(Summit No. 28th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Lands of the State of Land, 4 January 2013, considered the adoption of the Decree No. [2013] of 16 February 2013, No. 3 of the Order of the People's Government of the State of the Interior, effective 1 April 2013)

Chapter I General

Article 1 provides for the full advancement of the rule of law administration and the establishment of this approach in line with the relevant provisions of the Department of State's Comprehensive Framework for the Implementation of the Law of the Judiciary, the Decision on strengthening the administration of the city's municipalities and the Observations on the Strengthening of the Rule of Law Government.

Article 2

Article 3. This approach refers to activities undertaken by the archaeological, evaluation and awards by the archaeological body to advance the legal administration.

Article IV

The Government of the People of the City, the District (zone) has established the Office of the Judicial Leadership Team to organize the administrative conduct of the work under the law.

Article 5 The Government of the city is responsible for conducting a review of the administration of the respective departments, districts (zones) and the Government of the people.

The People's Government of the District (zone) is responsible for conducting a review of the administration of the respective departments and communes (communes), street offices.

In the case of the dual management and vertical administration, the local people's government is responsible for the conduct of the examination, the results of which should be released to their superior management, and the results of the study shall be sent to the local people's Government.

Article 6 shall be guided by the principles of realism, impartiality, public participation and responsibilities.

Article 7 incorporates the annual work objective nuclear indicators system of the government of the people of the city, the district (zone).

Chapter II

Article 8

(i) Strengthening organizational leadership;

(ii) Capacity-building under the law;

(iii) Enhanced and normative system-building;

(iv) Scientific and democratic decision-making in accordance with the law;

(v) regulate administrative law enforcement;

(vi) Enhance administrative oversight;

(vii) Discribe conflicting disputes by law;

(viii) The promotion of public affairs in a comprehensive manner.

Article 9 reinforces the basic requirements for the organization of a leading examination:

(i) The establishment of a coordinating body, in accordance with the law governing the administration of justice, the sound leadership, monitoring and coordination mechanism, the development of specific approaches and accompanying measures to advance the administration of the law, the provision of work in the financial budget and security;

(ii) Implementation of the annual report system of the Executive Secretary. (a) To monitor the inspection, the conduct of the nuclear system in accordance with the law and to establish a sexual deployment and annual task of work under the law, and to conduct monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the mandate;

(iii) Strengthening the rule of law institutions and the building of the workforce. The provision of office funds is guaranteed in the financial budget by requiring the independent establishment of the rule of law institutions, with dedicated personnel. The role of the staff, assistants and legal advisers of the rule of law institutions;

(iv) The establishment of administrative accountability that is focused on the executive head and the strengthening of the Government's implementation and credibility.

Article 10

(i) Establish a mechanism for the development of a legal knowledge learning training long-lasting mechanism for the implementation of the Government's Standing Conference and the system of parliamentary law of the Bureau of Sectoral Affairs;

(ii) Each year, no less than two leaders shall be held to conduct lectures in accordance with the law administration or the rule of law;

(iii) The establishment of a government office leadership study and legal knowledge test system under the law;

(iv) Implementation of the pre-position legal knowledge test and a system of administrative missions to be assigned to the leadership;

(v) Incorporate legal administrative knowledge into the training of civil servants;

(vi) Organizing administrative law enforcement officials to participate in the training of generic legal knowledge and the training of specialized legal knowledge rounds;

(vii) Producing and specialized training on new legislation and regulations relating to the industry in a timely manner.

Article 11. Strengthening and regulating the basic requirements for the construction of the archaeological examination:

(i) The development of government regulations and normative documents should be in compliance with legislative authority and procedures and in conformity with the provisions of the law, legislation and policies;

(ii) The drafting of local legislation, the development of government regulations, the introduction of probationary, public participation, expert advice, collective discussion decisions;

(iii) Governments should publish regulations and normative documents in accordance with the requirements and time-bound requests, in accordance with the required requirements and deadlines, and to ensure that the executive branch performs its normative reporting functions and undertakes a comprehensive review of the documentation;

(iv) Improvement of government regulations, changes in normative documents, repeal and periodic clean-up systems, and timely release of the results to society.

