the management of civil servants; that administrative disciplinary measures were lawfully imposed in violation of the relevant provisions of administrative inspections; and that criminal responsibility was transferred to the judiciary.

Article 14. The results of the administrative law enforcement review are published by the Government of the city within 30 days of the conclusion of the review of the examination.

Article 15. The commune, district- and district-level government shall produce a written report on the results of the administrative law enforcement review in the current administrative area in the first quarter of each year, which shall be submitted to the Government's rule of law institutions.

The executive branch of the city's government is expected to produce a written report on the results of the previous year's review of administrative law enforcement by 31 March each year and to report back to the municipal authorities.

Article 16 is implemented effective 1 June 2007.