(Adopted by the 116th ordinary meeting of the Government of Gangong Province on 25 October 2012 No. 93 of 30 October 2012 by the People's Government Order No. 93 of 30 October 2012 and issued effective 1 January 2013)

Chapter I General

In order to regulate administrative effectiveness inspections, the executive body is mandated to implement administrative management in accordance with the law, improve administrative effectiveness, optimize the economic and social development environment, and to develop this approach in line with the relevant laws and regulations such as the National People's Republic of China Administrative Monitoring Act, the Civil Service Act of the People's Republic of China.

Article 2, this approach applies to inspection of the administrative effectiveness of the enterprise units and their staff appointed by the executive organs at all levels of the province and their civil servants, other personnel appointed by the executive branch.

Article 3. The administrative effectiveness inspection referred to in this approach refers to the inspection activities carried out by the inspection body on the efficiency, effectiveness, effectiveness and effectiveness of the duties of the inspector.

Article IV. Governments of more people at the district level should strengthen the leadership of administrative effectiveness inspections, establish sound leadership structures and work mechanisms, regulate administrative approval, administrative law enforcement and political services, promote marketization of public resources, optimize the governance environment, enhance efficiency of work and ensure effective administrative effectiveness inspection.

Under the leadership of the people at this level and the supervisory body at the senior level, the Inspector-General is responsible for organizing administrative effectiveness inspections within this administrative area.

The relevant sectors of Article 6 should establish a sound internal management system, strengthen educational monitoring, effectively implement administrative management, promote institutional change functions, improve practices and enhance effectiveness.

Article 7.

Chapter II

Article 8

(i) The development of an administrative effectiveness inspection workplan and the organization of implementation;

(ii) Establish a robust administrative effectiveness inspection system;

(iii) To receive complaints of administrative effectiveness;

(iv) To investigate matters affecting the effectiveness of the administration and make inspection recommendations or inspection decisions in accordance with the law;

(v) Organization of administrative effectiveness evaluation;

(vi) Other responsibilities under law, regulations.

Article 9, in one of the following cases, is monitored by the inspectorate in accordance with the authority of management:

(i) Execution of laws, regulations, regulations and superior decisions, instructions, orders and orders that affect the smoothness of political orders;

(ii) The adverse effect or serious consequences of conflicting decision-making or failure of decision-making;

(iii) The failure to respond to sudden events, the slow response and the failure to dispose of them, resulting in a deterioration of events;

(iv) Unless, at the request of the State Department, the provincial government, to identify, concentrate administrative approval functions, streamline, decentralize administrative approval matters, influence or impede the reform of the administrative approval system;

(v) In the context of marketization reforms in public resource allocation, the development of a unified public resource transaction market is weak and affects the efficiency and quality of public resource allocation;

(vi) In the context of the building of the political environment, the ways in which to promote the construction, innovation and approval of services at the centre of government are weak and affect economic and social development;

(vii) Inadequate or incorrectly discharge their duties, delaying predatory, cranes, inefficiencies, undermining the interests of the public and the image of the Government;

(viii) Failure to provide for the implementation of public and public notification obligations and service commitments;

(ix) The arbitrary, wilful harassment of the performance of public service or the inadmissibility of legitimate interests using the job;

(x) Execution of administrative licences in violation of statutory conditions, procedures and time limits;

(xi) It is not possible to determine the basis, without the statutory scope and time frame, whether the additional project or the administration of the relevant provisions in violation of financial instruments;

(xii) Execution of administrative penalties, administrative enforcement and administrative penalties, in accordance with the statutory basis, competence, procedures, and damages to citizens, legal persons and organizations;

(xiii) In major project construction, dedicated funds and the use of large funds, government procurement violates project, financial management provisions;

(xiv) There is no regulatory regime for the soundness of first-hand responsibility, for job responsibilities, for example, for the duration of time and for service commitments;

(xv) Other circumstances affecting administrative effectiveness.

Article 10 In administrative effectiveness inspections, the inspection body has the right to take the following measures:

(i) To request the inspector to provide documents, information, financial accounts, etc. relating to inspection matters, for access or reproduction;

(ii) To request an explanation and clarification from the subject of the inspection;

(iii) To investigate or stop violations of laws, regulations, regulations and administrative disciplines and to take the necessary remedies;

(iv) Other measures under laws, regulations and regulations.

