(Adopted at the 77th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Sichuan Province, on 2 March 2011, No. 254 of 4 May 2011, issued since 1 July 2011)

Chapter I General

Article 1 protects the lives, health and property security of the population, in line with the provisions of the Law on Security of the People's Republic of China, the Sichuan Province Safety Production Regulations, and in line with the provisions of the relevant legal regulations, such as the Law on Security of the People's Republic of China, the Sichuan Province Safety Production Regulations.

The second approach applies to the construction, alteration and expansion of security facilities in the administrative regions of Sichuan Province (hereinafter referred to as construction projects) and their supervision.

The approach refers to the construction of project security facilities that are operated after the completion of the project, the use of facilities, equipment, systems, devices, construction (construction) for the prevention of safe accidents and accident response.

Legislation, legislation and regulations provide for the construction of project security facilities and their supervision.

Article 3. Construction of a project security facility must be designed in parallel with the main works, while at the same time being constructed, with inputs for production and use. Investment in security facilities and related costs should be included in the construction project estimates.

The construction of a project security facility should be reviewed in accordance with laws, regulations and methods. Without review or review of inadmissibility, no administrative licence shall be subject to construction; no failure to collect or receive it shall be produced and used.

Article IV. The construction of a project security facility should be consistent with national security production laws, regulations, and methods, as well as relevant national standards, industry standards, local standards and technical norms.

With regard to security facilities that do not have national standards and industrial standards, the relevant departments of my province should organize, in accordance with the relevant requirements of the security production and methods, local standards and technical norms in a timely manner, and be revised in accordance with scientific and technological progress and economic development.

Article 5 Investments, units, organizations (hereinafter referred to as construction units) in construction projects are the subject of responsibility for the construction of project security facilities and assume responsibility for the construction of project safety facilities while designing, constructing parallel construction and investing in production and use.

More than 6 people at the district level should strengthen their leadership in the management of the construction of project security facilities, and promote the establishment and implementation of a monitoring management system for the construction of project safety facilities, in accordance with the law.

More people at the district level and their relevant sectors should be strengthened when designing and implementing rural and urban planning.

Article 7

The investment authorities at the district level and sectors with the responsibility for the safe production management are governed by their respective responsibilities for the construction of project security facilities and are governed by the relevant administrative licences for construction projects under the law.

Article 8. Trade unions are governed by law by the construction and use of project security facilities. The views of trade unions should be dealt with in a timely manner by the production unit or by the sector with the responsibility for monitoring safety.

Any unit and individuals have the right to report to the sector that has the responsibility to monitor the production of safety.

Chapter II

Article 9. Construction projects should conduct safety conditionality arguments when selecting sites. Safety conditions should contain the following:

(i) Risks and harmful factors that may exist in the construction project itself;

(ii) The security impact of construction projects on the production, operation or resident life, public activity, and the productive lives of farmers;

(iii) Where possible, the production, operation or residence of units, public activities and the safety implications of farmer production for construction projects;

(iv) The impact of local natural conditions on construction projects;

(v) The impact of construction projects on local natural conditions.

The following Article 10 construction projects should be preceded by a project subparagraph (concluding approval, approval, approval, replenishment, etc.), which should be commissioned to conduct a safety pre-assessment evaluation by a security evaluation body with the corresponding qualifications, and to prepare a report on security advances evaluation:

(i) The construction of the mines (concluding the end-of-size deposits);

(ii) Construction projects for the production, operation, storage and use of hazardous chemicals;

(iii) Construction projects for the production, storage of cigarettes;

(iv) Black and ferrous metallurgy construction projects;

(v) Major construction projects for industrial enterprises such as chemical, construction, mechanical, and light text;

(vi) Airports, terminals, water banks, electricity stations, major bridges, tunnel construction projects;

(vii) Other construction projects provided by States and provinces.

Article 11 Safety advance evaluation reports should be consistent with national standards and industry standards, including the following:

(i) A qualitative assessment of the main risks, the types of harmful factors and the extent of harm and the security, public safety impacts of practitioners;

(ii) Assessment of the possibility of preventing and controlling major hazards and harmful factors;

(iii) Effectiveness evaluation of safety facility design principles, security response measures, and security emergency management;

(iv) Advantage evaluation of clear conclusions;

(v) Other matters requiring clarifications under laws, regulations and regulations.

