(Adopted by the 18th ordinary meeting of the Government of the Community of 1 August 2013 No. 143 of 13 August 2013, No. 143 of the Order of the Government of the Community of the Republic of Western Sahara, effective 1 October 2013)

Chapter I General

Article 1 ensures quality of construction work, protects the lives, property security of citizens, legal persons and other organizations, and develops this approach in line with the laws and regulations of the People's Republic of China Building Act, the Department of State Regulation on Quality of Construction.

Article 2 activities such as new construction, expansion, alteration and implementation of quality supervision in the present city's administration area (hereinafter referred to as engineering).

Article 3 builds, surveyes, design, construction, treasury units (hereinafter referred to as the subject of quality responsibility for the work), construction materials, components, prefabricated concrete production enterprises and construction map review bodies, engineering quality testing units (hereinafter referred to as relevant subjects) should be established, the sound engineering quality assurance system should be implemented in accordance with the law.

Article IV. The construction of administrative authorities in the city is responsible for the quality supervision of the work in the city.

Urban (zone) and district-building administrative authorities are responsible for the management of quality oversight in the field.

Sectors such as transport, water, municipal parking forests should be responsible for monitoring the quality of professional works in accordance with their respective responsibilities.

The construction of administrative authorities may be mandated by the competent engineering quality monitoring body in accordance with the law to implement the quality of the work.

Article 5 Quality supervisory bodies should be delegated to the executive authorities, in accordance with the relevant legal regulations, the mandatory standards for construction of work and the construction of administrative authorities, to monitor the quality of the engineering entity, the subject of the quality of the work, the quality of conduct of the relevant subjects, the examination of specific inspections, monitoring tests and administrative enforcement activities, such as administrative sanctions.

The municipal engineering quality monitoring body is responsible for the day-to-day management and coordination of work quality oversight throughout the city, organizing oversight inspections, inspections and inspections, providing guidance on the operation of municipal (zone), regional engineering quality monitoring bodies, and harmonizing information management systems such as quality management, engineering testing.

Article 6 Quality supervisors and supervisors should be in accordance with the conditions established by the State and the province, and with the establishment of administrative authorities in the province, to carry out the quality supervision of the works in accordance with the law.

Article 7 encourages citizens, legal persons or other organizations to investigate, prosecute and complain about accidents in the quality of work, shortcomings and violations of the law governing the quality of the work.

Chapter II Oversight management

Article 8 Quality supervision includes the following:

(i) Implementation of the mandatory standards for legal regulations and construction;

(ii) Examination of the quality of engineering entities that relate to the structure of the engineering subject matter and the main functionality;

(iii) Examination of the quality of work by the subject matter of responsibility for the quality of the works of the relevant subjects;

(iv) Examination of the main building materials, construction components and prefabricated concrete quality of the construction site;

(v) Oversight of the completion of the work inspection;

(vi) Organizing or participating in the work quality accident survey;

(vii) Establishment of a mechanism for the evaluation of the quality of the work;

(viii) Establish the corresponding quality oversight management system.

Article 9. When the quality of the work is performed by the Engineering Quality Monitoring Bodies, the following measures may be taken:

(i) The inspection units are required to provide information on the quality of the work;

(ii) Access to the construction site inspection of the inspectorate;

(iii) Restructuring of the quality of work affecting the security of the structure and the vital use of its functions, in the event of a serious suspension of work and suspension of production;

(iv) Measures such as responsibilities for quality of work that violate the relevant laws and regulations and the construction of mandatory standards of work, the relevant subjects resort to caution, quality integrity, record of malfunctioning;

(v) The organization of work quality technicians to conduct training on legal regulations and mandatory standards.

