Advanced Search

Nanning Housing Use Safety Management Regulations

Original Language Title: 南宁市房屋使用安全管理规定

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

Safety management of houses in South Africa

(Adopted at the 64th ordinary meeting of the 13th People's Government of South Africa, on 21 March 2014)

Chapter I General

Article 1, in order to strengthen the security management of homes and to guarantee the lives and property security of the people, establishes this provision in line with the relevant laws, regulations and regulations.

Article 2

Article 3 provides for the safe management of houses as described in this Article, which refers to the management of buildings that secure the security of tenure structures, including the management of housing structures, the management of paternity, the management of housing security recognition and the management of dangerous homes.

Article IV. Safety management of tenure is governed by the principles of prevention, association, normative use and ensuring security.

Article 5 is the competent authority for the safe management of houses in this city, which is responsible for the safe management of homes in the city, and is responsible for the proper day-to-day management of its own housing safety management and mir management.

The urban housing management is responsible for the safe management of houses in the Territory, in accordance with the division of duties.

The construction, planning, land resources, education, health, sports, culture, transport, commerce, tourism, safe production monitoring are responsible, within their respective responsibilities, for the safe management of housing.

Article 6. Governments of the urban and urban areas should include provisions for the safe management of homes in the financial budget and guarantee the need for the safe management of homes.

Article 7. Housing management should strengthen monitoring of the use of houses, the safe management system for the use of homes and the disaster response relief advances.

Sectors such as education, health, sports, culture, transport, commerce, tourism should organize regular inspections of the security conditions in the use of public premises, such as schools, kindergartens, hospitals, sports premises, cultural recreation sites, vehicle stations, hotels, meals and restaurants.

The communes and street offices, the communes (communes) should organize personnel to conduct emergency safety inspections of homes affected by natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, slopes, land sediments, or explosions in the Territory.

Article 8. Housing management should establish housing safety management files. The housing security management archives should contain the following:

(i) The basic situation of the house;

(ii) The construction of information and the completion of inspection data;

(iii) A record of housing renovation, maintenance, and consolidation;

(iv) A record of the use of security inspections, security clearance and mir control in homes.

Housing management should build up a security management information system for house use and integrate housing security into information management.

The units and individuals should cooperate with the construction of a housing security management file that requires the extraction and reproduction of relevant information.

Article 9. Housing property rights units, goods and services enterprises shall inspect and rehabilitate homes and their subsidiarys, record and maintain permanently.

Article 10 has the right to complain and report on violations of the security of tenure. The urban housing management in the home area should be promptly investigated after complaints and reports are received.

Chapter II

Article 11. The owner, the user, shall use the house in the right manner, in accordance with the structure and purpose of the house design, guarantee the security of the housing structure and shall not affect the security of the use of the contiguous homes.

Article 12. The owner of the house is the first responsible for the safe use of the house. In the course of home use, the following acts shall not be carried out:

(i) To dismantle or partially dismantle the components of the housing base, the walls, the pillars, the blues, the building blocks;

(ii) The addition of windows on heavy walls or the expansion of the original window holes;

(iii) To open the holes on the walls or the heavy ladder of the ladder of the escalating of the smoil;

(iv) Additional windows on non-exclusive walls;

(v) Changes in the design of housing planning;

(vi) More than design standards or norms to increase the number of buildings, houses and loads;

(vii) Reclassification of rooms without water functions to sanitation, kitchen facilities;

(viii) Explore the basis of the house, build local facilities or reduce the number of places in the house;

(ix) Removal of homes in total;

(x) The installation of facilities and equipment that affect the security of the housing structure;

(xi) Distinguished structures in public premises such as schools, kindergartens, hospitals, sports houses, cultural recreation sites, vehicle stations, chambers, hotels, restaurants, meals, etc.

(xii) Other laws, regulations and regulations endanger the safety of homes.

The owner of the house, the use of the person to commit the acts listed in the preceding paragraph shall have access to the design document of the original design unit of the house or the design units with a corresponding level of qualifications; the absence of a design document should provide a feasibility programme for the establishment of a housing safety accreditation body under the law and conduct related procedures in the planning, construction. During the thirty-first day of the completion of the work, the design documents for the design of the design units, the feasibility programme for the identification of house safety, the material for the completion of the inspection, were presented to the management of the housing area.

Article 13 Housing owners should maintain and conduct safety inspections on a regular basis for the housing structure, detect safety hidden or dangerous situations and should be managed in a timely manner.

Business-service enterprises should conduct inspections, conservation, repairs, and keep records in line with service contracts.

Article 14.

Chapter III

Article 15. New construction, alteration and expansion of homes should be carried out in the prevention of mirage.

Article 16 provides for new construction, alteration and expansion of homes, and construction units shall enter into a mirage control contract with the white mirage units prior to the start of the construction.

