(Summit 5th ordinary session of the People's Government of 19 August 2013 to consider the adoption of Decree No. 2 of 17 September 2013 and No. 2 of the People's Government Order No. 1 November 2013)

Chapter I General

Article 1 provides for the implementation of the State Department's Strategic Framework for Quality Development (2011-2020), in accordance with relevant provisions of the People's Product Quality Act of the People's Republic of China, the Government of the Commonwealth of Independent Mongolia for the further strengthening of the work of the Quality Accruing Zone (No. [2010]55), the notification by the Government of the People's Republic of Appeal and Huntland to the full advancement of the work of the “quality city” (notes No. [2010]90) and the development of this approach in the context of my city's actual practice.

Article 2 Medals for the quality of the city of Hitil (hereinafter referred to as “the city quality awards”) are established by the Government of the city to grant organizations or individuals with broad social visibility and influence, their products, services, the quality of business management, the autonomy of innovation and the competitiveness of the market, with a marked economic benefits and social benefits.

The evaluation of the municipal quality awards adheres to the principles of science, openness, equity and justice, with unit recommendations, expert review, government validation as the basic process to promote organizational or individual access to tangible quality, economic and social benefits and to optimize the economic development of my city and to enhance the competitiveness of the economy.

Article IV. This approach refers to all types of enterprises, business units and scientific institutions that are registered within the city's administrative system, which are independent legal persons, and to persons covered by the city, including employees of enterprises and persons engaged in quality management, quality education and training, quality scientific research, and quality promotion.

Article 5 provides for a period of three years to be effective, in the case of the Mayor's Quality Award and the Quality Management Award. The Mayor's quality awards apply to individuals with high levels of quality management and to individuals whose quality management awards are applicable to organizations that are better in quality management and who make a prominent contribution.

The Urban Quality Award is the annual award. The Mayor's Quality Award Unit does not exceed 5 per year (two3 product quality awards, one engineering quality award, one service quality award, and no more than two individuals; the Quality Management Award Unit does not exceed 7 per year and no more than three individuals. The declared units or individuals do not meet the incentive conditions, which are vacant during the year.

Article 6 declares that the city's quality awards are not charged. The provision for incentives and work is included in the annual financial budget.

Chapter II Organizational management

Article 7. The Government of the city has established the Municipal Quality Awards Commission (hereinafter referred to as “Commission”). The Director of the Commission is appointed by the Mayor and the Deputy Director is appointed by the Deputy Mayor for the management of quality, consisting of a representative and authoritative renowned scholar, quality experts, enterprise management experts, industry and government counterparts.

The main responsibilities of the Committee are to organize quality awards evaluation activities, review quality awards evaluation criteria, implementation guidelines, evaluation processes, study major matters in the process of determining the municipal quality awards and consider the proposed list of incentives.

Article 8 establishes the Urban Quality Award Evaluation Office, which is based in the Urban Quality Technical Monitoring Agency, responsible for the daily work of the municipal quality award evaluation. The main responsibility is:

(i) Develop specific evaluation criteria, implementation guidelines, working procedures, etc. for municipal quality awards;

(ii) The development of an evaluationor management system. The establishment of an evaluationor's expert bank and evaluation team, the conduct of the duties of the archaeological, supervisory and evaluationor, and the establishment of an evaluationor's selection mechanism;

(iii) Preparation of the annual work plan for quality awards, application and evaluation of municipal quality awards, summary, advocacy, dissemination of typical experience and results;

(iv) To summarize and report to the Committee on the results of the evaluation of the municipal quality awards and to present the candidate list.

Article 9 provides for a system of evaluation of the evaluation team, consisting of three to five evaluationlers. In accordance with the annual work plan, a dedicated evaluation team consists of the different sectors, with the introduction of a team leader.

The main responsibilities of the evaluationor are to maintain a good evaluation record based on evaluation criteria, implementation guidelines and objective and impartial evaluation of the declared units.

In the course of the evaluation of the city's quality awards, the role of the industry sector (Association), technical bodies, social groups, brokering institutions and the media should be fully realized and widely consulted.

Chapter III Status of declaration

Article 11. Organizations that declare quality management awards should have the following conditions:

(i) Registration in the administrative region of the city, with independent legal personality, for more than three years of production activity and for taxes under the law;

(ii) A licence, certification or registration of products or systems requiring, such as administrative licences, mandatory product certification or system certification, product registration;

(iii) The sound quality management system and the performance of quality;

(iv) The products, works and services provided are consistent with the relevant standard requirements, and nearly three years of State, self-government and metropolitan control of the products or services that are screened;

(v) A good economic benefits, which have not been lost in recent years;

(vi) A good record and social reputation;

(vii) No major quality, security, environmental pollution, public health, etc., in recent years; the lack of organizational responsibility resulting in the salient issues of complaints by the user (the customer); and the absence of any other violation of laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 12. The organization that declares the Mayor's quality prize shall have the following conditions:

(i) Registration, in accordance with the law, within the administrative area of the city, of independent legal personality, for the production of more than five years and for the production of taxes under the law, and for the period of effectiveness;

(ii) Actively employing advanced quality management methods with a sustainable improvement mechanism for themselves. Implementation of the excellent performance model for more than one year and with self-assessment reports containing three-year data and information;

(iii) Advantaged performance or social contribution. (b) The social contribution of non-profit operations is pre-market industry;

(iv) The advantages of branding have been highlighted and have good quality record and social reputation;

(v) Strict compliance with national environmental protection policies and the active adoption of advanced production processes and environmental technologies, with a notable impact on energy consumption and environmental protection.

