(Adopted at the 44th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Turkmen people, held on 31 December 2010, by Decree No. 77 of 16 January 2011, published as from 1 February 2011)

Chapter I General

In order to prevent and redress violations or inappropriate administrative law enforcement, the executive organs are guaranteed and supervised by law, the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, and, in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations, in the context of my city's practice.

Article II defines administrative law enforcement oversight as a reference to activities carried out under the law of law or inappropriate administrative law enforcement by the executive branch of the executive branch at the lower executive level, the municipal, district and territorial Government, and its executive law enforcement agencies.

Article 3 applies to administrative law enforcement oversight activities within the city administration.

The administrative law enforcement oversight activities of administrative law enforcement agencies that implement vertical management and dual management are applicable.

The laws, regulations and regulations, such as administrative review, administrative inspection, have been provided for in their provisions.

Article IV: Organization, coordination and monitoring of administrative law enforcement oversight in the present administration area is the rule of law sector in the municipalities, district governments.

The rule of law institutions of the executive branch are responsible for the supervision of administrative law enforcement in this body and the system.

Article 5 implements administrative law enforcement oversight and should conduct a comprehensive oversight of administrative law enforcement by administrative law enforcement authorities and their administrative licences, administrative sanctions, administrative recognition, administrative charges, administrative enforcement, administrative payments and administrative decisions.

Article 6 implements administrative law enforcement oversight and should be guided by legitimate, impartial and public principles, uphold the principles of integrity, inviolability, guarantee the proper implementation of laws, regulations and regulations and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 7. Civil, legal or other organizations have the right to prosecute, prosecute and lodge complaints of offences committed by administrative law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials, and the authorities shall be promptly seized and processed.

Chapter II Administrative law enforcement

Article 8. Administrative law enforcement should be implemented by the same-level government-recognized and published institutions with the qualifications of executive law subjects.

Article 9. The executive law enforcement authority shall exercise administrative law enforcement authority within its statutory mandate.

Article 10 Laws, regulations authorize organizations competent to administer the functions of public affairs and shall exercise administrative law enforcement within the statutory purview.

Article 11. The executive body may entrust, within its statutory responsibilities and competence, administrative law enforcement by an organization that complies with the statutory conditions, in accordance with the provisions of the laws, regulations and regulations.

The organs should be entrusted with monitoring the administrative law enforcement acts carried out by the commissioning organization and assume legal responsibility for the consequences of the act.

The commissioning organization, within its mandate, carries out administrative law enforcement in the name of the organ entrusted, shall not be entrusted to other organizations or individuals for administrative law enforcement.

Article 12 The commission shall contain the following matters:

(i) The name, address of the organ entrusted and the designated organization;

(ii) The law enforcement basis of the organs entrusted;

(iii) The law enforcement matters and competence entrusted;

(iv) Other matters to be addressed.

The letter of commission shall be signed by the legal representative of the parties and shall be added to the chapter.

Article 13. The executive branch should be entrusted with law enforcement and should inform society and report on the Government's rule of law sector.

Article 14. The competent organization shall carry out administrative law enforcement acts in accordance with the law within the terms of its duties and competence, and shall be null and void without notice or by administrative law enforcement that goes beyond the scope of the notice.

Article 15. Administrative law enforcement agencies should develop processes that are clear and require specific administrative enforcement procedures, in accordance with the provisions of laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 16 should establish an administrative law enforcement registry system. Registration of administrative law enforcement officials, law enforcement time, place, subject to inspection, law enforcement, etc.

Administrative law enforcement should be open. In addition to national secrets, commercial secrets and personal privacy, administrative law enforcement agencies should make public law enforcement content, law enforcement, law enforcement procedures and enforcement results.

Article 18 Administrative law enforcement has introduced the evidence-based induction system. Effective administrative law enforcement documents should be presented when administrative law enforcement officials perform their duties.

No administrative law enforcement activity shall be carried out without access to administrative law enforcement documents.

The use of administrative law enforcement certificates issued by the Department of State in accordance with the provisions of the law, administrative regulations should be made available by the certifying authority to the rule of law of the Government at this level and made public. The law is used in this administrative area; no case may be used as lawful and effective administrative law enforcement documents.

Article 19 The executive law enforcement body should establish systems such as the qualifications of the executive law enforcement subject, complaints, avoidance, hearing, punishment, vetting, vetting, major administrative sanctions decisions, vetting, accountability, supervision and full-time rule of lawmakers.

Article 20, either two or more administrative law enforcement agencies, are of the opinion that the organ has or does not have a statutory responsibility for management, competence. It should be determined by the same Government's rule of law. The Government's rule of law sector will be implemented by the relevant authorities after the approval of the same-ranking people's Government.

Chapter III Administrative law enforcement oversight

Article 21, the Government's rule of law sector and administrative law enforcement agencies should enhance oversight of administrative law enforcement.

Section 2 of administrative law enforcement oversight includes:

(i) The legality of the qualifications of the subject matter of administrative law enforcement;

(ii) Is there sufficient administrative law enforcement basis;

(iii) Whether specific administrative acts are lawful and appropriate;

(iv) The establishment and implementation of systems such as administrative law enforcement registration, avoidance, hearing, punishment, vetting, major administrative penalties decision-making, review of the examination, accountability, complaints, oversight;

(v) A breakdown, publication and implementation of the provisions of the legal, regulatory and regulatory levels;

(vi) Implementation of statutory responsibilities;

(vii) Other cases under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 23 provides for the implementation of administrative law enforcement oversight by:

(i) Hearing administrative law enforcement reports;

(ii) On-site supervision, screening or concealment of administrative law enforcement;

(iii) Inspection and organizational review of administrative law enforcement volumes;

(iv) Investigation of administrative law enforcement complaints and reporting cases;

(v) Accelerating and reciprocating administrative law enforcement files to visit the relatively person;

(vi) A review of major administrative penalties decisions;

(vii) A review of the implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities;

(viii) Other modalities provided for by law, regulations and regulations.

