(Act No. 290 of 16 December 2011 of the People's Government Order No. 290 of 16 December 2011)

Chapter I General

Article 1 guarantees the legitimate rights and interests of the respondents in order to regulate the review and review of the correspondence, to guide the visitor to carry out its duties in accordance with the provisions of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations, such as the State Department of State's Correspondents Regulations, and to develop this approach in the light of the actual rights of the present province.

Article 2

The letter of visit referred to in this approach is reviewed and made a decision by the respondent to a letter from the relevant executive body to deal with a letter of invitations.

The letter of visit referred to in this approach is reviewed in the light of the fact that the respondent does not apply for a review of the letter from the review body, which is reviewed and decided upon by the superior administrative body of the former review body.

Article 3 Reviews and reviews of mission matters should be guided by the principles of compliance with the law, determination of facts, responsibilities, impartiality and efficiency of the public.

Article IV. The Government of the people at all levels and the work sector of the people's government at the district level are a letter of review and review body (hereinafter referred to as a review and review body). The review, review body shall perform the verification, review and verification functions in accordance with the provisions of the State Department's Correspondence Regulations and this approach.

Article 5

(i) To receive and conduct review and review applications;

(ii) Review, review and review of the letter of visit in accordance with the terms of reference;

(iii) Processing of a letter of invitation to review;

(iv) To study the issues identified in the review and review and, in a timely manner, to make recommendations for improvements to the relevant organs;

(v) Other responsibilities under laws, regulations and regulations.

More than the people at the district level may determine, in accordance with the actual work needs, the review and review of the nuclear work of a letter from other working bodies (sectors) other than the visiting body.

Article 6. Agencies (sectors) where the Government of the above-mentioned people conducts a mission review and review process should implement the review, review staff, strengthen operational training and education, and ensure that they are adapted to the review and review.

Article 7. The Government of the people at the district level should establish a mechanism for the review and review of communications from the Government's leadership, department responsible and social participation.

The review, review and review of the letter should be conducted in accordance with the actual circumstances in which relevant experts, social groups, social volunteers, etc., should be organized to improve the quality and efficiency of the review process, including through advice, mediation, hearings.

Chapter II Application and admissibility

Article 8 responds to requests for a review and review of the letter of visit in accordance with the provisions of this approach are the applicant, who has been treated in the original letter, and the review body is the applicant.

The same letter of visit was reviewed and the number of applicants for review was more than five, and the applicant could elect one to five representatives for review and review. The representative participated in the review and review of the effectiveness of the applicant's representative; however, the representative withdrew the review, reclaimed applications, altered or abandoned the review, reinsertion requests and conciliation and conciliation must be agreed by the representative's applicant.

Article 9. The respondents shall submit, within 30 days of the date of receipt of a letter of enquiry, the review of the request for review, review and review to the review, review body; and the reasons for the extension of the application shall be submitted to the review, review body within 5 days of the removal of the obstacles.

Article 10 provides for review and review and shall be in accordance with the following conditions:

(i) The applicant is not the respondent to the matter of the visit and the ex-emplator of the review;

(ii) Review, regression and fall within the terms of reference of the review body;

(iii) Specific review, review requests and facts, reasons;

(iv) To be submitted within the time period specified.

Article 11. The applicant shall submit a review and review application to the relevant administrative organs, in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The applicant is the Government of the people and shall apply to the Government of the people at the highest level.

(ii) The applicant's work sector at the district level may apply to the Government of the people at this level or apply to the authorities at the grass-roots level; it should not be determined that the authorities at the highest level should apply to the Government of the people at the current level; that the application should be made to the superior authorities; and that the province's people's work sector should be submitted to the Government.

(iii) The applicant is an institution established by law by the Government of more than the people at the district level and should submit an application to the Government of the people that has established the office; a dispatch agency established by law by the Government's work department and, in its own name, to address the matter of the mission, to review the opinion, should be submitted to the establishment of the office or to the Government of the people at this level.

(iv) The applicant is an organization mandated by law, legislation and shall apply directly to the Government or the people's Government.

(v) As a result of the separation, consolidation, revocation or functional adjustment of the applicant's former executive body, an application should be made to the superior administrative organ that continues to exercise his or her functions; and that the responsibility is not clear and is appointed by the Government of the people at the highest level.

Article 12 provides for review, review and review, which shall be in writing; written requests are difficult and may be made orally, by review, review body production of a review, review of the application, and confirmed by the applicant's verification or by chapter G.

Article 13 provides for review and review and shall submit the following materials:

(i) Applications, including names or names, residences, contact modalities, review, review of specific requests, facts and grounds, signature of the applicant or chapter, application date.

