Advanced Search

Hohhot City Housing Use Safety Management Procedures (Trial Implementation)

Original Language Title: 呼和浩特市房屋使用安全管理办法(试行)

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Security management approach to the use of houses in the city of Hi and Hi.

(Summit No. 47th ordinary meeting of the Government of the city of 24 August 2012 to consider the publication, effective 20 October 2012.

Chapter I General

Article 1 establishes this approach in the light of the relevant national laws, regulations and regulations, in order to strengthen housing security, preserve the public interest of society, guarantee the life and property security of citizens, legal persons and other organizations.

Article 2

The laws, regulations provide for the safe management of homes by the military, religious groups and property protection units, as well as their provisions.

Article 3. Safety management of tenure should be governed by the principles of lawful use, prevention of ownership, integration and security.

Article IV Safeguards the housing sector as the administrative authority for the safe use of houses in this city, with the specific responsibility of the security management body for the use of the house. The flags, districts and sector-building management are responsible for the management of the safe supervision of homes within this jurisdiction, operating supervision and guidance for municipal housing security and housing management.

Development reforms, urban and rural construction, planning, security regulation, urban administration, public safety, human defence, business, quality, seismic sectors, in line with their respective responsibilities, are synchronized with the safe management of homes.

All units and individuals have the right to report and complain about violations of the security of tenure.

Chapter II

The owner of the house is the owner of the security responsibility for the use of the house.

The owner, the user, should use the house in a reasonable manner, in accordance with the design of the house, shall not destroy or otherwise change the housing structure without prejudice to the security of the adjacent homes.

Housing owners should be inspected on a regular basis and find damage to timely governance to ensure the safety of homes; home users should report to the owner, the trustee on the security issues identified, in a timely manner, in cooperation with activities such as inspection of homes, safety recognition, security governance.

Article 7. Housing self-governing units, trustees should be able to manage and inspect the maintenance of homes for the safe use of homes within the scope of their management, finding that violations of the security of tenure should be discouraged and stopped. In refusing to accept management, timely reporting should be given to the administrative authorities for the use of housing.

Article 8 prohibits:

(i) Removal, changing the subject of construction and heavy structure;

(ii) Increase the use of homes in excess of design standards;

(iii) Changes in the use of homes and affect the long-term safety of homes;

(iv) The establishment of a hole, an additional window, or the replacement or expansion of the original Windows;

(v) Other acts that endanger the security of the housing structure.

Article 9. The executive authorities for the use of security in the home should strengthen oversight inspections, put an end to and inspecting acts that endanger the security of homes, and deal in a timely manner with reports and complaints of the existence of safe hidden homes.

In addition to the provision of article 8 of this approach, the administrative authorities for the use of security in the house should issue a letter of house arrest that would provide for the renovation and consolidation of tenure.

Article 10. The construction units shall inform the purchaser in writing of matters such as the transfer of construction materials to the trustee and the transfer of relevant technical information to the administrative authorities for the use of housing in the custody of the property rights registry.

The new service industries such as accommodation, catering, ablution, sing, sing and Internet bars, etc., should be verified by the relevant administrative authorities when the relevant evidence requires the identification of operating premises. The existence of security features in the operation should require the applicant to report on the safety of the house. The relevant evidence shall not be taken into account for the use of dangerous houses as operating places.

The former service industry is subject to approval by a number of administrative authorities, and the responsibility for the inspection of the security conditions in the operation is assumed by the first units in the process of approval.

Chapter III

Article 12. The municipal housing security and housing management administrative authorities have established a housing safety accreditation body responsible for the safe identification of homes in the city, which is based on the determination of housing security.

Those involved in the security of homes should have the corresponding expertise, with professional training and evidence-based induction.

Article 13. The owner, the user or the trustee believe that the security of the house is hidden and can apply for the identification of the housing safety accreditation body.

In one of the following cases, the owner of the house shall apply for the identification of the housing security accreditation body:

(i) The time limit for the use of homes beyond the design of houses will require continued use;

(ii) The continued use of structural damage caused by sudden accidents;

(iii) The failure to perform the construction of houses already in operation of the approval process has not identified their safety;

(iv) Changes in use endanger the security of tenure;

(v) An increase in the number of homes designed by the subject of demolitions;

(vi) The occurrence of structural breaks, variables and depositions that endanger the security of tenure;

(vii) intensive public buildings, such as education, science and technology, cultural recreation, broad electricity, sports, sanitation, transport, business services, talent markets, etc., which are beyond five years in which more than half of the design year is not valid;

(viii) Other laws should be validated.

Article 14. The applicant shall pay for the security of the house in accordance with the criteria approved by the price administration, with a man-made factor leading to the security of the house and the identification of the costs borne by the accident responsible.

