(The 60th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the State of Sus Republic of 21 December 2010 considered the adoption of Decree No. 115 of 30 December 2010 on the People's Government Order No. 115 of 30 December 2010 for the period from 1 March 2011)

Chapter I General

Article 1 enhances urban management, enhances the effectiveness of administrative law enforcement, regulates the application of a relatively centralized executive sanction, protects the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, and develops this approach in line with the provisions of the National People's Republic of China Administrative Punishment Act and the State Department's Decision on furthering the work of the relatively centralized administration of justice.

Article 2

Article 3. The Urban Management Committee is the integrated coordinating body for urban management, with a specific responsibility for coordinating and providing guidance on major urban management efforts to study key issues of urban management and relative concentration of administrative sanctions.

Article IV is the executive branch of the city, the district level and the district administration administration administration administration (hereinafter referred to as the municipal law enforcement sector) as the executive authority of the Government of the people at this level to exercise the relatively centralized administrative penalties, with independent law enforcement subjects, exercising the right to administrative punishment relative to urban management, in accordance with its mandate under this scheme, and assumes the corresponding legal responsibility.

The urban law enforcement authorities can entrust the city-managed administrative law enforcement agencies with the implementation of relatively centralized administrative penalties.

The law enforcement authorities at the district level, in the district administration sector, have placed in the streets, in the construction of the town (development area) and are responsible for the exercise of the relative concentration of administrative penalties in urban management within the Territory.

The Government's rule of law sector is responsible for the supervision and guidance of urban management in relation to the concentration of administrative penalties.

The executive authorities, such as planning, housing and rural-urban construction, urban hosting, parking and greening, water (water), environmental protection, business, public safety, land and land, should work in conjunction with the urban administration in a relatively concentrated administration of administrative sanctions.

Article 6. Urban management is relatively focused on the exercise of the right to administrative punishment, and should be guided by the principles of legality, justice, openness and popularity, adherence to the combination of administrative law enforcement and management services, punishment and education, and administrative guidance for public participation and self-respect for social oversight.

Article 7. Requirements for the implementation of urban management in relation to the concentration of administrative penalties are included in the financial budget and are fully financed by financial resources.

Chapter II

Article 8. The urban law enforcement authorities exercise administrative penalties under the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations governing the management of sanitation in urban cities, and enforce the removal of buildings or facilities that are not in compliance with urban standards, sanitation standards.

Article 9. The urban law enforcement authorities exercise administrative penalties for the construction of the law, regulations, regulations and regulations in urban and rural planning management, except for administrative penalties authorized by the planning sector for administrative authorization but not authorized by the planning sector for construction projects that have not been established in accordance with the planning design or licence conditions, that have not been established after the expiration of temporary construction.

Article 10. The urban law enforcement authorities exercise administrative penalties under urban green management laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, except for the administrative penalties for urban greening offences involving the protection of archaeological trees in parking, ventilation, in-house urban greening.

Article 11. The urban law enforcement authorities exercise administrative penalties other than fuel, water, water, drainage, and flood facility management, in accordance with the laws, regulations and regulations governing municipal administration.

Article 12

(i) The use of broadcasters or other means of issuing high noises for customers in business operations;

(ii) In areas where noise-sensitive buildings such as institutions, hospitals, schools, scientific research units and homes are concentrated, the use of broadcasters or the conduct of service processing activities generate environmental noise pollution;

(iii) In regions where the population is concentrated and other special protections are required, the burning of alphates, oils, rubber, plastics, leathers, etc. produces toxic futiles or heinous gases.

Article 13. The urban law enforcement authorities exercise the legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions governing the management of rivers, and shall impose administrative sanctions on the following offences committed in the context of urban river management:

(i) The dumping of waste, manure or other wastes;

(ii) contaminated water bodies, such as wheat, turb, oil-type containers, corrupted items or vehicles, devices;

(iii) Direct release of sewerage;

(iv) Direct discharge of the catering industry or the operation of the dying of livestock, sewage from water products;

(v) The landownership of ships within the area of urban construction, development or town.

Article 14.

Article 15. The urban law enforcement authorities exercise their laws, regulations, regulations and regulations governing the management of public safety transport, and impose administrative penalties for the discontinuation of mobile vehicles in urban gateways as prescribed.

Article 16 contains one of the following offences, which is punishable by the municipal law enforcement authorities according to the following provisions:

(i) Without the authorization to open, open windows, footprints, or shops, at the main roadside, affecting urban landscapes by redirecting their deadlines or restoring their status, and imposing a fine of up to $200,000;

(ii) Public places, such as roads, square brackets, are not subject to a provision for the suspension of non-modile vehicles, or non-moile vehicles, in violation of the prohibition, with a warning or a fine of up to $50.

Article 17 states, provinces adapts to the exercise of the responsibilities of urban management that are relatively concentrated in administrative penalties, and is implemented in accordance with the modified responsibilities.