(ii) The applicant's identity; the author should also submit his or her identity certificate and authorization to the review, review body.

(iii) The original of the letter-of-mission processing and review.

(iv) Relevant evidentiary material.

(v) Other material to be provided by the applicant.

Article 14. The review, the review body shall, upon receipt of the review and review request, be reviewed within 7 days, shall be admissible and communicated in writing to the applicant and, at the same time, copies of the application or requests for copies to be sent to the applicant.

The review, review of the application material is incomplete or is not clear, and the review, review and review body shall take place or inform the applicant in writing within 7 days of the date of receipt of the application. The date on which the request is made to supplement the material is received.

Article 15, as reviewed, review and review of applications in one of the following cases, review, review and non-appointment by the nuclear organs and, in accordance with article 28, review and review of the non-admissibility decision:

(i) Incompatible with article 10 of this approach;

(ii) The request for complaints that are to be resolved by law or through legal means, such as litigation, arbitration, administrative review;

(iii) A letter visit to the General Assembly, the People's Court, the People's Procurator's Office, which is to be dealt with in accordance with the law by the People's Representatives Assembly at all levels and by the People's Office;

(iv) A complaint request for the identification, identification, testing, testing and quarantine of conclusions based on technical standards, technical norms;

(v) Call for a review of decisions and orders developed by the executive organs that are generally binding;

(vi) A letter of visit is being processed or closed;

(vii) The content of the application exceeds the scope of the processing and review of requests from the original letter;

(viii) Other cases of inadmissibility provided for by law, regulations and regulations.

The application of the terms of reference for the review, review and review shall be based on the grounds of inadmissibility and shall be communicated to the competent organ at the same time.

Article 16 shall be submitted by the applicant for written replies within five days of the date of receipt of a copy of the application under article 14, paragraph 1, of this approach or of the application of a copy of the request for a copy of the record and for the submission of the evidence of the communication, the examination of the opinion, the basis of and other relevant material. The applicant did not respond, without prejudice to the review and review process.

Article 17 re-entry, re-exploitation of the staff member in relation to a letter to which he or she was requested for review, review or visitor's direct stake should be avoided; the parties may also make a request for a waiver.

Chapter III

Article 18 Reviews, review bodies shall conduct a comprehensive review of the functions of the ex-antee, the review body, on the basis of application and procedures.

Article 19 review, review and review body shall, in principle, take a written review, provided that the applicant may, at the request of the applicant or review, review and review, consider necessary, hear the facts and reasons of the applicant and request the applicant, the relevant unit and the person's description.

Article 20, review and review bodies consider that further verification of the situation may be required, and the relevant units and personnel can be consulted, replicated, redirected and relevant documents and information. The investigators shall not be less than two.

The review and review of staff members should be confidential for the secret, commercial secret and personal privacy of the State involved in the investigation.

The investigation units and personnel should be in accordance with the law to cooperate with the work of the investigators and shall not be denied or obstructed.

Article 21 Reviews, review bodies may, inter alia, hear views from the relevant departments, units and experts on the review, review of nuclear matters, including through the convening of the solicitation meetings, the coordination meetings, the hearings, the hearings and the hearings; and may also convene relevant sectoral, unit representatives and experts to form the review team.

Article 2 provides for a review, review and review of major, complex and difficult matters, which may be organized by a review and review body, and is implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Government's letter of visit hearings.

The review, review and review of the hearings may be communicated to society by law.

The applicants may voluntarily withdraw their applications for review and review before the review, review and review decision is taken.

The applicant shall not apply again for the same facts and reasons, except where the applicant can prove that the application is contrary to his true will.

Article 24 may be self-confided in the course of review and review by the parties to the original letter of visit, or may apply for review, review and mediation by the nuclear body.

The applicant shall submit a written reconciliation agreement to the review and review body. The content of the reconciliation agreement is not in violation of the law, without prejudice to public interests and the legitimate rights and interests of others, and the review, review and review body shall be authorized and inform the applicant in writing.

As agreed by mediation, the review and review bodies should produce mediation letters. The letter of mediation should contain requests, facts, rationales and mediation findings, as well as re-entry, photocopy of the nuclear organs. The letter of mediation came into force with the signature of the parties. There was no agreement on mediation, and the review and review body should take timely review and review decisions.

Article 25, after review, review and review of applications by a nuclear body, is suspended in one of the following cases:

(i) The main evidence is being confirmed by other statutory procedures;

(ii) Examination, review of issues relating to legal, regulatory, or policy application, and the need for interpretation or recognition by the competent organ;

(iii) The whereabouts of a natural person acting as the applicant are unknown or declared missing;

(iv) Other cases requiring suspension of review and review.

