Advanced Search

Shenzhen Chief Electronic Supervision

Original Language Title: 深圳市行政电子监察工作规定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Public e-monitoring provisions

(Health meeting of the Fifth People's Government, Kingston, 22 May 2013, considered the adoption of Decree No. 250 of 9 June 2013, No. 250 of the Order of the Government of the People's Republic of Shenzhen, effective 1 July 2013)

Article 1 provides for the regulation of e-monitoring, the strengthening of administrative oversight, the promotion of integrity, the improvement of administration and the development of this provision in line with relevant laws, regulations and regulations, such as the National People's Republic of China's Administrative Monitoring Act.

Article 2

The e-monitoring system referred to in this provision refers to the online work platform for the inspection of the performance of the administration and its staff, using modern information technology for collection, analysis of administrative matters.

Article 3 e-monitoring should be guided by the principle of a combination of e-monitoring and manual oversight inspections, rapist and institutional-building.

Article IV Integrated and directs e-monitoring efforts across the city.

Regional inspection bodies are responsible for e-monitoring in the region.

The inspection body should designate specialized agencies and staff with a dedicated mandate to carry out e-monitoring.

Article 5

(i) Administrative approval process, catalogue implementation;

(ii) Implementation of administrative law enforcement;

(iii) Implementation of public information and the sharing of information resources;

(iv) Management of financial funds;

(v) Government investment projects, tenders for construction works, land concessions and implementation of government procurement;

(vi) Other administrative matters for e-monitoring should be implemented.

Article 6. The construction of the e-monitoring system should be integrated into all-urban e-government-building planning, in line with integrated planning, resource sharing, information openness and security requirements.

Article VII Integrated e-monitoring systems-building by municipal inspection agencies, related to the development of e-monitoring systems in line with their respective responsibilities.

Article 8. The inspection body may build an electronic inspection system through:

(i) Construction of an e-monitoring system directly with the administrative business information system of the executive branch, or through the municipal information-sharing platform.

(ii) To establish a monitoring function module in the administrative business information system of the executive branch;

(iii) Other approaches that need to be used in the context of modern information technology development and administrative inspection.

The supervisory body should provide the necessary technical support for the engagement.

Article 9. The inspection body is to incorporate administrative matters relating to e-monitoring (hereinafter referred to as “e-monitoring matters”) and requires the construction of an electronic inspection system to be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Government's investment project management.

In the case of e-monitoring to be incorporated by the executive branch, the management system for the operation of e-monitoring matters should be streamlined in accordance with the requirements of the rule of law and normativeization of administrative matters, the preparation of a directory of authority, clear implementation conditions, normative operating procedures, and the management of e-monitoring matters involving multiple administrations, with the responsibility of the host sector and other departments.

E-monitoring matters and their operation management systems are structured and regulated as important elements of the feasibility study for e-monitoring projects.

Article 10. The inspection body shall determine the e-monitoring rules based on the administrative management system for the operation of administrative matters administered by the executive branch, based on the functions of the administrative matters, conditions, modalities, procedures, time limits, etc.

Article 11. The executive body shall incorporate administrative matters into e-monitoring, as required by the development of the e-monitoring system, as well as work on the operational information system of this unit's administrative matters with the technology of the e-monitoring system or in collaboration with the construction of the inspection function module.

Article 12 Operational information systems for administrative matters of the executive organs should communicate administrative matters in a real, complete, accurate and timely manner to the e-monitoring system.

Article 13 should establish a sound e-monitoring day-to-day management system that enhances oversight, system operation maintenance, data management and information safety.

Article 14. The inspectorate may send a reminder to the executive branch and its staff through the e-monitoring system on electronic inspection matters that have not yet been closed.

The executive branch and its staff shall not be responsible for precision on the basis of failure to receive a reminder.

Article 15. The inspection body should respond to the violations discovered by the e-monitoring system in practice, request clarifications and clarifications through the system's direct feedback to the executive organs, or an order to stop violations.

Article 16, in administrative e-monitoring, found the following cases to be verified:

(i) Automated monitoring of alleged violations by the electronic inspection system;

(ii) Video monitoring by the e-monitoring system of the office window of the executive body to the alleged violations;

(iii) A manual inspection of e-monitoring cases of alleged violations;

(iv) Reports and complaints by citizens, legal persons or other organizations through administrative e-monitoring systems;

(v) Other verification cases.

The violation referred to in the previous paragraph refers to violations of laws, regulations, normative documents and other relevant provisions requiring accountability.

Article 17 The inspectorate has the right to take the following measures in verification:

(i) To request the executive branch and its staff to provide documents, information, financial accounts and other related materials relating to electronic inspection matters for access or reproduction;

(ii) To request the executive branch and its staff to explain and clarify issues related to electronic inspection matters.

Article 18 should complete verification work within ten working days; the complexity of the situation, with the approval of the Inspector-General, could extend ten working days.

The results of verification should be feedback to the administrative authorities on time after verification by the inspection body. The verification is found to be a violation and should have written feedback. The executive body contests the results of verification and may submit a written objection request within five working days from the date of receipt of the verification results, and the inspection body shall conduct a review and respond in writing within ten working days from the date of receipt of the objection.

Article 20, which is verified by the inspectorate that there is a violation by the administrative body, should be responsible for the relapse of the administrative organs and, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the performance evaluation, the deduction of their performance evaluation scores; the need to hold administrative responsibility to be processed in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations; and the transfer of suspected crimes to the judiciary.

Article 21, in the e-monitoring process, found that administrative authorities needed to improve good governance, attendance systems, etc., should make timely recommendations for inspection and that administrative authorities should adopt and feedback on the situation.

Article 2, the inspection body may conduct a performance evaluation of the administration's work on e-monitoring matters as an important component of the Government's performance management.

Article 23 should report regularly to the same-level Government on the implementation of e-monitoring efforts, provide an overview of the operation of inspection matters, provide administrative improvements and promote responses and recommendations for good governance.

Article 24 is one of the following cases for the executive branch and its staff, which is being converted by an inspection authority to the performance evaluation value of the unit, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the performance evaluation; the duration of the period has not been restructured, and the administrative responsibility is governed by the law:

(i) The inclusion of administrative matters in e-monitoring as required by this provision;

(ii) No complete filling of data on electronic inspection matters;

(iii) Issuance of the availability of data for e-monitoring;

(iv) The construction of an electronic inspection system, in line with this provision;

(v) Not to cooperate with the inspection body in carrying out verification;

(vi) Other violations of this provision.

Article 25. The inspectorate and its staff are not carrying out their duties or incorrectly performing their duties in an electronic inspection and are held in accordance with the law and are suspected of committing crimes and transferred to the judiciary.

Article 26 applies to the electronic inspection activities of organizations with public affairs management functions authorized by the law and their personnel and administrative authorities in public service, which are mandated by the law by the organization engaged in public affairs management activities and its personnel engaged in public service.

Article 27 of the present provision is implemented effective 1 July 2013.