The urban, district and territorial governments have special provisions for the implementation of the relatively centralized administrative penalties within the current administrative system, within the purview of the urban administration approved by the State, provincial governments.

Article 18 The executive branch of the city shall exercise relatively centralized administrative penalties in accordance with the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations establishing the administrative sanctions regime, which may apply administrative investigative powers and administrative enforcement powers relating to the relative centralized exercise of administrative penalties.

Administrative penalties have been relatively concentrated in the urban administration sector, which may not be exercised by the competent administrative authorities; administrative penalties have continued to be exercised.

Chapter III

The Government of the people at all levels should establish a coordination mechanism for the sound urban management of relatively centralized administrative penalties, strengthen administrative law enforcement collaboration between the law enforcement and the relevant administration sectors, and guarantee the effective implementation of urban management's relatively centralized administrative penalties.

Article 20 should establish mechanisms for the sharing of sound urban management and law enforcement information, as well as provide timely briefings on relevant administrative licences, administrative sanctions, etc.

The law enforcement authorities in urban areas are found to be guilty and the relevant administrative authorities should be determined in a timely manner; the technical identification needs should be delegated to the competent identification body.

Article 21, the offences identified by the urban administration in law enforcement activities do not fall under the jurisdiction of this sector and should be transferred in a timely manner to competent administrative authorities.

The authorities concerned have found that the law should be investigated by the urban administration and should be transferred in a timely manner to the urban administration.

The public security sector should support the municipal law enforcement authorities in carrying out their duties under the law, and should be treated in a timely manner in accordance with the law in order to prevent administrative law enforcement officials from exercising their duties under the law.

Chapter IV

Article 23 provides for a system of administrative penalties that is relatively concentrated in urban administration and for a fine-free regime with a system of separation from fine collection, the introduction of an administrative law enforcement responsibility regime and a review of the nuclear system.

Article 24 should be compiled in a timely manner with respect to the relevant provisions of the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations that have been relatively centrally covered by the right to administrative punishment and be adapted in a timely manner in accordance with legal, regulatory and regulatory changes.

The urban law enforcement authorities should regulate the operating procedures and administrative sanctions of administrative authority, such as administrative coercion, administrative sanctions, and make public public the benchmark.

Article 25. The urban administration should establish a sound day-to-day inspection mechanism to prevent, investigate and correct violations of urban administration laws, regulations and regulations in a timely manner.

Article 26 investigates violations by the law enforcement authorities in the city and shall be aimed at redressing violations. It should be educated to correct the violation in the light, mitigated or exempted the offender from punishment.

Article 27, when administrative law enforcement officials are in the exercise of their duties, should be uniformed, with a uniform law enforcement mark, presentation of administrative law enforcement documents and enforcement in accordance with the laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 28 Enforcement authorities in the city shall produce lists of items, names of evidence, types, specifications, quantity and degree of integrity, either signed by the custodian and by the parties, or chapter. The list is carried out by executive units and parties.

The imposition of a moratorium on items that are hard-to-life and vulnerable to lapse should be addressed in a timely manner in accordance with the relevant provisions.

Chapter V Enforcement oversight

Article 29 Governments at all levels should strengthen monitoring of the exercise of the right to administrative punishment in the urban administration.

Article 33 The urban administration should be open to the executive branch and be proactive in the supervision of the public.

Article 31 should establish a system of reporting of offences and confidential the reporting person.

Violations reported to citizens, legal persons or other organizations should be promptly investigated within the scope of the functions of the sector; they should be transferred in a timely manner to the relevant sectors and to inform the reporting person.

Article 32 Law enforcement authorities in the city should strengthen operational guidance, coordination, evaluation and supervision of the district-level municipalities, the district administration.

The municipal administrations have found that the law enforcement authorities at the district level, in the district city, should not be detected and should be responsible for the investigation of the offence in accordance with the law; it is found that the law enforcement authorities at the district level, in the district town, should be lawful or inappropriate, and should be responsible for its correction.

Article 33 governs the administration of justice in the city and its staff members shall be held in accordance with the law and shall be held accountable under the law, which constitutes a serious offence and shall be held in accordance with the law:

(i) Violations of the physical or other legitimate rights of the parties;

(ii) Abuse of mandates,ys of negligence, favouring private fraud;

(iii) There is no statutory basis for the enforcement of administrative penalties or non-compliance with statutory procedures;

(iv) It is not possible to determine whether the administrative sanctions decisions that have been made are altered by or in violation of the statutory procedures;

(v) The production of legal instruments or the non-utilization of legal instruments, as prescribed;

(vi) Separate seizures, seizures and confiscation of property;

(vii) To require the parties to assume their unlawful obligations;

(viii) Other violations of law enforcement.

Annex VI

Article 34 of this approach is implemented effective 1 March 2011. The pilot approach to urban management in Sud State, which was implemented effective 1 October 2001, was also repealed.