(Please No. 63 of 18 August 2006 by the Government of the Sea, in accordance with Decision No. 68 of 14 December 2010 concerning the amendment of 13 Government regulations, etc.), the first amendment to the first amendment of the 15 March 2012 Ministerial People's Government's first ordinary meeting to consider the adoption of the Second Amendment of the Decree No. 88 of 17 April 2012 on the date of publication of the Order of the People's Government of the Sea,

Chapter I General

Article I, in order to strengthen urban management, improve the level and effectiveness of administrative law enforcement, preserve the urban order, develop this approach in line with the provisions of the relevant legislation, such as the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Punishment Act and the letter of the Office of the State of the Rule of Law on the Competency in the City of Sea.

Article 2: Urban management within the city administration is relatively focused on the application of administrative penalties.

Article 3 governs the implementation of this approach by the municipal administration authorities (hereinafter referred to as the municipal administration). In accordance with the terms of reference established by the Regional Urban Administration Administration (hereinafter referred to as the district administration of law enforcement) authorities, the authorities of the urban administration have been relatively concentrated in the area of administrative sanctions and are subject to operational guidance and supervision by the municipal administration.

The municipal, regional and municipal administrations (hereinafter referred to as the urban administration) can be entrusted with the specific work of the urban management administrative law enforcement agencies established under the law to focus on administrative penalties.

The relevant administrative authorities, such as sanitation, planning, parking, construction, environmental protection, business and public safety, are working in urban administration in line with their respective responsibilities.

Article IV governs the centralization of the administration of urban sanitation, urban planning management, urban greenification management, municipal facilities management, construction market management, fuel management, administrative penalties provided for in laws, regulations, regulations and regulations, as well as environmental protection management, public safety transport management, and the administration of business.

Following the relatively centralized exercise of the administrative penalties set out in this approach, the relevant administrative authorities shall no longer exercise the administrative penalties that have been centrally exercised by the city's law enforcement authorities; continue to exercise administrative sanctions decisions are null and void and have corresponding legal responsibilities.

Chapter II

Section I

Article 6.

(i) There is no timely removal of the marks of paper or paints that are posted on the law of the building, the construction of the material, and a fine of up to $50 million for all, the user or the manager.

(ii) Without the approval of an assessment point on the human day bridge, the bridge and other bridges, the streets, the imposition of a fine of more than 100 million dollars.

(iii) Concrete construction and closure of the day-to-day buildings, with a fine of more than 200 million dollars.

(iv) The positive and windows of the street building on the main streets of the city, which are subject to fines of up to $50.

(v) In urban buildings, public facilities and manoeuvres, slots or unauthorised walls, posters, etc., fines of up to $50 million.

(vi) Approval of the use of public advertisements in the event of the dismissal of an advertising body, brands, advertisements or the use of non-construclusive language, which are not later commuted, with fines of up to $2.0 million, respectively.

(vii) Facilities such as buildings, senshrines and municipalities, public use, electricity, communication, defence and air conditioning are not consistent with the provisions and are fined by more than 200 million dollars.

(viii) The imposition of a fine of up to €200 million for all of the buildings and constructions, facilities laundering, floating or repairing at the urban neighbourhood.

(ix) Without the approval of the production, operation of public premises on the road and its two sides, the saving of materials, the installation of non-permanent facilities or the installation of posters, markers, passwords, promotional windows, etc., and the imposition of fines of more than 500,000 dollars, notwithstanding the fact that they have not been properly cleared or removed.

(x) No approval or approval of the requirement for outdoor advertisements, quotations, hidings, hidings, hidings, hidings, cigarettes, etc., and fines of up to 500,000 yen, notwithstanding the approval of the approved period of time or removal.

(xi) The construction of the construction site is not defined as the savings, the establishment of a temporary perimeter wall, the closure of the street construction works or the non-requirement of a peaceful settlement site after the completion of the construction work, with a fine of over €200 million.

Article 7.

(i) At the streets, public places accompanying chewings, hidings, hidings and incests of cigarettes, fruits, paper, plastic kits, packaging boxes, containers, sing. Between the building and various vehicles have been fined up to $50.

(ii) On the road, the release of wastewater is fined up to $50 million.

(iii) A fine of up to 50 million dollars for the unit and a fine of up to $200 million for individuals, with the intention of dumping, singlinging and releading urban garbage.

(iv) To impose a fine of up to 5,000 dollars on the sea, rivers, lakes, the dumping of garbage, etc.

(v) Unlike the provision for the treatment of arbitrary loss, with diarrhoea, radio and other toxic substances, a fine of more than 5,000 dollars; and a fine of up to €50 million for blend into urban life.

(vi) The vehicle carrying the discharge, liquid material is not subject to a fine of up to 1000 United States dollars, as required by the provisions;

(vii) Cards, silos, tyres, in the city area, are subject to a fine of up to 200 metres per kilometre.

(viii) In the construction of construction work, no hard-clock or no-washing facility has been established for the entry of the work area, resulting in a polluting route on the vehicle or tyres, which is subject to a fine of up to $2.0 million per square kilometre.

(ix) To reject the payment of cleaning fees and impose a fine of two times the net payment.

(x) In violation of the provision for the raising of livestock, which was not disposed of, forfeiting and imposing a fine of up to $50 million per day.

(xi) Removal of the body of poultry, rats and other small-scale animal bodies by fines of up to $50 million.

(xii) The subsoil resulting from the conservation operation was not cleared on the day, with a fine of up to €200 million, and the humidation of the vouchers and the watercourses was not delivered on the day and fines of over 1000 dollars.

(xiii) The clean-up of health-responsibilities areas, which are not regulated by the provisions, affects urban sanitation and imposes fines of more than $20 million.

(xiv) The imposition of public toilets in public places, which are not corrected, imposes a fine of up to 3,000 dollars.

