600 KAR 6:060. Professional Engineering and
Engineering-related
Service Selection Committee.
RELATES TO: KRS 45A.800-45A.835, 23
C.F.R. 172, 23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2)
STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 45A.807(2), 23
C.F.R. 172(1), 23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2)
NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: KRS
45A.807(2) requires the Transportation Cabinet to promulgate administrative regulations
to implement its procurement of engineering services pursuant to KRS 45A.800 to
45A.835. This administrative regulation establishes the procedure to be used by
the Transportation Cabinet when selecting engineering or engineering-related
services while implementing the provisions of KRS 45A.800 to 45A.835.
Section 1. Establishing a Professional
Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee. (1) A
Professional Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee
shall be selected as set forth in KRS 45A.810(5) and (6).
(2)(a) The Transportation Cabinet
Secretary, or designee, shall annually request voluntary applications from the
professional engineering staff in the cabinet for availability to serve in the
pool of six (6) professional engineers required by KRS 45A.810(5)(a).
(b) The Transportation Cabinet Secretary,
or designee, shall review all applications from which the secretary shall appoint
six (6) professional engineers to serve in the pool for a period of one (1)
year.
(c) The six (6) appointees shall meet the
requirements established in KRS 45A.810(5)(a).
(d) A person serving on the Professional
Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee from this pool
shall not be eligible to serve on the same selection committee as a representative
of a user division as specified by KRS 45A.810(5)(b).
(3)(a) The director of the user division
responsible for monitoring the professional services shall appoint two (2)
professional engineers from either the user division or the same functional
area from the highway district offices where the project is located in
accordance with KRS 45A.810(5)(b).
(b) If the user division does not have
two (2) professional engineering merit employees or if the services in the
announcement are for nonengineering but related services, the director shall
appoint two (2) employees who have familiarity and experience related to the
services that are being contracted.
(c) The director may appoint himself or
herself to the committee.
(d) If the cabinet is procuring engineering
or engineering-related services in conjunction with another agency or
governmental entity or state, that unit outside the cabinet may be designated
as a co-user division and be eligible to appoint one (1) member of the
selection committee.
(4) An employee of the cabinet shall not
involuntarily serve as a member of a Professional Engineering and Engineering-related
Services Selection Committee.
(5) Each member of a Professional
Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee shall
complete, sign, and return to the committee the following forms:
(a) Form TC 40-9E, Certification of Understanding
of Restrictions for Members of Professional Engineering and Engineering-related
Services Selection Committee;
(b) Form TC 40-6, "Ex Parte"
Disclosure;
(c) Form TC 40-4, Certification of
Confidentiality; and
(d) Form TC 40-10, Certification of Conformity
with Procurement Process.
(6)(a) If the individual, randomly
selected to serve on a selection committee in accordance with KRS
45A.810(5)(c), is an employee of a consulting firm, that consulting firm shall
not be considered for a project which is reviewed by that selection committee.
(b) If a firm submitted a response under
the circumstance identified in paragraph (a) of this subsection, the firm's
response for that project shall be returned by the selection committee with a
letter of explanation.
(7) After issuing approval to advertise
for a consultant to perform engineering or engineering-related services, the
secretary of the cabinet, or designee, shall establish a Professional
Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee for each project.
(8) The Division of Program Performance shall
provide each Professional Engineering and Engineering-related Services
Selection Committee with the necessary administrative and technical support and
office supplies.
(9)(a) Each member of a Professional
Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee shall comply
with the Executive Branch Code of Ethics established in KRS Chapter 11A.
(b) Each member of a selection committee
shall comply with the cabinet's Official Order Number 102295 regarding
conflicts of interest.
Section 2. Operation of a Professional
Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee. (1)(a)
Meetings of a Professional Engineering and Engineering-related Services
Selection Committee shall be called by the Division of Program Performance.
(b) The quorum for meetings shall be three
(3) of the five (5) voting members. Each quorum shall include at least one (1)
member appointed by the user division responsible for monitoring the professional
services.
(2) Subsequent meetings.
(a) If needed, a subsequent meeting of a
Professional Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee
shall be called:
1. By the chairperson at a mutually
convenient time; or
2. Upon a consensus of three (3) of the
five (5) voting members of the selection committee.
(b) A motion or decision of the selection
committee shall require a simple majority affirmative vote of all members
present for passage.
(c) Voting by proxy shall not be allowed.
