(Adopted at the 44th Annual Conference of the Eleventh People's Government of the Commonwealth of Independent States, 7 January 2011, No. 253 of 20 January 2011, published from 20 February 2011)

Chapter I General

Article 1 provides for the regulation of administrative law enforcement and guarantees that administrative law enforcement is fair, fair and public and that the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations are preserved, in accordance with the laws, regulations and the relevant provisions of the Department of State, in the light of the actual provisions of my province.

Article 2 refers to administrative law enforcement, as stated in the present article, to administrative licences, administrative penalties, administrative enforcement, administrative payments, administrative charges, administrative recognition, and specific administrative acts affecting the rights and obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, in accordance with laws, regulations and regulations.

Administrative law enforcement agencies and administrative law enforcement officials within my province should be subject to this provision.

Article 3. Provincial, municipal, district (including district, district, sub-group) government has been leading in the harmonization of administrative law enforcement activities in the present administrative area.

The provincial, municipal and district authorities are responsible for monitoring, inspection, guidance and coordination of administrative law enforcement activities.

Article IV. Administrative law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials shall engage in administrative law enforcement activities in accordance with the provisions of laws, regulations and regulations within the statutory competence.

Article 5 Administrative law enforcement authorities should make the basis, process and outcome of the exercise of administrative law enforcement rights public to society.

Citizens, legal persons or other organizations interested in administrative law enforcement are entitled to know information produced or obtained by administrative law enforcement agencies in administrative law enforcement activities.

Laws, regulations stipulate that they are not open.

Article 6. The executive law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials, in administrative law enforcement activities, should guarantee the right to participation of citizens, legal persons or other organizations that are in the interest of administrative law enforcement activities.

Article 7. Administrative law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials shall, within the statutory procedures and time frames, reduce the incidence of conduct, increase efficiency and provide quality and quick services for citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Measures and instruments taken by executive law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement personnel in administrative law enforcement activities should be in line with legislative purposes and principles and reflect the necessary and reasonableness. Administrative law enforcement agencies can take a variety of measures to achieve administrative purposes by law and should select measures that are most conducive to the protection of civil, legal or other organizations.

Article 9. Administrative law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials should follow the principle of good credit in administrative law enforcement activities. In the absence of statutory matters and subject to statutory procedures, administrative law enforcement authorities shall not revoke, modify and repeal administrative law enforcement acts that have entered into force. If the State interests, the public interest or other statutory matters are to be removed, modified and repealed, in accordance with the statutory authority and procedures, and the damages resulting from civil, legal or other organizations shall be compensated by law.

Chapter II

Section I

Article 10. Administrative law enforcement authorities shall exercise their law enforcement authority in accordance with the legislative authority.

The superior administrative law enforcement authorities shall not exercise their legal, legislative and regulatory mandates that fall within the subordinate executive law enforcement authority, and shall be responsible for the enforcement of the executive branch at the lower level in accordance with the law.

Section II Mandate and commission

Article 11. Organizations mandated by the law, legislation and regulations should take over administrative law enforcement activities on their own behalf, with the corresponding legal consequences.

Article 12. Administrative organs or other organizations entrusted by administrative law enforcement agencies are entrusted with external administration enforcement activities in the name of administrative law enforcement agencies, which are entrusted to the executive law enforcement authorities to oversee and assume the corresponding legal consequences.

The administrative organs or other organizations entrusted may not be entrusted with the commissioning of the matter to other organizations or individuals.

Article 13. In-house institutions and agencies of executive law enforcement agencies engaged in administrative law enforcement activities, the legal consequences of which should be borne by administrative law enforcement agencies in the name of administrative law enforcement agencies. However, other provisions are provided for by law, legislation and regulations.

Section III

Article 14. Administrative law enforcement activities must be carried out by administrative law enforcement officials, and administrative law enforcement activities cannot be carried out without access to administrative law enforcement. Administrative law enforcement documents have been consolidated by the provincial Government's rule of law sector.

Administrative law enforcement officials relocate from their law enforcement positions or redeploy administrative law enforcement agencies, whose administrative law enforcement documents are recovered by their units and sent to the issuing agencies for write-off.

The failure of administrative law enforcement documents should be declared invalid, with the application of the witness's unit to the issuing authority.

The use of administrative law enforcement documents issued by the Department of State, which are presented by the use of units to the Government's rule of law sector.

In one of the following cases, administrative law enforcement officials should avoid, and the parties and their agents have the right to request a waiver:

(i) Near relatives of the parties or parties;

(ii) Relations with themselves or with their close relatives;

(iii) Other relations with the parties may affect fair law enforcement.