(xv) The construction of urban garbage collection facilities in accordance with urban garbage management planning and environmental sanitation standards may be fined up to 10,000 dollars.

(xvi) Remuneration and damage to environmental sanitation, with a fine of up to 1000 dollars, resulting in economic losses.

(17) Enterprises engaged in urban garbage, collect and transport do not clean in a timely manner and receive garbage for urban life, with a fine of over 3,000 dollars.

Article 8.

(i) The unit that disposes of the garbage of the construction is not carrying the approved documents for the disposal of the building blocks at the time of transporting the garbage, or is not operating in accordance with the required transport routes and time.

(ii) Removal, sale, rental, loan or other forms of unlawful transfer of authorization documents for the disposal of urban buildings by fine of up to €50 million.

(iii) Unauthorized disposal of building garbage or disposal of buildings beyond the authorized scope, a fine of more than 10,000 dollars for the construction unit, and a fine of up to 3,000 dollars for the construction units, the transport of buildings.

(iv) The blend of the building block into the garbage or the transfer of hazardous waste into the building block, with a fine of up to $3000 to impose a fine of up to $20 million for individuals.

(v) The unauthorized establishment of a dumped land under Nagarbage, which imposes a fine of up to €50 million for the unit and imposes a fine of €300,000 for individuals.

(vi) The garbage of the construction garbage, living garbage and toxic hazardous waste are subject to fines of more than 5,000.

(vii) The construction unit does not make the construction garbage generated during the construction work process in a timely manner, resulting in environmental pollution, with a fine of more than 5,000 dollars.

(viii) The construction unit handed over construction garbage to a person or was disposed of without approval of units engaged in the construction of garbage transport, with a fine of more than 10,000 dollars.

(ix) The unit that disposes of the garbage of the building was abandoned along the course of the transport of the building blocks and the garbage of the sub-soiled buildings, with a fine of more than 50 million dollars.

(x) A fine of up to 50 million dollars for units and a fine of up to 2.0 million dollars for individuals, with the intention to shift, disband or lay down the garbage.

Section II Urban planning management

Article 9 does not obtain a licence for construction of engineering planning or no construction in accordance with the provisions of the construction engineering planning licence to stop construction; corrective measures may be taken to eliminate the impact on the planning implementation, a period of up to 10 per cent of the construction works; it is not possible to adopt corrective measures to eliminate the impact, remove the deadline for the removal of the period of time, exclude the physical or criminal income, and provide for a fine of up to 10 per cent of the construction of the works.

Article 10 Construction units or individuals have one of the following acts, the removal of the deadline, which may and may double the temporary construction of construction works:

(i) Interim construction without approval;

(ii) No temporary construction in accordance with the approval;

(iii) Interim buildings, construction of objects beyond the deadline for approval.

Section III

Article 11 states as follows:

(i) To trajectory, destroy the trees, imposing a fine of three times the value of the trees;

(ii) Theft of mangroves, which is fined for three times the value of the trees; the proceeds of the violation and confiscation of proceeds of the offence;

(iii) Exemptively to fly or post advertisements on trees, to deduct themselves or to eliminate advertisements, and to impose a fine of up to $50 million per person;

(iv) The dumping of garbage, hazardous waste, oil or mileage in the green area, with a fine of more than 5,000 dollars;

(v) Remuneration of buildings and construction within the Green Land, with a fine of more than 5,000 dollars;

(vi) A fine of up to 1000 dollars in the green area or incineration;

(vii) In violation of the planned establishment of a variety of assessment points in the green area, a fine of more than 5,000 dollars;

(viii) Damage to the Greenization Facility in Towns, with a fine of three times the value of the facility.

Article 12 punishes:

(i) The construction project was not completed at the time of the completion of the approved greenization criteria, with the deadline for the replacement of the approved greening standard; the delay had not reached the approved greening standards, with a fine of up to $50 million per square metr, in accordance with the shortfall in the green area, and the payment of the Greenization Administrative Authority;

(ii) Reimbursement of the nature of green use, conversion or exit of the time limit, reactivation of the green area and fines of up to 1000 dollars per square metr; failure to restore the green area or to cause loss of the green function to impose a fine of two times the payment of the Greenization indemnity;

(iii) The illegal occupation of green areas in towns or, notwithstanding the approval of the temporary use of the green area, which was not returned, the time limit was returned and fined between 2 and 3 times the payment of the royalties on a temporary basis;

(iv) Damages and damage to greenfields in towns, except compensation, and fines of three times the value of the loss;

(v) Removal of trees by means of a fine of three times the value of the trees; resulting in the death of transplanted trees, which is fined for four times the tree value;

(vi) Removal of trees by means of a fine of five times the value of the trees and the replacement of the same number of trees in situ;

(vii) Renovate manoeuvres or report to the Greening Administration and the Green Land Conservation Management Unit within the prescribed time period, warnings may be made and fines up to 5,000 dollars.

Section IV

Article 13. In the course of municipal road survey, design, construction, construction and engineering, penalties are imposed for:

(i) Excluding the work of the unit's qualifications, ordering to stop the offence, submitting the awarding authority to reduce the level of credit, design fees or fines of more than two times the award;

(ii) The absence of a certificate of credit for the purpose of the work, which is prohibited by a fine imposed under the preceding paragraph; and the confiscation of proceeds of an offence;

(iii) The acquisition of a certificate of excellence by means of deceivation, which is submitted to the issuing authority for the suspension of the award certificate, which is fined in accordance with subparagraph (i) of this article, and forfeiture of proceeds derived from the law.

Article 14. In the construction of municipal roads, the construction unit consists of one of the following acts, a change of responsibility, a fine of more than 4 per cent of the works contract price; and liability under the law:

(i) Non-organizational clearance and unauthorized delivery;

(ii) Inadequate access and unauthorized delivery;

(iii) The non-qualified construction works are collected in accordance with the eligibility engineering tests.