(3)(a) The Professional Engineering and Engineering-related
Services Selection Committee shall give fair and impartial consideration to
each response certified in accordance with KRS 45A.825(5).
(b) The selection committee shall utilize
the evaluation factors and weights indicated in the announcement for each
project to screen each certified firm response.
(c) Prior to the selection committee
determining the three (3) most qualified firms, each voting selection committee
member shall review all certified responses and preliminarily evaluate and
numerically rate each firm using the weighted evaluation factors that appeared
in the procurement bulletin.
(4) In an executive session pursuant to
the requirements established in subsections (5) through (13) of this section,
the selection committee shall determine the three (3) best qualified firms and
develop a ranking of the three (3) by considering the weighted evaluation
factors that appeared in the procurement bulletin.
(5)(a) Each committee member shall list
the three (3) firms he or she ranked highest.
(b) Each firm included in a list prepared
by a committee member shall be placed on the short list of firms.
(6)(a) All firms included on the short
list shall be individually discussed by the committee with regard to their
qualifications, the quality of their proposals, and the evaluation factors.
(b) Each committee member shall be given
the opportunity to provide insight into the reasons for selecting or not
selecting each firm for the project.
(c) A firm shall be eliminated from
further consideration by consensus of the selection committee members.
(7)(a) Each firm remaining under
consideration after the discussion period established in subsection (6) of this
section shall be individually ranked by the committee members using secret
ballots.
(b) A new listing of short-listed firms
based on the composite rankings of the secret ballots shall be discussed by the
selection committee.
(c) A firm shall be eliminated from
further consideration by consensus of the selection committee members.
(8) If at the end of the process
established in subsection (7) of this section, more than three (3) firms remain
under consideration, the process established in subsection (7) of this section
shall be repeated until three (3) firms remain for consideration by the
selection committee.
(9) Each of the three (3) firms
identified in subsection (8) of this section shall be individually ranked by
the committee members using secret ballots.
(10)(a) Unless there is a tie between two
(2) of the firms, the results of subsection (9) of this section shall determine
the ranked order of the three (3) best qualified firms.
(b) If there is a tie ranking and if one
of the firms has indicated that more of its work tasks will be performed in Kentucky, that firm shall be ranked higher than the other with which it had tied.
(c) If there is a tie ranking and if the
work tasks to be performed in Kentucky are equal, the selection committee shall
again perform the functions established in subsection (7) of this section until
the tie is broken.
(11) If the selection committee elects,
it may interview a responding firm to aid in its determination of the best
qualified firm.
(12) For a selection committee review
involving statewide services advertised in accordance with Section 1(5) of 600
KAR 6:050, the committee shall rank:
(a) The top three (3) firms; or
(b) If more than three (3) firms are
specified in the procurement bulletin, the number of firms specified in the
bulletin.
(13) The evaluations and ratings of the
individual selection committee members shall be considered preliminary and
confidential working documents and shall not be available to the public.
(14)(a) The Chairperson of the
Professional Engineering and Engineering-related Services Selection Committee
shall notify the Director of the Division of Program Performance, or designee, of
the firms determined by the committee to be the three (3) best qualified and
the order of their ranking.
(b) The Division of Program Performance shall
send the letters required in KRS 45A.825(7)(c).
(c) The Division of Program Performance shall
immediately notify by letter the top-ranked firm of its selection for the
advertised project.
Section 3. Incorporation by Reference.
(1) The following material is incorporated by reference:
(a) "Certification of Understanding
of Restrictions for Members of Professional Engineering and Engineering-Related
Services Selection Committee", Form TC 40-9E, effective April 2006;
(b) "Ex Parte" Disclosure, Form
TC 40-6, effective September 1998;
(c) "Certification of
Confidentiality", Form TC 40-4, effective September 1998;
(d) "Certification of Conformity
with Procurement Process", Form TC 40-10, effective January 1997; and
(e) The Transportation Cabinet's Official
Order Number 102295 regarding Conflict of Interest, June 15, 2004 edition.
(2) This material may be inspected,
copied, or obtained, subject to applicable copyright law, at the Division of
Program Performance, Transportation Cabinet Office Building, 200
Mero Street, Frankfort, Kentucky 40622, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. (22 Ky.R. 1412; Am. 1843; eff. 4-5-96; 24 Ky.R. 2762; 25 Ky.R. 837; eff.
10-6-98; 29 Ky.R. 1878; eff. 5-15-03; 33 Ky.R. 548; 1312; eff. 11-9-06.)