Article 10 Quality of work is monitored according to the following procedures:

(i) Procedures for quality supervision of the work;

(ii) Develop monitoring plans;

(iii) Organization of quality monitoring of the work, with a focus on screening and measurement of the quality of the engineering entity, the subject of the quality of the work and the quality of the work of the relevant subjects;

(iv) Monitoring the completion of the work test, with a focus on monitoring the form, procedures and procedures of the completed process;

(v) Preparation of quality monitoring reports and submission of administrative authorities;

(vi) Establishment of a quality monitoring file.

The following documents and information should be made available in the course of the construction unit's work quality monitoring process:

(i) A statement of quality monitoring of the work;

(ii) The construction map design document examines the qualifications;

(iii) The letter of credit and construction, the contract for the administration of justice;

(iv) Other documentation and information provided for in the legislation.

In line with the requirements, the Quality Monitoring of Engineering shall be issued within three working days.

Construction projects that do not deal with the quality of the work are not carried out by law.

After completion of the work, the construction units shall submit to the construction units the completion reports for the completion of the work and apply for the completion of the work.

The construction units should organize engineering clearances in accordance with the provisions and criteria; the completion of the work inspection process should have the following conditions:

(i) To complete the elements of the engineering design and contract agreement;

(ii) A complete technical file and construction management information;

(iii) A pilot report with major construction materials, construction components and equipment;

(iv) Quality-qualified documents signed by units such as survey, design, construction and administration of justice;

(v) The quality assurance of work signed by the construction unit;

(vi) Improvement of the quality of the work;

(vii) Other accreditation documents provided for in the legal regulations or authorization for the use of documents.

The work has not been completed or has been completed without qualifications and cannot be delivered.

Article 13. The construction units shall notify the quality of the work oversight body in writing before the completion of the work of seven working days.

The engineering quality monitoring body should monitor the form, procedures, etc. of the completion of the work, identify violations of the quality management provisions of the work, and reorganize the construction unit in writing or reorganize it.

The engineering quality monitoring body should submit a quality monitoring report to the construction of administrative authorities within five working days.

Article 14. After the completion of the work test, the construction units shall have the following documents and information to the construction of administrative authorities on 15 days for the completion of the inspection receipts:

(i) The completion of the receipt schedule;

(ii) completed inspection reports;

(iii) In accordance with the law, the accreditation documents made by sectors such as planning, environmental protection or the authorization to use documents;

(iv) Received qualified documentation for large-scale and other special construction works by the public safety firefighting sector in accordance with the law;

(v) The quality of works signed by the construction unit;

(vi) Other documents and information provided for in the legislation.

Article 15 is in line with the requirement for the completion of the work clearance process, and the construction of the administrative authority should receive the construction units within 15 days for the completion of the work clearance documents.

The construction of administrative authorities found that there was a violation of the quality supervision of the work, and the completion of the inspection was to be reorganized on 15 days of the receipt of a warrant.

The work was not carried out without completion of the receipt.

Article 16, when the construction unit is in the process of registration of property rights, the property registration body shall submit the completed work clearance document to the property registry institution.

After the accident of the quality of the work, an accidental owner should report immediately to the head of the construction unit; the head of the construction unit should report within one hour to the construction of the administrative authorities and the related sectors; and, as a matter of urgency, the accidental personnel may report directly to the construction of administrative authorities.

The construction of administrative authorities should be informed, in accordance with the provisions, of accidents and of the sectors such as public safety, inspection bodies.

Chapter III

Article 18

(i) Authorize by law units with corresponding qualifications to perform engineering-related operations, such as survey, design, construction, treasury and quality testing, and to enter into contracts in accordance with the law to fulfil the responsibility for quality management of the participating units;

(ii) The construction map design document should be sent to the construction map review body for review and no unauthorized change in the review of qualified construction map design documents;

Changes in the construction map design document related to mandatory provisions relating to public interest, structural security or construction standards should be reviewed by the original construction map review body;

The specific design documents entrusted separately relate to structural safety and vital use functions, which should be signed by the original design units or by the appropriate design units;

(iii) No reduction in the quality of the work or the arbitrary reduction of the period of reasonable work.