After the suspension of the review and the elimination of the reasons for the review, the process should be resumed in a timely manner.

The applicant shall be informed in writing of the review, suspension or resumption of the proceedings.

Article 26, after review, review and review of applications by the review body, has one of the following cases:

(i) The withdrawal of the application by review and review body;

(ii) Agreements on self- Reconciliation and authorized by the review bodies;

(iii) Agreements on mediation by the review and review body;

(iv) Other cases under laws, regulations and regulations shall be closed and inspected.

The end shall be communicated in writing to the applicant without any review and review.

Article 27 shall be reviewed by the review and review body, and shall, in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The treatment of the original letter of visit or the review of the determination that the facts are clear, that the evidence is sufficient, that the application is based on the right, procedural legitimacy and content appropriate, and that it is maintained;

(ii) Discussed or reviewed the decision to determine whether the main facts are ambiguous, insufficient evidence, the error of application, breach of the statutory procedure, go beyond or abuse of authority, which is clearly misplaced or withdrawn. It should be responsible for reprocessing and re-entry decisions by the applicant's deadline, with the exception to which it should be inadmissible.

The applicant who reprocessing, re-examining the matter shall not make the same facts and reasons as the original processing, review of the contents or the basic decision, except as the proceedings are not lawfully retroactive. The applicant may apply for review and review in accordance with the law in connection with the re-establishment of the letter.

Article twenty-eighth review and review bodies shall, within 30 days of the date of receipt of the request, take a review, review decision; however, the time used for the replenishment of the application, the holding of hearings, expert opinions, the organization of review teams, reconciliation, mediation and suspension shall not be calculated.

The review, review and review decisions by the review body shall produce a review, review of views, plus a review, photocopy or re-entry, review-specific chapters.

The review, review and review shall be sent to the applicant within 15 days after the review, review and review decision taken by the review body. The process of delivery is governed by the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Act of the People's Republic of China.

Article 29 re-decisions shall be closed for the purpose of the letter. The applicant's non-consistency with the review decision remains in the same facts and the reason for the visit, and the executive organs at all levels are no longer admissible.

In the context of the preceding paragraph, the Government of the people of the applicant's location and the relevant departments should be able to provide the applicant with legal, regulatory, regulatory and policy advocacy and clarification.

Article 33 The applicant shall submit a new letter of visit during the review and review process, which shall be communicated to the competent organ.

Chapter IV Guidance and oversight

Article 31 Governments of the population at the district level should strengthen the monitoring and guidance of the self-governing, re-entry work, and establish a system of responsibility for the review, review and review of nuclear work, including the review and review process in the management of the mission's letter to the current people.

Article 32 The provincial authorities should make full use of existing government information networks resources, establish and improve the overall provincial communications information system and share information resources with the national communications information system.

More than the people's Government's letters to visit the work agency and the related work sector should promptly process, review and review information into the information system for the visitor to facilitate the review and review of the mission matter on the ground.

Article 33 provides for a review of the matter of the visit. The review body shall, within 30 days of the date of the submission of a letter of visit, submit the review decision and the related material to the provincial Government's letter to the visiting body.

Article 34 should be monitored by the executive organs at all levels for the implementation of the review, review of the decision by the executive branch of the lower executive branch; it should be responsible for the implementation of the review, review of the decision without implementation or without justification.

Chapter V Legal responsibility

Article XV is one of the following acts by executive organs at all levels, which is being converted by an executive authority at the superior level; the refusal to change or cause serious consequences; and the authorities are lawfully disposed of by law by the competent and other direct responsibilities that are directly responsible under the authority of management:

(i) Applications for review and review shall be inadmissible;

(ii) A breach of a provision or no review and review;

(iii) To deny or delay the implementation of review and review decisions without justification;

(iv) Force the applicant's mediation or violate legal provisions, damage to public interest and legitimate rights of others in the organization of mediation;

(v) Other provocative acts of fraud, abuse of authority and omission.

Article XVI rejects or obstructs re-entry, re-entry and access, reproduction, releasing the relevant documents and information by law and punishes the responsible person in question.

Article 37, after the review, the review process was completed, the respondents repeated or cross-border correspondence visits, were discouraged, criticized, invalidated education, constituted a violation of the provisions of the security administration and punished by law by the public security authorities.

Article 338 violates the provisions of this approach and constitutes a crime and is criminally prosecuted by law.

Annex VI

Article 39 Reviews and reviews are carried out by social groups, business units and other organizations.

Article 40, “5 days”, 7 days” under this approach means the day of work, without holidays.

Article 40