(Summit 5th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of Sihan on 29 March 2012 to consider the publication of the date of publication No. 111 of the People's Government Order No. 111 of 10 April 2012)

Chapter I General

Article 1, in order to strengthen urban housing security management, ensure the safe use of homes, preserve the public interest of society, develop this approach in line with the relevant national laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 2

Laws, regulations provide for the safe management of homes by the military, religious groups and property protection units, from their provisions.

Article 3 of this approach refers to the management of homes in order to secure the use of buildings, including the safe management of homes, the management of housing safety and the management of hazardous homes.

Article IV. Safe house management should be guided by the principles of prevention, control and integration and ensuring security.

Article 5. The municipal housing administration is responsible for the management of housing security supervision throughout the city, and the municipal and district housing administration is responsible for the management of homes in the Territory, in accordance with its responsibilities.

Relevant sectors such as planning, construction, public safety, business, development reform, firefighting, urban management and safe production should be implemented in collaboration with their respective responsibilities.

Article 6. The municipal housing administration should establish a safe management system for the use of homes in accordance with the law, promote knowledge on the safe use of homes, strengthen monitoring of the safe use of homes, and put an end to and inspect acts that endanger the security of homes in a timely manner.

Chapter II

Article 7. The owner of the house, the user, shall make reasonable use of homes in accordance with the structure and purpose of the house and guarantee the overall structure of the house.

Article 8

(i) Removal of heavy emancipation, columns, and infrastructure;

(ii) Removal of heavy walls or exhumation of walls, windows etc.;

(iii) Functional changes that exceed the design criteria that may endanger the safe use of homes;

(iv) Beaching or expanding the hole in the building structure;

(v) Reduce the high number of places on the ground in the home for the increased use of space in the home, or changes in the use of the functions, such as the breadth and expansion;

(vi) Distinguished structures in large buildings such as schools, hospitals, chambers, hotels, meals, theatres, sports sites, high-level buildings, which have housing resistance, and the overall function of fire prevention.

Article 9 shall submit the following materials:

(i) Applications for changes in homes;

(ii) The owner or the owner's identity certificate;

(iii) The right to housing is registered, and the applicant should also submit a certificate of the owner's consent to changes in the housing structure;

(iv) In the case of a shared office, a certificate of consent of the complicity should be provided;

(v) Design programmes for the design of the original design units or design units with corresponding qualifications. The application for demolitions does not involve the emancipation, typology, etc. of the construction subject and the lack of design programmes, which can provide the feasibility assessment report from the housing safety accreditation body. Design units, housing safety identification institutions should be responsible for their programmes.

Article 10. The owner, the user, submits written requests to the municipal housing administration. The material is in compliance with the provision that an on-site survey should be conducted within seven working days from the date of receipt, covering fire safety, and should be consulted on the responses approved by the firefighting sector. Without approval, the applicant should be informed in writing and, on the grounds that the material is not in accordance with the provisions, the housing administration should communicate the material in a one-time manner.

Article 11. The owner or the owner is entitled to search the main structure of the house, a heavy structure, a fire-fighting structure, the design of the house and the functionality of the operation before the renovation, construction of the house, and the searchee is obliged to cooperate.

The transferee or the lessor shall notify the transferee in writing or the lessee of the main structure of the house, the heavy structure, the anti-attack structure, the design of the house for the year and the functionality.

Article 12. The property unit shall inform the purchaser in writing on matters such as the main structure of the house, the heavy structure, the structure of firefighting, the design of the homes and the use of functionalities, and shall transfer housing construction information to the pre-service enterprise, as required.

The former-provincial service enterprise should keep the housing building information in good custody and inform the owner or the user in accordance with the law of the behaviour and concerns requiring changes in house use. Construction information should be transferred in accordance with the law upon the establishment of the Commission or the replacement of the enterprise.

Article 13 Business-service enterprises, owners' committees, property units, housing property rights units should be monitored for the safe use of their services and managed homes, finding that the use of the law and the renovation of houses should be discouraged and found to be safely hidden and that the property administration should be reported in a timely manner, corrective action by the property administration sector.

Article 14. The municipal housing administration should establish a housing security management file and organize regular inspections of the security of houses in the areas of the Territory's schools, kindergartens, wards, hospitals, such as priority units and chambers, hotels, theatres, recreational places.