Article 19 Construction units in residential works, in addition to the implementation of the provisions of article 18 of the scheme, shall also perform the following quality responsibility for the work:

(i) Responsibilities for the quality of the work, in accordance with the provisions for the payment of quality assurance payments or the processing of quality insurance;

(ii) The organization of the construction unit for the quality of the residential work and the introduction of the residential construction system.

Article 20

(i) Survey, design, in accordance with the relevant legal regulations and the mandatory standards for construction of works;

(ii) Surveys, design documents depth should be consistent with the relevant provisions of States, provinces, municipalities and actual construction requirements;

(iii) Surveys and changes in design documents in accordance with prescribed procedures;

(iv) Accidental of the quality of the work, which is received;

(v) Participation in the quality of the work and accident processing.

Article 21, the construction unit shall perform the following quality responsibilities:

(i) Carry out construction operations within the scope of qualifications, with the provision of the relevant engineering project quality technical managers and equipment instruments;

(ii) The construction of the construction organization in accordance with the review of qualified construction map design documents, the quality of construction tests and the construction operation schedule;

(iii) A test of the relevant products, such as construction materials, components, equipment and prefabricated concretes, involving probationary, probationary and related materials that are structurally secure should be found in sampling and vetting, without testing or testing of non-qualified use;

(iv) The establishment and implementation of the quality test system, which provides for inspection of the quality of the work;

(v) To collect information on quality control of the work and the important use of functional testing reports.

Article 2

(i) Carrying out engineering operations within the scope of their qualifications, with the provision of appropriate field-based and equipment instruments;

(ii) In accordance with the relevant standard norms and the review of qualified construction map design documents, a written halt to violations committed by construction units in the works and to put an end to invalidity should be communicated promptly to the construction units;

(iii) Execution of the quality of the work and conduct of inspections and parallel tests;

(iv) Accreditation sampling and inspection of probationary, probationary and related materials involving structural safety;

(v) To organize or participate in the quality of the work and to sign the quality of the work;

(vi) There should be no reduction in the criteria for receipt and false receipts.

Article 23 Quality Monitoring Units should perform the following quality responsibility for the work:

(i) To carry out testing operations within the approved qualifications or determinations;

(ii) Develop, implement testing programmes in accordance with the relevant standard norms, test protocols and contract requirements, which are consistent with the provisions of the testing process, reflecting the quality and quality of the engineering entity and the probationary, probationary, related material;

(iii) In accordance with the provision of sampling, sampling and sampling, the authenticity and accuracy of the testing data and the testing reports, covering the conduct of the field-specific testing, which is responsible for the head of the engineering structure represented;

(iv) Non-qualified testing reports should be sent within 24 hours to quality oversight bodies.

Participating parties or engineering quality monitoring bodies have contested the results of the test, and municipal engineering quality monitoring bodies should organize testing or identification.

Article 24: The construction map review body shall perform the following quality responsibilities:

(i) To review qualifications, provide construction map review opinions and review qualified evidence to the construction unit and, within five working days, inform the building of administrative authorities;

(ii) Without the scope of the review or the review of inadmissibility, refunding units and written reasons.

The construction map review body is eligible for review of construction map design documents that are not in compliance with the provisions of the law and the construction of mandatory standards, causing losses to the construction units and should be held in accordance with the law.

Article 25 Production supply units for relevant products, such as construction materials, components and prefabricated concretes, shall perform the following quality of the work:

(i) The sound quality assurance system and the supply of the relevant products within the scope of a licence or business licence;

(ii) The quality of the products in question is consistent with the requirements of technical standards and norms, and the authenticity and integrity of the quality-qualified documentation;

(iii) In accordance with the procedures for registration, the quality of the relevant products on the construction site is qualified for the documentation and the registration of the documents, etc., with the construction, construction and inspection units' nuclear tests.

Article 26 subjects of responsibility for quality of work and the relevant subjects should establish a good quality assurance system.

