(Adopted by Decree No. 107 of 25 May 2010 of the People's Government of Favu Province on 1 July 2010)

Article 1, in order to strengthen the administrative body's normative documentation review, preserve the rule of law and promote the administration of justice, develop this approach in line with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 2

Article 3 Review of the normative documents reserve should be made available, mandatory and resilient.

The review of normative documents should be based on the principle that the review of legality is fundamental and that the appropriate review is complementary.

Article IV

(i) The Government of the people at all levels, as well as the documents issued in the name of the Executive Office (room) by the Government of the more than the people at the district level;

(ii) Approval of documents issued in the name of the Government's work department or agency by the Government of the people at the district level;

(iii) Documents issued by the people's work sector at the district level;

(iv) Documents issued by the Government of the people at the district level;

(v) Documents issued by the following vertical management in the province;

(vi) Documents issued by organizations authorized by law, legislation and regulations that manage the functions of public affairs.

The subjects entitled to issue normative documents are outlined in the preceding paragraph.

The following documents issued by the executive branch are not applicable:

(i) Orders, decisions, briefings, etc. that recognize and award punishment;

(ii) Notice of personnel;

(iii) Request, report to the superior administrative body;

(iv) Transmission of higher-level documents without increasing notice of the content of the rights obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations;

(v) Notices, notices, notifications and administrative decisions on specific matters;

(vi) Summary of the proceedings of the meeting;

(vii) Internal working systems, management systems and technical operating protocols;

(viii) Other documents that do not involve the rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations or are not universally binding.

Article 6

(i) The Government of the people at all levels and, with the approval of the normative documents issued in the name of the Executive Office (rooms), are sent to the Government of the people at the highest level.

(ii) The approval of normative documents issued in the name of the Government's work department or agency, by the Government of the people at the district level.

(iii) The normative documents issued by the Government's work sector at the district level, which are sent to the Government of the people at this level, and the normative documents issued jointly by the two sectors are sent by the host sector.

(iv) The normative documents issued by the Government of the people at the district level, which were sent to the people's Government for the establishment of the office.

(v) The normative documents issued by the following vertical management in the province, which are sent to the top-level authorities and are sent to the Government of the same people.

(vi) The normative documents issued by organizations that are mandated by law, legislation and regulations to manage the functions of public affairs are presented directly to the competent authorities of the organization.

More than the people at the district level who have accepted the normative documents reserve, or the authorities, are briefed by the authorities.

The following normative documents shall be submitted in accordance with Article VII of the present methodology, in addition to the submission of requests pursuant to article VI of this methodology, and in accordance with the Financial Documents Request of the Standing Committee of the General Assembly, on behalf of the People at all levels of the Foi province:

(i) The Government of the people at the district level, as well as the normative documents issued in the name of the Executive Office (room) with the approval of the Government of the people at the district level, are sent to the General Assembly Standing Committee of the People's Congress.

(ii) The approval of normative documents issued in the name of the Government's work department or agency, by the approval body, is submitted to the General Assembly Standing Committee of the People's Representatives.

Article 8. The body responsible for the rule of law (hereinafter referred to as the working body) is responsible for the specific work of the normative documentation review.

The Town People's Government, the Street Office designated the Principals to be responsible for the specific work of the normative document delivery.

Article 9. When the normative documents are sent, copies should be submitted, formal (one third) and electronic texts. Reports should include the name and volume of normative documents, the date of entry into force and the form of publication.

In the opinion of the competent organ, a drafting note could be requested to provide the organ with the normative documentation for the submission.

Article 10

(i) Excluding statutory competence;

(ii) The lawful rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, or the obligation to increase citizens, legal persons and other organizations in violation;

(iii) The creation of administrative powers such as administrative licences, administrative penalties, administrative enforcement and administrative fees in violation of the law;

(iv) Contrary to laws, regulations, regulations or superior normative documents;

(v) Other elements requiring review.

Article 11, as reviewed, found that there was one of the circumstances set out in article 10 of the present methodology, approved by the request-providing body to issue a written review opinion to the issuing body recommending that the issuance of the organ be corrected; that the issuance of the body should be processed within 60 days from the date of receipt of the opinion; that the issuance of the organ's late non-correctation or non-removal, with the approval of the written review by the author's reporting body to change or withdraw it.

Prior to the issuance of the body's own corrective, the competent body considered that the continued implementation of the normative document could result in serious consequences, which could be reported to the requesting authorities for a decision to suspend the implementation of the normative document or all of its contents.

Article 12 Civil, legal and other organizations consider that there is one of the circumstances set out in article 10 of the normative document, and may submit a review request to the relevant authorities through the means of the presentation, mail, facsimile, government website, e-mail. The contents of the review request should include the name or name of the applicant, the manner of contact, the name of the normative document for the review, the issuance of the text and the application for review matters, reasons and etc.

Article 13 Civil, legal and other organizations submit a review request to the competent body for review.

Within the scope of the review by this body, the review body shall communicate the results of the review to the applicant within 30 days of the date of receipt of the request for review; the complexity of the situation, and the approval by the holder of the reserve agency for the appropriate extension of the period of review shall not exceed 45 days. Upon review, normative documents exist in one of the circumstances set out in article 10 of this approach and are dealt with in accordance with article 11 of this approach.

Without the scope of the review by this body, the request for review should be communicated to the competent organ within 5 days of the date of receipt of the request for review.

Article 14. The Government of the people at the district level may, in accordance with the reality, require normative documentation developed by the respective work sector to carry out a review of legitimacy before the publication of the Government's rule of law institutions.

Article 15. Normative documents should indicate the period of effectiveness, which shall normally not exceed five years, and the normative documents that have expired in effect are automatically invalid.

Normative documents that need to be continued at an effective time should be assessed by the issuing body and reissued in accordance with the relevant procedures.

Article 16 should be cleared by the issuing body every two years for normative documents and publicize the results of the clean-up with the written report of the clean-up results.

Clearing results should include a list of normative documents that continue to be effective, modified, repealed or declared invalid.

Article 17 The issuance of organs shall send the directory of normative documents issued by this organ to the body by 31 January each year.

The reserve body shall report in writing to the author of the written report on the review of the previous annual normative document by 31 March each year.

Article 18 Once-to-date authorities regularly check the delivery of normative documents by the issuing authority. At the time of the inspection, the issuance of organs should be synonymous with relevant information, such as the request for a directory, the text of the document.

Article 19 The review of the normative documentation reserve should be assessed as a component of the performance assessment of the Government and its sectors.

Article 20, in violation of the provisions of this approach, provides that the competent body responsible for direct responsibility and other persons directly responsible may be subject to correction by the competent organ or by law.

Article 21 does not seriously perform the review function in the case, which is rectified by a warrant by the competent organ responsible for direct responsibility, or by law.

Article 2