Advanced Search

Hangzhou City, Hangzhou Municipal People's Government On The Revision Of The Provisional Regulations On Land Use Fee Collection And Management Of Foreign Investment Enterprises Regulations Part 23 Municipal Government Decisions

Original Language Title: 杭州市人民政府关于修改《杭州市外商投资企业土地使用费征管暂行规定》等23件市政府规章部分条款的决定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Decision of the Government of the State of the State of War on the amendment of part of the regulations of the Government of 23 municipalities, such as the provisional provision for the use of land-use fees for commercial investment enterprises in the State of Alejane

(Consideration of the 66th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of the State of Délejan on 20 March 2012 through the publication of Government Order No. 270 of 18 May 2012.

The municipality decided to amend part of the provisions of the regulations of the 23 municipalities, such as the provisional provision for the use of land-use fees for commercial investment enterprises in the State of Alejane as follows:

A uniform amendment to the Lands Authority of the State of Alejand Town, in the provisional provision for commercial investment for land use in the State of Alejane, is the National Land Resources Authority.

Article 7 amends to read: “Asss a foreign investment enterprise to use land in a Détachement in the city area shall be subject to a land-use contract signed by the State's Urban Resources Authority, which receives a land-use certificate, and must pay land-use payments to the National Land Resources Authority of the State of Alejane, in accordance with the prescribed standards. The land-use fee has been paid every half a year from the date of approval of the land for use (requesting land, from the date of receipt of the royalties. Payments are due at the end of June and at the end of December of each year. Unpaid, with the exception of the period of time, the daily payment of the default amount of one life was added. During the first calendar year, land-use costs were calculated for a half-year period; inadequate half-year, free of land-use payments”.

Article 34, subparagraph (c), of the Rélejan Landway Management Approach was amended to read: (iii) in violation of article 20 of this approach, the time limit was changed. In the event of a grave nature, fines of up to 500,000 dollars;”

Article 34, subparagraph (iv), was amended to read: “(iv) in violation of article 24 of this approach, to modify the period of time and to impose a fine of more than 50 million dollars, and to impose a fine of up to $50 million;”

Paragraph (v) of article 34 reads as follows: “(v) gives a warning in violation of article 25 of this approach and obliges the time limit to be changed. Until such time, the people's courts are required by law to forcibly dismantle them and to impose a fine of more than 200 million dollars;”

Article 34, subparagraph (vii), was amended to read: “(vii), in violation of article 27 of this approach, to acquittal of its duration and to impose a fine of up to $50 million; and to a fine of up to $50 million. The accident caused by the unmarked and late removal is borne by it for all cost of loss and accountability for its accidents;”

Article 34, paragraph (viii), was amended to read: (viii) violate article 28 of this approach and article 29, which has resulted in an impact on navigation and sluggish sludges, with a delay of irrevocation and a fine of up to $500,000;”

Articles 40 and 41 were deleted.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

The deletion of article 23, subparagraph (v), article 27, article 28, and article 23.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

Article 13 of the Regulations on the Safety of Transport in the State of Alejand states amends to reads as follows: The establishment of fixed nets and the cultivation of water biomass is prohibited in customary routes. The Maritime Authority may be responsible for the cessation of operations by all persons and for the removal of deadlines.

Delete article 26.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

V. Delete article 25 of the provisions on the safe management of the flooding of ships in the State of Alejane.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

Article 22, paragraph 1, of the State of Alejane Urban groundwater management stipulates that “[a]ny offence, compensation shall be terminated by an administrative law enforcement authority in urban administration and shall be treated and punished in accordance with the following provisions:”

Article 2, paragraph 1 (a), was amended to read: “ (i) impose a fine of up to 100,000 dollars without the approval of the unauthorized use of groundwater;”

Paragraph 1 (ii) of article 22 reads as follows: “(ii) supraplanting the exploitation of groundwater, giving warning;”

Article 13 of the Code Management Scheme of the Organization of the High Contracting States amends to reads as follows: “In the supervision of the inspectorate, the codes are entitled to be certified by the body of the organization.”

Article 14, paragraph 1, was amended to read: “A breach of this approach is one of the following acts, by the competent authorities of the city, the district (market) code to order the period of time being changed and to impose a fine of up to $100,000:”

Article 15 amends as follows: “The organ of the organization is guilty of the falsification, alteration, sale, transfer or use of the invalid code certificate, which is fined by the author's authority of more than 1 million dollars.

Article 16 amends to read: “Administrative penalties for violations of this approach shall be carried out in accordance with the procedures set out in the National People's Republic of China Administrative Punishment Act”.

Article 33 of the State's Urban Mecials Management Approach was amended to read: “Any unit or individual who violates this approach shall be warned by the urban administration executive law enforcement agencies, the time period of responsibility, compensation for loss and fines”.

Article 33, subparagraph (b), of the Zero-Alejan State Diplomament method was amended to read: (ii) “[i]n (ii) do not obtain a licence for advertising the conduct of an outdoor advertising operation under the relevant provisions of the Department of State's Action against Search;”

Article 33, paragraph (iii), was amended to read: “(iii) by reason of self-removal of approval by issuing outdoor advertisements, ordering them to discontinue the issuance of deadlines and correcting them; in the event of severe fines of up to 5,000 dollars;”

Delete article 33, subparagraph (v).

Article 34, subparagraph (i), was amended to read: (i) “If the time limit has been changed and fines of up to 2,000 yen of 2000”.

Article 34, paragraph (iii), was amended to read: “(iii) post or distribute print advertisements outside the designated public advertisements, order their duration to be changed and fined by the amount of €200,000.”

