Advanced Search

Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Security Facilities Of Construction Project Supervision And Administration

Original Language Title: 宁夏回族自治区建设项目安全设施监督管理办法

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Regulatory approach to the construction of security facilities in the Nin summer self-government area

(Act No. 35 of the People's Government Order No. 35 of 13 October 2011, published as of 1 December 2011) at the 102th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the Nin summer Autonomous Region, held on 13 October 2011

Chapter I General

Article 1, in order to enhance oversight of the construction of project security facilities, to prevent and reduce production of safe accidents and to secure the lives and property of the people, to develop this approach in the light of the relevant laws, regulations, such as the People's Republic of China Security Production Act.

Article 2

Legislation, legislation and regulations provide for the construction of security facilities and their supervision.

Article 3. The construction of project safety facilities, as described in this approach, refers to the totality of equipment, facilities, devices, construction (construction) and other technical measures used by productive operators in preventing accidents.

Article 4

The development reform, economic and informationization, construction of rural and urban areas, and transport industry authorities, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, implement oversight over construction of project security facilities within their purview.

The design, construction and production of the coal construction project security facility is carried out in accordance with the provisions of the national legislation on coal mining and is reported to the safe production of the management reserve.

Article 5 The construction of the project security facility must be designed in parallel with the main works, while at the same time being constructed, with inputs for production and use. Investment in construction of project security facilities should be included in the construction of project estimates.

Chapter II

In carrying out the feasibility study on the construction of the project, the productive units should, on their own initiative, justify their security production conditions, prepare safety condition statements and commission security pre-assessments and prepare safety pre-assessment reports by the corresponding security evaluation body:

(i) A project for the construction of non- coal mines;

(ii) Construction projects for the production, storage of hazardous chemicals, including the diversion of hazardous chemicals through long-range pipelines;

(iii) Construction projects for the production, storage of cigarettes;

(iv) The self-governing area and municipal, district-level priority construction projects in industries such as smelting, metallurgy, machinery, lightwork, textile, tobacco, trade, business, industry, roads, water transport, local railway lines, electricity and electricity.

Article 7. When the productive units carry out construction projects other than under Article 6 (non-continuation of coal, under the same conditions) they should conduct an integrated analysis of their security production conditions and facilities, form a written report and report on the management of safety production monitoring.

Article 8. In carrying out the initial design of construction projects, the productive units should be entrusted with the design of project safety facilities and the development of project safety-specific features.

The construction of a project security facility should be designed to consider the security response measures proposed in the construction of the project safety condition report and the security advance evaluation report.

Article 9. After the completion of the design of construction project safety facilities under Articles 6, paragraphs I, II and III of this approach, the production operation shall submit a review request to the safety and productive management and submit the following information:

(i) The construction of project approval, approval or documentation;

(ii) Applications for the design review of the project security facility;

(iii) The design qualifications certificate of the design unit;

(iv) Preliminary design reports and security features for construction projects;

(v) Construction of project safety pre-assessment reports and related documentation information;

(vi) Other information on the legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions.

Article 10

(i) The construction of project approval, approval or documentation;

(ii) Preliminary design reports and security features for construction projects;

(iii) Pre-project security evaluation reports and related documentation information.

Article 11. In carrying out the design of a project security facility other than under Article 6 of this approach, the productive units shall organize themselves to review, form a written report and report on the safety and productive management reserve.

Article 12 Upon receipt of the application by the security production monitoring authority, the applicant shall be informed in writing of the decision to be admissible or inadmissible within five working days after receipt of the request.

In respect of the applications that have been accepted, the security production supervision management should make decisions on approval within 20 working days of the date of receipt and inform the applicant in writing. No decision could be taken within 20 working days, with the approval of the head of the sector, 10 working days could be extended and the applicant should be informed in writing of the reasons for the extension period.

Article 13. Construction of a project security facility is designed in one of the following cases, without approval, and no construction shall be initiated:

(i) No construction project approval, approval or documentation;

(ii) The design of design units with corresponding qualifications;

(iii) The security advance evaluation report was prepared by the security evaluation body that did not have the corresponding qualifications;

(iv) No design in accordance with laws, regulations, regulations and national standards relating to safe production, or sectoral standards, technical norms;

(v) Failure to adopt security responses and recommendations in the report of the security advance evaluation and to provide no full justification;

(vi) No other conditions under the law, regulations and regulations are incompatible with.

