(Summit No. 55 of 13 June 2011 of the Twelfth People's Government of the Lift, considered the adoption of the Decree No. 176 of 27 June 2011, published on 1 August 2011)

Chapter I General

Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations, in order to enhance the oversight management of enterprise burdens, optimize the enterprise development environment and preserve the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises.

Article 2

Article 3. The municipalities, districts (markets), the people of the region should strengthen the leadership of the management of enterprise burden monitoring, organize, coordinate and promote the regulatory management of the sector's corporate burden under the law.

Article IV. The Industrial and Information Bureau is responsible for overseeing the management of enterprise burdens within the city's administration. The primary responsibility is:

(i) To monitor the implementation of laws, regulations, regulations and regulations relating to the burden of enterprises and to make policy recommendations for mitigating the burden of enterprises;

(ii) To receive complaints, reports and legal inspections concerning the corporate burden;

(iii) To urge the authorities of the same-ranking people to monitor the corporate burden of the management sector;

(iv) Other work to oversee corporate burden management.

Sectors identified by the communes' governments to oversee the management of business burdens are responsible for the supervision of the management of enterprises within this administrative area.

The relevant sectors, such as inspection, finance, prices, audit and rule of law, should be able to oversee the management of business burdens, in accordance with their respective responsibilities.

Article 6. The media should enhance the oversight of opinion on the violation of the law to increase the burden of enterprises.

Chapter II Oversight management

Article 7. The municipalities, districts (markets), the people of the region and their sectors have developed normative documents without legal, regulatory and regulatory basis, without any provision to increase the corporate burden.

No unit or organization shall be in breach of the provisions, establish administrative expenses, raise charges and expand the scope of fees. All administrative fees, government funds projects, fees standards should be announced in the media to increase transparency.

Article 9 collects administrative fees, government funds and government pools to enterprises, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the laws, regulations and the State Department, the Government of the province. Incompatible with the provision, the enterprise has the right to refuse payment.

Enterprises have objections to the scope, basis and criteria of the fees project and are entitled to request clarifications from the fees sector and units, or to provide the enterprise with the oversight authority and financial, price administration, and to facilitate the relevant sectors.

The Article 10 sector with a charge-raising function shall present the notice of approval of the royalties, the licence and the fee-for-feasing certificate issued by the price sector, using a dedicated fee-relevant for administrative purposes issued by the provincial fiscal sector, and in the Register of Corporate Payments, as required, the name of the fee unit, the time, the fees project, the fees standard, the fees and the name of the person charged. Where formalities are not fully or have not been completed, enterprises may refuse payment.

Article 11. The administrative organs shall not collect or receive any other cost except for expenses incurred by the State and the provincial authorities in connection with matters such as licence, approval, annual review and registration.

Article 12. Administrative penalties for businesses by an executive body or by an organization with administrative functions shall be based on laws, regulations or regulations, and shall be used in the financial sector for the purpose of making a fine, forfeiture and forfeiture of property against its staff.

Article 13 quantification of the offence by the executive branch, which does not result in the consequences of the harm, imposes the first impunity and obliges the enterprise time limit to be changed. Major administrative penalties, such as the suspension of work, the suspension of licences or licences, and the higher amount of fines, should be reported to the same level of government rule of law in conjunction with the penalties.

Article 14. In addition to security production inspections, food safety inspections, major environmental cases surveys and criminal cases, as well as law enforcement inspections arranged by States and provinces, mass reporting of complaints cases, any unit shall not be allowed to carry out a review of business. The review is carried out in accordance with the law and is to be carried out three working days prior to the activities of the same Government's rule of law, with the approval of the latter. An administrative law enforcement document and approval instrument should be presented in comparison to the enterprise inspection.

Article 15. Social groups shall not collect contributions or other expenses in the course of a licence, approval, annual review and registration by an administrative body.

Article 16 Intermediation agencies are entrusted by the executive authority to inspect, test, consult, assess and assess the costs of enterprises, which are subject to laws, regulations and regulations that should be paid by the executive branch and cannot be charged to the enterprise.

Article 17 utilities such as postal, telecommunications, civil aviation, railway, roads, electricity, water supply, heating, fuel, radio and television enterprises shall not be allowed to increase government pricing or to exceed the range specified by government guidance prices.

Article 18 prohibits:

(i) The transfer of administrative functions to the cause unit or an intermediary agency to collect fees to the enterprise;

(ii) Intermediation services, such as advice, assessment, detection, etc., which should be chosen by corporate ownership, should be converted into mandatory designated services and charged to enterprises;

(iii) Unless prescribed by law, legislation and regulations, the taxation of all types of taxes, fees for enterprises in advance;

(iv) borrowing funds from the enterprise, which should be allocated under the law to the enterprise and should be returned to the corporate tax, fees, fines, government funds and grants in accordance with the law;

(v) The property of the enterprise, such as property, transportation tools, communications equipment and electronic equipment without compensation;

(vi) To require businesses to assume costs such as travel, communications, conference fees, catering and medical fees;

(vii) Enforcing businesses to make provision of office funds;

(viii) Enforcing businesses to provide sponsoring, financing and contributions;

(ix) Enforcing businesses to participate in insurance other than legal, legislative and regulatory provisions;

(x) Enforcing businesses to purchase orders, newspapers, audio-visual products or advertisements;

(xi) Enforcing businesses to participate in training, technical examination, academic studies, and to enforce corporate participation in the Institute, associations, etc.;

(xii) The preparation of directory, Yearbook, Master, Photo and video material at the expense of an enterprise;

(xiii) Costs and property to be performed in the name of school, assistants;

(xiv) Constraints to the acquisition (acceptance) of designated products (services) by enterprises, which have been able to increase commodity (service) prices;

(xv) Other acts that increase the burden of enterprises in conflict with the law.

