Advanced Search

Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Major Administrative Decision-Making Procedures

Original Language Title: 广西壮族自治区重大行政决策程序规定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Major administrative decision-making procedures in the Autonomous Region

(Summit 17th ordinary meeting of the Twelfth People's Government of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 30 October 2013, to consider the adoption of Decree No. 93 of 28 November 2013, of the People's Government Order No. 93 of 28 November 2013, which came into force on 1 January 2014)

Chapter I General

Article 1, in order to regulate major administrative decision-making, ensure that administrative decision-making science, democracy, legitimacy and improve the quality of administrative decision-making, establishes this provision in line with the relevant provisions.

Article 2

Article 3 Governments and their sectors should uphold scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making, legal decision-making, and establish public participation, expert perceptions and decision-making mechanisms to improve decision-making rules.

Article IV

(i) A draft local legislation, the development of government regulations and important normative documents;

(ii) The development of major policy measures open to macroeconomic regulation and reform;

(iii) Develop major policies for resource development, environmental protection, ecological construction, disaster prevention, labour employment, social security, family planning, safe production, food security, education, housing construction, transport management, and state-owned enterprise conversion, among others, for the benefit of the public;

(iv) Develop or adapt a variety of overall planning, important regional planning and specific planning;

(v) The preparation of draft financial predetermined accounts and the use of funds;

(vi) Examination of major governmental investment projects, State-owned asset disposal matters;

(vii) Develop or adjust important administrative fees and important commodities, services prices for government pricing;

(viii) Develop or adjust major emergencies;

(ix) Change programmes in administrative areas;

(x) Significant matters for civil service;

(xi) Other important matters requiring government decision-making.

Article 5

Article 6

Article 7. Matters, bases and results of major administrative decisions should be made public by law, including through government portals, government bulletins, media.

Article 8

(i) Policy research;

(ii) Advisory arguments;

(iii) Public participation;

(iv) Risk assessment;

(v) Review of legality;

(vi) Collective discussions on decisions;

(vii) Publication of results. The laws, regulations, regulations and regulations provide for the decision-making process.

The Government's significant decision-making process should be reported to the current level.

Chapter II

Article 10 Priorities for major administrative decision-making should be preceded by research studies to fully and accurately capture the relevant information required for decision-making. Expert, professional service or other organizations may be entrusted with research.

Article 11. Key elements of policy-making research:

(i) Status of decision-making matters;

(ii) The need for decision-making matters;

(iii) The feasibility of decision-making matters;

(iv) Legal, policy basis for decision-making matters;

(v) Other needs to be studied.

The decision-making programme should be developed after the study of decision-making. More than two decision-making options should be developed for matters requiring multi-programme comparative studies or inconsistent consultations.

Chapter III Advisory opinion

Article 13 is more professional in major administrative decision-making matters and expert advice should be organized.

Article 14. The executive body should improve the system of decision-making information and intellectual support, which could involve a number of experts in providing regular annual decision-making advice.

Article 15. The expert advisory opinion may be made available, for example, through the Advisory Chamber, the Accreditation or written advice, as well as written observations. The heads of executive bodies should be present at the expert advisory meetings, the hearings.

Article 16

Article 17 Key administrative decisions relate to the functions of the relevant administrative organs and should also seek the views of the relevant administrative bodies. The relevant administrative bodies should organize serious studies, make clear observations and receive timely feedback. There is a principled divergence among executive organs and should be coordinated.

Chapter IV Public participation

Significant administrative decision-making matters involve the public interest and should be consulted publicly. Public requests could be made for example by demonstrating, investigating, collating and hearing.

Article 19 Major administrative decision-making matters may be disclosed through local newspapers, radio television, government portals, public columns of government, or through demonstration models, photographs, ills, videos, etc.

Article 20 highlights of major administrative decisions include:

(i) Policy matters;

(ii) Based, rationale and description;

(iii) Modalities and time for feedback;

(iv) Other elements should be indicated.

Article 21 contains one of the following cases for major administrative decision-making, and hearings should be held:

(i) The public interest;

(ii) It may affect social stability;

(iii) The public has significant differences in decision-making programmes;

(iv) Legal, regulatory and regulatory provisions should be heard.

Article 2: The executive body shall notify the following 10 years before the hearings:

(i) The time, place of the hearings;

(ii) The content, rationale, basis and background information for administrative decision-making;

(iii) The time and manner of the request for participation in the hearings.

Article 23, citizens, legal persons and other organizations that have a stake in hearing matters, may apply for participation in the hearings. The executive body shall, in accordance with the nature of the hearings, the conditions established in the hearings, the order in which the application is admissible and the proportion of the dissenting. The executive branch may invite relevant professionals, expert scholars, as required.

Participation in the hearings. The number of applicants for participation in the hearings is higher, and the executive branch should opt for participants.

Article 24 should be held in public order to allow access to and media.

Article 25 Hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures:

(i) The hearing recorders identified the attendance of the witness and declared the disciplinary of the hearings;

(ii) The moderator declared that the hearings started, introduced the hearing and declared the hearings process;

(iii) Presentation by the contractor on decision-making matters;

(iv) Expression of opinion by the participants;

(v) Conduct qualitative evidence and debate around hearings;

(vi) Concluding remarks by the moderator.