Article 34, subparagraph (iv), was amended to read “ (iv) outdoor advertisements, breaks, affect the city's intake and order to change its duration; and to impose a fine of up to $50 million;”

Article 34, subparagraph (v), was amended to read: “(v), after the expiration of an ex posterbation, the time limit is being changed and the fine below $200,000;”

Article 34, subparagraph (vi), was amended to read as follows: (vi) outside advertisements and their subsidiary facilities and public advertisements for an effective period authorized for self-occupation, removal, incestation, damage and damage to the authorized establishment were warned, responsible for the conversion of their deadlines and fines of up to $200,000.

Delete article 35, article 36, article 42.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

Article 39 of the State's Land Reserve Implementation Approach was amended to read: “The former land-use-owner did not provide for the delivery of land and land-based buildings under this scheme or, in conjunction with the delivery of the land, the Urban Land Reserve Centre was entitled to require the rehabilitation and continuation of the contract by the original land-use holder and could require the land-use-owner to compensate for the corresponding economic losses”.

Delete article 44.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

Article 22, subparagraph (c), of the Removal of the Carriage of Goods in the State of Alejane.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

Article 11 of the Zhong River Basin Scheme is amended to read: “In violation of article 7 of this scheme, no Soleil Licensive Licence has been granted by the Water Administration authorities to stop the violation, forfeiture the proceeds of the conflict and impose a fine of up to 20,000 yen; In the case of serious circumstances, the confiscation of the operating facilities can be carried out”.

Article 13, paragraph 1, was amended to read: “In violation of article 8, paragraph 1, of this approach, the period of time being converted by the administrative authorities of the river without reference to the contents approved in the Shelter Licence; the fine of up to 10,000 yen; the circumstances of the gravity, and the release of the river shrine licence”.

Article 36 of the Zerowater Management Approach to Urban Regions was amended to read: “The administrative law enforcement agencies in urban administration may deflect their tools, goods relating to violations by law”.

Article III, paragraph 1, and article IV, paragraph 2, of the Removal of Buildings Confiscated by Law in the State of Alejane.

Article 6, paragraph 1 (b), was amended to read: “(ii) the parties were re-buyed. Inviolable buildings confiscated by law are inseparable from legitimate buildings, and the parties to the conflict may be ordered at the price prescribed by the municipal authorities. The parties are not willing to return to the purchase, but they are not purchased by others.”

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

Article 16 of the Removal of the Modalities for Urban Management in the State of Démocratization of Administrative Punishment.

Article 20 amends to read: “Any humiliation, beating urban administration of administrative law enforcement officials, impeding the administration of urban law enforcement officials to carry out their official duties under the law, punishable by public security authorities in accordance with the provisions of the Law on the Safety and Security of the People's Republic of China, which constitutes an offence punishable by law by the judiciary”.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

Article 17 of the XVI, Slejand City Mentorial Regulation amends to read: “Any unit and individual has the obligation to protect the mark. The owner of the construction unit or property right shall be updated to find a damage or a lack thereof.”

Article 20 of the Live Land Disposal approach in the State of Alejane has been amended to read: “Every land is left behind and land-users shall pay their landless expenses as prescribed. The land administration authorities may apply for the enforcement of the People's Court of Justice.

Article 35, paragraph 2, of the Alejand Town Maintenance Fund and the Property Management Use Management Scheme were amended to read: “Accidentals by the Industrial Council or the Property Management Unit, the owners of the industry still do not pay or continue to prepare the assessed fund for the maintenance of the material industry, which is paid by the administrative authorities responsible for the payment of their deadlines.”

Article XVI amends to read: “The construction unit shall not receive the payment or maintenance fund, and shall be charged by the administrative authorities responsible for the collection or surrender of its duration.”

Article 20, paragraph 2, of the provisional approach to the management of commercial special neighbourhoods in the State of Alejane has been amended to read: “without the approval of the law, the activities set out in the preceding paragraph should be discouraged or stopped, and the organizer may be responsible for the immediate alteration, cleaning of the site, causing losses and the organization should bear liability”.

20, Delete Article 28 of the Ecognical good of the State of Alejane.

At the same time, the relevant provisions are adjusted accordingly.

In article 33, paragraph 1, of the Alejand Urban River Protection Management Approach, “in one of the following acts, the urban administration enforcement agencies are responsible for the cessation of the offence, the restoration of the status quo, compensation for losses and punishment in accordance with the following provisions: Amendments were made to: “Any one of the following acts is responsible for the cessation of the violation by the urban administration of the administration of justice, the immediate transformation, compensation for losses and the punishment of the following:

Article 32 of the Démocratique People's Defence and Air Engineering Regulation was amended to read: “In violation of article 16 of this provision, the self-reformation of the people's air defence and engineering design can be changed and the period of time being ordered by the people's air defence authorities, giving warnings; it cannot be rectified to collect the cost of the people's air defence works in accordance with the law and may be fined by more than 500,000 dollars.

Article 34 was amended to read: “In violation of article 23 of this provision, the demolition of anti-aircraft works by the people has not been completed by prescribed standards and levels of resistance, and the period of time being ordered by the defence authority of the people, gives warning and may impose a fine of up to 5,000 dollars for individuals, which may impose a fine of up to 50,000 dollars for units”.

Article 19, paragraph (i), of the State's temporary occupancy of the urban road management approach was amended to read: (i) after the temporary occupation of urban roads, the occupation units or individuals were not promptly cleared and removed temporary facilities;”

The above-mentioned municipal regulations are released in accordance with this decision.