(The 69th Standing Committee of the Eleventh People's Government of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 12 October 2010, considered the adoption of Decree No. 58 of 2 November 2010 of the People's Government Order No. 58 of 2 November 2010 for the Greater Self-Government Zone, which came into force on 1 December 2010)

Article 1, in order to strengthen the monitoring of normative documents, to preserve the integrity and political ties of the rule of law, to ensure the proper implementation of laws, regulations and regulations, to promote the administration of the law, to establish the procedure in accordance with the Regulations (Act No. 322 of the State of State) and the State's decision to strengthen the administration of the municipalities in accordance with the law (State [2008]17), and to develop this approach in the light of the actual practice of the self-government area.

Article II of this approach refers to the normative document referred to by all levels of the people's government and its working sectors, as well as organizations mandated by the law, legislation and regulations, to administer the functions of public affairs, covering the obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, which are generally binding and may be applied repeatedly.

The Government of the people at all levels and its work sectors have developed internal work systems, technical operational protocols, administrative decisions on specific matters, and documentation on matters such as personnel, finance, external affairs and other matters of direct management.

Article 3 establishes normative documents that should be consistent with the principles of the rule of law, in accordance with its statutory powers and procedures, in accordance with its mandate and responsibility, democratic openness and popularity.

Normative documents should be sent by law. Normative documents for the submission should be reviewed by law.

Normative documents are available, the review should be guided by the principle of availability, certainty and integrity.

The name of the normative document is generally referred to as “the way”, “rules”, “rules”, “rules”, notice”, “Recommendations”, “Recommendations”, etc.”, but not as “regulations”.

Article 5 has one of the following cases, and normative documents can be developed:

(i) Laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents have not yet been specified for administrative work in a particular area;

(ii) Legal, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents do not provide for specific and non-implementation;

(iii) Legislative, regulatory, regulatory and superior normative documents authorize normative documentation.

The development of normative documents should contain a quantity of quality and be conducted in accordance with the prescribed procedures.

The content already specified in laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents should not be repeated.

Nor should normative documents be developed by the Government's work sector, in principle, in the name of the Government of the current people or the Executive Office of the Government.

Article 7 establishes normative documents that should be in compliance with legal, regulatory, and national policy and that there shall be no violation of the obligation to establish administrative licences, administrative sanctions, administrative enforcement, administrative charges, and that citizens, legal persons and other organizations are not subject to the law.

Article 8. Interim institutions of the Government of the People at all levels, the proceedings and coordination bodies shall not establish normative documents in the sector, except under the laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 9 establishes normative documents that shall be subject to the following procedures:

(i) Research and drafting;

(ii) To seek advice. The public opinion is openly sought in relation to the public interest;

(iii) Organizational arguments. Organizing expert opinions on important matters, as well as the strength of professionalism;

(iv) Review of legality;

(v) Collective discussions among heads of organs;

(vi) Publication;

(vii) Resolves.

Nor shall normative documents be issued without hearing, review of legality and collective discussion decisions; without published normative documents, they shall not serve as a basis for administration.

Article 10 The drafting of normative documents by the drafting cell should conduct a study on the need and feasibility of the development of normative documents and conduct studies on issues to be addressed in normative documents, key systems and measures to be established.

Article 11. The drafting of normative documents by the drafting cell shall investigate, draw on experience of practice and hear the views of the relevant organs, organizations, experts and citizens. Hearing opinions can take a written request and hold a variety of forms, such as colloquiums, hearings and hearings.

The drafting unit drafted normative documents that have a significant impact on the region, the industry or directly related to the important rights obligations of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, which should be made public to society and seek the views of the various communities of society.

Article 12-related units have greater divergent views on the content of the draft normative documents, and the drafting cell should be consulted; after consultation, it cannot be uniformed and the preparation of institutional coordination is requested.

