(Adopted at the 112th ordinary meeting of the Twelfth People's Government of South Africa, 8 March 2011, No. 40 of the Decree No. 40 of 13 April 2011, published as from 1 June 2011)

Chapter I General

Article 1 regulates administrative penalties that are relatively concentrated in order to strengthen urban management, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the National People's Republic of China Act on Administrative Punishment, the administrative law enforcement procedures of the San-West Frontier Self-Government Zone, and the administrative law enforcement oversight approach of the SAutonomous Region.

The urban management within the urban areas under this city is relatively concentrated in administrative penalties and is applicable.

This approach refers to the relative concentration of administrative penalties in urban management, in accordance with the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Punishment Act and the relevant provisions of the Department of State, which is centrally exercised by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management in the area of urban management by law.

Article 3

The rule of law institutions of the Government of the urban and urban areas are the executive enforcement oversight body of the Government of the people at this level, and are governed by the law by the administrative law enforcement of the Integrated Administration of Urban Management.

Article IV. Integrated administrative enforcement agencies in urban management in urban areas are administrative authorities that exercise the relatively centralized administrative penalties of urban management.

The Integrated Administration of Urban Management has organized the coordination of major administrative law enforcement activities, which provide for the identification of offences under this scheme and guides and oversees the exercise of urban administration in urban areas with relatively centralized administrative penalties.

The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority in Urban Management in urban areas is responsible for the relatively centralized administration of justice within the Territory and is independent of the law.

In accordance with the regulations, the Committee has authorized the exercise of the right of urban management to be relatively focused on administrative penalties.

Relevant administrations such as parking, planning, environmental, business, public safety transport and construction should assist in the development of urban management relatively centralized administrative penalties in accordance with their respective responsibilities.

Chapter II

Article 5

(i) The right to administrative punishment in the management of sanitation;

(ii) The right to administrative penalties for the management of municipal facilities;

(iii) Administrative penalties for the management of urban square brackets;

(iv) The right to administrative penalties for the use of greenfields in urban areas outside the park, outside the unit compound and outside the area of residence;

(v) The right to administrative penalties for unlawful construction without authorization from the planning sector in urban and rural planning management;

(vi) The right to administrative sanctions in environmental protection management for the construction of open foods in urban areas;

(vii) The right to administrative penalties for the operation of a licence free of business in a legitimate place of operation;

(viii) The right to administrative penalties for motor vehicles, non-modile cars in the management of public safety transport;

(ix) Other administrative penalties granted by the Government of the People of the Autonomous Region.

Article 6. The scope of specific responsibilities for the integrated administration of urban management is central to the exercise of administrative penalties by the Government of the city to society.

Integrated administrative law enforcement agencies and relevant administrations in urban management shall not be able to adapt themselves to the extent of the relatively centralized administrative penalties.

Article 7 has been centrally exercised by integrated urban administration law enforcement authorities, which may not be exercised by the former administration; administrative penalties are still exercised and the corresponding legal responsibility is assumed.

The integrated administrative law enforcement agencies in urban management have disputed administrative responsibilities and jurisdiction with the relevant administrations, which are dealt with by the city or by the people's government in the relevant urban areas.

Article 8. Relating to the concentration of administrative penalties is the responsibility of the integrated administrative law enforcement agencies in urban areas where the offence is committed.

Integrated administrative enforcement agencies in urban management are responsible for identifying cases that have a significant impact.

Article 9 contains one of the following cases of violations, designated by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, or by the direct investigation:

(i) The dispute over jurisdiction between urban management integrated administrative enforcement authorities in urban areas;

(ii) An integrated administrative law enforcement authority in urban management in urban areas should not be identified.

In cases of violations in the cross-crural area, the Integrated Administrative Enforcement Agencies of the Urban Administration of the District of the Länder are dealt with in a case where other relevant urban areas have been identified and the case is dealt with by the integrated administrative law enforcement agencies governing urban management in the pre-stige. The jurisdiction is established in accordance with the preceding paragraph.