Article 15 has one of the following acts, and is responsible for its transformation and rehabilitation. (b) The loss shall be compensated by law:

(i) Beating cement, mortars and concretes on the road;

(ii) Exhumation of ground, dumping of waste, saving material within urban bridge facilities, lighting facilities;

(iii) Resistance of pre-maxes and slopes;

(iv) Removal of vehicles and parking vessels within the framework of the bridging facilities;

(v) Reimbursement of urban road lighting facilities;

(vi) Private self-exploitation, cut-off power sources or self-contained communications lines (bush), and other facilities;

(vii) Other damage to urban roads, bridges and urban road lighting facilities.

Article 16 consists of one of the following acts:

(i) No change procedures have been taken in accordance with the authorized place, area, use, duration or excavation of urban roads;

(ii) No security mark and safety-safety facilities were installed on the road construction site in urban areas;

(iii) Exhumation of roads without technical requirements, or failure to clean the ground after the occupation, excavation of urban roads, rehabilitation of roads and original road traffic facilities;

(iv) The property rights units of various pipelines and the urban road conservation responsibilities unit found that the routing and the shortage of subsidiary facilities, such as the garet, were not promptly filled, rehabilitated or failed to take effective safety protection measures;

(v) Authorize vehicles, ferry vehicles or other vehicles damaged by roads or bridges;

(vi) Renovate the line under the urban road without formalizing the approval process.

Article 17 is one of the following acts:

(i) Reoccupation and excavation of urban roads;

(ii) The construction of buildings and construction materials within the context of urban roads and urban bridges;

(iii) Renovate the road entrance;

(iv) Consistency with the bridging line;

(v) Retire advertisements or other flyers on the road light facility.

Section V

Article 18

(i) The construction unit will grant the construction of a engineering package to a fine of up to 500,000 yen without a corresponding level of excellence.

(ii) The construction unit will build the engineering amputation package, which is fined by more than 1 per cent of the total or partial use of State funds, and may be submitted to the Principality Department for suspension of the project or suspension of funds.

Article 19 Construction units consist of one of the following acts, which are being fined by more than 500,000 dollars:

(i) To compel the contractor to bid at a lower cost price;

(ii) Arbitrary compression of reasonable work periods;

(iii) A clear or implied reduction in the quality of the work by design units or construction units in violation of the mandatory standards of construction;

(iv) The construction map design document was not reviewed or reviewed in a manner that was not qualified and was self-established;

(v) No procedures for quality supervision of the works in accordance with national regulations;

(vi) Express or imply that construction units use unqualified construction materials, construction components and equipment;

(vii) No completed inspection reports, confirmation of documents or authorization for the use of the documents file, in accordance with national provisions.

Article 20 provides that construction units violate the provisions that are not subject to the law of the administration of the work to be carried out by the institution, which is subject to a fine of up to 3,000 dollars.

Article 21, Construction units have one of the following acts, corrective orders, which are more than 4 per cent of the works contract price:

(i) Non-organizational clearance and unauthorized delivery;

(ii) Inadequate access and unauthorized delivery;

(iii) The non-qualified construction works are collected in accordance with the eligibility engineering tests.

Following the completion of the construction work, the construction unit was not transferred to the construction of the project file by the administrative authorities or other relevant departments, with a fine of more than 10,000 dollars.

Article 23, which does not obtain a construction licence or the opening of a business report, has not been approved and is responsible for the cessation of construction, a period of time being converted to a fine of more than two per cent of the construction unit's contract price; and a fine of up to 3,000 dollars for the proceeds of the violation, and a fine of more than 5,000 yen for the proceeds of the offence.

Article 24 redirects the construction of the construction project to avoid the processing of construction permits to disband the construction of the construction project by releasing the construction orders that do not meet the conditions of the start and imposing a fine on the construction units and construction units respectively.

The penalties set out in the preceding paragraph are prescribed by law, regulations and regulations. There is a fine of up to 3,000 dollars of the proceeds of the violation and a fine of more than 5,000 dollars of the proceeds of the offence.

Article 25 refers to the use of false documentation to deceive the construction licence and the transfer of the licensee to recover the construction licence, order the cessation of construction and impose a fine on the responsible unit.

The penalties set out in the preceding paragraph are prescribed by law, regulations and regulations. There is a fine of up to 3,000 dollars of the proceeds of the violation and a fine of more than 5,000 dollars of the proceeds of the offence.

Article 26 provides for the forfeiture of construction permits, which is null and void and is responsible for halting construction and imposing a fine on the responsible unit.

Responsibilities for the alteration of construction permits and fines for the responsible units.

The penalties set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2, are prescribed by law, regulations and regulations. There is a fine of up to 3,000 dollars of the proceeds of the violation and a fine of more than 5,000 dollars of the proceeds of the offence.

Article 27 reproduces the contractor's engineering package or the contract subcontracted by the law, responsibly, forfeitures of proceeds of the law, a fine of up to 1 per cent of the contract price of the construction contract, which may be submitted to the issuing authority for suspension of the operation and a reduction in the quality of the money, and, in the event of serious circumstances, the submission of the awarding authority for the award of the award.

Article 28 of the construction unit's slack of work in the construction process by using non-qualified construction materials, construction components and equipment, or by any other act that is not based on the engineering design map or the construction of technical standards, by reprioritizing the amount of more than 4 per cent of the engineering contract price; causing the quality of construction work that is not in accordance with the prescribed quality standards, is responsible for returning, repairing and compensating the resulting loss; and, in serious circumstances, the issuance of a certificate authority for suspension or reduction of the amount or a certificate of quality.

Article 29 of the construction unit does not carry out a test of construction materials, construction components, equipment and commodities, or is not subject to a probationary, probationary and related material sampling tests involving structural safety, which are converted to a fine of more than 200,000 dollars; in exceptional circumstances, the submission of a warrant for the suspension of the operation, the reduction of the level of qualifications or the repayment of the award.

