Advanced Search

Guizhou Normative Documents, Procedures And Regulatory Requirements

Original Language Title: 贵州省规范性文件制定程序和监督管理规定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Procedures and oversight management provisions for the development of normative documents in Hindu Province

(Adopted at the 21st ordinary meeting of the Government of the Honour, 30 December 2013, No. 152 of 9 January 2014, by Decree No.

Chapter I General

Article 1, in order to improve the quality of normative documents, to strengthen the management of normative documents, to optimize the development environment, to promote the administration of the law, to develop this provision in the light of the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 2 refers to the normative documents established by the executive branch and by the organization mandated by the law and legislation to administer the functions of public affairs (hereinafter referred to as the statutory authority) in accordance with its statutory powers and procedures, which relate to the rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, which are generally binding, and documents governing administrative matters, such as regulations, regulations, bulletins, notices, methods, application of rules, advice, etc. (except government regulations).

Two categories of normative documents:

(i) normative documents developed by the Government of the people at the district level and its Executive Office (rooms) (hereinafter referred to as normative documents of the Government).

(ii) The Government's work sector at the district level (including the formation of the Ministry, the Oriental Institutions, the Office of the Ombudsman, etc.) and the provision of normative documents by the Government of the above-mentioned people (hereinafter referred to as sectoral normative documents).

Article 3 establishes procedures for the development of normative documents and oversees the application of this provision.

This provision is not applicable in the form of internal regulatory norms that do not involve the rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations, the summary of meetings, the request for indicative reports, the system of work and documents such as recognition of incentives, personnel immunity, decision-making on specific matters.

Interim executive bodies, such as the command and joint meetings, the proceedings coordinating bodies and their offices, the internal structure of the executive branch shall not produce normative documents.

Article 4 Governments and sectors of the population at the district level should strengthen their leadership in the formulation and management of normative documents. Requirements for the management of normative documents dealing with major public interests should be safeguarded.

More than the people at the district level have the rule of law institutions, and more people at the district level are working, dispatched and authorized to organize rule of law institutions specifically responsible for the review and monitoring of the management of normative documents.

The formulation of normative documents should be guided by the following principles:

(i) Maintenance of the unity and political order of the rule of law;

(ii) In accordance with the legislative authority and procedures;

(iii) Legal, reasonable and necessary and feasible;

(iv) Guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Article 6. Nor shall normative documents create the following:

(i) Administrative penalties;

(ii) Administrative licence matters;

(iii) Administrative coercive matters;

(iv) Administrative disposal matters;

(v) Matters governed by laws, regulations and regulations;

(vi) Other matters prohibited by law, regulations and regulations.

In addition to the normative documents of the provincial Government and provincial finances, price authorities, other normative documents may not create administrative fees.

Nor shall normative documents restrict the exercise of rights by citizens, legal persons or other organizations, and not violate the obligations of citizens, legal persons or other organizations.

Drafting and research

Article 7. Drafting normative documents should investigate the reasonableness of the necessaryness, feasibility, proposed major systems and measures.

Article 8. Governments of more people at the district level may identify one or several sectors responsible for drafting governmental normative documents.

Sectoral normative documents are drafted by the development body, with a high degree of professionalism or a greater degree of difficulty, and the formulation of bodies can commission the drafting of relevant organizations, experts.

Normative documents relate to two or more sectors of competence, which could be co-drafted by two or more sectors and hosted by one sector, and in collaboration with other relevant sectors.

Article 9 Drafts normative documents that should be openly consulted and can be conducted in a variety of formats, such as hearings, colloquiums and symposia.

Article 10 Laws, regulations and regulations should be heard or openly consulted with the public, and institutions should be established in accordance with the provisions.

The process of hearing to draft normative documents was carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national and provincial administrative hearings. Public inquiries should be made available through Government websites, sectoral websites or other public-friendly formats for publication of draft normative documents. Civil, legal or other organizations should study the draft normative document.

Article 11 has different views on the draft Government's normative document, which should be studied and coordinated, and should be explained in the drafting note.

Chapter III

Article 12 After the review of legality, the Government of the people at the current level has been given consideration.

The drafting of sectoral normative documents should be sent to the rule of law institutions in the sector for consideration at the departmental office.

Article 13

(i) Will be a normative document;

(ii) Is there the need, feasibility and operationality to be developed;

(iii) Are incompatible with the law, regulations and regulations;

(iv) In conformity with the drafting and research procedures set out in chapter II of this provision.