Chapter III Law enforcement norms and procedures

Article 10. Integrated administrative enforcement agencies in urban management should strengthen the normative, rule-of-law development of the law enforcement force, strengthen training in education and increase the level of law enforcement in urban management.

Article 11. The integrated administration of urban administration should be governed by administrative law enforcement procedures such as the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Punishment Act and the provisions of the administrative law enforcement procedures for the Eutonomous Regions of China, the executive investigative authority, administrative penalties and administrative enforcement.

Article 12 In the event of an offence by an integrated administrative law enforcement body in urban management, the following can be exercised by law:

(i) The right to enter the inspection units or on-site investigation, inspection as required by the case;

(ii) Inquired the parties, the verifies and may require them to provide information on the evidence;

(iii) Access, access, reproduction, photographing, recording of evidence materials, sampling or pre-registration of the relevant evidence;

(iv) Seizure of items or instruments relating to the offence and notify the parties of treatment within a specified period of time to the designated location;

(v) Other measures under laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 13 provides for the execution of seizures and seizures by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management and shall be carried out in accordance with the conditions, procedures and deadlines set out in the laws, regulations and regulations, and shall be kept in custody, seizures shall not be used or destroyed.

In the case of hard-wy products, severances and other untenable seizures, seizures may be auctioned or sold after the adoption of evidence-based preservation measures.

Article XIV, after the execution of seizures and seizures by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, the facts should be promptly identified and the decisions taken within the statutory period. It was clear that the goods should be confiscated by law and that they should be destroyed by law. The authorities concerned shall be returned to the auction or to the full price of the proceeds of the sale, in accordance with article 13, paragraph 2, where they have been auctioned or sold.

The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management will return the seizures and seizures to the parties and shall notify the parties of their receipt; the parties are unknown and shall issue a press release on their political website and the designated bulletin, which shall not exceed thirty days. The parties have refused to receive or give up their notices, and the Integrated Administration of Urban Management should deal with the property in accordance with the law.

Article 15. The parties are not in compliance with administrative penalties decisions or are not subject to a prescribed investigation, and the integrated administration of urban administration should inform the parties within thirty days of their investigation or treatment to the designated location; they have not been investigated or processed, and the integrated administrative enforcement authorities in urban management can auction, sell or be treated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State.

Article 16 should be in line with product quality standards, food hygiene standards, which should be registered before the auction and before the sale.

The destruction process should be recorded through photographs or videos (intakes). The record of the auction, sale and destruction of seizures, seizures shall be reported once every six months in the same financial sector.

Article 17 Integrated administrative law enforcement officials in urban management should have administrative law enforcement qualifications. In the event of the commission of an offence, it is important to harmonize the markings of urban administration and present administrative law enforcement documents.

The facts, rationales and the basis of the administrative sanctions decisions taken by the integrated administration of urban administration should be communicated to the parties to make administrative sanctions decisions, and to the parties should be informed of their rights under the law, to hear the statements of the parties and to the defence. The parties' statements, the facts, rationales and evidence presented by the defence, and the integrated administration of urban management should be adopted.

Integrated administrative enforcement agencies in urban management shall not be subject to increased penalties as a result of the statements made by the parties.

In keeping with the hearings and the parties' requests for hearing, the Integrated Administration of Urban Management should organize hearings in accordance with the law.

Article 19 The Integrated Administrative Enforcement Authority of Urban Management found that the breach of the law by the parties should be liable for damages in respect of public property in the course of the investigation of the violation, and that the related material should be transferred to the relevant executive branch after administrative sanctions decisions are taken.

Chapter IV

Article 20, the Government of the urban and urban communities should establish a coordination mechanism for the sound urban management of relatively centralized administrative penalties, strengthen administrative law enforcement collaboration between integrated urban administration and the relevant administration sectors, and guarantee the effective implementation of urban management's relatively centralized administrative penalties.