The party's application for the avoidance of administrative law enforcement officials should be submitted to the executive law enforcement agencies affiliated with administrative law enforcement officials that the administrative law enforcement authorities should avoid the record of the application.

Until the decision was taken, administrative law enforcement officials who had been denied were not allowed to participate in administrative law enforcement activities, except for urgent measures.

The application of a waiver by an administrative law enforcement authority against the parties shall be decided in writing within three days. A written opinion may be made by administrative law enforcement officials who have been requested to avoid circumventing. The parties may apply for a review of the decision to the executive law enforcement authorities. The review shall be made within three days. During the review, the persons who had been denied had not stopped participating in administrative law enforcement activities.

Article 16, Administrative law enforcement officials engaged in administrative law enforcement activities, should be regulated and crafted. The terms should be regulated by civilization, express accuracy, uniformity, and prohibit stigma, discrimination, stigma, inducement, deception, provocation, intimidation and threatening languages.

Section IV

Article 17 refers to civil, legal or other organizations that have legal stakes with administrative law enforcement activities to participate in administrative law enforcement activities in their own name and to have legal consequences.

Article 18

(i) The information on the admissibility of the application or the case;

(ii) Authorization of the agent;

(iii) Access to the relevant material in the present case, except for State secret, commercial secret or personal privacy;

(iv) Presentations and defences;

(v) Submission of evidence;

(vi) Request for hearing by law;

(vii) Other procedural rights under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 19 may authorize the agent to participate in administrative law enforcement activities, with legal consequences being borne by the agent. The parties must not be entrusted with their obligations. The parties have renounced their statutory rights and must be expressed in writing.

The laws, regulations and regulations stipulate that administrative law enforcement activities must be taken up by the parties themselves, from their provisions.

Article 20 refers to citizens, legal persons or other organizations who have legal stake in administrative law enforcement activities other than the parties. Prior to the adoption of administrative law enforcement decisions, the executive law enforcement agencies should be informed that the stakeholders have the right to make presentations.

Article 21, which is more than 10 persons, may be elected by one to five representatives.

On behalf of all parties, the legal consequences are borne by all parties. The parties must not be entrusted with their obligations. The parties have renounced their statutory rights and must be expressed in writing.

The laws, regulations and regulations stipulate that administrative law enforcement activities must be taken up by the parties themselves, from their provisions.

Other participants, including identification, translators, witnesses, etc.

Chapter III

Article 23 of the provincial, municipal and district governments specifically determine the responsibilities and jurisdiction of the executive law enforcement agencies to which they belong, in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

More than two administrative law enforcement authorities have jurisdiction over the same matter, which is governed by the first instance and the administrative law enforcement body, except for the designation of jurisdiction by the executive organs at the first level.

In the event of a sudden incident, there is a need for immediate measures to avoid causing significant losses, where the administrative law enforcement authorities can take the necessary treatment, but immediate notification should be given to competent administrative law enforcement authorities.

After the application of the parties or the commencement of administrative law enforcement procedures, the executive law enforcement authorities found that the organ was not competent and should be transferred to the competent administrative law enforcement body and informed the parties. The administrative law enforcement organs transferred shall not be transferred on their own initiative.

Article 24 creates jurisdictional disputes between executive law enforcement agencies, reporting to the competent organ of the executive branch at the level or to the Government at this level.

Article 25

Article 26 The administrative law enforcement organs requested to assist shall not be denied assistance without justification. The denial of assistance should inform the administrative law enforcement authorities requesting assistance.

In one of the following cases, the administrative law enforcement agencies requested to assist should refuse to assist:

(i) The assistance requested does not fall within its mandate;

(ii) The requested assistance is explicitly prohibited by law, legislation and regulations.

In one of the following cases, the administrative law enforcement agencies requested to assist may refuse to assist:

(i) Assistance from other administrative law enforcement agencies is clearly more reasonable and economically;

(ii) Assistance will seriously hamper its completion;

(iii) There are other grounds that cannot be provided.

The administrative law enforcement agencies requesting assistance object to the refusal of assistance, and the administrative law enforcement agencies assisted by the request are reported jointly at the level of executive organs.

Article 27 requires administrative law enforcement agencies requesting assistance to assume legal responsibility for administrative law enforcement decisions based on the conduct of assistance, and the administrative law enforcement agencies requested to assist in the provision of legal responsibility for the conduct of assistance.

Chapter IV General procedures

Section I

Article 28 should be made available in office or on the website by administrative law enforcement agencies in matters relating to application, basis, conditions, quantity, procedures, duration, and the full material required to be submitted.

