(The 15th ordinary meeting of the Government of Sus State of 30 July 2013 to discuss the adoption of Decree No. 130 of 25 October 2013, No. 130 of the Order of the People's Government of the State of Sus Republic of Korea, effective 1 January 2014)

Article 1 promotes scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making and legal decision-making, and enhances the quality and efficiency of decision-making, in accordance with relevant provisions such as legislation, regulations, etc., and establishes this provision in the light of the actual practice of the city.

Article 2, which refers to the significant administrative decision-making referred to in this article, refers to activities taken by the Government of the city (hereinafter referred to as the municipality) to perform administrative functions in accordance with the law and to take decisions on major matters pertaining to the public interest of society.

The following matters shall not be considered as administrative decision-making matters:

(i) Market competition mechanisms can be effectively regulated;

(ii) Citizens, legal persons or other organizations can decide autonomously;

(iii) Industry organizations or intermediaries are able to manage themselves independently;

(iv) grass-roots organizations can be managed autonomously.

The People's Government (CWC), the municipal government service sector can be more effective in decision-making or decision-making in accordance with its mandate, and should be determined by themselves or by the municipal authorities.

Article 3. The laws, regulations, regulations and regulations also provide for their provisions.

The provision of local legislation bills, regulations and government normative documents to respond to sudden incidents is not applicable in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article IV is governed by the principles of law, science, democracy, openness and efficiency.

Article 5 Governments should strengthen the normative development of decision-making, improve the rules of decision-making procedures and incorporate the implementation of decision-making procedures requirements into the annual performance appraisal of the Government and the legislative administrative appraisal.

The Urban Government Office is responsible for the organization, coordination, guidance and oversight of major administrative decisions.

The municipal risk assessment management, the Government's rule of law sector, the executive inspectorate, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, performs significant administrative decision-making risk assessment, review of legality, operational guidance for integrity assessment and related oversight management.

Article 6. Municipal governments should establish an open functioning system for major administrative decision-making, regulating the implementation of decision-making processes and decision-making matters and improving administrative effectiveness.

Article 7. The Office of the Municipal Government shall prepare a directory of major administrative decision-making matters each year with sectors such as urban rehabilitation, inspection, finance, the rule of law, risk assessment management, to be published after approval by the municipal authorities. Contents include project names, sub-offices and completion time. It should be published in a timely manner.

The following persons or institutions may make significant administrative decision-making recommendations to the municipality:

(i) Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Secretary-General, Under-Secretary-General;

(ii) People's Government at the district level (zone) and provincial governments send municipal government administrations;

(iii) The municipal government service, the dispatch agency, the immediate unit, the provincial office in Sustain;

(iv) Other State bodies, democratic parties or groups of people, business units, grass-roots organizations, industry organizations, intermediary agencies, academic groups, etc.;

(v) A large representative or a member of the Government;

(vi) Other citizens.

Significant administrative decision-making recommendations should be presented for reasons and basis for decision-making recommendations, issues to be addressed, and related materials such as a solution.

Article 9 addresses major administrative decision-making recommendations in accordance with the following provisions:

(i) Major administrative decision-making recommendations made by the Deputy Mayor, which may be determined by the Mayor.

(ii) The Secretary-General, the Under-Secretary-General's proposals for major administrative decision-making, which may be determined by the mayor of the report after the approval of the Deputy Mayor.

(iii) People's Government at the district level, the provincial government dispatched municipal government administrations, the municipal government service, the dispatch of institutions, the immediate unit, the provincial governor's main administrative decision-making recommendations, which were made by the sub-sistance mayor, after the approval of the Deputy Mayor.

(iv) Significant administrative decision-making recommendations from other units, representatives of the human person, members of the political union or other citizens, which are determined by the Mayor after the approval of the Deputy Mayor by the municipal government office.

In order to identify major administrative decision-making matters and decision-making matters involving the parent, the city or its Standing Committee, the municipal government should designate an office and include decision-making matters in a directory of major administrative decision-making matters.

Article 10 The Agency shall prepare draft major administrative decisions in accordance with procedures such as public participation, expert opinion, risk assessment, legitimacy review.

Article 11. In major administrative decision-making processes, the sub-offices should seek public advice to the community through the Government's portal, newspapers, radio, television, etc., and seek the views of the relevant regional governments, sectors and citizens, legal persons and other organizations that have direct stake in decision-making matters. Where necessary, the views of the Standing Committee of Municipalities, the Municipal Union, the Democratic Party and the People's Group should also be specifically sought.

The UNOPS shall, in accordance with the need for a colloquium, a witness, hearing or other views of the parties concerned.

In seeking and listening, the Agency should provide the first draft of the draft decision-making and the drafting notes.

The hearing of major administrative decisions should be held in public.

The office should publish the hearings, select the witness participants, including through voluntary presentations, targeted selection options, to ensure the broad representation of the witness participants and to publish the list of the participants in the hearings in advance.

The Office shall make a statement on decision-making matters at the hearings, receive a hearing to take part in the hostages and adopt reasonable observations and recommendations.

Article 13 provides for more professional decision-making matters, which should invite experts in relevant areas or entrust the relevant professional bodies with the need for, scientific, feasibility and content of decision-making matters, and form an evidentiary report.

The office should select authoritative and representative counsellors, including through public invitations.

Experts participating in the advisory opinion may consult relevant information, attend relevant meetings, participate in relevant research activities and conduct independent advice and be responsible for the submissions.

The municipal government has established a pool of decision-making advisory experts in different professional areas.

Article 14.

