(Summit No. 121 of 24 December 2010 of the Government of the People of the House of Commons to consider the publication, effective 1 March 2011, of Decree No. 141 of 31 December 2010, of the People's Government Order No. 141 of 31 December 2010)

Chapter I General

Article 1, in order to effectively enhance the management of normative documents of the executive organs of the city, to promote the administration of the law, to preserve the unity of the rule of law, to develop this approach in the light of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 2

(i) All levels of the people's Government, as well as the documents issued on behalf of the Government's Executive Office (rooms);

(ii) The Government of the city, the people of the region approves the documents issued in the name of the Government's work sector, the immediate agency, the office and other bodies exercising administrative functions in accordance with the law (hereinafter referred to as the Government);

(iii) Documents issued by municipal, district government departments;

(iv) Documents issued by the authorities of the municipalities and territories;

(v) Documents issued by organizations authorized by law, legislation and regulations that manage the functions of public affairs.

Article 3

(i) Orders, decisions, briefings, etc. that recognize and award punishment;

(ii) Notice of personnel;

(iii) Request, report to the superior administrative body;

(iv) Transmission of higher-level documents without increasing notice of the content of the rights obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations;

(v) Notices, notices, notifications and administrative decisions on specific matters;

(vi) Summary of the proceedings of the meeting;

(vii) Internal working systems, regulatory systems and technical operational norms (trads);

(viii) A phase-specific rehabilitation programme, programme of work, implementation programmes, emergency prestigation and notification of annual inspections, registration, declaration, exhibition, evaluation;

(ix) Other documents that do not involve the rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations or are not universally binding.

Article IV should enhance the management and oversight of normative documents.

The municipalities, the rule of law institutions of the district government, under the leadership of the people's Government, are specifically responsible for the implementation of this approach.

Article 5 has one of the following cases, and normative documents can be developed:

(i) The relevant laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents have not yet been specified for administrative work in a particular area;

(ii) The relevant laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents do not provide for specific and operational administrative work in a particular area;

(iii) Relevant laws, regulations, regulations and superior authorities authorize the development of relevant normative documents.

Article 6. The executive body may develop normative documents consistent with the pilot policy of economic zones in the West Bank, in accordance with the relevant mandates and provisions of the State, Fford Province.

Article 7

(i) Be consistent with laws, regulations, regulations and regulations that cannot be intertwined;

(ii) In accordance with the legislative authority of this organ, no longer exceeds the statutory competence;

(iii) No legal, regulatory, regulatory and regulatory basis shall be established for this organ and additional obligations, limitations on the rights of citizens, legal persons and other organizations;

(iv) No administrative licence, administrative penalties, administrative enforcement, administrative treasury and administrative expenses shall be granted and no other matters shall be established by law, regulations, regulations;

(v) In line with the actual, reasonable and appropriate nature of the socio-economic development of the city, there must be no impartiality and equity;

(vi) In line with the statutory procedures requirements.

Article 8 Nor shall normative documents provide for retroactivity, except in order to better protect the rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations.

Chapter II Drafting and review

Article 9. The executive body prepares normative documents that should conduct research on the need and feasibility of normative documents, the issues to be addressed, the key systems to be established or the main measures to be set, and should take a wide range of views. In relation to the responsibilities of other administrative organs or in close collaboration with other administrative bodies, the competent organ should be fully consulted.

The normative documents drafted relate directly to the significant interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations or have a significant impact on the development of the region, the industry, should be made public and consulted by all sectors of society; legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions must hold hearings and should be held.

Article 10 The drafting of normative documents should be in line with the following norms:

(i) In accordance with the format and procedures for the processing of correspondence by the executive branch;

(ii) The name shall normally be provided for, inter alia, by means, rules, decisions, resolutions, observations, orders, notices, notices, proclamations, etc., without the use of the law, regulations and the law, legislation and regulations providing for the prohibition of use;

(iii) The content may be made in the form of the provision or in the form of the paragraph;

(iv) The content should be logical and the terms should be regulated, accurate, concise and should be correctly regulated and regulated by the use of words and symbols.

Article 11. Normative documents are interpreted by their mandated departments and are not explicitly explained by the designating body.

Article 12. The executive body should establish a system for the harmonization of normative documents, and normative documents should be reviewed by the body of rule of law that should be referred to it prior to publication.

The drafting branch of the Government's normative documents should submit the text of normative documents together with the drafting of notes and the development of the basis for the review of the current Government rule of law bodies.