The applicant requests the executive law enforcement authorities to provide clarifications and explanations of the content, and the executive law enforcement authorities should provide a one-time explanation, interpretation and accurate and reliable information.

Article 29 requires that citizens, legal persons or other organizations apply for the commencement of administrative law enforcement procedures and shall be in writing. The application shall document the following matters:

(i) The applicant's basic situation;

(ii) The name of the executive law enforcement authority;

(iii) The facts, rationales and requirements of the application;

(iv) The applicant's signature or chapter;

(v) The year, month and day of application;

(vi) Other matters to be documented.

The applicant's written submissions were difficult and could be verbally filed by the executive law enforcement authorities and confirmed by the applicant.

Article 33, upon receipt by administrative law enforcement authorities of applications from citizens, legal persons or other organizations, should be redirected, indicating the date, place, receipt and receipt of requests from administrative law enforcement agencies, and the record of the volume.

In respect of the requests received, the executive law enforcement agencies are treated separately according to the following:

(i) The application shall not be authorized by this administrative law enforcement body by law and shall be communicated to the applicant at the time of the application;

(ii) The matter of application does not fall within the terms of reference of this administrative law enforcement body, and should be decided upon inadmissibility at the time and inform the parties of their application to the competent administrative law enforcement organs;

(iii) The error in the application of the material may be corrected at the present stage and shall allow the applicant to be corrected at the present stage;

(iv) The application is incomplete or incompatible with the statutory form, and the administrative law enforcement authorities should communicate to the applicant the matter and the additional period of time within 5 days. The late notification is received from the date of receipt of the request;

(v) The application matter falls within the terms of reference of this administrative law enforcement body, the application is fully, in accordance with the statutory form, or the applicant is required to submit the full replenishment of the application, and the administrative law enforcement authority shall be admissible.

The administrative law enforcement body shall receive or be inadmissible and shall be given a written certificate showing the specific seals of the executive law enforcement authorities and the dates indicated.

The applicant shall submit the relevant material and reflect the true situation to the administrative law enforcement authorities. Administrative law enforcement authorities should verify and review the authenticity of the content of the application.

The applicant's application is in accordance with the statutory conditions and the administrative law enforcement authorities shall make written decisions to grant the application in accordance with the law.

The administrative law enforcement authorities shall make a written decision not to grant the application in accordance with the law, explain the reasons for hearing the applicant's presentation and the defence and inform the applicant of the right to apply for administrative review and administrative proceedings in accordance with the law.

The executive law enforcement body shall take a decision within 20 days of the date of receipt of the application. It was not possible to take a decision later than 10 days, with the approval of the head of the executive branch, and to communicate the extension period and reasons to the applicant.

The law, legislation and regulations provide otherwise, from their provisions.

Section II Administrative law enforcement procedures initiated under its mandate

Article 33, Administrative law enforcement authorities should conduct a case review, in accordance with the conditions of the case, in relation to complaints, reports, administrative inspections, transfers of other organs and administrative law enforcement cases discovered through other means.

The executive law enforcement authorities should register and perform the relevant filing procedures.

Two or more administrative law enforcement cases are jointly handled by the host authorities.

The executive organs and other organizations entrusted with the processing of administrative law enforcement cases should submit cases to the executive law enforcement authorities.

Section III Investigation

Article 335 Administrative law enforcement authorities should organize investigations in a timely manner. The investigation, collection of evidence by administrative law enforcement agencies should be guided by legitimate, objective, comprehensive and timely principles.

In the course of the investigation, administrative law enforcement authorities shall not be less than two members and shall present administrative law enforcement documents to the parties or the person concerned. Administrative law enforcement officials do not produce administrative law enforcement documents, and the investigators have the right to refuse to investigate and provide related material.

Article 337 Investigation may take the following:

(i) To ask the parties or witnesses to listen to the parties' presentations and the defence;

(ii) Accreditation, material evidence to the relevant units and individuals;

(iii) Surveys, surveys, etc.;

(iv) To sample sampling;

(v) Hearing;

(vi) Accreditation findings from the designation or commissioning of the statutory accreditation body;

(vii) Sound recordings, videos or other audio-visual means;

(viii) Production of on-site notes;

(ix) Other methods of investigation provided for in laws, regulations and regulations.

Section IV Evidence

Article 338 Evidence of administrative law enforcement includes:

(i) A certificate;

(ii) Evidence;

(iii) Audiovisual information;

(iv) Witness statements;

(v) Presentation by the parties;

(vi) Identification of conclusions;

(vii) Surveys, on-site notes;

(viii) Legal, regulatory provisions may be used as other material of evidence.

