(Act No. 218 of the People's Government Order No. 218 of 4 January 2011)

Chapter I General

Article 1 raises the level of administration in accordance with the provisions of the State Department's Bulletin on the issuance of a comprehensive framework for the implementation of the law (No. [2004]10), the State of State's decision to strengthen the administration of the municipality in accordance with the law (Statement No. [2008]17) and the State Department's observations on strengthening the building of the rule of law government (issuing State [2010]33)) in the light of the actual provisions of my province, to develop this approach.

Article 2

Article 3. This approach refers to activities undertaken by the archaeological, evaluation, etc. by the archaeological body to follow up on the work of the archaeological and provincial governments in the implementation of the relevant provisions of the law.

Article IV is governed by the principle of fair public, public participation, unity of organization and sub-level responsibility.

Article 5 incorporates into the Government's performance appraisal system, conducts a separate study and results as an important component of the Government's performance assessment.

Chapter II

Article 6

The rule of law sector of the people at the district level is specifically responsible for the implementation of the organization under the law.

Sectors such as development reform, inspection, finance, human resources and social security, preparation, audit and correspondence are in line with their respective functions.

Article 7. The Government of the Provincial People is responsible for conducting a review of the administrative status of its respective departments and municipalities (States), and of the Supreme Council.

The Government of the city (the State), the Presidential Commission are responsible for the conduct of a review of the Government's administration in accordance with the law of its respective departments and districts (markets, areas).

The People's Government of the District (communes, districts) is responsible for carrying out a review of its respective departments and communes, and the Government of the town.

The following vertical and dual management sectors in the province are being carried out by the local people's governments and are fully consulted by their superior authorities, and the results are reproduced to their superior authorities.

Article 8

(i) The preparation of the annual administrative appraisal programme under the law;

(ii) Specific implementation of the legislative executive review;

(iii) Submission of views to be dealt with in accordance with the results of the administrative examination;

(iv) To communicate the results of the administrative examination under the law;

(v) To promote the rehabilitation of the problems identified in the legal administrative examination;

(vi) Guidance and supervision of the lower-level Government's rule of law sector, in accordance with the legislative administrative conduct.

Chapter III

Article 9

(i) To carry out its duties in accordance with the law;

(ii) Scientific democratic decision-making;

(iii) Enhanced system-building;

(iv) Managing administrative law enforcement;

(v) Enhance administrative oversight;

(vi) Preventing social contradictions;

(vii) Implementation of legal administrative safeguards.

Article 10 Basic requirements for the performance of duties under the law:

(i) The establishment of normative institutions, the strengthening of the management of institutions, the rational definition of the functions and competencies of government departments and the effective coordination of functional disputes in the respective sectors;

(ii) The promotion of separation, political separation, political separation, separation from government and market intermediary organizations, and the full realization of the basic role of markets in resource allocation;

(iii) Establish effective communication and good interaction mechanisms between government administration and popular self-government at the grass-roots level to strengthen the development, regulation and management of social organizations;

(iv) Establish early warning and emergency response mechanisms that address all types of emergencies and maintain a normal social order;

(v) Improve the public financial system, pooling payments, government procurement and sectoral integrated budget systems, strengthening budget management and oversight, strengthening government non-levant income management and regulating government procurement practices;

(vi) deepen administrative approval system reform, reduce administrative approval projects, innovative administrative approaches and improve administrative efficiency;

(vii) Establish a public information system for the sound government, make public information publicly available, implement public responsibility for public information and facilitate access to government information;

(viii) Public transparency as a basic system for the work of the Government, and all social service-oriented government departments are fully informed of relevant information on the project, in accordance with the law, conditions, requirements, processes and results;

(ix) Strengthening e-government, expanding the Government's online office and achieving intersectoral information interconnection and resource sharing.

Article 11. Basic requirements for scientific democratic decision-making:

(i) Enhance administrative decision-making processes and sound administrative decision-making rules;

(ii) The establishment of systems such as public participation in major administrative decisions, expert opinions, risk assessment, review of legitimacy, collective discussion decisions, and as a mandatory process for major administrative decisions;

(iii) Establish a system of follow-up feedback and post-implementation evaluation of major administrative decision-making, to detect and correct problems in administrative decision-making and to reduce the loss of decision-making;

(iv) Establish a system for sound response to emergencies;

(v) Establish a system of accountability for sound administrative decision-making and harmonization of decision-making and decision-making responsibilities.