Article 12 Basic requirements for scientific democratic decision-making in accordance with the law:

(i) To regulate administrative decision-making processes and to improve key decision-making rules, involving the public, expert opinions, risk assessment, legitimacy review and collective discussion decisions as essential procedures for major policymaking;

(ii) The executive heads of the Government's rule of law bodies are represented in the Government's standing parliamentary system and the sectoral rule of law institutions (the Commission, the Office);

(iii) The establishment of a major decision-making hearing system;

(iv) Establish a system of accountability for sound decision-making.

Article 13

(i) Implementation of administrative law enforcement responsibilities, conduct of a judicial review and strengthen accountability for administrative law enforcement;

(ii) To carry out their duties in accordance with the law, to identify cases of violations, to implement the administrative sanctions discretion benchmarks, to promote and regulate the relatively centralized exercise of administrative sanctions and to actively promote integrated law enforcement pilots;

(iii) Detailed law enforcement processes, clear law enforcement elements and steps to improve the relevant system;

(iv) Execution of the administrative law enforcement review system, regulating administrative law enforcement volumes;

(v) Execution of administrative law enforcement subjectivity management, and law enforcement officials should have legal and effective documentation and offer;

(vi) Sound enforcement funds are financially guaranteed by the financial security system, prohibiting the imposition of penalties, strict enforcement of the separation of payments and the payment of two line systems.

Article 14.

(i) To be aware of the oversight of the Greater and Political Cooperation, to receive advice and proposals by the governing body, in accordance with the provisions of the report, the acceptance of the inquiries, and to receive advice and suggestions, as required;

(ii) Be vigilantly accepting judicial oversight and the executive heads of administrative proceedings before the People's Court should be actively present in the court, in response to their determination of the entry into force of the decisions and decisions made by the People's Court, taking seriously into account the judicial recommendations of the People's Court;

(iii) To support and cooperate with specialized oversight bodies, such as inspection, audit, to carry out monitoring, in accordance with the law, and to implement oversight decisions by oversight bodies;

(iv) The hiring of administrative law enforcement social monitors or parliamentarians and the organization of their participation in oversight activities;

(v) Improve the mass reporting system, establish a complaints monitoring platform, sound investigation, verification and timely work mechanisms to deal with issues reflected in mass inspections, media;

(vi) Enhance internal oversight and specialized oversight and timely redress of unlawful or inappropriate administrative acts; and organize regular inspections on a regular basis in accordance with the law;

(vii) Establish administrative accountability mechanisms that are responsible for the perpetrators of violations, in accordance with the law.

Article 15 Basic requirements for the legalization of the object of the dispute:

(i) Improve the coordination mechanism for administrative law enforcement disputes;

(ii) The establishment of an administrative review mechanism v. the communication system with administrative trials;

(iii) Sound administrative review bodies. In accordance with laws, regulations and regulations, the executive review body was established and staffed to ensure administrative review funding; to receive and hear administrative review cases in accordance with the law; to correct violations and inappropriate administrative conduct; and to comply with its responsibilities under the law for participation in administrative review activities and to comply with and implement administrative review decisions of the executive branch.

Improving the administrative review process system by providing for timely and accurate reporting of administrative review reports to the case statistics statements; the review of case files management has a fixed place and a specific-scale storage, the archiving of files is regulated in a timely manner; the standard norms of legal instruments.

Article 16 Basic requirements for the full promotion of public scrutiny by the Government:

(i) Enhance public information on priority areas such as project construction, health and education;

(ii) To accelerate e-government construction and to promote online conduct and clearance. The Office of the High Commissioner and the Complaints Centre normatively operate to strengthen the operation of the ISU. To respond to public requests for information in accordance with the law;

(iii) To promote public attendance at hospitals, schools, public referrals, water supply, heating, electricity and heating, with emphasis on public duties, service commitments, fees projects, oversight channels, etc.;

(iv) Organization of public information review studies.