Article 39 should be taken into account by administrative law enforcement activities and subsequently decided. Evidence based on administrative law enforcement decisions should be valid.

The administrative law enforcement authorities shall not be used as a basis for the determination of the evidence produced or transferred by means of law.

The parties are obliged to provide evidence to administrative law enforcement authorities in writing, oral or otherwise.

The parties have the right to express their views on the evidence based on administrative law enforcement decisions. Evidence without the views of the parties cannot serve as a basis for administrative law enforcement decisions.

Article 40 has the right of the party to apply for the application of the evidence. The parties apply to the executive law enforcement authorities for the purpose of obtaining the evidence and should submit the application for the application of the evidence.

The application to extract evidence should contain the following:

(i) The name or name of the holder of the evidence, the place of residence;

(ii) The content of the evidence to be drawn;

(iii) The reasons for the application for the application of the evidence and the facts of the case to be certified.

The application of administrative law enforcement authorities for the parties to obtain evidence, which is reviewed in conformity with the condition of obtaining the evidence, should be taken in a timely manner; it is not in accordance with the condition of the evidence, should be sent to the parties and their agents within three days of the date of receipt of the request and to the reasons for not being removed.

Article 40 shall be produced at the time of the occurrence of the case, specifying the contents of time, place and events, and shall be signed by administrative law enforcement officials and parties. The parties refused that the administrative law enforcement authorities should indicate the reasons why others who were invited to sign in the record; without others, administrative law enforcement agencies could take photographs, audio-visuals and videos to preserve the ground.

Laws, regulations and regulations provide otherwise for the production of the on-site record.

Article 42 allows the parties and their agents to apply to the administrative law enforcement authorities for the preservation of the evidence if the evidence is likely to be lost or otherwise difficult to obtain.

The parties apply to the executive law enforcement authorities to take evidence-based protection measures and should clarify the name and place of the evidence, the content and scope of the preservation, and the reasons for the application of the preservation.

The administrative law enforcement authorities may take protection measures such as pre-registration, photographs, audio, videos, replication, identification, testing, and the production of a query, depending on specific circumstances.

When administrative law enforcement authorities preserve the evidence, the parties and their agents may be required to do so.

Section V Presentations

Article 43, prior to the administrative law enforcement decision, the executive law enforcement authorities should be informed of the views of the parties and, in writing, of the following matters:

(i) The administrative enforcement decisions to be taken and the facts, rationales and bases thereof;

(ii) The right of the parties to make statements;

(iii) The duration of the presentation and the consequences of the late submission of observations.

The executive law enforcement authorities shall, in the form of an oral notification to the parties, produce a notice, communicate to the parties or receive them, signed by the parties or chapter.

Article 44 states that the executive law enforcement authorities informed the parties of the right to make statements, the parties and their agents are entitled to apply to the executive law enforcement authorities for access, excerptation and replication of evidence materials in administrative law enforcement files.

Evidence materials relate to State secret, commercial secret or personal privacy, and administrative law enforcement authorities may reject the party's application.

The executive law enforcement authorities shall not be charged with accessing, expropriating the relevant material. Reproduction of relevant evidentiary material can be charged.

Article 42 allows the parties to make a written presentation to the executive law enforcement authorities, including the facts, rationales and bases involved in administrative law enforcement decisions.

The parties have made an oral presentation to the executive law enforcement body, and the executive law enforcement authorities should produce records, read out to the parties or, after their examination, be signed by the parties or chapter.

The parties did not present their views within a limited period of time, and considered the right to give up their submissions.

Article 46 should be reviewed by executive law enforcement authorities on the facts, rationales and basis of the parties; the facts, rationales and the basis established by the parties should be adopted by executive law enforcement agencies. The reasons should be given in writing.

Section VI

Article 47 states that:

(i) Legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions should be held;

(ii) The parties, the stakeholder, shall apply for hearing under the law;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement authorities consider it necessary to hold hearings.

In addition to national secrets, commercial secrets or personal privacy, hearings should be made public.

Administrative law enforcement hearings involving major public interest should be represented by a proportion of public representatives.

Article 48 should inform the parties of the right to be heard. The parties should apply for hearings within three days.

The executive law enforcement body shall communicate written notification to the parties and the stakeholders by 7 days of the hearings. It is impossible to deliver, and the manner in which it can be used. The law, legislation and regulations provide otherwise, from their provisions.

The following matters should be included in the letter:

(i) The name, residence, name, place of the person or legal person or other organization or name, residence and statutory representative or principal;

(ii) Date and place of hearings;

(iii) The name of the moderator, the unit in place, the office;

(iv) The facts and legal aspects of the hearings;

(v) The main procedure for hearing;

(vi) Other matters to be documented.