Urban-building administrative authorities should be governed by the principles of good faith, misconceptions and corrections, with regard to the establishment of a unit of engagement and the registration of the executive branch, and the identification of candidates.

The quality oversight body shall regulate the subject of the quality of the work, the integrity of the relevant subject matter, establish the quality credit file and make available to society information on the quality of the work.

Chapter IV

Article 27 presents a qualitative defect in the construction process and during the maintenance period, and citizens, legal persons or other organizations may lodge complaints to the quality oversight body responsible for overseeing the work.

In accordance with the conditions of admissibility, the quality oversight body of the works should be promptly admissible and the complaint was informed in writing of the results.

Article 28 provides quality issues in the scope of work and during the maintenance period, construction units or construction units shall perform their obligations under the law and shall be borne by the responsible party; within the reasonable period of use, the quality of the work due to the deficiencies of the quality of the work, to be dealt with by the construction unit or the enterprise of the goods and services, and the costs shall be borne by the responsible party in accordance with the law.

In the second article, the owner of the residential works, the user found the quality of the housing works, it should be reflected to the construction unit or the business service enterprise, which should address the issues reflected.

Article 33 may be resolved by the parties as a result of the dispute over the quality of the work, or by means of arbitration, litigation.

Article 31 Quality supervisory bodies that receive complaints about the quality of the work shall not disclose or transfer the complaints to the prosecution, denouncing, accused persons and units.

Chapter V Legal responsibility

In violation of this approach, the construction unit consists of one of the following acts, being modified by an administrative authority to impose a fine of up to 30,000 dollars; in the event of a serious nature, it is recommended that the organ issuing a certificate of qualifications reduce the level of qualifications by law or revoke the award of a certificate of credit:

(i) The absence of a process of quality supervision of the work;

(ii) Non-performance of the responsibility for quality management of the participating units, such as survey, design, construction and treasury;

(iii) No change in the construction map design document in accordance with the provisions;

(iv) No responsibility for the quality of housing works is assumed by law;

(v) Reduce the quality of the work, resulting in deficiencies in the quality of the work;

(vi) No reporting and processing of quality issues and accidents in accordance with the provisions;

(vii) No residential engineering quality inspection or implementation of the residential construction sampling system, as required;

(viii) Failure to complete the work of the organization or the completion of the work was not carried out by the competent self-exploitation, or the work was not carried out with the self-exploitation of the completed receipt.

In violation of this approach, a survey, design unit consists of one of the following acts, being modified by a warrant for the construction of administrative authorities to impose a fine of up to 30,000 dollars; in the event of a serious nature, it is recommended that the organ issuing the award of the award of the award be reduced by law, or that the award of the award of the award be revoked:

(i) Surveys, the quality of the design of documents does not meet the mandatory standard normative requirements or the depth of the survey, design documents is not in accordance with the relevant provisions, construction requirements;

(ii) No mapping and design changes in the prescribed procedures;

(iii) No inspection of the compatibility of the engineering entity with the design document and the quality of the work obtained, or a false receipt of the opinion;

(iv) Participation in the quality of the work and the handling of accidents, as prescribed.

In violation of this approach, the construction unit consists of one of the following acts, which are modified by the construction of an administrative authority to impose a fine of more than 3,000 dollars; in the event of a serious nature, it is recommended that the organ issuing the award of a certificate of qualifications reduce the level of qualifications by law or revoke the award of a certificate of credit:

(i) The absence of a sound quality assurance system or the absence of a provision of technical managers and equipment for the quality of engineering projects in accordance with the provisions;

(ii) The absence of a review of qualified construction map design document, the quality of construction tests and the construction of the construction operation schedule, resulting in deficiencies in the quality of the work;

(iii) No inspection of the relevant products, such as construction materials, components, equipment and prefabricated concretes, and no sampling and inspection of the probationary, probationary and related materials related to structural safety, as required;

(iv) Provide information on the quality control of false works;

(v) The quality of the construction is not reported and processed in accordance with the provisions for the rehabilitation and quality of the work.