Article 26 hearings should produce hearings and refer to the witness to the signatory. The hearings should produce hearings based on hearings and make the hearings a key reference to decision-making.

Article 27 should be categorized by the executive branch to make the views publicly collected, to make the observations adopted or not adopted and to explain the reasons.

Risk assessment

Major administrative decision-making matters relate to the full and public interest of economic and social development and should be subject to a social stabilization risk assessment. Mechanisms for risk assessment to improve sectoral evidence, expert advice, public participation, professional agency measurement.

Article 29 Risk assessment shall be conducted in accordance with the following procedures:

(i) Develop an assessment programme. Clear assessment purposes, targets and content, assessment criteria, assessment steps and methods.

(ii) Full hearing. The views of stakeholders and the social public were fully heard, including through calls for follow-up, sampling inspections, focus visits and the holding of colloquiums, hearings.

(iii) A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. An integrated analytical study of the relevant sectors and experts collected is conducted by relevant organizations and scientific forecasting and synthesis of risks arising from decision-making.

(iv) Identification of risk levels. In accordance with the assessment, the three levels of risk are determined accordingly.

(v) A assessment report.

Article 33 Risk assessment reports should assess the risks that may be triggered by decision-making and then make preventive, mitigation or disposal scenarios.

Article 31 Risk assessment results should serve as an important basis for decision-making by the executive branch, without risk assessment, without decision-making. Risk assessments consider that there is a high risk of decision-making matters and that decision-making is not possible. Risk assessment considers that there is a low risk and that decision-making should be taken after effective preventive and curative measures are taken.

Chapter VI Review of legality

Prior to the submission of major administrative decision-making matters to the collective discussion, legitimacy should be reviewed. Unless the review of legality or review is not adopted, the executive body cannot take decisions.

Article 33 of the Government's major administrative decision-making is reviewed by the Government's rule of law sector responsible for the review of legality, and the Government's major administrative decisions are subject to review of legality by the sectoral rule of law institutions.

Article 34 Review of the legitimacy of major administrative decisions includes, inter alia:

(i) Whether laws, regulations, regulations and related provisions are violated;

(ii) Would go beyond the statutory competence of the policymaking organs;

(iii) Whether significant administrative decision-making procedures are violated;

(iv) Other issues of legitimacy need to be examined.

After a review of the legitimacy of major administrative decision-making matters by the Government's rule of law or by the rule of law institutions of government.

Chapter VII

Major administrative decision-making should be taken by the executive branch in collective discussions.

Article 37 brings to the collective discussion decisions on major decision-making matters and shall submit the following materials:

(i) Reports on decision-making matters;

(ii) Research reports;

(iii) To seek advice and address the situation;

(iv) Expert advice;

(v) Risk assessment reports;

(vi) Review of the views of legitimacy;

(vii) Other relevant materials.

Article 338 Collectively discusses decisions on major administrative decision-making matters, as required by the following:

(i) Pre-session notification of major decision-making matters for collective discussions;

(ii) The decision-making matters are brought to the Conference by the sector to report and respond to questions;

(iii) The heads of the management and other heads of delegation;

(iv) In accordance with the agreement of the moderator, the views of other participants;

(v) The final publication of concluding observations by the head of the executive branch or by the moderator of the Conference.

In accordance with the collective discussion, the heads of executive organs may agree, agree, modify or discuss decisions on major administrative decision-making matters under discussion.

Article 40 convenes major administrative decision-making meetings by the executive organs and shall produce a record of the meetings. A summary of the proceedings of the Conference shall be prepared in accordance with the records of the meetings. A major administrative decision-making outcome of article 40 should be made public in a timely manner, in addition to the confidentiality of the law. Major administrative decision-making matters decided by the Standing Government should be reported publicly in the local media. After the publication of government regulations, important normative documents, the book issued by the Government of the current people and the newspapers issued within the current administrative region should be published in a timely manner.

Chapter VIII Recturing and decision-making responsibilities

Article 42, the executive body should conduct a review of the implementation of major administrative decisions and ensure the proper implementation of decisions.

Article 43 thirteenth organs should establish major administrative decision-making mechanisms that are timely in identifying and correcting problems in decision-making design and implementation through methods such as public opinion tests, sample surveys, follow-up feedback, post-decision-making assessments. Citizens, legal persons or other organizations believe that major administrative decisions should cease implementation or amendment and may make observations or recommendations to policymaking organs.

Article 44, in violation of major administrative decision-making procedures, should be heard by the executive organs and their staff, without a hearing, an assessment of the misconduct of the risk assessment, a review of legality or a review of decision-making without collective discussion, leading to errors in decision-making,

Administrative decision-making is erroneous.

Chapter IX

Article 42 Government dispatched agencies, the Management Zone Commission, the Development of Regional Committees and the organizations mandated by the law, regulations and regulations to manage the functions of public affairs and implement the provisions of this provision for major administrative decisions. General administrative decision-making refers to the implementation of this provision.

Article 46 The provisional provision for the major decision-making process of the executive organs of the SAutonomous Region (No. 32 of the People's Government Order of the Autonomous Region) was published on 26 November 2007.