In public hearings, the executive law enforcement authorities should have the time, place and case at the office, website or other open media announcements.

The moderator of the hearing is appointed by the executive law enforcement authority. The moderator and administrative law enforcement officials should be different.

The moderator shall preside over the hearing in a fair and impartial position.

At the beginning of the hearings, the moderator shall collate the names, names and names of administrative law enforcement officials, parties, stakeholders and ask whether the parties have made a request for evasion.

Administrative law enforcement agencies read out the proposed administrative law enforcement decisions, as well as the facts, rationales and grounds identified.

Article 50: The hearings are conducted in accordance with the following steps:

(i) The moderator declared the commencement of the hearings;

(ii) The recorder has ascertained whether administrative law enforcement officials, parties, stakeholders have reached the meeting and declares the content and discipline of the hearings;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement officials, parties, persons of interest;

(iv) Submission of evidence and conduct of evidence;

(v) The debate on the facts of the controversy by administrative law enforcement officials, parties and stakeholders;

(vi) Administrative law enforcement officials, parties, persons of interest and persons of interest are given their views on the last.

Article 52 should produce a notice. Administrative law enforcement officials, parties and stakeholders should read a hearing at the end of the hearings, with confirmation of non-correct signatures or chapters.

Administrative law enforcement officials, parties and stakeholders have the right to make changes to the errors in the record.

The moderator shall, within 2 days of the end of the hearings, make recommendations for processing under the hearings, report on the decisions of the executive law enforcement authorities.

Section VII

In the course of administrative law enforcement, administrative enforcement agencies can implement administrative coercive measures in order to put an end to violations, prevent the destruction of evidence, avoid the risk of harm and control the spread of the risk.

Article 54 imposes administrative coercive measures by administrative law enforcement authorities in compliance with the following provisions:

(i) Prior to the adoption of administrative coercive measures, written or oral reports are to be submitted to the executive law enforcement authorities. When administrative coercive measures are taken at the site, immediate reports should be made;

(ii) Implementation by more than two administrative law enforcement officials;

(iii) Submission of administrative law enforcement documents;

(iv) To inform the parties of the grounds for administrative coercive measures, the basis, remedies and the rights of the parties under the law;

(v) Hearing the parties' statements and the defence;

(vi) Production of on-site notes;

(vii) Execution of seals, seizures, the production of a list of seizures, the seizure of a list of two seizures and the preservation of the parties and the administrative law enforcement authorities, respectively;

(viii) The on-site record is signed by the parties, administrative law enforcement officials and witnesses or chapters indicating that the parties are not on the ground or by the parties, witness witnesses refusing to sign or to appear in the chapter, and should be indicated in the note;

(ix) Other procedures established by law, regulations.

Article 55, when administrative coercive measures are carried out, administrative law enforcement officials should fill the relevant procedures within 24 hours; administrative enforcement measures in remote, water and transport areas should be completed within 2 days of return to administrative law enforcement agencies.

Article 56 provides administrative law enforcement activities, such as inspection, investigation, etc., in the place of production, which must have legal, legislative and regulatory grounds, and the parties have the right to refuse without legal, regulatory basis.

Article 57 has one of the following cases where the executive law enforcement body with the executive authority to impose administrative coercive measures, in accordance with the laws, regulations, may impose administrative measures on the property of citizens, legal persons or other organizations:

(i) The discovery of prohibited items;

(ii) Preventing the destruction of evidence;

(iii) Preventing the transfer of property by the parties from legal obligations;

(iv) Other cases provided for by law, regulations.

Administrative coercive measures for the seizure of property shall not be allowed to enter the citizen's home to seize the personal property of the citizen.

In accordance with the law, legislation and regulations, the administration of justice requires the execution of seizures, seizures and seizures of property belonging to citizens, legal persons or other organizations, which shall be approved by the executive law enforcement authorities; seizures and seizures of major cases or amounts of property shall be carried out by the heads of executive law enforcement agencies.

The administrative law enforcement authorities that do not have the authority to impose administrative measures shall take registration measures in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Punishment Act and shall not take administrative coercive measures against the seizure and seizure of property.

Article 58 shall not exceed 30 days for seizures; the situation is complex and, with the approval of the executive law enforcement authorities, may extend 30 days; the exception of the law, legislation and regulations for the period otherwise provided.

