(Summit 7th ordinary meeting of the People's Government of Sihan on 26 June 2012 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 114 of 11 July 2012 No. 114 of the People's Government Order No. 114 of 11 July 2012 for the application of 1 September 2012.

Chapter I General

Article 1 establishes this provision in the light of the provisions of the Act on People's Representatives at the local level of the People's Congress and at the local level of the People's Government of the People's Government of the People's Republic of China, the National Department of State's Framework for the Implementation of the Law of the Judiciary, the Decision on Strengthening the Administration of the Municipalities and the Opinion on the Strengthening of Rule of Law.

Article 2

Article 3. Major administrative decision-making in the municipality should be guided by scientific, democratic, legitimate and public principles and be guided by administrative decision-making mechanisms that combine public participation, expert advice, risk assessment, legitimacy review and collective decisions. The system of accountability for decision-making is strictly enforced.

Article IV provides for the public, press release or media outreach of major administrative decision-making information in the municipality.

Chapter II Scope of decision-making

Article 5 refers to the decisions taken by the municipal authorities in accordance with their statutory responsibilities with regard to major matters related to the economic and social development of the region, the social breadth, professionalism and policy strength, and the people's public interest. Includes:

(i) To study the implementation of the important resolutions, decisions and operational deployments of the Provincial Council, provincial and municipal councils;

(ii) Develop and revise overall planning or specific planning, annual plans for various economic, social development and public services;

(iii) The use of significant financial resources to arrange major government investment projects to dispose of major State assets;

(iv) Develop major policy measures for the protection of human beings, labour employment, social security, health services, cultural education, social assistance, urban housing security;

(v) studying key issues related to the transformation of municipal government functions, the reform of the administrative system, and the construction of the municipal government itself;

(vi) Discussion on the draft local legislation to consider municipal government regulations and to study important normative documents;

(vii) Other important matters requiring municipal government decision-making.

The following circumstances do not apply to this provision:

(i) The decision of the municipality to be free of charge;

(ii) Develop measures for the management of internal affairs within the municipality and sector;

(iii) The disposal of sudden incidents;

(iv) General decision-making matters that are not major administrative decisions;

(v) Matters already provided for in the decision-making process by law, regulations and regulations.

Chapter III Decision-making process

Article 7. Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Secretary-General and Under-Secretary-General may make proposals for decision-making in accordance with their respective responsibilities.

The relevant sectors of the municipal government, the municipalities, which are of the view that matters requiring the decision-making of the municipal government can be recommended to the municipal authorities for decision-making matters.

Other units, organizations or individuals may make proposals for relevant decision-making matters to the municipalities through the Executive Office of the Municipal Government, the relevant sectors of the municipal government, and the municipalities.

Article 8

(i) Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Secretary-General and Under-Secretary-General for decision-making matters, which are established in accordance with the legislative authority of the municipal authorities. With regard to a number of sectors, the intersection of functions is difficult to define and is appointed by the executive heads of the municipal government in accordance with the competence of the municipal government rules of work;

(ii) The Executive Office of the Municipal Government, the relevant authorities of the municipality, which submits decisions on decision-making matters, proposing sectoral units;

(iii) The district government submits decision-making matters to the municipality and the district government is hosting units;

(iv) Citizens, legal persons or other organizations submit decision-making matters to the municipal government and are appointed by the executive head of the Government in accordance with the rules of work of the municipal government.

Article 9. The relevant sectors of the municipality and the authorities of the various districts should be consulted in depth on matters to be submitted to municipal government decision-making, with full and accurate knowledge of the relevant circumstances required for decision-making, drafting or entrusting experts or specialized research institutions with drafting decision-making programmes.

Article 10 presents major administrative decision-making matters, and the sub-office shall submit the programme of decision-making recommendations, drafts. The programme of decision-making recommendations, drafts may be drafted by the host agency itself or by the experts or specialized research institutions.

Major administrative decisions requiring multi-programme comparative studies should be developed to develop more than two options for decision-making.

Article 11 deals with the full range of economic and social development across the city, as well as major administrative decision-making matters that are professional and policy-making, with the introduction of an expert advisory system. A written statement should be made after an expert advisory opinion.

Risk assessment systems are put in place for major administrative decision-making matters that may involve social stability, the environment, the economy and the law. Risk assessments should be assessed in accordance with the provisions of the municipal government for the management of social stabilization risk assessments on major matters, and a written risk assessment report should be submitted.

Risk assessments for decision-making can be categorized as commissioned by specialized research institutions.

Article 12 The hearings should be held in writing.

Article 13 should be widely consulted on the views and recommendations of the various sectors of the community, such as municipal representatives, parliamentarians, democratic parties, mass groups.

The offices should be based on expert evidence reports, risk assessment reports, relevant departments and district governments, and public recommendations, among others, on the draft major administrative decisions.