The construction projects set out in Article 10, subparagraphs (i) to (v) of this approach shall apply to the construction of a safety review to the same-level safety-production management in the construction project establishment and submit the following materials:

(i) The establishment of a security review application for construction projects;

(ii) The construction of a project candidate confirmation;

(iii) Report on the security conditions for the construction of projects;

(iv) A safety advance evaluation report;

(v) A notice of prior approval of a corporate legal person's license or enterprise name;

(vi) Other relevant information provided for in laws, regulations and regulations.

The construction projects set out in article 10, subparagraphs (vi), (vii) of this approach should be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, in accordance with the law, in order to apply for the construction of a safety and productive management project at the same level in the construction of a project. The relevant sectors should establish safety reviews in accordance with laws, regulations, regulations and national provisions.

Article 13, Safety and Productive Regulators and other sectors with the responsibility to oversee the management of safe production, provided a safety review of qualified opinions or non-qualified opinions to construction units within 20 working days of the date of the formal acceptance of the application for security review. No decision could be taken within 20 working days, with the approval of the head of the sector, 10 working days could be extended and the construction unit would be informed in writing of the reasons for the extension period.

Article 14. The construction project submitted by the construction unit contains one of the following cases, and the establishment of a security review is not adopted:

(i) The absence of a security advance evaluation or a security advance evaluation is not qualified;

(ii) The construction project involves dangerous and harmful major factors that are not fully analysed and understood;

(iii) The construction project involves major hazards, harmful analysis and inaccurateness;

(iv) There is no security conditionality or argument;

(v) Major technologies, processes or methods and devices, equipment, facilities are not identified;

(vi) The response and recommendations of security facilities are not in accordance with legal, regulatory, regulatory and related standards and actual requirements;

(vii) Emergency management and disposal programmes do not adapt to the needs of safe production;

(viii) No security evaluation body with corresponding qualifications was commissioned to carry out a safety advance evaluation;

(ix) Provision of false information and related information.

The legislation, regulations, such as Article 10 (i) to (iii) of this approach, stipulate that the project should apply for the construction of a security review project and that, when applying for an application, the construction unit should submit a letter of qualified opinion for a security review of the project. Unsubmissions of the project to establish a security review of qualified opinions are not valid.

Article 16 provides for the establishment of a security review of unqualified construction projects, which can be reviewed once again by construction units.

The establishment of a security review project has been one of the following conditions, and the construction units should apply for a change review to the original review sector:

(i) Significant changes in the construction of an external security protection environment for the project;

(ii) Changes in construction addresses;

(iii) Changes in major devices, equipment and facilities;

(iv) Changes in technologies, processes or approaches and major devices, equipment, facilities;

(v) The types, types and quantities of products covered are beyond the scope of the construction projects already under review.

Chapter III Safety review of construction of project security facilities

Article 17, when construction projects are designed, the design units should be accompanied by the design of security facilities and the development of specialized designs for security facilities. The security facility design unit should be qualified accordingly.

Safety facilities design should be consistent with national standards, industry standards and local standards and technical norms.

The construction of a project safety facility design unit should establish a system of quality assurance and accountability for the design of a sound security facility and be responsible for the quality of the design of safety facilities in accordance with the relevant national provisions.

Article 19

(i) A summary of construction projects;

(ii) The design basis (concluding sub-item);

(iii) Safety environmental evaluation in the vicinity of construction projects;

(iv) Construction (construction) and location;

(v) Risk and harmful analysis of production processes;

(vi) Emergency preparedness and response capacity;

(vii) Corrective preventive measures designed by security facilities;

(viii) The creation and staffing of security institutions;

(ix) Safety-specific investment estimates;

(x) The responses and recommendations contained in the report of the security advance evaluation or the security conditions argument;

(xi) Expected effectiveness and problems and recommendations;

(xii) Other matters that need to be described in the laws, regulations and regulations.

The construction projects under Article 10, subparagraphs (i) to (v) of this approach shall apply to the construction of a security facility design review to the same-level safety-production management in the construction of the project portfolio and submit the following materials:

(i) A project-building document;

(ii) Report on security conditions in the feasibility study;

(iii) Safety advance evaluation reports and related evaluation information;

(iv) A dedicated and design report on the design of security facilities;

(v) Other material to be submitted is required under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 21, Safety and Productive Regulators, within 20 working days of the date of the formal receipt of the project safety facility design review, have provided construction units with the design of qualified opinions or non-qualified opinions. No decision could be taken within 20 working days, with the approval of the head of the sector, 10 working days could be extended and the construction unit would be informed in writing of the reasons for the extension period.