There is a need to test, test, quarantine or technologically validate the items and the period of seizure, seizure does not include the period of testing, testing, quarantine or technical identification. The period of testing, testing, quarantine or technical identification should be clear and communicated to the parties. The cost of testing, testing, quarantine or technological identification is borne by administrative law enforcement agencies. The law, legislation and regulations provide otherwise, from their provisions.

In respect of the seizure, seizure of property, the administrative law enforcement authorities should be kept in good custody and shall not be used or destroyed; the loss and liability.

Article 599, when administrative law enforcement agencies are carrying out administrative coercive measures that are sealed and seized, the facts should be kept in a timely manner and decisions are taken in the statutory period.

For seizures, seizures of property, the law is clear that the law should be confiscated by law, forfeiture by law, for which more than two administrative law enforcement officials should be present at the time of destruction and for the production of a record, signed by administrative law enforcement officials in a record or in a seal, and can be archived, including on-site photographs, videos.

In cases where there is no violation or no longer a need for seizures, seizures shall immediately be removed, seized or returned to the seizure, seizure or seizures after the decision is taken; the unsecured property has been auctioned or sold, returned or sold. The price of the property auction or the sale of the property is significantly lower than the value of the property itself due to the fault of the administrative law enforcement authorities and is compensated by the executive law enforcement agencies.

The administrative law enforcement authorities had not been decided late and the seized property was considered closed; the parties had requested the return of the seized property and the administrative law enforcement authorities should return immediately.

Article sixtieth freezing deposits, remittances should be carried out by administrative law enforcement agencies under the law, and other administrative law enforcement agencies or organizations may not be delegated to other executive organs or organizations; any other administrative law enforcement body or organization shall not freeze deposits, remittances.

The freezing of deposits, the amount of remittances should be appropriate to the amount of implementation of administrative law enforcement decisions or the circumstances of the offence; the freeze has been frozen by law by other administrative law enforcement agencies.

Removal deposits and remittances should be communicated in writing to financial institutions. Financial institutions should be immediately frozen without delay and must not disclose information to the parties before the freeze.

In accordance with article sixtieth, which provides for the freezing of deposits and remittances, the administrative law enforcement organs that decide shall deliver the licence to the parties. The freezing decision shall contain the following matters:

(i) The name or name of the party;

(ii) The grounds and basis for the freeze;

(iii) The accounts and amounts frozen;

(iv) The right to apply for administrative review or to initiate administrative proceedings;

(v) The name, seal and date of the executive law enforcement body.

Article 62 shall, within 30 days of the freezing of deposits, the remittance of remittances, be decided by the executive law enforcement authorities to deal with or release the freezing decision; the situation is complex and, with the approval of the executive law enforcement authorities, may extend 30 days. Except as otherwise provided by law, legislation and regulations.

The decision to extend the freeze should inform the parties. There is no need to freeze, and the administrative law enforcement authorities should make timely decisions to lift the freeze.

The administrative law enforcement authorities should notify financial institutions and parties in a timely manner of their decision to lift the freeze.

The administrative law enforcement authorities should be removed from the freeze by the date of the closure of the freeze.

Section VIII

Article 63 should be taken in writing by administrative law enforcement decisions, which include, inter alia, the following:

(i) The name, sex, age, residence, name, place of a legal person or other organization, place of residence and statutory representative or of the principal head;

(ii) The laws, regulations and regulations based on administrative law enforcement decisions;

(iii) The main facts and evidence based on administrative law enforcement decisions;

(iv) Concluding observations of administrative law enforcement bodies;

(v) The chapter of the executive law enforcement organs taking administrative law enforcement decisions, as well as the signatory or chapter thereof;

(vi) Date of administrative law enforcement decisions;

(vii) The parties do not have access to and duration of administrative law enforcement decisions;

(viii) Other provisions of laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 64 Administrative law enforcement decisions should explain the reasons. Administrative law enforcement authorities should explain, for reasons, the grounds for determining the facts and the legal basis for applying administrative law enforcement decisions. The main considerations considered in the exercise of discretionary powers should also be noted.

Article 65 of the administrative law enforcement decision has been written, erroneous or otherwise wrong, and is subject to the authority of the decision-making administrative law enforcement body or to the application of the parties.

Section IX

Article 46 has one of the following circumstances and administrative enforcement decisions are null and void:

(i) No subject of statutory executive law enforcement;

(ii) No legal basis;

(iii) Other cases of invalidity provided for in laws, regulations and regulations.

The content of administrative law enforcement decisions has been partially confirmed as null and void, while other parts remain in force, administrative law enforcement decisions cannot be established in the absence of partial dismissal and should be completely invalid.

Unavoidable administrative enforcement decisions have no legal effect.

