(The 113th ordinary meeting of the Government of Gangong Province, held on 4 September 2012 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 91 of 6 September 2012 on the date of publication of People's Government Order No. 91 of 6 September 2012)

Article 1, in order to strengthen the responsibilities of the people at all levels and their sectors in the prevention of disaster risk reduction, addresses seriously misconduct in the context of disaster prevention efforts, ensures the implementation of disaster risk reduction responsibilities, and develop this approach in line with the relevant laws and regulations such as the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Monitoring Act, the People's Republic of China's Emergency Response Act, the Civil Service Act of the People's Republic of China.

Article 2 Governments and their sectors, as well as staff members of the Government and its departments responsible for disaster risk reduction, do not perform, do not meet in a timely manner or do not properly perform responsibilities such as preparedness, monitoring early warning, emergency response and treatment, and requires accountability and applying this approach.

Article 3 should be held accountable for disaster prevention and mitigation and should be guided by objective justice, accountability, corrections, and the principle of order.

Article 4

After the event of disasters, all levels of people and their sectors with the responsibility for the harmonization of disaster prevention and mitigation should be identified in a timely manner, in accordance with the relevant provisions, in order to establish improved measures. There is a need for accountability to initiate accountability proceedings in a timely manner, in accordance with this approach, or to bring accountability to the relevant organs.

Article 6 should be held accountable in one of the following cases in the preparedness for disaster prevention:

(i) Failure to develop, revise and revise the corresponding disaster risk response scenarios or to improve the corresponding organizational chain of command, responsibility, prevention and early warning mechanisms, emergency response and disposal mechanisms, in accordance with the pre-disaster response scenarios;

(ii) Infrastructure and equipment that are not reasonably determined in rural and urban planning and construction, and that are necessary for the integrated arrangements for disaster risk reduction;

(iii) The establishment of a system of sound emergency response assistance, the management of emergency stocks, as prescribed;

(iv) No hazardous sources such as slope, risk assessment, inspection, safety precautionary measures, and timely rehabilitation, are carried out against dams that are vulnerable to disaster;

(v) The establishment of disaster risk reduction information systems, as required;

(vi) No daily maintenance, testing of the police and emergency relief equipment, facilities, as required;

(vii) Non-required organizations of relevant departments and personnel to promote disaster risk reduction education, emergency response and professional training.

Article 7 should be held accountable in one of the following cases in the prevention of early warning of disaster risk reduction:

(i) No pooling of storage, analytical chambers and transmission of information on disaster;

(ii) Suspected, concealed reports, retreats, omissions of information on disasters or briefing, dispatch and publication of false information;

(iii) A disaster that can be early warning under current technical conditions, without prompt warning, early warning measures and a rapid response from the relevant sectors;

(iv) The level of early warning and re-issuing and reporting are not adjusted in a timely manner, based on developments.

Article 8 should be held accountable in one of the following cases in response to disaster risk reduction:

(i) Inadequate commencement of emergency preparedness and response responses, the timely implementation of relevant dynamic monitoring, situation verification, information briefings, coordination of intermodal and control measures;

(ii) Not subject to the unity of leadership, command and coordination of the Government and its sectors in response to disaster risk reduction.

Article 9 should be held accountable in one of the following cases in the response to disaster risk reduction:

(i) Failure to organize emergency relief efforts, to take the necessary response and preventive measures, or to dispose of them for reasons of subjective nature, resulting in the occurrence of secondary and derivatives;

(ii) Inadequate post-harvest work, such as life-saving, the production of self-saving and reconstruction, with serious consequences or adverse effects;

(iii) Disadvantages of loss of life or negligence, evasion of responsibility, resulting in significant loss of life and property that may be avoided, or increased casualty and property losses;

(iv) Non-implementation of corrective measures or misappropriation, negative response, causing serious consequences or adverse effects;

(v) Failure to disburse, distribut funds, supplies and serious consequences or adverse impacts;

(vi) Separating, crowding, misappropriation, misappropriation or conversion of privately classified emergency relief funds, supplies, or mismanagement of emergency relief funds, goods, causing serious damage to waste or adverse effects.

Article 10. Other failures, failures to perform or failure to perform their duties in a timely manner should be held accountable, affecting disaster prevention, causing significant loss or adverse effects.

Article 11 provides for accountability under this approach, in accordance with instructions, instructions, instructions and requests from the superior organs or the Government, opinions from the executive, the ombudsman, the recommendations of the inspection, auditing, the inspection of the problems identified in the course of the audit, the prosecution of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, the charges, the authorities of the people concerned or the inspectorate may initiate the accountability investigation process. At the end of the investigation, there is a need for accountability and accountability to be held in accordance with the delegated authority of the Ministry.

Article 12 Implementation of the responsibility for disaster risk reduction should be held in accordance with the overall emergency preparedness of public emergencies in Gang Province, the response to natural disasters in Gangong Province, the Integrated Disaster Mitigation System in Gang Province and the responsibilities related to specific emergency scenarios, the division of labour, sectoral management responsibilities and personal responsibilities, and the precise definition of responsibilities, the separation of collective responsibility with individuals, leadership and direct responsibility.

In violation of this approach by all levels of the people's Government and its sectors, the Government of its superiors, its departments or the inspectorate are being redirected in accordance with the authority.

For staff who have the responsibility to prevent disaster risk reduction, there are circumstances set out in Articles 6 to 10 of this approach, warnings or seizures of directly responsible supervisors and other direct responsibilities; in the light of the gravity of the circumstances, giving weight or degrading; and in the event of serious circumstances, granting them or removing them. The leadership of the above-mentioned personnel may be combined with written inspections, briefings, dismissals, public apologies, suspension inspections, resignations, resignations and dismissals based on circumstances. The transfer of the judiciary is governed by law.

Article 14. The executive organs and their staff members who are held accountable for their removal from the annual appraisal and the selection of various advanced qualifications.

The resignation, the resignation of the responsible order and the dismissal of the office of the head of office shall not be re-engaged within one year with the same leadership as the original office, and the post of one year should be re-engaged in the same manner as the pre-existing office, and should also seek the views of the Government and the relevant departments at the superior level and make public statements.

Article 15, in the context of the investigation of responsibility for disaster risk reduction, obstruction of interference in the investigation, concealment of facts, combat, reprisals, traps, perpetrators, complainants, witnesses and other associated personnel, may be brought to the office of the exemption and be held accountable in accordance with the law.

Article 16, in the context of disaster prevention, is one of the following circumstances, which may be held accountable, mitigated or exempted from accountability:

(i) Actively perform its duties, but it is difficult to deal with failures due to changes in objective conditions and urgent circumstances;

(ii) Be able to take proactive measures to effectively reduce the loss of life or property and to recover the social impact upon the disposal of failures;

(iii) Actively in collaboration with the investigation, with the active responsibility to redirect towards tangible results.

Article 17 should strengthen the monitoring inspection of the accountability for disaster risk reduction and identify issues that should be held without accountability or accountability to deal with non-implementation, and that corrective actions should be promoted in a timely manner.

Article 18 commune governments, street offices and their staff are held accountable for disaster risk reduction, taking into account this approach.

Article 19 is implemented since the date of publication.