(Act No. 285 of the People's Government Order No. XIV of 21 December 2010)

Chapter I General

In order to enhance the quality management of arable land, the integrated productive capacities of arable land are developed in accordance with the laws, regulations, such as the People's Republic of China Agriculture Act, the People's Republic of China Land Management Act, the Basic Farmlands Protection Regulations.

Article 2, Protection, construction and management of the quality of arable land within the province's administration, is applicable.

Article 3. The cropland referred to in this approach refers to agricultural land used for the cultivation of crops, which is specifically determined to be implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and the Government of the province.

The quality of arable land, as described in this approach, refers to the degree of strength of arable land and the environment, the level of infrastructure and the appropriateness of crop crops.

Article IV. Governments of more people at the district level should strengthen leadership in the management of the quality of arable land, establish a sound land quality management system, enhance the quality of arable land protection, increase financial inputs, incorporate the requirements of arable land quality surveys, monitoring, protection and oversight management into the same fiscal budget; implement the responsibility for quality management of arable land and incorporate the quality management of arable land into the responsibilities for the conservation of arable land.

The Town People's Government (at the streets' offices, along with) is responsible for the quality protection, construction and management of arable land within this administrative area.

Article 5 Soil fertilizers, affiliated with the Government's agricultural administration, are covered by specific services such as cropland quality surveys, monitoring and evaluation.

In accordance with the responsibilities of the executive authorities for environmental protection at the district level, they are responsible for the management of environmental pollution control in the arsenal.

The relevant sectors such as the development and reform, finance, housing and rural and urban construction (planning), water and forestry are in line with their respective responsibilities to manage the quality of the cropland.

Article 6

Article 7. The executive authorities of agricultural, land-based resources should strengthen monitoring of the quality of land conservation and construction. The inspection units and individuals should not be denied if they are provided.

Any unit and individual have the obligation to protect the quality of the arable land and have the right to report on violations that undermine the quality of the land.

Article 8 Provincial land resources and the agricultural administration should organize the development of a cropland management information system in the province, enhance information exchange, achieve information sharing and reflect in a timely manner the quantity and quality of land.

Chapter II Planning and monitoring

Article 9. The Government of the people at the district level should organize national land resources, agriculture, development and reform, finance, housing and rural and urban development (planning), environmental protection, and develop quality conservation and medium- and long-term planning for arable land in accordance with the overall land-use planning, rural and urban planning and the quality of arable land in the current administration area, with the approval of the Government of the people at the highest level.

The quality protection and long-term planning of arable land should be clear, specific arrangements, quality requirements and quality enhancement measures.

Article 10 Agricultural administrative authorities should establish a long-term positioning monitoring network for the quality of arable land, setting signs and monitoring the quality of arable land. The quality monitoring of arable land includes pollutant indicators such as soil organic, acid, nitrogen phosphate and heavy metals.

Any unit or person shall not destroy, damage or provide facilities and symbols for the quality monitoring of the arable land. As a result of the construction of facilities and symbols that need to be adapted to the arsenal, construction units should have the consent of the agricultural administrative authorities that have approved the establishment of the monitoring network site and assume the costs required for adjustments.

Article 11 divides the quality of arable land in accordance with the inherent characteristics of the soil, natural conditions and infrastructure indicators, and environmental conditions such as heavy metal content. The fixed-term criteria such as the quality of arable land are established by the Provincial Agricultural Chamber with the resources of the country and by the administrative authorities for environmental protection in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State.

The commune-level people's governments should organize, in accordance with the metric criteria for the quality of arable land, the executive authorities for agricultural, land-based resources to carry out the arable land within this administrative area.

Article 12 Agricultural administrative authorities should conduct surveys and evaluation of the quality of arable land with the relevant sectors, such as environmental protection, land resources, and report regularly to the Government of the people at this level on the state of quality and development trends in arable land.

