Advanced Search

Scope Of The Basel Convention On The Control Of Transboundary Movements Of Hazardous Wastes And Their Disposal

Original Language Title: Geltungsbereich des Basler Übereinkommens über die Kontrolle der grenzüberschreitenden Verbringung gefährlicher Abfälle und ihrer Entsorgung

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.

119. Presentation of the Federal Chancellor concerning the scope of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal

According to the Communications of the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the following other States have their accession instruments to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (BGBl. N ° 229/1993, last amended by BGBl III No 46/2010 , last proclamation of the BGBl scope. III N ° 77/2006)

States:

Date of deposit of the instrument of accession:

Gabon

6 June 2008

Congo

20 April 2007

Democratic Republic of Korea

10 July 2008

Laos People's Democratic Republic

21 September 2010

Somalia

26 July 2010

Tonga

26 March 2010

Furthermore, Montenegro, with its effectiveness of 3 June 2006, has declared that it should continue to comply with the Convention.

In addition, the United Kingdom 1 6 September 2006 and 6 September 2006 respectively 14 September 2007 stated that the Convention was based on the Sovereign Bases of Akrotiri and Dhekelia on the island of Cyprus, Jersey is to be used.

Denmark 2 extended the scope of the Convention to Greenland and the Faroe Islands on 30 April 2008.

According to a further note by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the Netherlands made the following statement on 17 February 2010:

The Kingdom of the Netherlands 3 Declares, in accordance with Article 20 (3) of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and its Disposal, that it is binding on both the means of dispute referred to in this paragraph in relation to each party that recognises one or both means of dispute settlement.

Faymann