The draft major administrative decision-making to be submitted is reviewed by the law by the institution of the rule of law of the institution of the institution of the institution of the institution, which is led by the unit to discuss the adoption of the report.

Article 14.

Article 15

(i) Request for consideration by the municipality;

(ii) Policy-making programmes and their development statements;

(iii) Relevant reports and materials, including expert validation reports, risk assessment reports and requests for summary materials. The hearings should be delivered;

(iv) Other material on major administrative decision-making matters.

Article 16 provides for the first instance within five working days of the date of receipt of major administrative decision-making programmes and their related materials. The material has been backed up by the municipal authorities to lead the review of legality by the municipal authorities' rule of law institutions; the material is not available to inform the host office of additional material.

Article 17 provides a review of legality within 20 working days of the date of receipt of major administrative decision-making programmes and related materials.

In accordance with the requirements of the municipal authorities, the municipal council of law institutions may organize the legal advisers of the municipal government and the legislative advisory expert to validate major administrative decision-making programmes.

Following the review of major administrative decision-making programmes by the municipal rule of law institutions, the municipal authorities should submit a review of the recommendations submitted for consideration and suspension of the review.

The Executive Office of the Municipal Government received a review of the legality of the municipal rule of law institutions, which was sent to the municipal authorities for five working days. It may be submitted for consideration; it cannot be submitted for consideration and written notification of the institution.

Chapter IV

Article 19 Principal administrative decisions of the municipal government are governed by the principle of a combination of democracy concentration and the responsibility of the executive head, and the system of collective consideration of municipal councils or municipal government plenary meetings.

Article 20 In accordance with the discussions at the Conference, the Mayor shall adopt, adopt, modify or reconsider the decision on the matter under consideration.

Significant administrative decision-making reviews should be followed by clear implementation units.

Article 21, the Executive Office of the Municipal Government, the Office of the Ombudsman, is responsible for the preparation of material for major administrative decision-making processes.

Chapter V

Article 2 allows the Office of the Municipal Government to bring to the Executive Office the recommendations of the major administrative decision-making Review Conference to invite the municipal population to listen to or conduct live webcasts.

The major administrative decision-making government considers the system of local hearing and the live-in-charge system, which is organized by the municipal government office.

Article 23. The major administrative decision-making review meeting is to be broadcast live and, within 20 working days of the pre-session meeting, civil, legal or other organizations may request hearing to the Executive Office of the Municipal Government, in coordination with the Executive Office of the Municipal Government, through the media such as municipal television, newspapers and networks, to make public the publication of information, such as the main topics held at the Conference, and the authorities of the city apply for hearing to the Executive Office.

Following the adoption of major administrative decisions, the Executive Office of the Municipal Government, in accordance with the relevant provisions, has been made available to society within 15 working days from the date of adoption.

Chapter VI

The implementation of article 25 units should develop implementation programmes that clearly implement the objectives, implement implementation measures, implement and implement comprehensive, timely and rightly the major administrative decisions of the municipalities.

Article 26 implements the performance evaluation system for major administrative decisions. Major administrative decision-making implementation should be included in the responsibilities for the year-end period.

The executive units should enact performance evaluation reports on the implementation of decision-making during the current year, which are reviewed by the Executive Office of the Municipal Government.

Article 27 provides that significant administrative decision-making leads to a full or partial failure to achieve decision-making goals in the implementation of force majeure or objective changes, and that implementation units should take immediate remedial measures and report to the municipal authorities.

Citizens, legal persons or other organizations are of the view that significant administrative decisions are inappropriate and can be made available to the executive units.

Article twenty-eighth municipalities can adapt, suspend and cease implementation decisions based on the realities in the implementation of major administrative decisions and performance assessment reports.

The Executive Unit should take immediate and effective measures to avoid, reduce potential losses and social impacts, following the decision of the municipality to make significant administrative decisions, suspension and cessation of implementation.

Article 31 of the Municipal Government's Executive Office, the executive inspectorate responsible for the implementation of major administrative decision-making, the promotion, conduct of nuclear work, follow-up inspections, the facilitation, ensuring the proper implementation of decision-making and reporting to the municipal authorities in a timely manner.

Article 31 states that the municipality and its relevant departments should be proactive in the development, implementation of the law and democratic supervision of the municipal councils for major administrative decision-making, and the supervision of democratic parties, the media and the public.

The municipal inspectorate, the auditing sector should strengthen the specialized monitoring exercise by law and deal with violations in a timely manner.

Accountability

Article 32

In violation of this provision by decision-making enforcement units, leading to a failure to properly implement major administrative decisions, accountability for those responsible for leading responsibility and other direct responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant provisions and the competent authority of the Ministry.

Chapter VIII

Article 34 of this provision is implemented by the Executive Office of the Municipal Government.

Major administrative decision-making procedures of the various district governments may be implemented in the light of the provisions.

Article 33 XV provides for implementation effective 1 September 2012.