Article 14.

Chapter III Construction of project security facilities

Article 15. Construction of a project security facility shall be carried out by construction units that have the corresponding qualifications and be constructed in conjunction with the construction of project subjects.

The construction units should develop safety technical measures and construction on-site temporary power programmes in the design of the construction organization, while the construction of specialized construction programmes for the larger hazardous subsectors in accordance with the law and accompanying safety tests.

The construction units should be designed in strict compliance with safety facilities and related construction technical standards, regulating construction and responsible for the quality of the work of the security facility.

Article 16 found that the security facility design document was misleading and should be presented in a timely manner to the productive units, design units. Production units, design units should be processed in a timely manner.

The construction unit found that there were significant security features in the design of the security facility and should immediately cease construction and report on the restructuring of the productive units. The construction could be resumed after the replacement of qualifications.

Article 17 shall review whether safety technical measures in the design of construction organizations or specific construction programmes are in compliance with the mandatory standards for the construction of project security facilities.

In the course of the implementation of the penitentiary system, the construction units were found to be inclined with accidents and should be required to restructure the construction units; the situation was serious and the construction units should be required to stop the construction work temporarily and to report on the production units in a timely manner. The construction unit refuses to modify or stop the construction, and the engineering unit should report to the relevant authorities in a timely manner, and the authorities should be responsible for doing so?

Following the completion of the construction of the project security facility, the productive units should inspect the security facility and replicate the problems identified in a timely manner.

After completion of construction projects under Article 6 of this approach, construction projects in accordance with the relevant provisions need to be piloted and should be carried out in formal inputs for production or pre-use.

The construction project for production, storage of hazardous chemicals should be preceded by the construction of a safe production control management record.

The duration of the trial should not be less than 30 days, up to 180 days, except for the industries that are otherwise provided by the relevant State or which require special requirements.

Chapter IV

After the completion of the construction of a project security facility under Article 6 of this approach or the completion of the probation operation, the productive units should be entrusted with testing and inspection evaluation of security facilities by the security facility with the corresponding qualifications of the security facility inspection and security evaluation agencies. The security facility inspection body and the security evaluation body should have a safety facility inspection report, respectively, and the construction project safety inspection evaluation report.

Article 21, the security facility inspection body and the security evaluation body should strictly conduct testing, inspection evaluation, and legal responsibility for testing and inspection findings.

Resistance systems have been introduced for specialists or intermediary organizations that have direct stake in construction of project units or construction of project design units.

The security evaluation body is engaged in the construction of a security advance evaluation of the project, and no longer undertakes a security test evaluation of the same construction project.

Article 22, paragraph 1, of this approach shall apply to safe production supervision management for the completion of the safety facility and submit the following material:

(i) The application for inspection of the security facility;

(ii) Review of views on the design of security facilities (reprinted);

(iii) Modalities for the construction units (relead copies);

(iv) The construction of the project safety inspection evaluation report and the re-recognition of its problems;

(v) A security production management structure or a safe production manager;

(vi) Safety training education and qualifications of practitioners;

(vii) Security facilities require probationary operations and should provide self-identification reports;

(viii) Other information on the legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions.

Article XXIII. Before the production of construction projects under Article 6, paragraph 4, of this approach, after the completion of the inspection by the competent authorities, a security production monitoring management case should be submitted to the following documents:

(i) Statement of views on the design of security facilities (reprinted);

(ii) Modalities for the construction units (relead copies);

(iii) Construction of project safety inspection evaluation reports and corrective confirmation of their problems;

(iv) The establishment of a security production authority or the staffing of a safe production manager;

(v) Training and qualifications of practitioners in safety education;

(vi) Security facilities require probationary operations and should provide self-identification reports.

Article 24

Article 25 Upon receipt by the security production supervision management of the application for the completion of the construction of the project security facility, the decision to be admissible or inadmissible within five working days of the receipt of the request shall be communicated in writing to the applicant.

In respect of the applications that have been accepted, the security production supervision management should make a decision of eligibility within 20 working days of the date of receipt and inform the applicant in writing; in 20 working days, it is not possible to take a decision, with the approval of the head of the sector, to extend 10 working days and to inform the applicant in writing of the reasons for the extension period.