Business-service enterprises, management units should be able to keep the records of house safety inspections in a timely manner, and to establish the archives for the safe use of homes.

Article 15. The municipal housing administration is subject to reports of violations of the use or renovation of homes, complaints should be promptly received and the results-based respondents or the complainants should be processed by other administrative law enforcement authorities and transferred to other departments in a timely manner.

Chapter III

Article 16 provides that the identification of housing safety shall be carried out by the body established by law.

Article 17 states that:

(i) The continued use of homes beyond the design of the year;

(ii) Public places such as schools, theatres, sports parks, large chambers, meals and shops have reached half of the design time limit;

(iii) The continued use of natural disasters after the occurrence of natural disasters;

(iv) The continued use of persons who suffer from inhuman destruction;

(v) To carry out tunnels and ground-based works, to extract deep-seated pits, explosive breaks, and damage to the construction area's surrounding homes and subsidiaries;

(vi) No construction process or no construction permit has been used;

(vii) Changes in the main structure and structure of the original building due to the implementation of the breadth, expansion and major renovations;

(viii) Other legislation should be carried out in the form of housing identification.

Housing identification is commissioned by the housing owner and the area of the use of the home or by the district administration of the estate; the municipal housing administration inspectes the circumstances indicated in the previous section, while the housing owner, the user, the construction unit, etc. do not apply for the security of the house, shall be charged with the deadline for application; the late application shall be validated by the designated housing safety accreditation body by the municipal property administration. The identification costs are borne by units (persons) that should be delegated.

Article 18

Article 19 quantify institutions can accept the administrative, judicial body commissioning the safe identification of homes.

Article 20 entrusts the safety of homes with the following materials:

(i) A letter of credit for housing safety;

(ii) The identity of the commissionor or the legal certificate;

(iii) An effective certificate of ownership of the home or an effective certificate of civil rights associated with the identified house;

(iv) Other material to be provided by law, legislation and regulations.

Article 21, the identification body must conduct a safe identification of homes in accordance with the following procedures:

(i) To accept the commission;

(ii) Conduct investigations to map the history and status of homes;

(iii) On-site survey, test, record of various material damage data and circumstances;

(iv) Review and collate technical material;

(v) A comprehensive analysis, characterization, integrated judgement and recommendations for processing;

(vi) A validated concluding instrument.

The second article shall conduct an on-site survey within five working days of the date of receipt of the application for the security of the house, issue a report on the security of the house within 10 working days from the date of the on-site survey, complexity, identification of the housing structure, and failure to be completed within 10 working days, and the identification of the reporting period shall not exceed one year, in accordance with the actual circumstances.

Article 23 conducts safety recognition, with the participation of more than two identifiers, any unit or individual may not obstruct the identification of persons to conduct regular housing safety identification activities. The Housing Safety Identification Body and its identifiers are responsible for their findings.

Article 24 provides for the safe identification of fees for the home shall be carried out by the housing administration and subject to approval by the price management.

The fees are charged in accordance with the principle of whoever applies. The parties contest the findings and may apply for re-confirmation within 15 days of the date of receipt of the identification instrument. In the event of re-identification, the identification body shall designate another identifier. The re-confirmation of the applicant shall preliminarily meet the cost of the identification, agree on the conclusions and determine the costs to be borne by the applicant. Identification of conclusions is inconsistent and the costs are borne by the validation body.

Article 25. Housing security identifies national standards and implements national standards; national standards have not been promulgated to implement industrial standards. Safety recognition of industrial buildings, public buildings, high-level buildings, artefacts protection buildings should also be based on relevant professional technical standards, norms and protocols.

Chapter IV

Article 26 was identified as hazardous homes, and the housing safety certificate body should communicate the report to the owner or the user in a timely manner and report to the municipal housing administration. After reports from the municipal housing administration, the notice of dangerous homes should be given to the owner or the user in a timely manner, and views on the suspension of use or governance. The notice of dangerous homes can serve as an effective basis for the application of specific funds such as the use of personal accounts.

In accordance with the identification report, the following governance measures should be taken against the hazardous houses:

(i) Observation. Short-term use would be applicable to the adoption of appropriate safety technology measures, but it would be necessary to continue to observe houses.