Article 13 Drafts normative documents of the Government of the people at the district level, which should be subject to a review of the draft normative documents and be discussed collectively by the heads of this unit. The draft normative document, which was not subject to review of legality, collective discussions by the head of the unit and signed by the main head of the unit, shall not be submitted to the Government for its consideration.

The draft normative document of the drafting sector should be submitted to the rule of law institutions in this sector for a review of legality.

Article 14. The draft normative document requested the Government to consider should be accompanied by drafting notes and other relevant materials.

The drafting note should include elements such as the need for normative documentation, the basis, the main measures provided, the views of the parties and the treatment of views.

The materials included the basis for the development of normative documents (relevant laws, regulations, regulations, the text of the superior normative documents), the request for a summary of comments.

The draft normative document of the Government was transferred from the Executive Office of the Government of the People at this level to the Legal Review of the Rule of Law.

The scope of the review of the legitimacy of normative documents includes:

(i) Would go beyond the statutory competence of the body in place;

(ii) Be in compliance with laws, regulations, regulations and national approaches policies;

(iii) Will conflict with the relevant normative documents.

The rule of law sector conducts a review of the Government's draft normative documents, which should be carried out within 20 days and provided the Government with a written review.

The development of normative documents should be considered in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The normative documents developed by the Government of the people at the district level should be considered by the Standing Government Conference;

(ii) Normative documents developed by other development bodies should be considered by the heads of units.

The normative document adopted by the Commission, which was considered, was signed by the principal holder of the body.

Article 19, which was signed, is made public by the designating body through, inter alia, the Government's bulletin, the Government's website or the press published on the ground.

Article 20 provides for the development of normative documents for emergencies, such as natural disasters, accidents, public health incidents and social security incidents, which may be simplified.

Article 21 contains one of the following cases and is interpreted by the designating body:

(i) The content of normative documents requires further clarity;

(ii) New developments after the development of normative documents require a clear application.

The interpretation of normative documents is equally effective with normative documents.

Article 2

(i) The normative documents developed by the Government of the city, the district, the town (community) and the Government of the people at the highest level;

(ii) The normative documents developed by the Government's work sector, which are presented to the Government of the people at this level;

(iii) The normative documents developed by the self-government zone in the form of vertically led departments, which are presented to the superior authorities;

(iv) The normative documents developed by organizations mandated by the law, legislation and regulations are presented by the authorities to the same-ranking people's Government;

(v) The normative documents developed jointly by the two departments, which are co-sponsored by the executive branch;

(vi) The normative documents developed jointly by the executive branch with the non-administrative organs are presented by the executive branch at the highest level;

(vii) The normative documents developed jointly by the local government sector with the central vertically-led sectors, which are presented to the top-level executive bodies.

Article 23 Review of normative documentation is carried out by the Government's rule of law sector or sectoral rule of law institutions.

Article 24 provides for the submission of normative documents and shall be submitted to the supporting report and the text of the normative document.

Article 25 provides normative documentation for the submission of the report, which is lawfully reviewed and is not lawful, and informs the designating body of its own corrective action.

After the notice received by the institution, the results should be corrected and reported on themselves within 30 days.

Article 26

Each month the body shall make the list of normative documents available to society.

Article 27 Governments and their work sectors should establish a system for regular clearance of normative documents. A list of normative documents that continue to be effective after clearance should be made available to society and that are not included in the normative document that continues to be effective in the form of a catalogue of documents, without being used as a basis for administration.

Article 28, in violation of this approach, provides for the development of normative documents, in one of the following cases, to be administratively disposed of by the relevant administrative organs or the inspectorate against the principal and other direct responsible persons, in accordance with the circumstances:

(i) Excluding statutory competence;

(ii) No observations;

(iii) No review of legality;

(iv) No collective discussion.

Article 29 amends and repeals normative documents and applies this approach.

Article 33 The procedures for the development of normative documents in the Autonomous Region of the Sentinel-Autonomous Region, published on 26 October 2005, were also repealed.