(Adopted at the 114th ordinary meeting of the Government of the People of San Suu Kyi on 19 December 2011, No. 244 of 21 December 2011, published as of 1 March 2012)

Article 1 provides for the scientific and effective implementation of price monitoring, plays an important role in price monitoring early warning in the regulation of national macro-monitoring and provincial government prices, maintaining basic stability in the overall level of market prices, in accordance with laws, regulations, such as the People's Republic of China price law, and develops this approach in conjunction with the practice of the province.

Article 2

Article 3. The price monitoring of early warning referred to in this approach refers to activities such as the collection, analysis, forecasting, reporting, publication and warning of changes in prices, costs, markets for important goods and services, in accordance with price regulatory requirements.

Article IV. Price surveillance should uphold objective and practical, scientific and effective principles that combine targeted monitoring with market survey visits, conventional monitoring and emergency monitoring.

Article 5 Governments of more people at the district level should strengthen leadership in price monitoring early warning, establish and improve the price monitoring early warning system, include requirements for price monitoring early warning in the current financial budget, and guarantee the normal conduct of price monitoring.

Article 6

In their respective responsibilities, the sectors of development reform, finance, commerce, economy and informationization, agriculture and food are aligned with the work of the price authorities to monitor early warning.

Article 7. Civil, legal and other organizations are obliged to cooperate with price authorities in monitoring early warning by law.

Units and individuals that have made significant achievements in the process of price monitoring early warning are rewarded by the Government's price authorities.

Article 8. The provincial price authorities, in line with the provisions of the national price monitoring reporting system, have developed a whole-provincial price monitoring reporting system, providing for the content of price-monitoring units, projects, standards, cycles and indicators, codes, etc. and adjusted as appropriate.

The municipal, district and district price authorities should develop price monitoring reporting systems, in line with the provincial price monitoring system, in conjunction with local real practice, and report on provincial price authorities.

Article 9

(i) Persons with task of price monitoring;

(ii) The price of commodities or services produced can reflect the price level of locally shared commodities or services;

(iii) The credibility and the sense of social responsibility;

(iv) The availability of price monitoring data collection and transmission tools;

(v) Other conditions under the price monitoring system.

Article 10. The price-monitoring unit has been established and the price authorities of the people at the district level may not be adjusted accordingly.

The price-monitoring unit has confirmed that the price monitoring mission cannot be completed because of production, the restructuring of the business and other reasons, and that the price authorities of the above-mentioned people at the district level should promptly remove their price-monitoring qualification and recover the price monitoring certificate and brand.

Article 11. Government price authorities at the district level should strengthen the guidance of price-monitoring units, conduct free operational training, provide free-of-payment of related price information on goods and services monitored, and grant funds in accordance with actual circumstances.

Article 12 Price monitoring point units should establish price monitoring booths and, in accordance with the provision of price monitoring information, no overstatements, late issuances or refusals shall be prohibited from counterfeiting, storing price monitoring information.

When the price of the commodities or services produced is volatile, the price monitoring point should be reported to the price authorities in a timely manner.

Article 13

Article 14. The Government's price authorities at the district level should enhance the analysis, forecasting, forecasting, forecasting, reporting on price developments and trends in important goods and services to the current people and the parent price authorities, reflecting problems identified in price monitoring and make recommendations.

Article 15 Government price authorities at the district level should establish sound price emergency monitoring mechanisms, one of which should implement price emergency monitoring:

(i) The price of important goods and services arises or may result in greater volatility and extraordinary changes;

(ii) Significant holidays and major activities require regulation of the appropriate level of goods and services;

(iii) The acquisition, storage and accumulation of important commodities;

(iv) Other cases where price emergency monitoring should be implemented.

Article 16, when carrying out price emergency monitoring, the Government's price authorities at the district level may temporarily designate price emergency monitoring units, identify monitoring projects, report frequency and time frames.

When price-based emergencies are disappeared in a sustained and stable manner, the Government's price authorities at the district level should stop price emergency monitoring in accordance with the relevant provisions.

In cases where prices of goods and services occur with abnormal fluctuation or when there has been an unusual fluctuation, the Government's price authorities at the district level should report the police in a timely manner to the current people's Government and the higher-level price authorities and make recommendations.

Article 18, which is closely linked to the production and life of the population, has become more pronounced and requires the publication of early warning information to society, with the consent of the Provincial Government, by provincial price authorities.

The early warning should be lifted in a timely manner when the current paragraph disappears.

The Government's price authorities at the district level should establish a robust price-monitoring system to organize daily inspections and special surveys. Specific surveys include, inter alia, price hot spot surveys, emergency surveys, appeal surveys and anticipated surveys.

Information should be provided on a real basis when government departments, business units, associations, etc. units and individuals receive price monitoring inspections.

Article 20

Article 21, price monitoring staff should have the expertise necessary to perform the price monitoring duties and be qualified by the examination, obtain administrative law enforcement documents issued by the Government of the Provincial People's Government, conduct price monitoring, investigation, and, in accordance with the provisions, offer administrative law enforcement documents.

In violation of this approach, the price-monitoring unit and the contingency price monitoring point unit are one of the following acts, which are being reprimed and warned by the Government's price authorities of more than 1000 people at the district level; in the case of serious circumstances, the fine of up to 5,000 dollars is available:

(i) The price of commodities or services produced does not be reported to the price authorities in a timely manner;

(ii) Restatements, seizures, delays or denial of price monitoring information;

(iii) Fering, storing price monitoring information.

In violation of this approach, the market survey ombudsman refused to provide information under the provisions or to provide false information, and was warned by the Government's price authorities at the district level, where the circumstances were serious and could be fined by the United States dollar.

Article 24 of the Government's price authorities and their staff violates this approach by depriving abuse of their duties,ys of negligence, favouring private fraud, or misappropriation of decision-making, in accordance with the law, and constituting an offence, criminal liability is held by law.

Article 25