Article 33 does not fulfil the obligation to repair or delay the fulfilment of the obligation to perform the repairs, and is changing with a fine of up to 200,000 dollars and liability for damage caused by quality deficiencies during the maintenance period.

Article 31 covers the renovation of the construction subject or the restructuring of the structure, does not design the self-engineered construction of the programme, reorder the fine of up to 500,000 dollars, and the construction user of the house has been forced to change the subject of the construction and the heavy structure in the course of the renovation process, and is responsible for the correction of the fine of over 500,000 dollars.

Article III, in violation of the provision for self-confidence on the construction site, the time limit was changed and was fined for the use of units with a maximum of up to 1 million dollars per fine per person by the actual pooled on the construction site.

Article 33 investigates, design units will reproduce the contractor's engineering package or the subsidiaries of the law, and forfeiture proceeds of the law, fines for the survey, design unit contract agreement, which exceed 50 per cent of the design fee, may be submitted to the issuing authority to suspend the operation and reduce the level of qualifications, in the event of serious circumstances, and the issuance of the certificate of the award.

Article 34 Surveys, design units have one of the following acts, corrective orders and fines of more than 30,000 dollars; causing major engineering quality accidents; submitting orders by the issuing agency to stop the scale and reduce the level of qualifications; and in the event of severe circumstances, submitting a certificate to the issuing authority for the suspension of the award certificate:

(i) The survey unit did not conduct a survey of the mandatory standards for construction of the project;

(ii) The design cell does not carry out the engineering design based on the results of the survey;

(iii) Designated construction materials, production plants for construction components and suppliers;

(iv) The design cell has not been designed in accordance with the mandatory standards for construction;

(v) The construction of new structures, new materials, new process construction works and special structures, and the design units do not make recommendations in the design of measures to guarantee the safety and prevention of accidents in production.

Article 35 states that there is one of the following acts, a fine of more than half a million yen to submit a certificate organ to reduce the level of money or to revoke the certificate of payment; and forfeiture with the proceeds of the violation:

(i) A collusion with construction units or construction units to circumvent the quality of the work;

(ii) Non-qualified construction works, construction materials, construction components and equipment will be signed in accordance with qualifications.

Article XVI, in violation of the provisions of article 36, provides that a person responsible for the cessation of an offence shall be liable to a fine of up to 3,000 yen; the confiscation of proceeds of an offence; the transfer of a certificate of excellence shall be transferred to the issuing authority to reduce the level of qualifications by law, order the suspension of the operation; and, in serious circumstances, the transfer of a certificate to the institution of the award of a certificate of credit by law:

(i) The failure to obtain the instrument of ratification of the institution of the application of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution of the operation;

(ii) Overstep the scope of the administration of justice;

(iii) Location, transfer, leasing, painting and counterfeiting certificates;

(iv) The transfer of other persons by the administration of justice;

(v) The construction units or construction materials, construction components and equipment supply units are covered or operationally related.

Article 37, without registration, has been engaged in construction surveys and design activities in the name of the registered construction engineering survey, design agents, to stop violations and to confiscate proceeds of the violation, with a fine of more than five times the proceeds of the offence.

Article 338, construction of engineering surveys, design of registration practitioners and other professional technicians, are not employed by a survey, design unit or by two surveys, design units, carrying out construction of engineering surveys, design activities, order to stop violations, confiscate proceeds of violations, paying more than five times the amount of fines from the violation; in serious circumstances, the issuance of a certificate authority to stop the implementation of the operation or to cancel the certificate of eligibility.

Article 39, without registration, is in the form of a treasury operation in the name of the treasury engineer, is being restructured, with a fine of up to 1 million yen in 2000.

Article 40

(i) Carry out the operation in private on behalf of the individual;

(ii) Removal, rent, borrower and selling certificates;

(iii) At the same time, at the same time, over two penitentiary units;

(iv) The contractor operates construction and construction of materials sales operations or functions in government organs, construction units, equipment and material supply units.

Article 40 provides for a six-month suspension certificate for the transfer of the certificate organ to the certificate of service, in the event of serious misconduct or favour of private fraud in the administration of justice.

Article 42, registered architects, registered structural engineers, supervisors and supervisors, etc., have resulted in a loss of quality accident, transferred to the issuing authority to cease the operation for a period of one year; causing a major quality accident to be transferred to the issuing authority to revoke the certificate of eligibility for the operation, five years without registration; particularly harsh circumstances, and the transfer of the licensee to the institution for life.

Article 43 must be subject to tendering projects without solicitation, which would be necessary to make tenders available for a project to be converted into a piecemeal or otherwise to avoid tendering, and the time limit would be converted to a fine of up to 10 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per day of the project's contract, which could suspend the execution of the project or the suspension of funds allocated for all or in part of the use of State-owned funds, and would be disposed of in accordance with the law.

Article 44 of the construction works that must be solicited by law, the solicitation owner organizes tenders without having passed the solicitation notice or the solicitation invitation to establish a request for approval by the executive authority or entrusts the solicitation agent with the solicitation for tendering, and the solicitor has not been charged within 15 days of the award of the contract to establish the administrative authority for the purpose of redirecting the proceedings and may impose a fine of up to 3,000 dollars.

Article 42 does not submit a written report on tendering to the establishment of administrative authorities within 15 days of the date determined by the medium-term programme, which is correct and may be fined by over 3,000 dollars.

Article 46 terminates tenders after the publication of the solicitation notice, the issuance of tender invitations or the sale of solicitation documents or prequalification documents, giving a warning, in addition to the justification, of a fine of up to 3,000 dollars in circumstances.