Article 12

(i) The organization of drafting or developing government regulations and normative documents should be in conformity with the provisions of the law and strictly comply with the statutory competence and procedures;

(ii) Focus on strengthening legislation on the improvement of economic institutions, the improvement of the cause of civil life and development and the Government's own building;

(iii) Establish a system for the sound development of government regulations, public participation in normative documents, expert advice, review of the rule of law sector, collective discussion decisions, hearings and follow-up notes, and publication;

(iv) The establishment of government regulations, normative documentation systems for cost-benefit analysis;

(v) Establish and improve government regulations, normative amendments, abolition of work systems and effective periods, regular clearance, regular assessment systems, and regulations are cleared every five years, and normative documents are cleared every two years, and the results of the clean-up are to be made available to society;

(vi) In line with other requirements established by the legal administrative system.

Article 13 Basic requirements for regulating administrative law enforcement:

(i) The strict exercise of authority and duties by executive organs at all levels, in accordance with the statutory authority and procedures;

(ii) Reform of the administrative law enforcement system, in accordance with the programmes approved by the provincial Government and the requirement to fully implement and regulate the relatively centralization of administrative penalties, actively promote integrated administrative law enforcement pilots, establish a mechanism for sound administrative law enforcement disputes, and address, at the source, a wide range of law enforcement, repetitive enforcement, law enforcement and enforcement gaps;

(iii) Improve mechanisms for administrative law enforcement and the uniformity of requirements for executive law enforcement in the financial budget;

(iv) In accordance with the legal regulations, changes, circumstances of invalidity and the administrative law enforcement basis, clear law enforcement functions, institutions, jobs, personnel and responsibilities, and publicize them to society;

(v) Strengthening the development of the administrative law enforcement force and strict enforcement of the evidence induction and eligibility management system for law enforcement officials;

(vi) To carry out administrative law enforcement responsibilities under the law and to ensure due process, accuracy and discretion, and to effectively address issues related to arbitrary law enforcement, policy-making, law enforcement and law-enforcement;

(vii) A sound administrative law enforcement file, a review system, which conducts at least one administrative law enforcement review by all levels of government and administrative law enforcement;

(viii) The introduction of an administrative law enforcement system, the law enforcement body, the law enforcement basis, the terms of reference, the content of the law enforcement, the criteria for the determination, procedural steps, specific time frames, the methods of monitoring, etc. should take effective forms of social disclosure;

(ix) Full implementation of the administrative law enforcement accountability system and the establishment and implementation of the relevant accompanying system, such as the administrative law enforcement review examination and accountability;

(x) The establishment of a benchmarking system for administrative discretion, the rationalization of science, the quantification of administrative discretion and strict regulation of the exercise of discretion.

Article 14. Basic requirements for enhanced administrative oversight:

(i) Self-response oversight, reporting on its work, receiving inquiries, making it mandatory to report to the Commission on the Status of Human Beings on the basis of the rules and regulations, and seriously address the recommendations of the representative;

(ii) Be vigilant in accepting the democratic oversight of the PDR, by taking the initiative of listening to ideas and proposals and by carefully negotiating proposals;

(iii) Be vigilant with regard to the judicial recommendations of the People's Court of Justice, in response to the fact that the administrative proceedings before the People's Court are actively brought before the courts, and that the people's courts have taken into account the decisions and decisions taken by law;

(iv) Enhance regulatory and normative documentation desk review, establish a system for the registration, publication, briefing and monitoring of normative documents, and strengthen the development of information on the work of the desk;

(v) A careful follow-up to the National Compensation Act, which is well-developed and rigorously enforced by administrative compensation and administrative compensation systems;

(vi) Establish a robust and regular system of oversight to strengthen oversight of the subordinate executive bodies;

(vii) To support and cooperate with oversight bodies, such as inspection, auditing, to carry out their work independently, in accordance with the law, and to monitor decisions by oversight bodies;

(viii) Improve the system of mass reporting of complaints and the mechanisms for the investigation, verification and timely processing of issues reflected in the mass media;

(ix) Strict administrative accountability, strict enforcement of administrative inspection laws, civil service laws, regulations on the disposition of civil servants by executive organs and provisional provisions on the enforcement of party-led accountability, and the need for accountability.

