Statement Of The Constitutional Court, That Phrase In § 25 Paragraph 3 Sixth Rate Of The Gambling Act Was Unconstitutional

Original Language Title: Ausspruch des Verfassungsgerichtshofes, dass eine Wortfolge im § 25 Abs. 3 sechster Satz des Glücksspielgesetzes verfassungswidrig war

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$20 per month, or Get a Day Pass for only USD$4.99.
93. by-laws of the German Chancellor about the saying of the Constitutional Court, that phrase in § 25 paragraph 3 sixth rate of the Gambling Act was unconstitutional

In accordance with article 140 paragraph 5 B-VG and according to § 64 para 2 of the Constitution Court of Justice Act 1953, BGBl. No. 85, is published:

The Constitutional Court with knowledge from 27 September 2011, G 34/10-16, the Chancellor delivered on 18 October 2011, rightly recognized: "(I).
The phrase ", where the liability of the Casino line of height is finally on the other hand limited after with the difference between the losses remain the existence minimum net income of the player taking into account its realizable assets on the one hand and the subsistence minimum;" no more than the replacement is the concrete minimum of existence of"in the 6th set of § 25 paragraph 3 of the Federal law to the regulation of the gambling industry (Gambling Act), the amendment to the Federal Budget Act and the repeal of the Federal law concerning life insurance with draw, BGBl. No. 620/1989 as amended by Federal Law Gazette I no. 105/2005, was unconstitutional.

II. the phrase in Spruch point I mentioned is that on June 22, 2011 at court no longer to apply to proceedings."

Faymann