Article 47: The solicitation or the solicitation agent has one of the following cases:

(i) Not to issue a solicitation announcement in the designated media;

(ii) To invite the solicitation to send a tender invitation under the law;

(iii) From the date of the sale of solicitation documents or prequalification documents to the end of the sale, less than five working days;

(iv) The project required by law for solicitation, which is not less than 20 days from the date of the submission of the solicitation documents;

(v) Public tenders should be made without open tendering;

(vi) To make tenders without tendering conditions;

(vii) The approval process should be carried out without implementation;

(viii) No tender shall be made in accordance with the approval by the project approval department;

(ix) To receive tender documents after the deadline for submission of tender documents;

(x) The number of bidders is not in accordance with the statutory requirement to reproduce tenders.

It was found to be invalid for the solicitation and should be re-produced.

Article 48 imposes a fine of up to 250,000 dollars for the direct responsibility of the procuring entity and more than 10 per cent of the unit responsible for the solicitation activities, or for the solicitation, the collusion of tenderers that undermines the interests of the State, the public interest or the legitimate rights of others, and a fine of up to 250,000 dollars for the construction of the competent and other direct responsible persons directly responsible.

Article 49 limits or excludes potential bidders by imposing discrimination on potential bidders, obliges tenderers to form joint tenders or limit competition among tenderers, and reorders to fines of up to 50,000 dollars.

Article 50 solicitors who are required to make tenders in accordance with the law disclose to others the names, quantity or other circumstances of potential bidders who have obtained the solicitation documents or may affect fair competition with respect to tenders, or the release of the mark, warnings may be made to the extent that they are subject to a fine of up to 10,000 yen; and that the competent and other directly responsible persons directly responsible for the unit are treated in accordance with the law.

Article 50 quantify the bidder other than the successful tenders recommended by the Commission under the law, which must be subject to the approval of the bid by the Commission after the rejection of all tenders. In order to be rectified, a fine of more than 10 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per cent of the project could be made available to the head and other direct responsibilities directly responsible for the unit.

In article 52, the solicitor does not determine the successful bid at the prescribed time, or after the issuance of the letter of assignment, changes in the outcome of the mark shall not be justified in the form of a contract with the moderate marker or, in the case of the contract, give a warning to the marker or modifying the substantive content of the contract.

After the notice of the intermediate tender was issued, the bidder could remove the mark and forfeiture its tender bonds without justification of the contract with the solicitor.

Article 53 sets of tenders between tenderers or collusion of tenders with tenderers, the bidder is computed by means of bribes to the solicitor or to the members of the board of tenders, the inefficiency of the subsidiaries, the amount of more than 10 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per cent of the principals directly responsible for the unit, and a fine of more than 10 per cent for other direct-responsibility units, the proceeds of the violation and the confiscation of proceeds of the law, and, in serious circumstances, the construction of an administrative authority to cancel the tenders and to the award.

Article 54 quantifies that tenderers who are required to make tenders on behalf of another person or otherwise in a manner that is not guilty of fraudulently falsely, the amount of the project in question is less than 10 per 1,000 per 1,000 per cent of the unit's direct responsibility and the other direct responsibilities unit of the unit, and that the proceeds of the conflict are in breach of the law and confiscated proceeds of the law, and, in serious circumstances, the construction of administrative authorities to cancel their tenders from 1 to 3 years and to bring them to the public administration of the licensee.

Article 55 examines the financial or other benefits of the bidder's members or the relevant staff participating in the evaluation to inform others about the evaluation and comparison of the tender documents, the recommendations of the successful candidates and other circumstances related to the evaluation of tenders, and gives warnings to the confiscation of the proceeds received and fines of up to 500,000 dollars, and to the appointment of the members of the valuator for the offences listed, without any further participation in any project subject to legal evaluation.

Article 56 Tests Committee members were left behind in the evaluation process, affecting the normal conduct of the evaluation process or warnings that they were unable to carry out their duties objectively and impartially in the evaluation process; in the event of a serious fine of up to 1 million yen and drew the establishment of administrative authorities to remove the qualifications of the members of the evaluation committee and not to participate in the evaluation of any solicitation project.

Article 57 is one of the following cases in which the evaluation process is not valid and should be remarked by law or reproduced in tenders, with a fine of up to 3,000 dollars:

(i) The use of tender documents does not establish criteria and methods for evaluating tenders;

(ii) The criteria and methods for evaluating tenders contain the content of preferences or the exclusion of bidders, impede or limit competition among tenderers and affect the results of the evaluation;

(iii) The participation of those who serve as members of the evaluation committee should be avoided;

(iv) The establishment and composition of the Commission shall not be in accordance with the statutory requirements;

(v) The Commission and its members have committed violations in the evaluation process and have an impact on the evaluation findings.

Article 588 assigns the subsidiaries to another person the transfer of the sub-item to transfer, after the disintegration of the items to another person, in violation of the provisions of part of the medium-sixed project, the key subcontractor, or the subcontractor's re subcontractor, the transfer, invalidity, the transfer of sub-projects, the amount of more than 10 per 1,000 live births; the proceeds of the violation and the confiscation of proceeds of the violation; and the construction of an administrative authority may be brought to the end of the business licence.

Article 599 amends the solicitation by the bidder against the bidder to enter into a contract in accordance with the solicitation documents and the bid documents of the marker, or by the solicitor, the moderate marker, in order to enter into an agreement that departs from the substantive content of the contract; and may be fined below 10 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 per 1,000 live in the mark.

The construction unit did not provide for the cost of construction of a safe production environment and security construction measures, and was responsible for the termination of construction.

The construction unit did not send the information on measures to secure construction or the removal of the works to the relevant sector reserve cases, and the time limit was changed and warned.

Article sixtieth establishes one of the following acts, the time limit is being changed to a fine of more than 500,000 dollars:

(i) The requirement that units such as survey, design, construction, engineering and engineering are not in compliance with the provisions of the law, regulations and mandatory standards of safe production;

(ii) The construction unit is required to compress the duration of the contract agreement;

(iii) The removal of the engineering package to construction units that do not have a corresponding level of qualifications.

