(Summit No. 148 of 10 May 2010 of the Seventh People's Government of the city of jewell City considered the adoption of Decree No. 73 of 27 May 2010 by the People's Government Order No. 73 of 27 May 2010 for implementation effective 1 July 2010)

Chapter I General

Article 1 establishes procedures for regulating the normative documents of the executive organs of the city (hereinafter referred to as normative documents) to enhance the monitoring and management of normative documents, in line with the relevant provisions of the State and the wider province, and in the light of the actual provisions of this city.

Article 2 refers to the normative document referred to in this article, which, in addition to the regulations of the Government, has been developed by the executive branch of the city and is generally binding on citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Normative documents are divided into governmental normative and sectoral normative documents.

The normative documents developed by the Governments of all levels and their offices, the Yochen New Zone Commission and the Economic Functioning Zone Commission are normative documents of the Government in their own name; normative documents developed in their own behalf by the city, the constituent departments and laws of the territorial Government, legislation authorizing the management of public affairs.

Article 3

Article IV establishes an internal system of work, technical operating protocols, administrative decisions on specific matters, and the development of documentation on matters such as personnel, finance, external affairs and other matters that are directly managed.

Article 5

Article 6 does not require legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions that restrict the rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations or increase their obligations.

The development of normative documents should reflect the principle of uniformity in the responsibility of the executive organs and, while giving the necessary authority to the executive organs, the conditions, procedures and responsibilities for their exercise.

Article 7

(i) Administrative penalties;

(ii) Administrative licences;

(iii) Administrative coercive measures;

(iv) Funding projects for administrative purposes;

(v) Other matters to be established by law, regulations, regulations or superior administrative bodies.

Article 8 is null and void of normative documents that have not been reviewed by the Government's rule of law institutions or issued without the provision of the material.

Drafting

Article 9. Normative documents are drafted by the organization's implementing units.

Normative documents relate to the terms of reference of more than two units, which may lead to drafting or drafting by designated units of the Government.

The main elements of the draft normative document include:

(i) Purposes;

(ii) Developing a basis;

(iii) Scope of application and adaptation;

(iv) Specific code of conduct;

(v) Date of operation.

Article 11. Drafting normative documents should investigate the views of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 12. The content of normative documents relates to the responsibilities of other units, which should be fully consulted by the drafting cell.

Each unit's input to normative documents should be carefully studied and responses in due course. The reasons and the basis for the revision should be given in writing.

Drafting units have different views with other units and should be fully consulted; the drafting cell should include different views and reasons for their adoption or non-recognition when it is not fully consulted.

Article 14. Drafting units shall be submitted to the Government's rule of law bodies for review, after consulting with other units, revising and forming a draft of normative documents.

Chapter III Review

The draft of the Government's normative document should be submitted directly by the drafting cell to the Government's rule of law body.

A roll-out of the normative documents of the Yokota New District Commission, the Economic Functional Commission shall be presented to the body review responsible for the rule of law of the executive branch at this level.

The Government of the town, the normative document of the street office, should be sent to the Government of the people of the region or to the judicial body of the Commission.

The introduction of sectoral normative documents should be reviewed by the drafting sector directly to the Government's rule of law institutions.

The following materials should be made available in the event of a review of the normative documents:

(i) A copy of the normative document;

(ii) Drafting notes;

(iii) Developing a basis;

(iv) Comments of the relevant units;

(v) Other relevant materials.

Other relevant materials include hearings, investigation reports and references.

The drafting note should provide clarifications on the purpose, need, feasibility, drafting of a brief process, the main issues to be addressed, the main measures set, the coordination situation and the adoption of the relevant views.

The development of laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents based mainly on the drafting of normative documents.

The draft articles should be signed by the main holder of the drafting cell.

Article 18

Article 19 of the Government's rule of law bodies review the legitimacy of the draft of the normative document. Other questions regarding the delivery of the normative document may propose amendments to the Drafting Unit.

In the review, the Government's rule of law institutions need clarifications, the basis for submission and assistance, which should be synchronized and responded within the deadline.