Integrated administrative law enforcement agencies and relevant administrations should establish mechanisms for the sharing of sound urban management and law enforcement information to inform the relevant administrative licences, oversight management, administrative sanctions.

The relevant administrations should work in conjunction with the integrated administrative enforcement agencies in urban management to obtain evidence, information inquiries, technical identification and monitoring related to the investigation of cases of violations.

Article 21, the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, in law enforcement, found that the offence was not within the jurisdiction of the sector and should be communicated or transferred to a competent department.

In the day-to-day monitoring management, the relevant administrations found violations that had been carried out by them but had been incorporated into a relatively concentrated scope of administrative sanctions, should be informed immediately of the integrated administrative law enforcement agencies in urban management and effective measures to protect the scene of violations. It is difficult to protect or to maintain evidence, and the relevant administration authorities should investigate evidence or take measures such as the registration of evidence prior to registration and, in a timely manner, transfer cases and related materials to competent integrated administrative enforcement agencies.

Integrated administrative enforcement agencies in urban management should promptly investigate cases transferred and, within seven working days after the completion of the case, address the relevant administration.

In article 22, the executive enforcement oversight body oversees administrative law enforcement matters in the integrated administration of justice at the level of urban management and oversees administrative law enforcement matters that have a significant impact on the implementation of integrated urban management authorities.

Article 23 of the Integrated Administration of Urban Management found that the relevant administration authorities had carried out a relatively centralized administrative penalties in violation of the right to administrative penalties or had not been assisted by the law, which could make written proposals directly to the relevant authorities or could request the executive enforcement oversight body of the Government of the people to ensure their corrective action.

The relevant administrations have found that integrated urban administrations do not carry out their statutory responsibilities or inappropriate penalties that are relatively concentrated in the administration of justice by law, may make written recommendations to them or bring them to correction by the executive enforcement oversight bodies of the Government of the people.

Article 24 Integrated administrative enforcement agencies in urban management should establish a system of oversight that exercises a level-level oversight system that is relatively centralized in administrative penalties, implements the quality of administrative law review, law enforcement errors, regulates administrative discretion, and oversees integrated administrative enforcement agencies and their law enforcement personnel in urban management in urban areas.

Chapter V Legal responsibility

Article 25 Law enforcement officers in the integrated administration of urban administration have one of the following acts, either by the executive inspector or by the relevant units, to be administratively disposed of by law to the competent and other directly responsible personnel directly responsible; and the transfer of suspected crimes to the judiciary to be criminalized by law:

(i) It is not possible to determine the basis of the law enforcement in violation of the statutory procedures;

(ii) Law enforcement using tools such as violence, threats;

(iii) The intentional damage or the destruction of the property of the parties in violation of the provisions;

(iv) Separate, misappropriation, private or transcendant punishment of property or use of pre-registration and seizure items;

(v) To request or receive the property of other persons, using the facilities of their functions;

(vi) Disclosure of the information of the reporting person without the consent of the reporting person, in the case of a grave nature;

(vii) In the event of a serious breach of the law or inadvertently;

(viii) Other abuses, omissions, provocative fraud, causing damage to the legitimate rights and interests of public interest, citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 26 The administration of integrated administrative law enforcement agencies and their law enforcement officials shall be liable under the law for damages to the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 27 is inconsistency with the administrative penalties imposed by the parties for the integrated administration of urban administration, which can be applied by law for administrative review or administrative proceedings.

Article 28 impedes the implementation of official duties by the Integrated Administration of Urban Management, in violation of the provisions of social security management, by public security authorities, by law; constitutes an offence, and by bringing criminal justice to the law.

Annex VI

The urban management of the city's occupier is relatively concentrated in administrative penalties and is implemented in accordance with the approval of the statutory procedures.

Article 33 The second amendment to the Decision of the Government of the Republic of South Africa on the revision of the scheme for the relatively concentrated administration of justice in the city of South Africa was repealed in accordance with Order No. 3 of 21 May 2004 on the revision of the Decision of the Government of the People of the Republic of 13 June 2003.