Article 14. The rule of law body that conducts a review of legality may convene a colloquium, an expert participating in the event of a dispute, a complex or other major issue. Where necessary, the views of the executive relative should be examined and heard.

Article 15. When the rule of law bodies review the draft normative documents, the following provisions may be addressed:

(i) Be not a normative document and back to the drafting cell;

(ii) To go beyond the competence, mainly in the violation of the law, the main regime and measures to be set are in conflict with the law, regulations, regulations or regulations, or are not necessary for the formulation of the normative document;

(iii) Incompatible with the research and drafting process set out in chapter II of this provision, it is recommended that the drafting cell be added;

(iv) Specific provisions that are not lawful and suggest changes.

Article 16 shall complete the review of legality within 10 working days from the date of receipt of the draft normative document and provide a valid review of views. For a more statute of limitation, the credentials for the review of legality should be given within three working days. The controversy is more controversial and complex and could be extended to 15 working days. Drafting units do not take into account the time frame for the review.

The time frame for sectoral rule of law bodies to review the draft normative documents by themselves.

Drafting units shall submit to the policymaking organs for their consideration, in accordance with the legitimate review of views by the rule of law bodies, a revision of the draft normative document. Without a review of the opinion, the development body should relocate the relevant material to the drafting unit, which should be reorganized in the process.

The drafting unit has different views on the review of legality, which can challenge the rule of law institutions and provide the relevant grounds and the basis. The rule of law body should conduct a prompt study on the question, which should be set up and should reproduce the concept of legality review; the objection was not established and should be answered in a timely manner.

Consideration and registration of chapter IV

The normative documents developed by the Government in article 18 should be considered by the Standing Committee of the Government; decisions may be considered at the thematic meetings of the Government with regard to a small and consensual nature. Sectoral normative documents should be considered by sectoral office meetings.

The normative document of the Government was signed by the principal head of the people's Government or by other heads of principal authority, with the registration of normative documents by the Executive Office of the People's Government (rooms) and the issuance of official documents.

Article 20 of the sectoral normative documents are registered by the principal heads of departments or by other heads authorized by the main heads of the main authorities for a period of three working days after the signing of the contract by the principal heads of the department or by the principal head of the authority of the head of the head of the head of the delegation of the people's rule of law, and the issuance of documents in the public, after obtaining normative documents.

Two or more departments have jointly developed normative documents and, within three working days of the completion of the signing of the signature by the principal head or other heads of the principal authority, are registered by the lead department to the Government's rule of law institutions and to obtain the number of normative documents by means of a procedure document.

The registration should be submitted to the registration report, the draft normative document adopted by the review and its clarifications, the legitimacy of the rule of law institutions.

Article 21 provides for sectoral normative documents, which shall be registered and registered with normative documents within three working days from the date of receipt of registration reports, and are not registered and justified.

The registration form of sectoral normative documents was developed by the Office of the Provincial Government of the Rule of Law.

Publication and monitoring

Article 2

Article 23 requires the immediate development of normative documents due to emergencies such as national security and major public interest, and the simplification of the process can be achieved through the approval of the principal holder of the design body.

The right to interpret normative documents is an organ of normative documents.

Article 25 Normative documents shall be sent within 10 working days from the date of publication in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) The Government's normative documents are presented in the Standing Committee of the People's Government and People's Representatives of the General Assembly;

(ii) Subsectional normative documents are presented to the Government of the People;

(iii) Normative documents developed jointly by two or more sectors are sent by the lead department;

(iv) The normative documents established by the Government of the people at the district level by a body established under the law, which are sent to the people's Government for the establishment of the office;

(v) Prescription of normative documents developed by the vertically managed sectors, while reporting to the Government of the people at this level.

The review of the normative document is carried out by the same body of government rule of law. Normative documents have been developed to report back to the Government of the People, which can be used to send to the Government's rule of law institutions for the review process.

The normative document of the Government of Article 26 is specifically responsible for the delivery of the case by the Executive Office of the Government of the People at the district level (rooms) and the sectoral normative document is specifically responsible for the reporting of the referral process by the sectoral instrument management body. Drafting units should provide timely information on the submissions.

The presentation of normative documents should be submitted to the request report, the formulation of notes, the basis and the formal publication of normative documents.

Governments and sector e-statements are encouraged.