Article 62 states that there is one of the following acts, that the duration of the period of time has been changed; that the delay has not been changed, that the issuance of the certificate authority is responsible for the suspension of the operation and a fine of up to 300,000 dollars; and, in the case of serious circumstances, that the transfer of the licensee reduces the level of qualifications until the revocation of the award certificate:

(i) No review of security technical measures in the design of the construction organization or of specific construction programmes;

(ii) The discovery of security accidents that do not require changes in construction units in a timely manner or the suspension of construction;

(iii) The construction unit refuses to reproduce or stop construction and does not report to the relevant authorities in a timely manner;

(iv) No enforcement of a mandatory standard of law, regulation and engineering.

Article 63 provides units that provide mechanical equipment and spare parts for construction works without having been equipped with full-effective insurance, restricted security facilities and devices as required by security construction, with the time limit being converted to more than three times the contract price.

Article 63 quantification units are not subject to security inspection or have been inspected by non-qualified equipment and construction machines and components, transferred to the issuing authority to stop the operation and to fine up to 100,000 dollars.

Article XV provides for the installation of self-sustainment facilities, such as heavy machines and overall enhancements, templates, with one of the following acts, for the duration of the period of time being converted to a fine of up to 50,000 yen; in the event of serious circumstances, the transfer of a warrant authority to stop the operation and reduce the level of qualifications until the repayment of a certificate:

(i) No programme for dismantling and the development of security construction measures;

(ii) No field supervision of professional technical personnel;

(iii) No self-execution certificate or false testimony;

(iv) No statement of security use to the construction unit and the process of handover.

Article 66 of the construction unit consists of one of the following acts, the period of time being reordered, the transfer of the certificate authority to the suspension of the operation and the transfer of a security production supervision authority to fine in accordance with the relevant provisions of the People's Republic of China Security Production Act:

(i) The absence of a security production management body, a dedicated security production manager or a sub-project construction exercise without dedicated safety and production manager on-site oversight;

(ii) The main heads of construction units, project heads, dedicated security producers, operators or special operating personnel, without training in safety education or conducting related work without qualifications;

(iii) There is no clear security alert marking at the dangerous sites of the construction site or no firefighting corridors, fire water sources, firefighting facilities and fire extinguishing firearms materials in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State;

(iv) No clothing for safety protection and security protection for operators;

(v) Unregistered after the establishment of a self-help facility, such as heavy machinery and overall upgrading of the trajectory, templates, was eligible;

(vi) The use of national orders for phase-out, the use of dangerous processes, equipment, materials.

Article 67 of the construction unit misappropriates the requirements for the safe production environment and security construction measures that are included in the construction of the proposed construction project budget.

Article 68 consists of one of the following acts, the time period of time being changed; the late uncorrected transfer to the issuing agency for the suspension of the operation and the fine of up to 100,000 dollars:

(i) No detailed description of the technical requirements for security construction prior to construction;

(ii) In the construction area, the corresponding security construction measures are not taken in accordance with different construction phases and surrounding environmental and seasonal, climate change;

(iii) The establishment of collective accommodations for employees in buildings that have not yet been completed;

(iv) The construction of temporaryly constructed buildings that are not in accordance with security requirements;

(v) No specific protection measures, such as adjacent buildings, constructions and underground routes, which may cause damage to construction work.

The construction unit consists of one of the following acts: a change in the period of time; an uncorrected delay; a transfer to the issuing authority for the suspension of the operation; and a fine of up to 300,000 dollars; and, in the event of a serious nature, a reduction in the level of qualifications by the transfer of the award authority until the release of the award certificate:

(i) Safeguarded equipment, mechanical equipment, construction machines and spare parts were not identified before entering the construction site or were not eligible for inspection;

(ii) The use of self-help facilities such as non-performance or inspection of non-qualified construction generators and overall enhancements of machines, templates, etc.;

(iii) Authorize units that do not have the corresponding qualifications to assume the installation of construction sites, the removal of heavy machines and the overall upgrading of cranes, templates, etc.;

(iv) In the design of the construction organization, there are no security-technical measures, construction of temporary power programmes on the ground or specific construction programmes.

Article 76, the principal head of the construction unit, the project manager did not perform the responsibility for the management of safe production, was responsibly corrected, and the transfer of the certificate authority to the construction unit was discontinued.

The main head of the construction unit, the head of the project, who had committed a previous offence, had not been criminally punished, had a fine of up to 20,000 dollars, or had been disposed of in accordance with the authority of management; no principal head of any construction unit would be appointed within five years, the project manager.

Article 76, after obtaining a certificate of qualifications, reduces the conditions of safe production and the time limit is being changed; the transfer of a certificate authority to accrue to a security production conditions that are not adapted to its level of qualifications, reduces its level of qualifications until the release of the certificate.

Article 72 does not implement the mandatory standards of legal, regulatory and engineering construction by the registered practitioners, which is responsible for the suspension of the operation for more than three months, and, in serious circumstances, the transfer of the certificate authority to revoke the certificate of eligibility for the operation and the non-registration of five years; and causes major security accidents and do not register for life.

Article 73 violates the provisions of this section and assumes liability under the law; constitutes an offence punishable by law by the judiciary.

Section VI

Article 74 of the new fuel engineering project does not report the approval of the provincial flammatory administrative authorities or the alteration, expansion of the fuel engineering project without approval by the municipal flammatory administrative authorities.

Article 76, which is one of the following acts, is responsible for halting the design, construction, conversion of deadlines and imposing a fine of up to 3,000 dollars; has been designed, paid certificates, in the circumstances of a serious nature, drawing to the issuing authority the design, payment of salary certificates:

(i) No design, wage quality or failure to assume the design, construction tasks for urban fuel works at a level of excellence;

(ii) No design, construction in accordance with the relevant technical standards and norms.

Following the completion of the new construction, alteration and expansion of fuel works under article 76, the construction unit has not been organized by law for the completion of the inspection or inspection of the unauthorized delivery of the harvest, and is punished in accordance with article 23 of the scheme.