Article 15. Basic requirements to prevent social contradictions:

(i) Establish a system of mediation of disputes in a sound society, which defines the scope of mediation;

(ii) The establishment of an administrative mediation system that is the subject of the overall responsibility of the people at the local level, the leadership of the Government's rule of law and the functional sectors;

(iii) To regulate and improve administrative decisions and administrative conciliation procedures, and to address social disputes promptly and low-costly;

(iv) Seriously follow up on the Administrative Review Act and its implementing regulations, and receive, impartially, administrative review cases, and seriously correct violations and inappropriate administrative acts;

(v) A sound administrative review body that would enhance administrative reviewers and ensure that administrative review cases are dealt with by more than two persons by law;

(vi) Access to administrative review requests, simplification of requests and facilitation of their application;

(vii) Improve the people's mediation system and actively support the popular mediation efforts of grass-roots organizations;

(viii) Improve the mechanisms for the interface between administrative review and correspondence visits to lead parties to resolve conflicts through legal means.

Article 16 implements basic requirements for the advancement of legal administrative safeguards.

(i) To use the law as a basic norm for the functioning of the Government, in all its aspects and components;

(ii) All levels of people and government departments are required to establish a legal executive leadership coordination mechanism, led by the main heads, and to harmonize leadership in the region and the sector to advance the legal administration;

(iii) The establishment of a robust leadership and oversight mechanism to implement the system of executive heads as the first responsible person for advancing the law;

(iv) The establishment of a system of reporting on the administration of justice, with at least two reports of the regular meetings of the communes of the communes of the communes of the communes and the Government of the people at the district level on an annual basis to report on the advancement of the administration of justice in accordance with the law, and the annual report of the Government to the current people and the relevant sectors of the people at the grass-roots level on the promotion of the administration of the law;

(v) The development and implementation of the legal administrative planning and annual plan to implement the annual reporting system, the statistical analysis system and monitoring inspections, the appraisal system;

(vi) Improve mechanisms for the advancement of financial security in accordance with the law, which are guaranteed in the financial budget;

(vii) To strengthen the Government's rule of law sector and sectoral rule of law institutions that are responsive to the tasks of work;

(viii) To focus on the role of staff officers and legal advisers in the rule of law of the Government, the rule of law bodies in the administration of justice, to participate in major decisions in the administration, to support and promote the Government's rule of law sector, sectoral rule of law institutions in the discharge of their duties and duties in the administration of law;

(ix) Introduce a legal administrative assessment and legal knowledge test system, which is proposed to serve as a leader of the local people's Government and its departments to conduct pre-positions of the relevant legal knowledge and the administration of the law, and civil service examinations will focus on the testing of legal knowledge, and to organize specialized legal knowledge examinations for those who are to be involved in the administration of justice, the rule of law, etc.;

(x) The establishment of a system of excellence in science, organized through pre-school law, rule of law lectures, etc. of the Standing Committee of the Government, to study constitutions, common legal knowledge and specialized legal knowledge relating to the performance of their duties, and at least two sessions of the Government of the people at all levels of the district are to be held in accordance with the law administration at least two times a year;

(xi) The establishment of a system of excellence in the staff of the executive branch, a civil service training course organized by various administrative colleges and civil service training institutions to incorporate legal administrative knowledge into the teaching content, to organize regular administrative law enforcement officials to participate in the training of general legal knowledge, specialist legal knowledge rounds and thematic training of new legal legislation, and to make training and learning achievements one of the basis for promotion;

(xii) Strengthen the awareness of the law and the rule of law, and create a rule of law environment for all social compliance with the law and the right to justice.

Article 17 shall, in accordance with the considerations and requirements established by this approach, develop specific appraisal programmes in the light of the actual, focus of local administrative work under the law, and report back-to-level vouchers.