Article 67 has one of the following cases, and administrative law enforcement decisions should be withdrawn:

(i) Major evidence is insufficient;

(ii) The application of error;

(iii) Violations of statutory procedures, with the exception to be added;

(iv) To go beyond the statutory mandate;

(v) Abuse of authority;

(vi) Other cases under laws, regulations and regulations should be withdrawn.

The content of administrative law enforcement decisions has been partially withdrawn and others remain in force, but, in addition to the partial withdrawal of administrative law enforcement decisions, all should be withdrawn.

When administrative law enforcement decisions have been withdrawn, their withdrawal is traced back to the date of the administrative law enforcement decision; laws, regulations and regulations provide otherwise that their withdrawal may occur on the date of withdrawal.

Administrative law enforcement decisions were cancelled and, if new evidence was found, administrative law enforcement authorities could redirect administrative law enforcement decisions by law.

Section X

Article 68 is calculated at the time, day, month and year. Times and days started during the period are not calculated.

The last day of the expiry of the period was the holiday date of the holiday, which expired on the first day after the holiday.

During the period, mails were not included at the time of the delivery of mails by instrument.

Article 69 is subject to suspension or other due diligence due to the inviolability of the party, and within 10 days of the removal of the obstacles, requests may be made for a period of time, if permitted, to be decided by administrative law enforcement agencies. The extension period was calculated at the time of written authorization.

Section XI

Article 76 must be sent to the law enforcement body to the effect that the instrument must be signed or signed by the recipient or the legitimate signatory and recorded the date of the signing.

The date on which the person was sent to the duty was reached.

Article 76 provides an instrument for the transfer of executive law enforcement agencies, and should generally be sent directly to the beneficiaries.

Those who have been sent are citizens who have difficulty in signing the contract and are allowed by their adult family members.

The person who is a legal person or other organization shall be contracted by the legal representative of a legal person, the principal head of the other organization or the owner of the law and the organization of the person responsible for the receipt.

The transferee has an agent and may be contracted by the agent.

The recipients were appointed by the recipient and were contracted by the distributor.

The date on which the contractor was sent to the date on which it was signed.

Article 72, either by the recipient or other signatory, rejects the instrument by the depositee, which may invite representatives of the grass-roots self-government organization or the recipient's units to attend to the site, explaining that, at the time of the arrival, the denial of the receipt and date shall be considered to be delivered to the person's residence.

Article 73 is directly difficult to send a mail. The mail was delivered to the date of the receipt indicated at the time of return.

The whereabouts of the person who has been sent are unknown or are unable to be delivered by other means set out in this section, may be sent to the notice. 60 days from the date of the issuance of the announcement were considered to be delivered.

Costs

Article 76 quasi-judicial enforcement shall not collect fees to the parties except for the costs incurred by the parties in accordance with the laws, regulations and regulations.

The administrative law enforcement agencies collect fees to the parties and must receive receipts from the financial sector.

Chapter V

Article 75 provides for a simple, statutory basis and a lesser impact on the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, and administrative law enforcement authorities may apply a simple procedure to explode administrative enforcement decisions, as well as the scope of application of the law, legislation and regulations with respect to the simple process.

Article 76 allows administrative law enforcement authorities to communicate orally to the facts, bases and reasons for the administrative law enforcement decisions of the parties and to hear the parties' statements and petitions.

The facts, reasons or evidence presented by the parties should be adopted by the executive law enforcement authorities. There should be no justification.

Article 77 applies to the process of sensitisation, which can take administrative enforcement decisions at the time.

Administrative law enforcement decisions should be made at the time of the executive law enforcement.

Administrative law enforcement decisions can be made in a format.

Implementation

Section I General provisions

Article 78 came into force when administrative law enforcement decisions were sent. Administrative law enforcement decisions that enter into force must be implemented.

The executive law enforcement decision does not apply for administrative review or for administrative proceedings, and administrative law enforcement decisions do not stop implementation, with the exception of laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 79 of the administrative law enforcement decision involves fines, and in addition to the collection of administrative law enforcement officers, the parties shall pay a fine from 15 days from the date of receipt of the administrative law enforcement decision.

Article 810 is one of the following cases where administrative law enforcement officials can collect fines:

(i) The application of a simple procedure to impose a fine of up to 20 dollars or to the extent that it is difficult to implement;

(ii) In remote, water-based and inaccessible areas, the imposition of a fine by administrative law enforcement authorities has been difficult for the parties to pay a fine to the designated bank, which is raised by the parties.