Article 77 does not obtain a licence for the operation of a fuel operation or, without approval, the establishment of a bottlenecks distributing trajectory to stop the operation of the law, forfeiture the proceeds of the conflict and pays a fine of more than three times the proceeds of the violation.

Article 78 consists of one of the following acts, responsible for the cessation of the offence and punishable by a fine of more than 3,000 dollars:

(i) The unauthorized establishment of an operating network;

(ii) Unauthorized changes in fuel facilities;

(iii) Business and distribution points without authorization for self-removal changes, suspensions, hotels, subsidiaries or mergers;

(iv) No unauthorized construction within the context of the safety protection of fuel facilities.

Article 79, in the event of a fuel operation, consists of one of the following acts, responsible for the cessation of the offence, forfeiture of the proceeds of the offence and fines of more than 300,000 yen; in the event of a serious fine of up to 3,000 dollars:

(i) Constraints, alterations, rents, transfer or transfer of licences for fuel operation;

(ii) Provision of gas sources to non-flammable operators;

(iii) The sale of fuel supplies from non-fuel operators;

(iv) Inflation of gasoline stations for other purposes.

Article 810 stimulate businesses that are not forced to enter into a gas contract by a flammable user in accordance with the principle of “equal voluntary, consensual” and are not notified to the user or to the public at the time of cessation of the supply or restoration of gas for a period of up to 24 hours, or discontinuation of any measures taken to guarantee the living of the user for more than 48 hours, reorders, warnings and fines of over 3,000 dollars.

Article 81, which is not subject to the requirement for the proper testing and testing of gas sources, shall cease the sale and impose a fine of up to 3,000 dollars.

Article 82 imposes a fine of up to 3,000 dollars for the operation of a flammable gas by an individual business and acquitting the proceeds of the violation and the operating equipment of the law.

Article 83 is one of the following acts by a flammable user, responsible for the cessation of the offence, the restatement of the status quo, compensation for damages and fines of up to 3 million dollars.

(i) Theft or diversion of gas;

(ii) Hydrocarbon bottlenecks;

(iii) Incrying bottlenecks and dumping of maiming;

(iv) Removal of steel bottlenecks;

(v) Equipment such as hydrothermal, air conditioning, which is fuelled by plumbing, which is installed by units with corresponding qualifications certificates without the consent of the fuel supply enterprise;

(vi) Other acts prescribed by law, regulations.

Article 84 Changes in the name of the user, expansion of the use of gas, changes in fuel use and installation, replication, dismantling of fixed fuel facilities, pipelines, conciliation devices, measurement orders are correct and fines of up to $3000.

Article 82 rifts of plumbing gas, unauthorizedly opening the sealed gas measurement mechanism sealed by the quantification body, or intentionally disparate and ineffective the fuel measurement mechanism, ordering the offence, pursuing the payment of gas charges and imposing a fine of up to US$ 3000 million; in serious circumstances, imposing a fine of more than 300,000 dollars.

Article 86 is one of the following acts, the order is being rectified and fined by more than 300,000 yen; in the case of serious circumstances, the fine of up to 30,000 dollars:

(i) The provision of security is not strictly enforced in the course of steel bottlenecks;

(ii) Intrusive fire operations by fuel production, storage, distribution systems, or fire operations, which are not carried out in the vicinity of the operation;

(iii) Construction of buildings, constructions on fuel pipelines and facilities, saving, exhumation of pits or saving items;

(iv) Cross cables and sandstructions near the river that paves the fuel pipeline.

Article 87 has one of the following acts in the context of the establishment of a clear mark for the safe protection of the fuel facility, corrective action, warning, and fines of more than 1,000 dollars:

(i) dumping, release of corrupted goods;

(ii) The cultivation of deep-rooted plants, such as trees, bamboo;

(iii) The unauthorized movement, coverage, alteration, removal, damage to fuel facilities and safety protection signs;

(iv) Urgently carry out operations such as welding, baking, trajectory;

(v) Be involved in the construction of electricity lines, Okinawa or drys at pipeline facilities;

(vi) A room with a fuel facility would be used as a residence room;

(vii) Other damage to fuel facilities.

Article 82, in one of the following acts, is responsible for the cessation of the violation, the restoration of the original plea, compensation for losses and fines of up to 3,000 dollars:

(i) The construction of approved public pipeline fuel works projects without justification;

(ii) In addition to emergency situations such as fire fire firefighting, the public veterans on fuel pipelines have been opened or closed without the consent of a flammable supplier enterprise.

Article 89, fuel terminals, gas plants, cooking stations, temperatures and fuel distribution facilities, has not been established in compliance with the State-mandated warning signs, and is subject to a fine of up to $3000.

Under article 90, fuel transport vehicles are on the basis of suspension by agencies, warehouses, chambers, theatres, hospitals, schools, 100 metres near populated areas, close to fire at 50 metres in the vicinity or at the same time by the driver and the shipmentr, in order to be responsibly, warnings and fines of over 200 million dollars.

Article 90, in violation of this section, constitutes an offence punishable by law by the judiciary.