Chapter IV

Article 18 is carried out in accordance with the annual executive review and is carried out on an annual basis.

Article 19 upholds the principle of the integration of a full-fledged examination with a focus examination, the integration of an in-house and external review, the written review and the field examination.

The internal archaeological examination is carried out primarily by verification of the annual report of the law administration, collection, statistics, verification of relevant data and information, and organization of specific inspections and inspections.

The external review took the main part of the organization questionnaire survey, civil assessment, expert review, interviews, networking surveys and the views of social monitors.

Article 20 shall establish mechanisms for the sharing of information resources for all types of archaeological purposes, and the results of specialized inspections and social reviews carried out by relevant departments or social groups, organizations dealing with matters of administrative conduct under the law, which can be used directly as a reference basis for the conduct of the administrative examination, and generally no repetitive examination.

Article 21

(i) Develop programmes. The archaeological organs have established the annual administrative appraisal programme under the law, specifying the criteria for the object, content, manner and evaluation, and are issued every first quarter.

(ii) Data collection. All data, information and a summary of the data, information collected and statistically collected by the archaeological bodies are governed by the law.

(iii) Organization verification. The archaeological body reviews the legal annual reports and information sent and conducts field inspections on the basis of actual needs.

(iv) Review. Other bodies, such as the archaeological organization or the commissioning of social professional institutions, are reviewed.

(v) Identification of results. Based on the collection of information, self-assessment, organization verification, and review, the archaeological assessment has been developed to determine the results.

In accordance with article 22, the archaeological object is ready to accept the examination by:

(i) Self-assessment. The object of the study shall be carefully self-assessment in accordance with the annual administrative appraisal programme under the law.

(ii) Reports. The objective of the study is to form an annual report of the executive branch, based on self-assessment, to be submitted to the archaeological bodies.

Article 23, which is governed by law, is divided into excellent, good, better, and less than four, depending on the scores of assessed contributions.

Article 24 consists of one of the following cases, which are divided in the administrative examination of the law:

(i) The performance of the administrative work under the law has been highlighted and has been rewarded by the State Department, relevant ministries or provincial governments;

(ii) In accordance with the law, administrative work is reported by the central media or by the main provincial media as an advanced feature;

(iii) Other cases determined by the archaeological body by law.

Subregion is the same matter and is not cumulative.

Article 25.

(i) Administrative decision-making is serious or unlawful, causing significant losses or severe impacts;

(ii) Inadequate and proper discharge of statutory responsibilities, resulting in resource development, environmental pollution and public safety accidents, causing significant loss or adverse effects;

(iii) Abuse of authority, imposition of a breach of an administrative act or omission, triggering civil disputes or other major events;

(iv) The criminal disposition of civil disputes, sudden-onset incidents, resulting in a deterioration of the situation and the adverse effects;

(v) Other unlawful administrative acts that result in the interests of the State, the life of the people, the significant loss of public property or the adverse effects of such property;

(vi) Resistance in the administration of justice;

(vii) Other cases determined by the archaeological body by law.

Article 26 shall be preceded by an indication within a certain scope that the archaeological object has objected to the results of the examination and may submit a written complaint to the archaeological body within the notice period. The archaeological body shall conduct a review within 10 working days of the receipt of the complaint and respond to it.

Chapter V Use of the results of the examination

Article 27 of the law shall be communicated within the executive branch and shall be made available to society in due course.

The results of the legislative executive review shall be presented to the same party and the Commission and the Government of the people at the highest level.

Article 28 provides that the results of the examination are three years or more, and serve as the basis for provincial governments to recognize the advanced administrative units of the law. The results of the study were poor, criticized and responsible for the submission of written restatement reports, which were revised for a period of time.

Article 29 of the archaeological objective is less than two years of study, which is not recognized in the province or recommended by the State and the relevant ministries before failure to meet the legal administrative examination or better.

Article 33 found serious violations of the administration and held accountable for the administrative organs and their staff in accordance with the relevant provisions.

Annex VI

Article 31 of this approach is implemented effective 1 February 2011.