The planning sector should, in the event of a nuclear construction engineering planning licence, test the construction unit's white mirage contract.

The construction units should submit proof documents that have been implemented in connection with the sale of homes and the registration process.

Article 17 shall carry out regular mirage inspections of homes and find mirables, and shall be subject to the supervision of the owner of the house, the use of the person to entrust the mirage.

The owner of the house, the user found the mirage of the house, should be entrusted in a timely manner with the removal of the mirage control unit and reporting to the BMS.

Article 18 should use State-mandated drugs, be treated under prescribed procedures and technical norms, and a white mirage control file.

Article 19 was not less than 15 years for the period of mir prevention, and the mirex was not less than two years.

Article 20 was mirable within the period of mirage, and the former parent control unit should be free of charge.

The unimplementation of paternity prevents or exceeds the time frame, and the cost of charging is borne by the owner.

Chapter IV

Article 21 provides for the safe identification of houses by a body established by law.

The report on housing safety identified by the Housing Safety Identification Institute is the basis for determining the security of homes.

In Article 22, the housing security accreditation body should be synonymous with the housing safety survey conducted by the property management in connection with accidents and natural disasters, or by the use of safe-induced houses.

Article 23, where the owner of the home, the user considers that the house is safely hidden, can be entrusted to the housing security accreditation body to conduct a housing safety certificate.

In one of the following cases, the owner of the house should entrust the housing safety recognition body with the identification of housing safety:

(i) The time limit for the use of homes or beyond the design of homes requires continued use;

(ii) There is a clear risk of house breaks, dumping and deposition, which require continued use;

(iii) The housing that is not subject to the quality supervision of the works but has been completed;

(iv) Other cases where the law, regulations, regulations and regulations should be identified for the safety of homes.

The length of use of house design is determined by the time limit for the design of information or the design of maps. Without the design of information, the design of map paper or the design of information, the design of map paper does not indicate the length of the use of the year, the use of the wood structure, the general house of the brick structure is 25 years, the brick structure, the steel structure, the ordinary house of the steel structure is limited to 50 years.

Article 25 reaches or exceeds the time limit for the design of houses and the hazardous homes that are inherently or renovated in governance, and the owner of the house shall submit to the housing registration institution a report on the safety and security of the housing vouchers that are eligible for safe use.

Article 26 Public premises, such as schools, kindergartens, hospitals, sports houses, cultural recreation sites, vehicle stations, chambers, hotels, meals, etc., should continue to be used after the design of the time limit, and should be subject to the advice of the design units or design units with corresponding qualifications to the length of the use and extension of the use of homes, and the continued use of the housing security-related identification body. The duration of the extension will require continued use by the original design unit or the design units with a corresponding level of qualifications, as well as the identification of the housing safety accreditation body.

Article 27 provides for the construction of works such as tunnels, run-ups, excavations of deep-rooted pits, and construction units should conduct safety inspections and preservation of the original records before the start-up work, which should be confirmed by the construction units and by the neighbouring owner; during the construction period, construction units should follow up on the safety of homes and take security-protection measures in accordance with the provisions.

The construction units should entrust housing safety accreditation institutions with the identification of housing safety.

Article 28 should be safely validated by law, and the parties entrusted with the obligation to do so refuse to entrust the housing safety recognition body with the conduct of a house safety certificate, with the exception of the laws, regulations, regulations and regulations.

Article 29, Homeland, planning, construction, city administration, housing, safe production monitoring and other relevant industry authorities, in accordance with article 28 of this Article, shall provide the following materials:

(i) A certificate of safety of tenure and a certificate of identity of the person entrusted;

(ii) The status of houses, photographic material or construction maps and completion of the housing structure;

(iii) Other information to be provided by law.

Other parties have entrusted housing safety experts to conduct housing safety clearances, and in addition to the material provided in the preceding paragraph, they should also submit home ownership certificates or legal evidence of their relevant civil rights.

Article 31: The housing safety recognition body shall conduct on-site inspections within five working days of the date of receipt of the inspection of house safety and report on house safety within ten working days; and the provision of adequate periods of time, such as separation, dumping and disengage, should be carried out within twenty-four hours of the time of the acceptance of the inspection of house safety and the identification of house security within seven hours; and the complexity, identification of difficulties and the need for continued observation. The extension period shall not exceed 20 working days.

Article 31, for the identification of dangerous homes, should address the recommendation in the report on housing safety in accordance with the following conditions:

(i) Observation. Short-term use would be applicable to the adoption of appropriate safety technology measures, but it would be necessary to continue to observe houses.

(ii) Treatment. When appropriate technical measures are applied, dangerous homes can be removed.

(iii) To stop use. They apply to unnovated values that are temporarily not dismantled and do not endanger neighbouring buildings and affect the security of others.