Article 26 has one of the following cases when the security facility is collected and is not eligible for production or use:

(i) No construction units with corresponding qualifications;

(ii) No construction or quality of construction in accordance with the construction of the project security facility design document or the lack of compliance with the requirements for the construction of the project safety facility design document;

(iii) Construction of a project security facility is not in line with national standards for construction technology;

(iv) The absence of a security evaluation body with a corresponding qualifications to conduct a safety test evaluation or a safety-seeking evaluation;

(v) Safety facilities and safety conditions do not meet the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations, regulations and national standards or industry standards, technical norms;

(vi) The discovery of unreplaceable accidents during construction project probation operations;

(vii) No security production management is established by law or by a security production manager;

(viii) The failure of practitioners to undergo training in safety education or to be eligible accordingly;

(ix) No other conditions under the law, regulations and regulations are incompatible with.

The construction of the project security facility, as previously provided, has not been completed through the completion of the test, and the production of the business unit could apply once again to the receiving sector.

Chapter V

Article 27 does not provide a warning of the safety conditions for production and security pre-assessments for construction projects under article 6 of this scheme, which may be fined up to three million dollars.

Article 28 does not conduct a comprehensive analysis of the conditions and facilities for the safe production of projects other than under Article 6 of this scheme, produce written reports and war warnings for the safe production of the management reserve, which may be fined by more than two thousand dollars.

Article 29 provides for construction projects under Articles 6, paragraphs I, II and III of this scheme, with penalties under article 83 of the People's Republic of China Act on Safety of Production:

(i) Without the design of a security facility or the design of a security facility without the consent of the safe production supervision management to carry out its work;

(ii) The construction unit does not design construction in accordance with approved security facilities;

(iii) Prior to the production or use of inputs, the security facility was not experienced.

Article 36

(i) No security facility design or safety facility design has not been made available to the safe production monitoring management;

(ii) The construction unit was not designed in accordance with the security facility;

(iii) Prior to production or use, the inspection of the security facility has not been made available to the safe production monitoring management.

Article 36 of this approach provides for construction projects other than those provided for in Article 6 of this scheme, where the production units are one of the following conditions, the time limit for the operation of the production unit is being changed and may be fined up to three thousand dollars:

(i) No security facility design;

(ii) The design of safe production monitoring management cases by security facilities;

(iii) The construction unit was not designed in accordance with the security facility;

(iv) The safety facility has been completed and has not been reported to the security production monitoring management.

Article 32 has undergone significant changes in the design of construction project safety facilities, and the production units have not reported the approval sector to review their consent to start-up work, with the time limit being converted to a fine of up to three million dollars.

Article 33 agencies responsible for security evaluation, testing, one of the following cases, warnings, and a fine of one million dollars; severe circumstances, suspension of a half-year period and a fine of up to three0,000 dollars; and the lawful disposition of the responsible person:

(i) Inadequate practitioners to conduct safety evaluation and testing activities on the ground;

(ii) Safety evaluation reports, testing reports are incompatible with the actual situation or there is a significant omission, but no significant loss has been caused;

(iii) Non-compliance with the relevant laws, regulations, regulations and national standards, industrial standards, and safety evaluation, inspection activities.

Article 34 agencies responsible for security evaluation, testing work, false testimony or reporting, constituting criminal liability under the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code, forfeiture of proceeds of conflict, forfeiture of proceeds of violations, for more than five thousand dollars of the proceeds of the offence and for fines of less than five thousand dollars for the proceeds of the offence or for the proceeds of the violation?

Removal of the corresponding qualifications of the body having committed a former offence.

Article XV Departments and staff members with the responsibility to monitor safe production include one of the following acts, which are punishable under the relevant legal regulations, such as the People's Republic of China Security Production Act:

(i) A review or completion of the receipt of the mandated procedures and conditions through the construction of the project security facility;

(ii) Be found that the construction of security facilities violates the relevant legal, regulatory and methodological provisions and is not dealt with by law;

(iii) Non-performance of regulatory responsibilities for approved construction projects under the law, finding that they no longer have the conditions for safe production to withdraw the original approval document or to find that safe production is not subject to scrutiny;

(iv) Design, construction and completion of inspection units for security facilities;

(v) Other abuses of authority, omissions, provocative fraud.

Administrative penalties under this approach are determined by the management of safe production oversight. The types, scales and decision-making organs of administrative penalties are provided by law, administrative regulations and regulations.

The management of safe production monitoring should be processed by other relevant departments and should be transferred in a timely manner and documented.

Annex VI

Article 37