Article 20 was sent to one of the following cases, and the Government's rule of law institutions could return:

(i) The basic conditions for the development of normative documents are not ripe;

(ii) There is greater disagreement among the relevant units with regard to the main elements of the provisions of the draft articles on the delivery of normative documents and that the drafting cell has not been consulted with the relevant units;

(iii) The basic repetitive provisions for the content of the draft normative document, which do not include specific provisions in practice and do not have the necessary development;

(iv) The misappropriation of normative documents and the confusion of the logical structure;

(v) The Government's rule of law body considers that other issues should be returned.

Article 21 concerns different views on the main measures covered by the Government's normative documents, the management system, the division of competence, etc. should be addressed proactively; after consultation, the Government's rule of law bodies should place the main issues, the views of the relevant units and the views of the Government's rule of law bodies on the people's decisions.

Article 2

In exceptional cases, with the consent of the Head of Government Rule of Law Institutions, 10 working days could be extended and the drafting unit would be informed in writing of the duration of the review and its reasons.

The period of review was recalculated from the date of replenishment of the material.

Article 23. The drafting unit contests the review of the Government's rule of law institutions, which can apply for review to the current people within 10 working days from the date of the written review.

Article 24

The sectoral normative documents were issued by the executive head of the drafting cell following review by the Government's rule of law body.

Chapter IV

The Government's normative documents are issued by the Office of the Royal People's Government after their adoption by the Government of the people at this level and by the executive head.

Article 26 Governments and departments at all levels should establish a system for the harmonization of normative documents. Nor shall the normative documents issued without the uniformity of the body be validated as a basis for administration.

Article 27 Governments at all levels should put in place a harmonized system of normative documents.

The normative document was issued by the principal governmental rule of law body, in accordance with the harmonized normative series, as a normative document, through the review of legality and the granting of a statutory mark.

The publication of the Municipal Government's normative documents is the Communiqué of the People's Government and is published on the Government's website.

The publication of the normative documents of the district government is a communiqué of the people of the region and is published on the website of the people of the region.

The publication of sectoral normative documents is the website of this sector and the website of the Government's rule of law institutions.

The WCSS normative documents are published in the light of the Government's normative documents.

The Town People's Government, the Street Office should establish a press column at the office site and in public places to make public the normative documents they have developed and the publication of the deadline should be less than 30 days.

The Drafting Unit of the Twenty-ninth Government's normative documents should be sent to the Government's rule of law institutions at this level, 10 copies of the drafting notes and the development of the paper-based paper and corresponding electronic texts, within five working days from the date of the publication of the document, and the Standing Committee of the General Assembly of the People's Deputies at the highest level.

The normative documents of the communes, the people of town and the street offices should be sent back to the Government's rule of law institutions within 15 days of the date of publication.

Article 31 should be implemented after 30 days of the date of publication; however, it may be carried out from the date of publication because of the need to guarantee national security, the major public interest, or if the publication does not immediately implement the normative documents.

Oversight inspection

In article 32, citizens, legal persons or other organizations believe that normative documents are incompatible with laws, regulations, regulations, etc., may submit written review recommendations to the Government's rule of law bodies. The Government's rule of law institutions should be dealt with within 15 working days and respond to the recommendations.

Article 33 Government rule of law institutions should monitor the development and management of normative documents in the same sector and the normative documents of the Government.

The Government's rule of law institutions can make the document null and void to society without the review by the Government's rule of law institutions of sectoral normative documents issued by consent or without the provision of the material.

Article 34 provides for the non-representation or non-representation of normative documents, and the Government's rule of law body responsible for the preparation of the case should request a deadline for delivery. The Government of the people at this level may be reminded of criticisms that have remained unsubstantiated.

Article 35 Governments and departments at all levels should conduct regular clean-up assessments of normative documents and identify inconsistencies with newly enacted legal, regulatory and national policy provisions and should be amended or repealed in a timely manner.

Annex VI

Article 36 regulates the interpretation of normative documents by the designating body.

The procedures for modifying or repealing normative documents are implemented in accordance with the procedure established under this provision.

Article 33, paragraph 1.