(iv) Overall dismantlement. They are subject to immediate demolition of homes, which are dangerous and unrealized.

Article 32, Housing Safety Identification and Housing Safety Identification, should be strictly conducted in accordance with the relevant professional standards and technical norms and should be held accountable for their findings.

The commissionor or other stakeholders have contested the results of the identification of housing security, which can apply for review by the housing security accreditation body; the Committee of Experts on Housing Safety can apply for review.

Chapter V

Article 33 of this provision refers to dangerous homes, which are one of the following circumstances, may at any time lose structural stability and affordability and do not guarantee the use of safe houses:

(i) There are serious deficiencies in the structure that are not in line with the mandatory standards of national engineering construction;

(ii) Structural damage;

(iii) A heavy component is a dangerous component;

(iv) Other serious security constraints.

Article 34, when a wind, fire season or other disaster occurs, the owner, the user, should be able to work at risk.

Article 33 fifiers, homeowners, users, and a copy of a letter of dangerous house letters should be sent to the city's property management in a timely manner, at the time of the site survey.

Article 36 Homeowners, users and other parties with governance obligations should be governed by measures such as repairs or removal of hazardous homes in a timely manner, in accordance with the recommendations made in the report on housing safety. In the absence of timely governance, public safety is jeopardized by the time limit of the housing owner, the user or other party with a governance obligation.

In the event of the identification of housing security by the housing security accreditation body, the owner, the manager or the user of the contiguous house should be co-ordinated; the owner of the hazardous house would need to be repaired or dismantled, and the owner of the housing that would be in a position to carry out governance responsibilities in accordance with the relevant provisions of the statutes of law, regulations, regulations and owners' management.

Article 338, when the owner of the house is responsible for carrying out the relevant procedures, the authorities should be supported and processed in a timely manner.

As identified as hazardous houses, no transfer, rent or other operation has been managed to eliminate the risk situation, and the authorities concerned may not conduct the relevant procedures.

Chapter VI Legal responsibility

Article 39, in violation of the provisions of Article 12, paragraph 1, paragraphs 1 to 3, shall be dealt with by construction management in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Regulations on the Quality of Engineering.

In violation of article 12, paragraph 1, paragraph 4, and article 5, the responsibility of the planning management is corrected and the fine of more than one million dollars for individuals is fined totalling more than one million dollars for the unit.

In violation of Article 12, paragraphs 6 to X of the present article, changes are being made by the treasury management order in the urban area, and a fine of more than one million dollars for the personal service and a fine of up to five million dollars for the unit.

In violation of Article 12, paragraph 10, this provision has been made by the Municipal Property Management Order and fines of more than five million dollars.

Article 40 has not been authorized by law and has been engaged in the safe identification of homes, confiscated by the commune property management of the proceeds of the law and fines of more than one million yen, causing loss to the owner of the house or to the user, and is liable under the law.

Article 40 contains one of the following acts by the Housing Safety Identification Body, which is being restructured by the municipal property management order and a fine of more than one million dollars, causing economic losses to be liable:

(i) The identification of non-hazardous homes for loss of home ownership or the use of the person;

(ii) No copies of the notice of dangerous homes are submitted to the commune property management file;

(iii) More than a period of time, there has been no security recognition of the homes and a security accident was commissioned.

In violation of article 24 of this provision, the owner of the house has not been entrusted with the safe identification of the house by the municipal property management for the period of time being changed and fines of up to five thousand dollars.

Article 43 thirteenth, the owner, the use of the house, in violation of article 26 of the present provision, does not obtain the advice of the original design unit of the public premises or the design units with a corresponding level of qualifications to extend the use of the house and continue to use public premises exceeding the design period of time, with the exception of a fine of more than five million dollars.

In violation of article 27, paragraph 2, of the present provision, construction units have not been entrusted with the safe identification of homes by a housing certificate body, which is subject to a period of time being transferred by the municipal property management and a fine of up to five million dollars.

Article 42 XV, the owner, the user or other party with a governance obligation, in violation of article 36 of this provision, does not take measures to improve or dismantle the governance houses, and the commune property management may impose a fine of up to five thousand dollars of the individual, pay less than five million fines for the unit and entrust the third to replace the administration for the costs incurred by the owner, the user or other party with the governance obligation.

Article 46, executive organs with responsibility for housing security management, and their staff members, have played a role in neglect, abuse of authority, non-performance of the responsibility for supervision of housing safety, are being redirected by their units or by the superior administrative authority, and are subject to administrative action by law.

Chapter VII

Article 47 governs the safe management of houses in the city's jurisdiction.

Article 48 The Southen Municipal Housing Safety Management Act (No. 40 of the People's Government Order No. 40) was abolished as of 1 September 2005.