In violation of the present approach, the Office of the High Commissioner has one of the following acts, which are redirected by the establishment of an administrative authority to impose a fine of more than 3,000 dollars; in the event of a serious nature, it is recommended that the organ issuing the award of the award of the award be reduced by law or that the award of the award of the award of the award of the award of the award of the award be revoked:

(i) Without the establishment of a sound quality assurance system, the absence of an on-site practitioner or the absence of a prison staff member, resulting in deficiencies in the quality of the work;

(ii) The fact that the quality of the work is directly affected by the absence of a pre-implementation authority under the provisions;

(iii) There is no evidence sampling and referral of probationary, probationary and related materials involving structural safety, as required;

(iv) Non-performance of the quality of the work of the organization in accordance with the provisions and standards;

(v) No observations on the quality of the work was signed in accordance with the provisions or a reduction in the criteria for the receipt and the false receipts.

In violation of this approach, the quality test unit consists of one of the following acts, which are modified by the construction of an administrative authority to impose a fine of more than 3,000 dollars; in the event of a serious nature, it is recommended that the organ issuing the award of the award of the award be reduced by law or that the award of the award of the award of the award be revoked:

(i) Failure to establish a sound quality assurance system that affects the quality of the testing;

(ii) No quality testing is carried out in accordance with the relevant technical standard norms, or no testing reports are provided in accordance with the provisions of the test, or the testing of data for false and false testing reports;

(iii) Inadequate monitoring programmes and implementation of testing, as prescribed;

(iv) There is no evidence sampling and referral according to the provisions;

(v) Unqualified inspection reports are not reported to be sent to local engineering quality oversight bodies within 24 hours, as required.

In violation of this approach, the major construction materials production units, such as prefabricated parts, prefabricated concretes, are one of the following acts, which are converted by the construction of administrative authorities to impose a fine of up to 3,000 dollars; in serious circumstances, notification of construction units or construction units suspending the use of construction materials, components:

(i) Excluding the production of the scope of the licence;

(ii) No sound quality assurance system;

(iii) The quality of material, such as prefabricated structures, prefabricated concretes, is not in accordance with technical standards, technical documents;

(iv) The provision of false quality documents, in accordance with the procedure for registration.

Article 338 units such as construction, survey, design, construction, supervision, testing and other units related to the quality of the work are not implemented in accordance with the relevant provisions of the national, provincial and municipal oversight of the quality of the work, which are dealt with or recorded in accordance with the law.

Article 39 builds the staff of the executive authorities and the engineering quality monitoring bodies to perform negligence, abuse of authority, provocative fraud, by virtue of their own units or superior authorities, and criminalizes by law.

Article 40 violates the provisions of this approach, the law and regulations already provide for legal responsibility.

Annex VI

This approach is not applicable to the construction of low-scale homes by the hijacking of disaster relief and other temporary housing buildings and the self-building activities of farmers.

Article 42

The quality of the engineering entity means reflecting the requirements of the works to meet the relevant standard provisions or contractual agreements, including their overall and implicit characteristics in terms of safety, the use of functions and their ability in terms of a long-term environment, environmental protection.

The quality of the work refers to activities carried out by the subject of the responsibility for quality of the work and by the relevant subjects to fulfil the quality responsibilities and obligations set forth in the relevant national legislation, regulations.

Monitoring tests refer to inspection activities carried out by management or agencies with supervisory functions, based on the relevant provisions and the criteria for the collection of norms, for the purpose of the prosecution and the subject matter of the examination, which is mandatory, and the results are valid.

Quality defects refer to whether the quality of the work is not in accordance with the mandatory standards of construction, the design of documents, the agreement of the contract or the quality of the functioning of the structure, such as the intrusion of inappropriate use and force majeure, leakage, etc.

Article 43