Chapter III

Article 17 is carried out in a manner that is synchronized between the time and the end of the examination, in accordance with the legislative executive review.

Article 18 upholds the principle of the integration of a full-fledged examination with a focus examination, the integration of an internal archaeological and external review, the written review and the field examination.

Article 19 provides for specific work by the executive heads of the municipal, district (zone) people's government in accordance with the law, as well as by the municipal, district (zonal) administrative law enforcement supervisors, and parliamentarians.

The public review may invite the representatives of the Greater, the members of the Parliament, the relative executive and other interested parties to participate in such a way as to conduct colloquiums, questionnaires, visit to the public and seek advice.

Article 20

(i) Develop programmes. The archaeological body has established the annual administrative appraisal programme under the law, which is clearly defined by the archaeological units, content, modalities and evaluation criteria, and is issued every first quarter of the year;

(ii) Data collection. A summary of the data, information and information collected and statistical data collected by the archaeological bodies in a timely manner by the archaeological units in accordance with the law;

(iii) Organization verification. The annual reports and information received by the archaeological organs are reviewed in accordance with the law administration, and field inspections are carried out on the basis of actual requirements;

(iv) Review. Examination of the organization of administrative law enforcement monitors or the commission of a review by professional institutions of society;

(v) Identification of results. Based on the collection of information, self-assessment, organization verification, and review, the archaeological assessment has been developed to determine the results.

Article 21 shall provide:

(i) Self-assessment reports on the administration of justice;

(ii) The results and the basis of the individual special examinations;

(iii) To promote the record of meetings, documentation, relevant case volumes, statistical statements, etc., in accordance with the law administration;

(iv) Other material requested by the archaeological bodies.

In accordance with article 2 of the study, the scores such as the examination are divided into excellent, good, escalating, non-exclusive tenders, and the sub-categories are determined by the annual appraisal programme.

Article 23 is one of the following cases, which are divided or increased according to the archaeological programme:

(i) The performance of the administration under the law has been highlighted and has been recognized and rewarded by higher levels of the provincial level;

(ii) Innovation initiatives in the administration of justice are promoted by more than provincial authorities as experience;

(iii) In accordance with the law, the related work is reported by more than provincial news units as a typical experience;

(iv) Other circumstances specified by the archaeological body.

Article 24 has one of the following cases and is divided into the administrative examination under the law:

(i) Administrative decision-making violates or is severely malfunctioning, causing significant loss or severe impact;

(ii) Unfull and rightful discharge of statutory responsibilities, leading to the occurrence of resource-related development, environmental pollution and public safety accidents, causing significant loss or adverse effects;

(iii) Abuse of authority, imposition of a breach of an administrative act or omission, triggering civil disputes or other major events;

(iv) The criminal disposition of civil disputes, sudden-onset incidents, resulting in a deterioration of the situation and the adverse effects;

(v) In violation of the relevant provisions of party wind integrity;

(vi) Other unlawful administrative acts that result in the interests of the State, the life of the people, the significant loss of public property or the adverse effects of such property;

(vii) No normative documentation is submitted in accordance with the relevant provisions and procedures;

(viii) Resistance in the administration of justice;

(ix) Other cases determined by the archaeological body by law.

Chapter IV

Article 25: The Government of the city, the district (zone) has been informed by the executive leadership team in accordance with the law.

The evaluation was given to the results of the study, which were excellent; criticisms were given to the non-appointed, the provision of written corrections orders, the replication of the situation was examined by the Office of the Executive Leadership Team under the law and reported to the leadership team at this level in accordance with the law; the refusal to restructure or reclassify was still outstanding, and the accountability of the responsible person was recommended.

Article 26 found violations of administrative conduct in the conduct of the examination, which should initiate administrative accountability procedures to hold the primary responsible person accountable, and the transfer of the judiciary to deal with the alleged crimes.

Chapter V

Article 27 of this approach is implemented effective 1 April 2013.