Article 24 states that citizens, legal persons or other organizations are of the opinion that specific administrative acts committed by executive organs are incompatible or inappropriate, and that complaints should be submitted to the competent governmental rule of law or administrative law enforcement authorities. Citizens have difficulty in submitting complaints, which may be verbally or otherwise filed.

Article 25 The Government's rule of law or administrative law enforcement authorities should be admissible for complaints that fall under the jurisdiction of this body, and the transfer of competent organs within 5 days and to inform the complainant.

The Government's rule of law sector should conduct an annual comprehensive review of administrative law enforcement. Prior to the inspection, inspection programmes should be developed to determine the purpose, content, methodological steps and requirements of inspections and to inform the inspection units.

Article 27, when administrative law enforcement monitors carry out administrative enforcement supervision inspections, should present administrative law enforcement oversight documents issued by the Government of the city.

In the context of administrative law enforcement supervision inspections and investigations, the relevant administrative law enforcement officers may be asked to visit the relative, witness, access to documents, information and case files related to the oversight content, and audio recording and video of administrative law enforcement.

Article 29 of the Government's rule of law sector should be synchronized by the executive law enforcement agencies and their law enforcement personnel when monitoring inspections.

Administrative law enforcement oversight observations should be developed after the inspection is monitored. The Government's rule of law sector should send administrative law enforcement oversight updates to the supervisory units.

Administrative law enforcement corrections notices should contain issues in administrative law enforcement, changes in opinions, and relocation deadlines. The supervisory units should be restructured in accordance with the requirements of the recommitation and write out the report.

The Government's rule of law sector should review the rehabilitation of the supervisory units.

Article 31 of the Government's rule of law sector should be informed of administrative law enforcement oversight inspections and report to the same-level Government on the oversight of the findings as an important basis for the conduct of an administrative examination in accordance with the law.

Chapter IV

Article 32 provides incentives for units and individuals that have made significant achievements in administrative law enforcement and administrative law enforcement oversight.

In one of the following cases, the Government's rule of law responsible for the cessation of administrative law enforcement activities:

(i) No functionality of executive law enforcement;

(ii) The law enforcement organization is entrusted with having not been provided in accordance with the provisions or has not been made public;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement committed by the commissioning organization goes beyond the scope of responsibility and competence;

(iv) Authorization for the duration of law enforcement has expired and has not been signed.

In one of the following cases, the Government's rule of law sector responsible for the period of time being changed; the late denial of correction was confirmed by the same Government as invalid or withdrawn:

(i) Existency in the provision of administrative law enforcement;

(ii) Execution of administrative law enforcement by persons without administrative law enforcement qualifications;

(iii) Administrative law enforcement in violation of statutory procedures;

(iv) Implementation of administrative law enforcement has no legal basis.

Article 33 is one of the following cases, which is rectified by the Government's rule of law, which is criticized, is not rectified by the dismissal of the executive branch or the administrative inspectorate, in accordance with the law:

(i) Failure to perform the statutory duties;

(ii) To impose fines and fees on administrative law enforcement personnel;

(iii) Designated or implemented administrative projects such as administrative penalties, administrative licences, administrative fees or administrative coercive measures;

(iv) Major administrative penalties decisions are not required by law;

(v) Administrative law enforcement documents should be filed without request.

Article XVI contains one of the following acts by administrative law enforcement officials, who are subject to the gravity of the circumstances of the same Government's rule of law, provide them with criticism, suspension or cancellation of administrative law enforcement documents, in the event of serious circumstances, administrative disposition by the organ of the dismissal or by the administrative inspectorate, which constitutes a crime, and hold criminal responsibility under the law:

(i) Failure to produce legal and effective administrative law enforcement documents when carrying out their duties;

(ii) Transfer of administrative law enforcement documents;

(iii) Not to perform their duties in accordance with the law, the ultra vires or the law enforcement of the statutory procedures;

(iv) Abuse of authority, use of administrative law enforcement powers as units and individuals for private gain;

(v) No law enforcement files, non-coordinated access and investigation evidence;

(vi) Concluding facts, false testimony or concealment and destruction of law enforcement evidence;

(vii) To deny or block administrative enforcement oversight;

(viii) Revenge, trapped by the parties charged with, prosecuting, applying for administrative review and conducting administrative proceedings;

(ix) Other offences under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 37 Administrative law enforcement authorities are not notified of changes to administrative law enforcement supervision, and the Government's rule of law has brought the following decisions to the Government:

(i) criticized;

(ii) Removal of administrative offences;

(iii) Administrative disposal of the competent and direct responsible person directly responsible.

Article 33, article 33, article XIV, article 33, article XV, article 33, article 33, article 33, article 33, article 33, article 33, article 33, article 33, article 16, paragraph 1, of this approach, excludes, in the light of the circumstances, the early evaluation of the administrative law enforcement year and deducts it in accordance with the legislative appraisal.

Article 39 Administrative law enforcement agencies and their administrative law enforcement officials consider that the Government's rule of law sector is in conflict with or inappropriate and may apply for review to the Government of the current people for review and decision-making within 30 days from the date of receipt of a review request.

Chapter V

Article 40 Oversight by administrative law enforcement authorities of law enforcement officials of this body, the system's administration is governed by this approach.

Article 40 The administrative enforcement oversight provisions of the Bobo Municipal Government were repealed on 20 October 2000.