The Government's normative documents, which have not been reviewed by the Government's rule of law bodies, are not submitted to the Government's Standing Conference or to the Mayor (Chief of the Region) office study.

In reviewing the Government's normative documentation, the Government's rule of law bodies may hold colloquiums, legal persons and other organizations on matters relating to the rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations involved in the draft normative document, to be heard, to review the revisions made to the present people's government for review.

Article 15 establishes normative documents for municipal government offices, which shall be referred to in the first instance by their rule of law institutions and shall be sent to the municipal rule of law institutions prior to publication:

(i) To send a letter to the Government's body for review;

(ii) The normative document to be developed (to be delivered);

(iii) A description of normative documents. Notes should include the need and feasibility for the development of normative documents; the names, provisions of the laws, regulations, regulations and normative documents cited; the main feedback from the solicitation bodies and administrative counterparts and the notes on priority provisions;

(iv) Legislation, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents based on normative documents;

(v) The municipal rule of law body considers other material to be submitted.

The normative documents developed jointly by two or more sectors are to be delivered by the host sector.

Article 16 provides for the normative documents of the municipal government authorities, and the municipal rule of law institutions shall be reviewed in accordance with Article 7 of this scheme within 15 days of the date of receipt of the normative documents of the municipal government authorities, and shall be dealt with as follows:

(i) In line with the relevant legal, regulatory, regulatory and present methods, the written review observations adopted;

(ii) While there is no apparent contradiction with laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, the content is apparently inappropriate or more controversial in the relevant sectors and the written review of the revisions made;

(iii) Incompatible with the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations, regulations and methods, the written review of views that are not adopted or are not reviewed and the reasons for refunding to the development body.

Nor can the review be completed within the period specified above, with the approval of the heads of the rule of law institutions of the municipality, by extension of the period of review and by written notification of the duration of the review and its reasons.

In emergencies, the municipal rule of law institutions should review and provide a review of the normative documents that are delivered.

The written review by the municipal rule of law body should be accompanied by a dedicated chapter for the review of normative documents.

In reviewing the normative documents of the sector, municipal rule of law institutions need to seek advice from other executive organs, and the relevant executive organs shall make observations within the prescribed time frame; and there is a need for additional clarifications by the organ and the designating body should provide clarification within the time frame.

The time required for the preceding paragraph shall not be taken into account for the duration of the review.

Article 19

Article 20 Structural normative documents are not valid.

Article 21 requires the immediate development of the normative documents of the Government, which are approved by the main heads of the design organs, to issue implementation and, within 5 days of the publication of the document, to take into account the relevant provisions of chapter IV of this approach.

Article 2 Government of the people of the region may, in accordance with the circumstances, require normative documentation developed by the competent working sector to carry out a review of legitimacy before the publication of the territorial Government's rule of law institutions.

Chapter III Decisions and publication

The content of Article 23 of the Government's normative documents has a significant impact on society and should be considered by the Government's Standing Conference or by the Mayor (Chief of Zone).

The normative documents of the Government shall be determined by a collective research decision of the Bureau of Sectoral Affairs or other means.

Article 24 Produces the normative documents of the Government and shall be issued by the head of the Government, subject to the signing of observations by the principal organs of the Government's rule of law.

The publication of normative documents of the Government shall be issued by the heads of departments, with the signing of observations by the body responsible for the rule of law.

The normative documents of the municipal authorities should be sent within 15 days of the publication to the municipal rule of law institutions three formal and electronic texts of normative documents.

Article 25 Normative documents should be made public by the designating body to the society, with the exception of State secrets. Nor does the normative documents issued to the public of the society, as prescribed, be not binding on the management relative and must not serve as the basis for the administration.

The proceedings of the executive branch, the Provisional Institutions and the institutions in place shall not be developed and published in the name of the normative document and the development and issuance of normative documents are invalid.

Article 26 The manner in which normative documents are issued should be accessible to citizens, legal persons or other organizations. The normative documents of the municipal government should be published and published on the House of Commons' Government Bulletin and on the website of the People's Government of the House; the normative documents of the municipal government and district governments are published by the municipal authorities in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Government of the city, in accordance with the Communiqué of the People's Government and the House's Government website.

The development organs of normative documents should issue normative documents, such as newspapers, television, radio, bulletins, websites.

Article 27 normative documents should specify the date of implementation.

Normative documents should be carried out after 30 days of the date of publication, but without delay the issuance of normative documents that may impede the implementation of normative documents or the guarantee of national security, major public interest and other special needs may be carried out from the date of publication.