Article 2 addresses the following conditions in which the security-production monitoring authority can provide a review of qualified opinions for the design of the project security facility:

(i) Security facilities are designed by design units with corresponding qualifications;

(ii) The Group of Experts organized by the construction unit has more than two thirds of experts on the site to sign a valid opinion or a qualified report by an intermediary with legal qualifications;

(iii) Other sources of recognition.

The construction of a project security facility design review was not adopted and construction projects were not open. Significant changes in the design of the project security facility should be reorganized.

The construction projects set out in article 10, subparagraphs (vi), (vii), of this approach require a review of the design of construction projects in both countries and provinces, and the relevant departments should review the design of security facilities for construction projects in accordance with the laws, regulations and national provisions.

Chapter IV

Article 24 should guarantee the conditions and requirements for the construction of a project security facility, fulfil the responsibility to build project security production management and ensure the quality of the security production and security facilities constructed in the construction of the project security facility.

Article 25 Construction of a project security facility construction unit should ensure quality and construction safety, in accordance with the design programme approved by the review, and after completion, the construction of the project security facility shall be produced to carry out the results-based assessment report.

The construction unit found that the design of security facilities was unreasonable or could lead to significant security shocks, and should stop construction and report on construction units in a timely manner and that the construction units should immediately organize on-site verification after the receipt of the report; and that, after the problems were discovered, the restructuring should be organized and the re-engineering of eligible construction could be restored.

Article 26 Construction of construction units, quality monitoring units should conduct dedicated and quality oversight of construction of project safety facilities, in accordance with the relevant provisions of construction and quality oversight, identify problems that are promptly promoted or reported to the construction units, and report on the quality and supervision reports.

Construction units, custodial units, construction units, quality monitoring units may not be allowed to modify the security facility design documents reviewed or other safety preventive measures plans.

Following the completion of the construction project, the construction unit should conduct a rigorous inspection of security facilities and take timely and effective measures to rectify the problems identified.

The 288 construction project requires probationary operation, and its security facilities must operate at the same time; construction units should conduct a detailed record of the operation of the security facility, identify problems in a timely manner and form self-assessment reports on the operation of the security facility.

The construction projects set out in Article 10, subparagraphs (i) to (v), of this approach should be commissioned by the construction units to carry out a safety inspection evaluation evaluation of the security facility prior to the completion of the inspection. The safety evaluation body is responsible for the results of its safety tests.

The construction projects set out in Article 10, subparagraphs (i) to (v), of this approach shall apply to the construction of a security facility for the same-level safety-production management in the construction of the project portfolio and submit the following materials:

(i) The operation of the security facility's self-identification report;

(ii) The report on the evaluation of safety tests;

(iii) The treasury report of the institution;

(iv) Quality oversight reports of quality oversight units;

(v) Report on the construction of the construction unit;

(vi) Other material to be submitted is required under the laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 31, Safety and Productive Monitoring Administration completed the process of identification within 20 working days of the date of the formal receipt of the project safety facility for the completion of the receipt of the request for identification, the identification of qualified or non-qualified decisions, and informed the construction units in writing. No decision could be taken within 20 working days, with the approval of the head of the sector, 10 working days could be extended and the construction unit would be informed in writing of the reasons for the extension period.

Article 32 contains one of the following cases in the inspection of the security facility:

(i) Security facilities do not meet design requirements;

(ii) In violation of this approach, it remains unqualified;

(iii) Inadequate submission of receipt requests;

(iv) A negative finding in the receipt of the request;

(v) No other conditions under the law, regulations and regulations are incompatible with.

The security facility has not been completed or completed, and construction projects cannot be used for production.

The construction projects set out in article 10, subparagraphs (vi), (vii), of this approach require the completion of the inspection by the State and the province concerned, which should be completed in accordance with national laws, regulations, regulations and national provisions, and security facilities for construction projects.

Following the completion of construction projects other than article 10 of this approach and article 33, construction units should organize safe facilities to be completed in a timely manner and receive the identification report. The following key elements should be included in the report on the completion of the security facility:

(i) The design of security facilities is in compliance with national standards, industry standards, local standards and technical norms for safe production;

(ii) The construction of security facilities is in compliance with design requirements;

(iii) The probationary operation of security facilities;

(iv) Accreditation units, personnel;

(v) The construction unit's observations on the results of the completion tests;

(vi) Other matters to be specified.

The security facility has not been completed or completed, and construction projects cannot be used for production.