Individuals who have declared quality management awards should have the following conditions:

(i) Conduct or involve more than eight years of quality work;

(ii) A stronger quality awareness and innovative awareness and a high degree of social visibility;

(iii) To make a salient contribution to quality development in the areas of work or in the quality of work, with fruitful results of the theoretical study on quality management or wealth of practical experience;

(iv) Adherence to professional ethics and social justice;

(v) Individual-owned organizations have no major quality, environmental pollution and public safety accidents over recent three years.

Article 14. Individuals who have declared the Mayor's quality awards should receive quality management awards and make a significant contribution to quality development in the area of quality in order to achieve results in quality scientific research, quality improvement and interception, as well as good economic benefits, quality benefits and social benefits.

Chapter IV Evaluation criteria

Article 15 Evaluation criteria for municipal quality awards are based mainly on the Excellence Performance Evaluation Guidelines (GB/T19580). The assessment criteria for the Mayor's quality awards and quality management awards are published by the Evaluation Committee and are organized and individual components.

Article 16, under the harmonized provisions of the municipal quality award evaluation criteria, may develop evaluation criteria, by sector category, to ensure consistency in evaluation in different industries. The implementation guide, according to the characteristics of the industries, focuses on setting evaluation criteria in terms of scale, quality management, scientific and technological progress, market ownership, integrity and social contributions.

The municipal quality award evaluation criteria should be revised in due course, in accordance with the quality management doctrine and the development of its practice.

Chapter V

The evaluation of the municipal quality awards includes, inter alia, the accreditation of the declaration unit, the evaluation of materials, the on-site evaluation and the consideration of the Commission.

Article 18, prior to the evaluation of the annual municipal quality awards, was issued by the Office of the Evaluation Committee at the main media in the city and on the website.

Article 19 The declaration unit shall submit to the Office of the Evaluation Committee, within the prescribed time frame, the declaration, including the Urban Quality Awards and other related materials, in accordance with the declared conditions of the annual municipal quality awards.

Article 20 is submitted to the relevant specialized evaluation teams, in the first instance of the office of the Evaluation Committee. The individual evaluation teams, based on material evaluation, on-site evaluation, form an integrated evaluation report, ranking, presentation of the municipal quality awards for the office of the Evaluation Committee, which is submitted by the Office of the Evaluation Committee to the plenary of the Review Committee for the identification of organizations and individuals to be rewarded and for the examination of verification.

Article 21, the Office of the Evaluation Committee provides an indication of the list of proposed awards to be made available at the main media and website in the city for ten working days. There was no objection to the fact that the Director of the Committee of Cassation had been reviewed, the Mayor had been published by the Government of the city and the award of awards (bates), certificates and awards to the award unit and individuals.

Article 2

Chapter VI Oversight management

Article 23 establishes a regular visiting and dynamic management system for award units. The sector should be informed in a timely manner of the production and quality management of the award units, and to promote their honour and continuously improve performance.

Article 24 makes a difference in the declaration of the city's quality awards and adopts unjustifiable means to deceive the organization or individuals of the city's quality awards, and the Evaluation Office shall draw the Government of the city to withdraw its municipal quality awards, recover awards, awards, awards and awards, and make it available to society.

Article 25 The Office of the Evaluation Committee found that the awarding organization or individuals had a relatively high degree of violation in terms of quality or complaints should be informed in a timely manner by the organization or by individuals, and that they should be promoted.

In one of the following cases after the awards were awarded, the Evaluation Committee's Office investigated the verification and submitted to the Commission's study, reported to the Government of the city to withdraw its municipal quality awards and to make public it possible to declare the city's quality awards within five years:

(i) Including a major quality liability accident;

(ii) The quality of products or the instability of the quality of services, which are determined by quality supervision in the State or in the self-government area to be non-qualified or by major service quality accidents;

(iii) A major problem in the quality of products, works and services, which are presented and documented by the parties and the mass;

(iv) The issue of quality of export products was reported abroad or claimed, causing greater damage to national image and credibility.

Article 27 awards organizations and individuals have an obligation to promote and share their advanced experience in quality work and to advocate for quality awards in the activities concerned, but must indicate the time of awards.

Article 28 provides that persons responsible for the evaluation of the municipal quality awards shall conservative the commercial or technical secrets of declared organizations and individuals, in accordance with the law, and strictly observe the evaluation of the relevant provisions and procedures.

Article 29 should be effectively strengthened by the Office of the Evaluation Committee to effectively strengthen the oversight of the evaluation process, to prosecute persons who misuse their functions in the evaluation process, perform negligence, favour private fraud, cause adverse consequences, remove their evaluation qualifications and bring the relevant departments to justice in accordance with the law; constitute crimes.

Chapter VII

Article 33