Article 19 does not implement the laws, administrative regulations or the provisions of the State and provincial, the Government of the Municipalities concerning tax relief of enterprises, tax exemptions, tax repayments, relief of administrative expenses and government funds, as a violation of this approach to increase the corporate burden.

Article 20, when sudden public events such as serious natural disasters, major accidents, may be taken into account by the Government of more than one of the population at the district level or by virtue of the relevant provisions for the solicitation of goods and services to the enterprise, shall be returned or compensated by law. The law also provides for the provision.

Article 21, Supervision of corporate burdens at all levels should establish enterprise burden monitoring networks, select a number of enterprises as burden supervisory points, guide businesses in the ownership of the fee management policy, understand the implementation of the fee policy, coordinate the processing of fees and understand the corporate burden. Business perceptions of mitigation cannot be less than once a year.

Article 22, the supervisory company should clarify a supervisor, who is the responsibility to monitor the burden of the enterprise, generally by the corporate financial head. The primary responsibility of the supervisor is:

(i) The Feasibility Unit and the charges project, standards;

(ii) To reject and report on the charges;

(iii) Provide policy advice to relevant departments;

(iv) Summary of corporate burdens.

Article 23 Oversight management at all levels should establish an enterprise burden monitoring and management file, record violations that increase the corporate burden and publish them on a regular basis.

Article 24 should be conscious of compliance with the laws and regulations, operating under the law, implementing regulatory systems such as safe production, food security and environmental protection, improving the quality of products (services) and safeguarding the legitimate rights of consumers.

Article 25. The executive body should strengthen the oversight management of enterprises, establish a monitoring inspection plan and organize implementation, maintain market operating order in accordance with the law of the enterprise.

Chapter III Reporting, complaints and treatment

Any units and individuals in article 26 have the right to lodge complaints and reports of violations of increased corporate burdens.

Article 27 oversees management at all levels of corporate burdens at all levels to establish a corporate burden to monitor the reporting of telephones, boxes and to keep the complainants, the reportingers confidential.

Article 28 provides that the corporate burden monitoring management shall be organized, coordinated or mandated to investigate the matter in accordance with the law and to take a decision to deal with the prescribed time frame. Complaints and reporting cases involving more than two functional departments are dealt with jointly by the enterprise burden monitoring management organizations.

Article 29 Complaints, reporting units and their staff should be subject to an enterprise burden-monitoring survey in the management and related sectors, and the units and individuals surveyed must not refuse and obstruct the investigation process without combating, revenge and reporting.

Article 33 considers that the normative documents developed by the city, the city, the people of the region and their sectors violate the legitimate rights and interests of the enterprise, which may require the review of normative documents by the relevant bodies.

Chapter IV Legal responsibility

Article 31, in violation of article 14 of the present approach, provides that an unauthorized inspection of the enterprise is carried out without approval and that the Government's rule of law is responsible for the cessation of the offence and that it is administratively disposed of by its units or by the inspectorate.

In violation of articles 15, 16 and 18 of this approach, social groups, intermediary agencies are responsible for the termination of the offence by the treasury of the management's corporate burden of supervision by more than communal government enterprises at the district level, and the period of time will return to the company's property, the costs incurred cannot be returned, the financially paid and fined the social groups with a fine of up to three thousand dollars of the intermediary's agency.

Article 33, in violation of article 17 of this approach, is punishable by the price authorities in accordance with the Rules of Administrative Punishment for the Violations of Prices.

Article 34, the executive organs, organizations with administrative functions and their staff members violate the provisions of this approach to increase corporate burdens, which are subject to the burden of supervision of the management and inspectorate organs of the government of more than the people at the district level to put an end to the offence, the period of return of the enterprise's property, the expenses of the enterprise to the enterprise and the inability to return, the financially and administratively dispose of the personnel and responsibilities of the supervisory authority; the loss of the enterprise shall be compensated by law; and the criminal responsibility of the law.

Article XV of the Government of the People at the district level has a burden on the management and supervision, finance, prices, audit, the rule of law and its staff, which are administratively disposed of by their units or by the inspectorate to the competent personnel and responsibilities; and constitutes an offence punishable by law:

(i) To cover or condon an offence to increase the burden of enterprises;

(ii) Failure to comply with confidentiality obligations, resulting in complaints, reports of reprisals;

(iii) The admissibility of the complaint and the absence of a case under the prescribed time frame shall be determined by law;

(iv) Other violations of oversight responsibilities.

Chapter V

Article 36 oversees the enforcement of the law to increase the burden of individual business and industrial workers, taking into account this approach.

Article 37 of this approach has been implemented since 1 August of 260.