Chapter III Quality protection

Article 13. Rural Collective Economic Organization or Village National Commissions, when they enter into contracts for rural land contracts with the contractor, should clarify the level of quality, protection obligations and default of the contracted land. When a rural land contract is transferred, the obligation to protect the quality of the arable land set out in the original rural land contract should be transferred simultaneously.

Article 14. Agricultural producers should protect arable farming, improve the conditions of farming, maintain and train fertile land.

Adjustments to agro-industries must not undermine the conditions of cultivation of land.

Article 15. Agricultural producers should secure and reasonable use of fertilizers, pesticides, veterinary medicines, agro-industry products to prevent contamination of arable land.

Article 16 shall not include:

(i) Distinguished emissions or dumping of wastewater, solid waste and other toxic hazardous substances in violation of the law;

(ii) Sustained humidation and other organic wastes that are not dealt with in a manner that does not meet the requirements of the State.

In the event of a arsenal, agricultural producers and associated units and individuals should report immediately to local environmental protection, agricultural administration authorities and take measures to eliminate or mitigate harm. Following reports received from environmental protection, the agricultural administration authorities should identify contaminated sources and responsibilities with relevant sectors and units such as land resources, promote responsibility units or individuals to propose and implement governance measures in contaminated land, with a deadline to meet the corresponding land quality requirements. The cost of contaminated governance is borne by the responsible unit or individual. There is no need to determine the loss of capacity of the polluter or the responsible person, to organize governance pollution by the district-level people's Government and to bear the costs.

With regard to polluted arsenal land, the PAH should organize administrative authorities such as environmental protection, agriculture, land resources. In the case of land that is not suitable for the production of specific agricultural products, more than the people at the district level should adapt their productive functions in accordance with the relevant legal provisions.

No unit or individual shall destroy the conditions of cultivation of the land.

Technical recognition is required by human-induced factors that undermine the conditions of cultivation of arable land and is organized by agricultural administrative authorities or laws, regulations and regulations. Technical accreditation norms are developed and published by provincial agricultural administrative authorities. The State also provides for the provision.

Article 19 construction projects have confirmed the need for the occupancy of arable land and should be supplemented by a requirement for pre-removal, replacement-balanced land.

The construction project has identified the need for the recruitment of standard agricultural fields and the replenishment of standard farms is subject to approval by provincial agricultural administrative authorities. The land resources, the agricultural administrative authorities, in accordance with the division of duties, should conduct a review of the supplementary subdivided standard farms and write four to supplement the land area in the standard farm field construction map. Completed standard farms are, in principle, one area, transferred from the standard farm field construction reserve.

Article 20 supplements the quality of cultivated land without reaching the level of quality of the occupancy of cultivated land, and the Government of the communes of the veterans of the communes or areas of the communes should organize programmes for the improvement of the quality of arable land, such as agricultural, land-land resources, and organize and complete deadlines for the preparation of the Provincial Agricultural, Land Resources Administration. Completed cropland quality upgrading programmes should include standards for cropland quality, duration of construction, quantity of funds, responsibilities units and responsibilities. The amount required to increase the quality of arable land is included in the cost of occupancy.

Completed standard farms have been upgraded to the length of construction, with special checks organized by provincial agricultural administrative authorities.

Article 21 provides for the quality of the arable land, which is assessed by the provincial or municipal agricultural administrative authorities, and assessed:

(i) Cropland areas that need to be complemented by farming;

(ii) Croplan construction projects.

In assessing the quality of arable land, relevant experts should be organized to conduct field surveys, to collect soil samples and to conduct testing by qualified soil fertility testing agencies. The agricultural administrative authorities, in accordance with the inspection reports of the soil fertility quality test body, have given the assessment of the quality of arable land.

The quality assessment of technology in arable land is developed by provincial agricultural administrations with the relevant sectors.

The assessment of the quality of arable land by agricultural administrative authorities should serve as an important basis for the completion of the project.

The construction of the construction project shall be repaired in a timely manner and cover the costs.

Chapter IV Quality-building

Article 23 encourages and supports the cultivation of green fertilizers by agricultural producers, residues and organic fertilizers.