Chapter V Oversight management

Article XV Establishment of a project safety facility monitoring management is carried out by the Government of the more than the population at the district level and its sub-sectors with the responsibility to monitor safe production:

(i) The Provincial Government and its related sectoral construction projects are vested in the relevant departments of the Government of the province;

(ii) The construction projects in the municipalities (States) and their related sector-specific construction projects are vested in the relevant sectors of the Government of the People's Government in the districts;

(iii) The construction projects at the district level of the people's Government and its relevant sectoral units are vested in the relevant sectors of the county-level government;

(iv) High-level-level-level-level-level-level-level departments may oversee the construction projects of the Government and its related sectoral projects.

(v) The parent-level sector may entrust the lower-level sector with monitoring the management of its responsible construction projects.

The sectors with the responsibility for the management of safe production should be established and improved, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, the oversight management system for security facilities, the strengthening of oversight management and the enforcement of the responsibility for the construction of security facilities by the construction units.

More than custodial management for safe production at the district level should strengthen oversight, guidance and coordination of the management of the security facilities in the relevant departments within the present administration, finding that the project has been carried out in violation of the scheme, and that administrative licences should be provided with safety inspections.

In establishing a safety review, design of safety reviews and completion of the project security facility, organized by the safe production supervision management in accordance with the specific circumstances of the project, the participation of other relevant departments should be informed, with the participation of the security production monitoring authorities, organized by other relevant departments.

Sectors that have the responsibility to monitor safe production should strengthen information communication and communication to achieve the sharing of information on the management of project safety facilities. The sector should reproduce the supervision of the construction project security facility in the industry to the same-level security productive management.

Article 33 Eighteen departments with the responsibility to oversee the construction units under the law have found that the construction of security facilities is in violation of the relevant legal, regulatory, regulatory and present schemes; and administrative sanctions are taken in accordance with the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations and methods of regulation.

In the course of the construction of the project security facility review, the sectors with the responsibility to monitor safe production can organize a group of experts not less than three or commission specialized agencies with the corresponding qualifications to undertake relevant professional reviews.

The relevant departments conduct written reviews of the material provided by the applicant and, if necessary, may send a member or organize a team of experts, professional bodies to conduct field verifications and the time for verification on the ground does not take into account the time frame for the review.

The documents based on the construction of the project security facility review, and the related materials, such as concluding observations, are the responsibility of the materialized units for their authenticity, integrity, science.

Chapter VI Legal responsibility

Article 40 violates the provisions of this approach, and the relevant laws, regulations, regulations and regulations have administrative penalties, administrative sanctions, and regulations.

The administrative penalties set out in this approach are determined by the management of the monitoring of safe production at the district level; the law, legislation, regulations, decisions on administrative sanctions are otherwise provided by the authorities.

In violation of this approach, the construction unit has one of the following acts and is responsible for the period of time being converted to order that the construction or suspension of the operation can be stopped and punished by a fine of up to 30,000 dollars, leading to accident accountability under the law; that constitutes an offence, and that criminal liability is prosecuted in accordance with the law:

(i) The establishment of a security review without the project or the non-qualified vetting process;

(ii) The design of safety facilities without review;

(iii) The security facility has not been completed or completed, and has been able to invest in production;

(iv) Significant changes have been made through the security review construction project, and construction units have not been requested for review.

Article 42, in violation of this approach, provides for false testimony that constitutes a crime and is criminally criminalized by law; does not constitute a crime, forfeiture of proceeds of the conflict in accordance with the provisions of the People's Republic of China Security Production Act, which provides for the confiscation of proceeds of the offence of more than 5,000 dollars of the proceeds of the offence and amounts to more than five times the amount of the proceeds of the violation; that there is no proceeds of the offence or that the proceeds of the violation have been less than 5,000 dollars of the fine, or that the person directly responsible for it is more than 300,000 dollars.

The security evaluation body with respect to former offences should be removed by law and the evaluation of the direct participation in security evaluation should be removed by law.

Article 43 above-ranking people's governments and their relevant departments, the staff concerned have one of the following acts, administratively disposed of the individual in accordance with the law, causing damage and liability under the law; and legal accountability:

(i) In violation of the provisions of the law, regulations, regulations and this approach, unauthorized self-governance and administrative licences for construction projects;

(ii) Review of construction of project security facilities in violation of this approach;

(iii) The inspection found that the construction of security facilities in the project was not reviewed, collected or, if reported, was not subject to legal scrutiny;

(iv) It is found that the construction of a project security facility for production is no longer in a position to secure production conditions without the withdrawal of the original licence or finding that the security production offence is not identified;

(v) Designate a project safety facility design unit or a security evaluation institution;

(vi) Other abuses of authority, omissions, provocative fraud.

Chapter VII

Article 44