The sub-offices should develop a programme of work on social stabilization risk assessment, conduct colloquiums, questionnaire surveys, data analysis, and provide an analysis of the risks that may be triggered by decision-making matters, identify risk levels and form risk assessment reports.

Risk levels are high, and the host units should submit proposals for a suspension of the discussion and non-discussive decisions to the municipalities in a timely manner.

The sub-office may entrust third parties, such as specialized agencies, with a risk of social stability.

Article 15. The Agency shall carry out a review of legality and integrity of decision-making matters. There was doubts and complex decision-making matters, and the sub-office should invite the experts concerned to exercise legitimacy and integrity.

The institution of the rule of law of the Agency should conduct a review of legality in terms of the competence, procedures, content and content of the decision-making body and form a review report.

The IGO should conduct an integrative assessment in terms of compliance with the integrity system, the availability of complicity benefits and the development of assessment reports.

Article 16, based on public participation, expert opinion, risk assessment, makes a significant change in the first draft of the decision-making process, which should be heard once again on the basis of the need for amendments.

The authorities, departments or units of the region concerned have divergent views on the draft decision-making draft, which should be coordinated; and, in coordination, cannot be agreed, the offices should bring the coordinated information and the comments to the municipal authorities.

Article 17

Decision-making matters require a multi-programme comparative study, which should develop more than two options for decision-making that could be chosen and offer orientation and justification.

Article 18 is submitted to the municipality for discussion of the draft decision, which should be sent to the Office of the Municipal Government to draft decision-making and drafting notes and be sent to the municipal risk assessment management, the Government's rule of law, the administrative inspection body.

The drafting note should include the need for decision-making, the drafting base, the drafting process, and the main elements, as well as materials such as the public, expert opinions and their adoption, risk assessment reports, review of legitimacy and integrity assessment reports.

A special note should be given to the fact that no decision-making process is carried out in the drafting process.

The offices should be accountable for the authenticity of the material related to major administrative decision-making.

The municipal risk assessment management, the Government's rule of law sector, the executive inspectorate has expressed opinions on the draft decision-making process for the hosting of the office, which should be reported in a timely manner and sent to the office.

Draft decision-making and related materials should be reviewed by the Office of the Municipal Government. The material is incomplete and is informed of the supplementary material of the host office; the draft decision-making process is not in accordance with this provision and the returnee units have improved the procedures.

The municipality may, depending on the needs, re-establish the relevant decision-making process by itself or by the authorities concerned.

Article 20

Mayors should adopt, adopt, modify, discuss or hold decisions on the draft decision, in accordance with the discussions at the Conference.

Article 21 Risk assessment management, the Government's rule of law, the executive inspectorate and decision-making matters, the implementation of relevant regional governments and key heads of sectors should be included in decision-making matters.

In discussing decision-making matters, municipalities may be invited to attend meetings of the Standing Committee, the municipal councillors, or to invite grass-roots organizations, industry organizations, professionals, as required, to attend meetings.

In discussing decision-making matters, municipalities may be invited to attend and media interviews.

By decision-making matters, the municipal authorities should determine the implementation units.

Decision-making matters are required by law to report to the superior body, the city or its Standing Committee, and the municipality should report in accordance with the provisions.

After the adoption of decision-making matters, the hosting units should receive timely feedback or make public, expert's main observations and reasons.

Following the adoption of decision-making matters, the Office of the Municipal Government should be made available to society in a timely manner through the media, such as the Government's portal, and the implementing units should be informed in a timely manner of civil, legal and other organizations that have a direct stake in decision-making matters.

In the course of the implementation of decision-making matters, the implementing units should take expert evaluation, social review, etc., organize the assessment of implementation of decision-making matters, propose recommendations for the continuation, adaptation or cessation of implementation of decision-making matters, and form an assessment report to the municipality.

In the course of the decision-making process, the implementation units should take immediate remedial measures and report to the municipal government, as a result of force majeure or objective changes that lead to the full or partial failure of the decision-making process.

In accordance with the assessment reports and the circumstances, the municipality may make decisions to continue, adjust or stop implementation.

The content of decision-making matters is adapted to the applicable decision-making process, but the situation is urgent and may result in significant loss or damage.

Article 25

Citizens, legal persons or other organizations, as well as the media, have the right to monitor the implementation of major administrative decision-making processes and decision-making matters, and may make observations and proposals to the municipalities, offices and implementing units.

Article 26 The Office of the Municipal Government, the Office of the Ombudsman and the implementing units should establish major administrative decision-making archives to collect relevant archival material in the recording of decision-making processes, decision-making matters.

Article 27, in violation of this provision, has one of the following cases in the decision-making process, resulting in a failure of decision-making and the grave consequences, which are governed by the law by its own units or by the superior authorities to the competent and other direct responsible personnel directly responsible; and constitutes an offence punishable by law:

(i) No decision-making process, as prescribed;

(ii) Provision of false material;

(iii) The draft decision-making submitted violates the law;

(iv) Other circumstances leading to errors in decision-making and serious consequences.

Article 28 of the People's Government (CWA) at the district level, and the municipal government work sector should establish major administrative decision-making procedures in accordance with this provision.

The People's Government (PACT) at the district level, the municipal government work sector should prepare a directory of major administrative decision-making matters in the region, the sector, report back to the municipal government office and transmit to the municipal risk assessment management, the Government's rule of law sector, the executive inspection authority. It should be restructured and sent within 10 days of the date of the adjustment and be sent to the relevant sectors of the city.

Article 29 The major administrative decision-making procedures established by the Government of the People of Sus State on 5 January 2010 were repealed.