Green fertilizer cultivation, residues, organic fertilizers for farmers' professional cooperation organizations and producers of large-scale agricultural producers, should be funded by the Government of the people at the district level. Specific approaches are developed by provincial fiscal departments with provincial agricultural administration authorities.

More than the people at the district level should organize agricultural goods such as green fertilizers needed to reserve fertiles.

Article 24 Governments of more than the population at the district level should actively promote agricultural land-building projects such as low- and medium-sized land rehabilitation, integrated agricultural development, land collation development, land reclaiming, and establish standards for quality of cropland.

Article 25 Construction projects should be used for the occupancy of arable land, and they should be taken away from the predominant farming of cultivated land. The cost of good farming is included in local costs.

In exceptional circumstances, there are difficult construction projects for cropland farming, with the consent of the commune government or the territorial Government of the communes of the area and the presentation of provincial land resources, the agricultural administrative authorities' case, which may not be able to carry out a cropland-flagged crop.

Article 26 shall be used for soil improvement at the level of arable farming. The arsenal of landland resources is organized by the territorial authorities of the arsenal (communes, areas) or in the area.

The arsenal of cropland is defined by the municipal agricultural administrative authorities in the area and by the territorial authorities.

Article 27 states that the city, district-level people's governments should organize the construction of standard agricultural reserves projects. The administrative authorities, such as land resources, agriculture, must conduct field missions when reviewing the construction of the standard agricultural reserves project, sketches and signatures of construction plots at the project planning map.

Land resources, agricultural administration authorities should conduct field inspections of standard agricultural reserves, in accordance with the accepted norms, and project planning and completion maps must be consistent. The recipient shall be signed on the completion of the project.

Chapter V Legal responsibility

Article 28 provides for violations of the provisions of this approach, and the law, legislation and regulations have legal responsibilities.

In violation of this approach by the Government and the relevant sectors, such as agriculture, land resources, environmental protection and finance, at the district level, the following acts have been converted by the authority to order; in serious circumstances, the disposition of the direct responsible supervisors and other direct responsibilities; and the criminal accountability of the law:

(i) Provision of false information or refusal or obstruction of quality monitoring of arable land;

(ii) Inadequate assessment of the quality of arable land, as prescribed;

(iii) No review, review and inspection as provided for in this approach;

(iv) Inadequate access to cropland farming in accordance with this approach;

(v) There are other acts of negligence, favouring private fraud and abuse of authority.

Article 31, in violation of article 10, paragraph 2, of this approach, provides that facilities and symbols that destroy, damage or unauthorized mobile farmland quality monitoring network sites are redirected by the agricultural administrative authorities to restore the status quo; that restitution cannot be reinstated to compensate for the loss of the status quo; and that a fine of up to $200,000 may be paid.

Article 31, in violation of article 16, paragraph (i), of this approach, provides for the release of or dumping of wastewater, solid waste and other toxic substances to arable land, punishable by law, regulations and regulations relating to environmental protection.

In violation of article 16, subparagraph (b), of this approach, the imposition of unwarranted treatment or, although processed, is not in compliance with the requirements of the State and other organic wastes, is being converted by an order of responsibility of the agricultural administrative authorities to a fine of up to 1000 dollars.

Article 32, paragraph 1, of this approach provides that damage to the conditions of cultivation of land shall be altered or managed by the administrative authorities of the country's resources, which have been overhauled by the administrative authorities of the country's resources, and that the costs are borne by the perpetrator of the offence, and, in accordance with the provisions of the National People's Republic of China's Land Management Act, a fine of up to 2 times the cost of reclaiming the land.

Article XXIII, in violation of article 22 of this approach, has resulted in the destruction of the infrastructure of the neighbouring arable land, which is subject to a period of time being repaired by the agricultural administrative authorities, which are to be repaired by the responsible person, and a fine of up to 2,000 yen.

Annex VI

Article 34 of this approach is implemented effective 1 March 2011.