Article twenty-eighth normative documents should indicate the period of effectiveness, which is generally not more than five years from the date of the implementation of the document, and the period of effectiveness of the provisional (a pilot) category of documents does not exceed 2 years. Effective expiry and normative documents have no effect.

Nor does it indicate the normative documents for the period in force, with the maximum duration of the application of the former paragraph document.

Normative documents that need to be continued at an effective time should be evaluated by the designating body and reissued in accordance with the relevant procedures.

Chapter IV Status and oversight

The normative document developed by the executive body should be submitted in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations, regulations, and regulations, in addition to the pre-reviewed review under chapter II of this approach.

Article 33 should be sent to the city, the Government of the District to submit a normative document, and the executive body should perform the corresponding request procedure within 15 days of the issuance of normative documents. The municipal, district government rule of law bodies are specifically responsible for reviewing the normative documents of the filing.

The following materials should be made available at the time of the submission:

(i) Reports;

(ii) Formal text of normative documents (one three) and electronic texts;

(iii) Drafting notes;

(iv) Developing a basis;

(v) The municipal, district government rule of law bodies consider other submissions to be submitted.

The previous paragraph should include the name of the normative document, the date of entry into force and the form of publication.

Article 31, the rule of law institutions of the municipality and the territorial Government shall review the normative documents of the submission, decide not to be inadmissible and communicated in writing to the design body, in accordance with article II of the present approach, but, in accordance with article 33 of the present approach, other relevant material that should be submitted should not be backed up, not regulated, may affect the normal conduct of the work of the reserve, shall be notified in writing of the completion of the institution's deadline and the establishment of an organ that is not justified by the late submission of the document.

In accordance with article 7 of the present methodology, the municipal, territorial Government's rule of law bodies review the normative documents for the filing of the submission and find that the content is contrary or clearly inappropriate and should inform the development body to cease implementation, amend or repeal it in a timely manner or to bring the changes or withdrawal of the Government of the people at this level.

Article 33 shall be communicated by the executive organ to the governing body by 31 January of each year to the governing body for the presentation of the directory of normative documents developed by this organ during the previous year.

The authorities of the city, the district government shall report to the Government of the people at this level, in writing, by 31 January, on the review of the previous annual normative document.

Article 34 should compile regular normative documents issued.

Article XV shall assess and clean up normative documents every two years and be based on changing circumstances, as well as laws, regulations, regulations and State. The family approach, the policy adjustments, the timely revision or repeal of the published normative documents, and the release of the results to society.

The procedures for the revision of normative documents by the executive body are implemented in the light of the relevant provisions of this approach.

Article 36 Governments at all levels should organize regular inspections of the implementation of this approach.

The Government's rule of law institutions should monitor the development and management of normative documents of the Government at this level and the normative documents of the Government. At the time of the inspection, the normative document development body should be synergistic and should request relevant information, such as the directory and the text of the document.

Article 37 review of normative documents should be assessed as a component of the performance assessment of the Government and its sectors, with a certain score.

Article 338 citizens, legal persons and other organizations consider that normative documents developed by the executive organs violate the provisions of article 7 of this approach by submitting requests for review to the Government's rule of law bodies through, inter alia, content, mail and e-mail.

The contents of the review request should include the name or name of the applicant, the manner of contact, the name of the normative document for the review, the issuance of the text and the application for review matters, reasons, etc.

Article 39, which falls within the scope of the review, should inform the applicant of the outcome of the review process within 30 days of the date of receipt of the request for review; the situation is complex and, with the approval of the executive heads of the municipal and district authorities for the appropriate extension of the review period, the review period shall not exceed 45 days. Upon review, normative documents are in violation of article 7 of this approach and are dealt with in accordance with the provisions of article 32 of this approach.

Without the scope of the review, the authorities of the municipalities and territories should inform the applicant to the competent organ within 5 days of the date of receipt of the review request.

Article 40 establishes or submits normative documents in violation of this approach, which are brought to the attention of the Government of the Republic, the rule of law institutions of the State, to the extent that the period of time has been changed; the circumstances are serious and have negative consequences, or, as a result of the implementation of invalid normative documents that undermines the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, municipal, district government rule of law institutions may bring to the attention of the authorities the executive branch to the effectiveness of the responsible and other direct responsibilities.

Chapter V

Article 40. This approach is interpreted by the municipal authorities' rule of law institutions.

Article 42 The announcement by the Government of the House of Commons concerning the management of normative documentation by the executive branch of the House (No.