(Adopted by the 81th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the city of Zenin on 19 December 2011 by Decree No. 48 of 28 December 2011, No. 48 of the Order of the People's Government of the city of Zenin, which came into force on 1 March 2012.

Article 1, in order to regulate the identification of property prices, preserve the legitimate rights and interests of national interests and citizens, legal persons, other organizations, develop this approach in the light of the provisions of national legislation, regulations and regulations.

Article 2 refers to the identification of property prices referred to by the judiciary, the executive branch and the arbitral body (hereinafter referred to as the entrusting authority) in cases under their respective jurisdiction, the price identification body established by the price authorities is responsible for the lack of price, the difficulty in determining prices and other financial transactions requiring the determination of prices.

Article 3. The application of this approach shall apply to the identification of property prices and management activities in the present municipal administration.

The provisions of the law, legislation and regulations are otherwise provided.

Article IV. The municipal price authorities are responsible for overseeing the management of the identification of property prices within the city's administration. The district price authorities, under the guidance of the municipal price authorities, are responsible for overseeing the management of the identification of property prices in the present administration.

Article 5 Price identification bodies and price-requents should be guided by objective, fair and scientific principles.

Article 6. The price identification body established by the price authority specifically assumes the identification of the property in question.

Article 7. The judiciary, the executive branch shall require criminal cases, administrative case-related financial price identification or determination, and shall be entrusted to the price identification body established by the price authorities and shall not be entrusted to the price identification body established by the non-price authorities.

Civil litigation cases, administrative litigation cases, financial price identification of arbitration cases may be delegated to the price identification body established by the price authorities.

Article 8. The price identification body established by the municipal price authorities to receive the identification of property prices commissioned by the municipal commissioner and other admissible.

The price identification body established by the district price authorities is governed by the sub-management provisions for the identification of property prices in the present administration.

Article 9. The price identifiers are granted by law to the State's price determination certificate and are registered by the price authorities of the State.

Article 10 entrusts the organ with the task of commissioning the price identification body to complete the price certificate and provide information and information in accordance with national provisions.

After the approval of the price identification body, more than two price-confirms should be appointed.

The price identifiers have a family relationship with the relevant party or are in the interest of the identification project, and the price identifiers should avoid themselves, entrusting the organ or the party involved may apply for its avoidance.

The evasion of the price-consensor was decided by the head of the price-recovery body, who was decided by the price authorities.

Article 12 Price identification bodies should be based on the time of the identification of baselines, the local equivalent price, the quality and the new strength.

At that time, local equivalent prices were calculated according to the following provisions:

(i) At that time, local equivalents were government-predictable, based on government pricing;

(ii) At that time, local equivalents were subject to the Government's guidance price, based on the Government's benchmarking price for guiding prices, drawing on actual price levels;

(iii) At that time, local equivalents were subject to market adjustments and were calculated at the same time, at the same time, in the same market and at market secondary prices for the same type of property.

Article 13. The price identification body may, in its identification activities, draw the assistance of the delegated authority in accessing information relating to the accounts, documents, etc., may be informed by the units and individuals involved in the commissioning of the matter or requesting the relevant price data.

Article 14. After the completion of the identification process by the price identification body, price-confirmation findings should be given to the commissioning body.

The price determination of criminal cases should be found within three days of the date of the commission of the commission, and the price determination of other cases should be found within 7 days of the date of the acceptance. The price recognition could not be completed within the above-mentioned period, with approval by the head of the price-recognition body, the extension period should not exceed 10 days. The parties were entrusted with another agreement from their agreement.

Article 15. The price determination is confirmed by the competent authority and can serve as a basis for the processing of cases.

The awarding authority may, within 15 days of the date of receipt of the price determination, provide additional confirmation or re-identification to the original price identification body, or submit a review decision or re-identification to the parent price identification body.

The parties in question object to the conclusion of the price identification, which may submit a request for review to the commissioning body within three days from the date of receipt of the price determination. The organ entrusted with the establishment of the grounds for the objection shall decide whether to add the identification, re-identification or review of the decision.

Article 16 has one of the following cases where the price-recognized conclusion is null and void, and the price-confirm body should designate other price-consensors to make new price determinations:

(i) The price identification body or the price identification officer does not have the corresponding qualifications;

(ii) A serious violation of the procedure;

(iii) A clear basis for the identification of conclusions;

(iv) Identification of errors, inconsistencies or incompleteness of conclusions.

In one of the preceding paragraphs, the price identification body for the review decision should withdraw the price determination and make new price determinations.

Article 17, in the identification process, the price-confirmed and the price-seeking body shall not disclose the secret of the matter, complicate the wrong interest and identify the conclusions at a false price.

In violation of article 17 of this scheme, price-consensing bodies disclose secrets of the transaction, complicate the wrong interests, give false price determinations, and are warned by the price authorities, responsibly and fined by over 3,000 yen.

Article 19 The price-consensor discloses the secrets of the case, gives false price determinations, as well as abuse of authority, provocative fraud, negligence, bribes to be disposed of by law by the price authorities; constitutes an offence punishable by law.

Article 20

The fees for price identification of other cases by price identification bodies are implemented in accordance with the relevant national provisions.

The price determination was cancelled by the review decision and the price-confirming body that had concluded the price determination should refund the fees charged to the commissioning body.

Article 21, this approach is implemented effective 1 March 2012.