Advanced Search

Government Regulations Legislative Evaluation Methods

Original Language Title: 西安市政府规章立法后评估办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Post-commercial assessment methodology

(Summit No. 142 of the 14th Session of the People's Government of Western Andi, 28 March 2011, considered the adoption of the Ordinance No. 92 of 6 April 2011 of the People's Government Order No. 92 of 6 April 2011, effective 10 May 2011)

In order to further improve the legislative quality of the city's people's government and promote economic and social development, this approach is based on the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 2 Post-legislative assessments of the Government of the city (hereinafter referred to as the regulations) apply.

Article 3. Post-legislative assessments referred to in this approach refer to surveys, analyses, evaluations, etc., on the quality, effectiveness and social impact of the regulations, which are modified and repealed in due course of the regulatory application.

Article IV Post-Conflict assessment should be guided by the principles of objectivity and impartiality, openness and transparency, scientific legitimacy and public participation.

Article 5

The State's rule of law institutions are responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the organization's guidance for post-legislative assessments and undertake legislative post-tradence assessments that are important, directly involving civil, legal or other organizations, as well as regulating regulations governing the common conduct of the Government.

The Government's executive authority or the immediate cause unit undertakes a legislative post-assessment of its regulations responsible for the organization.

Other executive bodies and related units should work in line with their respective responsibilities in conjunction with the post-regulation assessment process.

Article 6

Article 7.

(i) Closely linked to economic and social development and public interest, the breadth of social impacts, the high level of social attention and the implementation of three years;

(ii) Changes in the target, and the requirement for adaptation to economic, social development is not clear;

(iii) Bills of Greater Representation, proposals of members of the Political Union, and the general public of society;

(iv) The Government of the city considers it necessary to assess.

Amendments to regulations, repeals or emergency needs may not be assessed in accordance with laws, regulations and provincial government regulations.

Article 8. The assessment body shall conduct a holistic assessment of the full content of the regulations, in accordance with specific circumstances and actual needs, or undertake a partial assessment of their main elements, from legislative content, legislative technology and performance.

The assessment bodies should focus on the assessment of the institutional responsibilities, administrative licences, administrative sanctions, administrative enforcement, administrative charges, administrative requisitions, administrative assistance, administrative payments and administrative payments.

Article 9. The assessment shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures:

(i) Establish assessment teams. The assessment team is composed of rule-of-law staff and the relevant staff, and may also be invited to participate, among others, by a large number of representatives, politicians, experts, public representatives, legal practitioners. The assessment team was carried out in particular.

(ii) Develop assessment programmes. The assessment programme includes, inter alia, assessment purposes, evaluation content and standards, assessment methods, assessment steps and timing, funding and organizational guarantees. The assessment programme is carried out with the agreement of the assessment body.

(iii) Conduct research. The views and recommendations of the executive bodies, the management target audience and the public were collected through field missions, colloquiums, questionnaire surveys, thematic studies, expert perceptions.

(iv) Analysis evaluation. Analytical studies on materials collected and preliminary assessment findings.

(v) A assessment report. Further research and evidence of the preliminary assessment findings, suggesting that regulations continue to be implemented or modified, repealed, interpreted, developed an accompanying system, improved administrative law enforcement, and form an official assessment report.

Article 10. The assessment body may take a summary procedure to assess the actual needs of the assessment process.

A summary process could be undertaken through the collection, analysis of information, the organization of expert analysis data or the organization of an assessment of the assessment report, including through the convening of colloquiums, online questionnaire surveys or literature retrievals.

Article 11. The assessment body may, as required, entrust a number of units such as higher colleges, scientific institutions, social groups, intermediary agencies with specific implementation of the assessment or part of the assessment process.

The assessment should guarantee the effective participation of the public in society. The assessment bodies, commissioned assessment units should fully incorporate the views and recommendations of civil, legal and other organizations on the implementation of the regulations.

The assessment should be objective, impartial and realistic. The assessment authority, the delegated assessment unit shall not prejudge the assessment findings and shall not receive information on the merits of the assessment authority and staff. An explanation should be provided in the report for the non-recognition of important observations and proposals.

Article 14. The assessment shall be completed within six months of the establishment of the assessment team, with the complexity and controversy, and with the consent of the municipal authorities to extend for a period of two months. A summary process assessment should be completed within three months after the establishment of the assessment team.

Article 15 is assessed by the Government of the city in respect of the executive authority or by the unit of the immediate cause, which is sent to the Government of the city after the evaluation of the State's rule of law institutions. The assessment was carried out directly by the commune of the communes' rule of law institutions, which were sent to the Government of the commune and informed the relevant administrative authorities.

The assessment reports should be made public to society.

The assessment reports approved by the Government of the city are the main reference basis for changes, repealing regulations and improving administrative law enforcement.

The assessment report recommends that regulations be amended or repealed, and the relevant executive organs and units should be brought to the Government of the urban population in accordance with the legislative process or repealed. In accordance with the changes in regulations in the post-legislative assessment report, the recommendations of the assessment report should be taken into account and the reasons should be given.

The accompanying system of the recommendations of the assessment report needs to be improved or the implementation needs to be improved, and the executive bodies should take appropriate measures in a timely manner.

Article 17 Post-legislative assessment is incorporated into the scope of the administrative work of the law.

Article 18