Chapter III Inspection procedures and modalities

Article 11. The inspection body determines administrative effectiveness inspections according to the following:

(i) The deployment and requirements of the Government and the superior inspection body;

(ii) The central work and focus of the people's Government at this level;

(iii) Major project construction and dedicated financial resources of the people's Government at this level;

(iv) The public reflects the strong administrative effectiveness;

(v) Other matters requiring inspection.

Article 12 implements administrative effectiveness inspections on important matters, in accordance with the provisions, and reports to the Government of the current people and the supervisory body at the highest level.

Article 13 Implementation of administrative effectiveness monitoring should develop a programme of work. The programme includes inspection purposes, targets, content, steps, methodologies and measures.

Article 14. The inspectorate shall, prior to the implementation of administrative effectiveness inspections, issue a notice of inspection to the relevant units, with the exception of advance notification.

The inspection notice should contain the content, time and specific requirements of the inspection.

Article 15 monitors the implementation of administrative effectiveness inspections, which may be based on the need for the organization of relevant executive organs, associations and professional technical personnel, or the invitation to the representatives of the public, parliamentarians, invited ombudspersons and relevant social personnel, may establish monitoring points, engage the Ombudsman in oversight and review.

Article 16 allows inspection bodies to conduct administrative effectiveness inspections, such as routine inspections, special inspections, complaints and case surveys.

Article 17 provides for routine inspections, on-site monitoring, monitoring, inspection, evaluation, e-monitoring.

Article 18. Specific effectiveness inspections are applied mainly to major decision-making matters, major project construction, management of earmarked funds and large-scale funds, business and mass reflections of strong effectiveness issues, and the disposal of emergencies.

Article 19 should establish a system of complaints of good administrative effectiveness, to receive mass complaints reports, in accordance with the principle of territorial management, sub-ordination, and to make public information available to society on the content of complaints reports.

Article 20, when the inspection body investigates cases involving administrative effectiveness, should involve more than two persons and present administrative inspection certificates.

Article 21, after the end of the administrative effectiveness inspection, should generally be submitted to the report. The contents of the report should include basic circumstances, problems identified, causes analysis, response and basis, and recommendations for improved work.

The second article should be subject to an inspection recommendation or a inspection decision based on administrative effectiveness inspection.

Important inspection recommendations or decisions should be presented to the Government of the people at this level to agree and to report back-to-date inspections.

In matters that are not subject to administrative effectiveness inspection, the inspection authority shall be transferred to the relevant functional organs or departments in accordance with the provisions. The alleged crimes should be transferred to the judiciary.

Article 23 of the Inspector General's reporters, the situation of the complainant shall be confidential and shall not disclose the case of the reporting person, the complainant.

Chapter IV Accountability

Article 24, in violation of the provisions of this approach, has one of the circumstances set out in article 9 and accountability for the head of the unit in accordance with the following:

(i) Administrative effectiveness caution;

(ii) A written inspection order;

(iii) An open apology;

(iv) Notice of criticism.

Article 25

(i) Administrative effectiveness caution;

(ii) A written inspection order;

(iii) To inform criticism;

(iv) Removal of jobs;

(v) Removal inspection;

(vi) Restructivation, resignation and dismissal;

(vii) Administrative disposal.

Article 26 units and staff who are held accountable are removed from pre-emptive qualifications during the year.

Over two years of accountability for staff members, the annual appraisal shall be determined as the following file.

Article 27, concerning the refusal of the responsible person to correct errors, interfere with, block administrative effectiveness inspections, misguidance, conceal facts, combat reprisals, complainants, and should be addressed again or further.

Article 28 concerned the active collaboration of the responsible person and the proactive identification and redress of errors, mitigation of losses or undesirable adverse impacts could be held from light, mitigation or accountability.

Article 29 could not be held accountable because of force majeure or misrepresentation by administrative counterparts.

Article 33, the subject of inspection, which is incompatible with accountability, may lodge a complaint to the inspectorate within 30 days of the date of receipt of the administrative disposition decision, and the inspection body shall make a decision to maintain, modify or withdraw by law within 60 days.

The execution of the original decision was not discontinued during the complaint.

Article 31 Abuse of duties by administrative efficacy inspection staff, provocative fraud, negligence, secrets, and administrative disposition by law, which constitutes an offence and is criminally criminalized by law.

Chapter V

Article 32