Housing users, trustee management units and other stakeholders have found that there is a security hidden house, which can require home ownership to conduct a security certificate. The owner of the house refused to apply for the safety of the house, where the owner of the house, the trustee management unit and other stakeholders were able to submit a housing safety certificate to the identifier. The cost of identification is borne by the owner of the house, which is identified as a non-risk house, and the identification costs are borne by the author.

Article 15 Applications for housing safety recognition shall be submitted to:

(i) A letter of credit for housing safety;

(ii) The identity of the applicant;

(iii) The certificate of ownership of the house, the lease contract or other valid confirmation of its civil rights;

(iv) Other material to be provided by law.

Article 16 should be based on the relevant norms of the State, the self-governing area and my city, and the identification of persons shall not be less than two. In particular complex identification projects, the identification body may hire additional professionals or invite the relevant sector to participate in the identification.

The identification body shall make a report on the safety of homes within 15 working days; there is a clear risky house, which should be organized immediately. The complexity of the housing situation requires follow-up, and the time period for the identification of housing security can be extended appropriately and the applicant's information.

The Home Safety Identification Report uses a unified text format with a “special chapter for the safe identification of houses in the city of Hi and Hunami”.

Chapter IV

Article 17, which is identified as a hazardous house, shall be accompanied by a security administrative authority for the use of municipal housing. The authorities of the city's administration for the use of the security of houses should issue the letter of the hazardous homes in a timely manner, based on the identification of reports, and make governance observations.

Article 18, which is identified as hazardous homes, shall be treated by the owner in accordance with the governance opinions of the administrative authorities for the identification of reports and the use of the house in the following circumstances:

(i) Identification of purposes for observation and use within the time frame for the use of the observations indicated in the report;

(ii) To identify the use of the user to remove the risk department in accordance with the requirements for the identification of reports, the owner of the house shall entrust the original design unit or the design units with the corresponding qualifications, take the appropriate measures to govern and use the annual deadline, as determined by the design cell;

(iii) Identification that, in order to stop the use and removal of the whole, the use of the user should cease and be removed immediately; the use of the dispersion and the safety administration of the house should be responsible for stopping its use.

Article 19owners of houses who live side by side in dangerous homes are jointly responsible for governance. The required governance costs are shared by the owners of the homes. There is no responsibility for the redeployment of a security administrative authority from the house; the parties are not uniform and can be prosecuted by law to the People's Court.

Article 20: The owner of the house, the accident responsibility person rejects the risk of being subjected to the lack of governance of dangerous homes by the house's security administration responsible for their deadlines of governance and the elimination of the risk. In the absence of governance that may endanger public safety, the executive authorities for the use of housing should apply to the enforcement of the People's Court.

Article 21? The emergency response to homes should be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State and the city's response to emergencies.

The municipalities and flags, district and territorial governments should establish specific funding for emergency governance for the identification, renovation, renovation, sequestration, removal and resettlement of hazardous homes in emergencies.

Chapter V Legal responsibility

Article 22, in violation of article 8, paragraph (i), of this approach, imposes penalties in accordance with article 69 of the Regulations on Quality of Engineering.

In violation of article 8, subparagraphs (ii), (iii) and (iv), of this approach, non-residential housing units may be fined by a security administrative authority for the use of the house to account for the owner of the house, the use of the time period for restitution, the adoption of an incremental measure. The housing category is subject to penalties under Article 8, subparagraphs (ii), (iii) and (iv), in accordance with the scheme for the management of dressing in the residential room.

Article 23, in violation of article 13, paragraph 2, of the scheme, should apply for the safe identification of unimplemented claims, to be determined by the house's security administrative authorities, to communicate the requirements for their identification and the legal consequences of the non-application of the application; and to impose a fine of up to 1000.

Article 24

Article 25

Article 26 Restructuring reports or identification of serious errors of reporting by the house's security administrative authorities to inform their responsible personnel; in serious circumstances, to remove their accreditation. The legal liability is vested in the identification of dangerous homes for failure to notify the applicant in a timely manner and to report on the loss of the governance measures taken by the security administration authorities in the use of the house, which constitutes a crime and hold criminal responsibility under the law.

Annex VI

Article 27

(i) Dangerous homes: it means that structures have been severely damaged or that heavy components are already hazardous components and that they are at any time at risk of losing structural stability and affordability, and that they cannot be guaranteed and used safe houses.

(ii) The trustee: refers to companies or other units, individuals entrusted by the owner of the house to manage the safety of their homes in accordance with the provisions and agreement.

(iii) Construction subjects: reference to the structure of housing entities, including roofs, buildings, embassies, pillars, maintenance, walls, connectivity points and basics.

(iv) Structural structure: it refers to the main structural components that directly communicate to the ground in a systematic manner with various external weights, as well as their link points, including heavy walls, typology, framework blocks, tenets, buildings, roofs, roofs, foundations, savings, roofs, roofs, and slacks.

Article 28 provides that the housing security management of the city may establish rules based on this approach.

Article 29 of this approach is implemented effective 20 October 2012.