Section VII Environmental protection management

Article 92 punishes the following violations of environmental protection management:

(i) The construction operation that produces environmental noise pollution from 12 to 14 hours, from 22 to 6 p.m. is not approved and may be fined up to €50 million;

(ii) In urban urban areas, the use of the arsenal building base within the area of urban uneducation, which can be converted to a fine of up to $20,000;

(iii) Removal orders and fines of up to 2,000 yen in recreational places such as the sensitizing buildings in urban urban urban areas, which are concentrated in the area of the operation of an open singes, open theatre, open video screening;

(iv) In public areas, such as streets, squares, parks, as well as in therapeutic nutrients, landscape-size-fits-all areas, warnings may be given to broadcasters and broadcast promotion vehicles without authorization;

(v) The use of audio broadcasters in business operations or other means of issuing high noise to the customers, warnings that could be accompanied by fines of €200;

(vi) In the home area, there is no control over audio or other effective measures to cause environmental noise contamination to the surrounding population, giving warnings and fines of up to 200 dollars;

(vii) Between 12 and 1400 hours, between 212 and 6 p.m., five gold processings in the urban area, such as windows, keys, or indoor refurbishments in the residential buildings that have been delivered, do not take any other effective measures to cause environmental noise contamination to the inhabitants of the surroundings, giving warnings that a fine of up to 200 kidnapped;

(viii) In the absence of a precautionary, anti-soil measure, the storage of paints such as coal, coales, coales, sands and sods in the population concentration area may be liable, in accordance with different circumstances, to put an end to the offence, the time period is being converted or fined up to 50,000 dollars;

(ix) Inadequate measures or other protection measures, transport, loading or storage can distribute toxic hazardous gases or negligible substances, order the cessation of the violation, and the period of time being converted to a fine of up to 50,000 dollars;

(x) The operators of the catering services do not take effective pollution control measures, resulting in contamination of the residential environment of the near-resident population, the cessation of the offence and the conversion of the deadline to a fine of up to 50,000 dollars;

(xi) In areas where population concentration and other special protections are required under the law, the burning of paints, rubbers, plastics, leathers, garbage and other substances producing toxic harmful futiles and malicious gases is responsible for the cessation of the offence and a fine of up to $20,000;

(xii) To stop the offence by prohibiting the production of smoking contaminated substances in the region, in the vicinity of the airport, in the vicinity of the transport dry line, and in the local people's Government, in such a way as to prohibit the use of smoking contaminated substances in the region, such as slanders;

(xiii) Emissions to urban water bodies, dumping of industrial dissused residues, which are responsible for the elimination of the impact and can be fined up to 1 million dollars;

(xiv) The burning of buoys in urban roads, public places outside the street or neighbourhoods and their surrounding areas is subject to a fine of up to $50 million;

(xv) Environmental pollution operations, such as repair of vehicles, laundering vehicles, in urban roads, in public places, with a fine of up to 1000 dollars;

(xvi) The sale of fire pollution, such as coal, cement, cham or construction works, at the street, is punishable by a fine of up to $50 million.

Section 8

Article 93 punishes the following violations of road traffic safety management:

(i) In violation of motor vehicle parking, temporary parking orders for the suspension of vehicles on the urban road, the motor vehicle driver is not on the ground or, while on the ground, refuses to move immediately, impedes the movement of other vehicles, garners and fines of 100 kidnapped;

(ii) The non-moil vehicle driver is subject to a warning or a fine of 20 kidnapped in the streets of the city; the non-moil vehicle driver refuses to accept a fine and may detain its non-mocile vehicle;

(iii) Removal orders that are not authorized to carry out parking (line) or parking parking parks in urban roads, which can be fined by more than 500,000 yen.

Section IX

Article IX imposes a fine of up to 300 million dollars for operators without a fixed place.

Article 9XV redirects individuals who distribute print advertisements and commodity samples in public places outside urban roads and their two sides, and imposes fines of up to $50.

Other provisions of chapter III

Article 96 imposes administrative penalties in the urban administration and applies the procedures set forth in the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Punishment Act, the Provisional Provisions for the Construction of Administrative Punishment Procedures and the Administrative Punishment hearings in the Southern Province.

Article 97 provides that urban management law enforcement officials (hereinafter referred to as urban law enforcement officers) may exercise the following functions:

(i) Access to a inspectorate or on-site investigation or inspection in accordance with the provisions of the law, regulations;

(ii) Access, referral or replication of information relevant to inspection matters by the inspectorate;

(iii) Access to evidence material by means such as audio recordings, videos, etc. by law;

(iv) The registration of evidence relating to the offence, such as items, by law;

(v) To inform, inter alia, that the number of communications used in connection with the operation, such as posting, is to be charged by the offender;

(vi) Administrative punishment by law;

(vii) Other mandates under the law, regulations.

Article 98, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the law, shall be treated with respect to provisional items as follows:

(i) A person who commits an administrative sanction decision within the prescribed time period shall be returned to the goods and tools that are temporarily seized;

(ii) The offender was not subject to administrative sanctions decisions and was dealt with by law by the administrative law enforcement authorities in the city.

Article 99, Citizens, legal persons or other organizations decide not to apply for administrative review by the authorities of the communes or municipalities, to be accepted by the authorities of the communes or by the law enforcement authorities of the city; and administrative sanctions decisions taken by the municipal administration do not apply for administrative review and are accepted by the Government of the city. The parties may also bring administrative proceedings to the People's Court in accordance with the law.

Article 101 Civil, legal or other organizations have the right to lodge complaints and prosecution of offences committed by the urban administration and its law enforcement officials, and the authorities should be dealt with in a timely manner in accordance with their duties.

Article 101 prevents urban management law enforcement officials from exercising their official duties under the law, in violation of the provisions of social security management, by law by public security authorities; constitutes a crime and is criminalized by the judiciary.

Article 101 bis. In law enforcement activities, urban management law enforcement officials, in violation of the provisions of the statutory procedures, misuse of their functions, negligence, provocative fraud, are subject to administrative disposition by law; and constitute a crime, criminal responsibility by the judiciary.

Urban management law enforcement officials should be compensated by law, in violation of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons and other organizations.

Article 101 ter governs the exercise of the relative concentration of administrative penalties exercised by the urban administration in violation of article 5 of this approach by the administrative authorities.

Chapter IV

Article 101 quater indicates the number of “more than” referred to in this approach, and the reference to “the following” does not contain the number.

Article 105 of this approach is not specified and is implemented in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations involved in the exercise of administrative penalties in the context of urban management.

Article 101 of this approach is explained by the administrative law enforcement component in the management of cities at sea.

Article 101