(ii) Treatment. When appropriate technical measures are applied, dangerous homes can be removed.

(iii) To stop use. They apply to unserviceable values that are temporarily not dismantled and do not endanger neighbouring buildings and affect the security of others.

(iv) Overall dismantlement. There is an immediate need for the demolition of homes that are dangerous and unreserved.

As a result of the identification of houses used or processed by observers, the identification body has removed the risk and could continue to be used; it cannot be used without the risk of late governance or experience.

All those who live in dangerous homes should fulfil their governance obligations under the law.

Article 28, the district and district housing administration, should promote home ownership, the use of persons to manage dangerous homes in a timely manner, and inspect and document the results of the repair of hazardous homes and drainage.

Article 29, whose owner, the use of the owner, rejects the lack of governance of dangerous homes that endanger public safety, may be responsible for halting the use of dangerous homes and, if necessary, can take mandatory governance measures in accordance with the law, with governance costs borne by the owner and the user.

In the event of a precarious housing situation, the owner, the user, should take security governance measures and record governance. The housing owner, the user, should report in a timely manner on the city's housing administration and housing sites, the Government of the county, the city's housing administration sector and the place of houses, and the territorial Government should organize the relevant sectors to exclude the situation.

Article 31, the district, the territorial administration sector should enhance oversight of the control of dangerous homes, organize risk-free evictions in a timely manner for more than the design of time-limited stores or identified as hazardous houses and endanger public safety. The municipal housing administration sector and the district, and the people of the district, have taken drainage measures against hazardous homes, and the owner and the user are not prevented.

Article 32 governs the housing of the owner and requires the temporary relocation of the lessee, who shall be relocated in a timely manner and the owner shall continue to carry out the lease agreement, except if the lease is otherwise agreed by the parties.

Article 33, which is at risk of being identified by a neighbouring house, shall be governed by a common and shared segment and by the owner in accordance with the share provided in the Construction of the Department's Housing Contigation.

Article 34 of the Housing User has caused damage to homes by changing the housing structure or overloading, and has been identified as hazardous houses, and the owner shall be responsible for governance. Other houses are at risk due to construction, savings and collisions, and are governed by the perpetrators.

No unit of article 33, a person shall be exempted from any form or shall be used as a whole and shall be removed.

Article XVI requires the removal of the reconstruction process by the owner of the house, the use of the owner's security certificate and the letter of the hazardous house, and by the planning, construction of the relevant administrative authorities.

Chapter V Legal responsibility

Article 37, in violation of article 8 of the present approach, is warned by the housing administration sector, responsible for the restatement of the status quo by the owner or the user of the house, with a fine of up to $50 million, which is not operational, with a fine of up to $50 million.

Article 338, in violation of this approach, rejects the inspection of house safety, warnings by the property administration and fines of 1000.

Article 39, in violation of article 27, paragraphs 1, 2 and 2, of this scheme, is subject to a fine of up to $50 million for the duration of the management of the property, which is not operational. In violation of article 27, paragraph 3, a fine of more than 1000 was imposed.

Article 40 violates article 34 of this approach, with the responsibility of the housing administration to impose a deadline for the use of the house and a fine of up to 1,000 dollars.

Article 40, in violation of article 33, paragraph 5, of the scheme, imposes an immediate suspension or suspension by the property administration and a fine of up to $50 million for non-operational purposes, which is subject to a fine of up to $50 million.

Article 42, the owner, the user, refused to entrust the security of the house, rejecting the measures of governance, rejecting the implementation of the decision to deal with the collapse of dangerous homes and causing damage to others, should be subject to civil liability under the law and the transfer of the judiciary to justice.

Article 43 thirteenth, Staff of the Housing Safety Management Service, who favour private fraud and perform negligence, should be held accountable for their corresponding administrative responsibilities; serious circumstances constitute crimes and hold their criminal responsibility under the law.

Article 44 states that the identification of the contents of the report by the Housing Safety Identification Body is not true and that the loss is caused to the parties and that the corresponding liability should be borne by law.

Annex VI

Specific issues in the application of Article 42 are explained by the municipal housing administration.

Article 46 is implemented since the date of publication.