Article 81, when a fine has been collected, administrative law enforcement officials must send a fine collection to the parties for the uniformization of the provincial financial sector. The parties have the right to refuse payment if they do not receive a uniform payment for the provincial financial sector.

Article 82 imposes a fine collected by administrative law enforcement officials at the time of the collection, which shall be sent within 2 days of the date of the collection to the competent administrative law enforcement organs; a fine collected at the water site shall be transferred to the administrative law enforcement organs of which they belong within 2 days of the date of the deposit; and the administrative law enforcement authorities shall pay the financial institutions designated to receive the fine within 2 days.

Article 83 states that the parties have economic difficulties, require the extension or payment of fines, which may be suspended or paid by the parties for approval by the administrative and law enforcement authorities.

The parties are required to apply for the extension or payment of fines, which must be submitted in writing; the administrative law enforcement authorities shall take a decision of approval within 2 days of receipt of the application.

In addition to the items to be destroyed by law, the administrative law enforcement authorities shall make the unlawful property confiscated under the law public auction or be treated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State.

A fine, forfeiture of proceeds of an offence or forfeiture of an unlawful property auction must be fully donated, any administrative law enforcement authority or individual may not be held in private in any form; the financial sector shall not return a fine to the administrative law enforcement organs making administrative enforcement decisions, the proceeds of confiscation or the return of the proceeds of the confiscation of illegal property.

Section II Administrative enforcement

Article 82 provides that the executive law enforcement authorities may enforce if they fail to perform their duties within the prescribed time period, and the executive law enforcement authorities with administrative enforcement powers.

Article 86 should inform the parties of their obligations before administrative enforcement decisions are taken. The following shall be communicated in writing and set out:

(i) The time period for the parties to fulfil their obligations;

(ii) Modalities of enforcement;

(iii) With respect to money payments, there should be a clear amount and the way to pay;

(iv) The rights of the parties under the law.

As a result, the parties implement administrative law enforcement decisions without further enforcement.

Article 87 has the right of the parties to make a presentation and the defence after receiving a reminder. The executive law enforcement authorities must fully listen to the views of the parties, the facts, rationales and the basis for the parties, which should be recorded, reviewed, and the facts, rationales and basis established by the parties, and the executive law enforcement authorities should be adopted.

Article 82 was reminders that the parties were still failing to comply with administrative law enforcement decisions and, without justification, the executive law enforcement authorities could take administrative enforcement decisions. Administrative enforcement decisions should be taken in writing and include the following matters:

(i) The name or name of the party;

(ii) Facts and bases for administrative enforcement;

(iii) Modalities and deadlines for administrative enforcement;

(iv) The right to apply for administrative review or to initiate administrative proceedings;

(v) The name, seal and date of the executive law enforcement body.

Administrative enforcement shall not be carried out at night and statutory holidays. However, as circumstances are urgent or the parties agree.

The executive law enforcement authorities shall not take steps to end water supply, electricity, heating, heating, heating, and fuel to compel the parties to comply with their obligations. The law, legislation and regulations provide otherwise, from their provisions.

Article 90 provides administrative law enforcement decisions to pay obligations under the law, which are overdue by the parties, and administrative law enforcement agencies may be punished by law or lag.

Article 90 provides administrative law enforcement decisions to exclude obligations such as impeding, restoring the status quo by law, the parties have failed to perform, and the executive law enforcement authorities may entrust the other organizations that have no stake.

The following procedures should be followed by:

(i) To send and publicize the performance of the mark, modalities, dates, locations and generations;

(ii) To send a reminder to the parties for their implementation by three days of the date of their performance; the parties are automatically carrying out; and to stop their performance;

(iii) In the performance of generations, the executive law enforcement organs that decide shall be assigned to the field supervision;

(iv) In the end of the day, the executive law enforcement, the holder, the party or witness shall sign the instrument.

The cost to be performed by the parties. Except as otherwise provided by law, legislation and regulations.

In accordance with article 92, mandatory demolitions are required for the construction of infractions, the construction of facilities in conflict with the law, the markings established by the law, and shall be subject to the following procedures:

(i) To inform the parties by the executive law enforcement authorities of the removal of the parties' deadlines;

(ii) The parties have no capacity to dismantle, and the executive law enforcement authorities can commission the execution of other organizations without prejudice;

(iii) The late refusal of the parties to dismantle, and the enforcement of the People's Court by the executive branch, in addition to the provisions of the law.

Article 93, within 30 days of the end of administrative law enforcement, the executive law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials should make the relevant material generated in the course of the implementation of administrative law enforcement, in accordance with the provisions of the Archives of the Administrative Law Enforcement Instrument in the Province of Extension.

Chapter VII

Article 94