Article 27: The rule of law organs of the Government of the host country shall review the normative documents of the submission of the submission as follows:

(i) In conformity with the statutory competence;

(ii) Whether there is a violation of the provisions of the law, regulations and regulations;

(iii) Does not violate the provisions of the superior normative document.

More than the people's rule of law institutions at the district level conduct a central or other review of the normative documents of the referral.

In the context of a review of normative documents by more than twenty-eight people's rule of law institutions at the district level, relevant material or clarifications should be provided by the designating body or the drafting body; the need for advice from the relevant departments should be sought and the relevant authorities should respond within the time frame.

Article 29 of the Constitution of the Government of the People's Deputies at the District level is to be transferred to the competent body for review of normative documents that do not fall under the review of the institution's request; if necessary, the authorities of the Government of the High-level People's Rule of Law may request a direct review of the material sent by the organ concerned.

Article 33 issues identified in the review of normative documents are addressed in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Normative documents go beyond statutory competence or violate the provisions of laws, regulations, regulations and superior normative documents, and are notified by the competent government rule of law bodies reviewed by the host case to suspend implementation and to correct deadlines. The Government of the people at this level has been brought to change or withdraw by delay;

(ii) Contrary to the same matter between normative documents, coordinated by the Government's rule of law institutions that are under review. The relevant sectors should be implemented in a coordinated manner; the people's government decision to deal with the views sheets cannot be agreed upon;

(iii) The formulation of normative documents is based on contradictions, and the Government of the people at this level is not entitled to be dealt with, and should be reported on the procedures of the Government's rule of law.

The development body of normative documents shall modify or repeal normative documents within 15 working days of the date of receipt of the letter of redress. Changes or repeals should be reported in writing on the Government's rule of law institutions that are under review.

The development body of a normative document objected to the written review by the Government of the People's Rule of Law, which had been reviewed by the host Government, which, within 15 working days of the date of the written notification, had submitted a request for review to the Government of the people that had received the request and would review the Government's rule of law institutions that had applied for the preparation of the case review, the People's Government's Rule of Law Agency should submit comments to the Government of the current people within 15 working days.

Article 32 Procedures for the review of the normative documents of the referral case by the vertically managed sector are governed by the corresponding provisions of the executive authority.

Article 33 Civil, legal or other organizations consider that normative documents are incompatible with the law, regulations and regulations or normative documents, and may make recommendations for review to the rule of law institutions that prepare organs, conduct desk review. The establishment of organs or the rule of law body should be verified in a timely manner, after the review of the recommendations. There is a question to be addressed in accordance with article 33 of this provision. The recommendations of the written review should be informed of the outcome.

Chapter VI Clearance

Article XIV contains one of the following cases, and the development of organs should be cleaned in a timely manner, and the decision to modify, repeal and declare invalidity based on the facts:

(i) Be replaced by law, regulations, regulations, normative documents of the superior administrative body or normative documents developed by this organ or partially or entirely;

(ii) Failure to adapt to the needs of economic and social development, or incompatible with the new provisions of the legal, legislative, regulatory and superior administrative organs;

(iii) The mandate has been completed and there is no need for continuity.

The establishment of organs should take the clean-up of normative documents into account the rule of law bodies reviewed.

Amendments to normative documents are implemented in accordance with this provision. The revised normative documents should be re-registrated and sent.

Chapter VII Legal responsibility

In violation of the present provision, there are one of the following cases in which the period of time has been changed by the Government of the People's Democratic Republic of the Congo's rule of law; overdue, resulting in serious consequences, and the right to the executive disposition by the competent organ in accordance with the law:

(i) To refrain from the implementation of the review process without justification;

(ii) The normative documents developed are incompatible with the laws, regulations and regulations.

In violation of the present provision, the development of the institution's late submission or presentation of the request was not in accordance with the notification by the Government of the rule of law bodies of the period of time being changed; and the imprecise of the late omission could be informed.

Chapter VIII

The Government of the people of the communes (States), districts (communes, districts, special districts) may establish a means of implementation in accordance with this provision.

The procedures for the development of normative documents by the communes, the people of the town are implemented in accordance with this provision.

Article 39 provides for the operation effective 1 March 2014. A review of the administrative normative documentation for the provinces issued on 30 October 2003 by the Government of the People of the province (No. 71 of the Order of the Provincial Government) and of the procedures for the formulation of administrative normative documents by the Government of the Honour and its work sector, issued on 28 March 2009 (No.