Advanced Search

Nrs: Chapter 104A - Uniform Commercial Code—Additional Articles


Published: 2015

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
[Rev. 2/10/2015 4:13:34

PM--2014R2]

CHAPTER 104A - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL

CODE—ADDITIONAL ARTICLES

APPLICABILITY OF LAWS

NRS 104A.010        Applicability

of and references to Uniform Commercial Code.

NRS 104A.200        Law

applicable to transactions entered into before January 1, 1990.

ARTICLE 2A

LEASES

Part 1

General Provisions

NRS 104A.2101      Short

title.

NRS 104A.2102      Scope.

NRS 104A.2103      Definitions

and index of definitions.

NRS 104A.2104      Leases

subject to other law.

NRS 104A.2105      Territorial

application of article to goods covered by certificate of title.

NRS 104A.2106      Limitation

on power of parties to consumer lease to choose applicable law and judicial

forum.

NRS 104A.2107      Waiver

or renunciation of claim or right after default.

NRS 104A.2108      Unconscionability.

NRS 104A.2109      Option

to accelerate at will.

 

Part 2

Formation and Construction of Lease Contract

NRS 104A.2201      Statute

of frauds.

NRS 104A.2202      Final

written expression: Parol or extrinsic evidence.

NRS 104A.2203      Seals

inoperative.

NRS 104A.2204      Formation

in general.

NRS 104A.2205      Firm

offers.

NRS 104A.2206      Offer

and acceptance in formation of lease contract.

NRS 104A.2208      Modification,

rescission and waiver.

NRS 104A.2209      Lessee

under finance lease as beneficiary of supply contract.

NRS 104A.2210      Express

warranties.

NRS 104A.2211      Warranties

against interference and against infringement; lessee’s obligation against

infringement.

NRS 104A.2212      Implied

warranty of merchantability.

NRS 104A.2213      Implied

warranty of fitness for particular purpose.

NRS 104A.2214      Exclusion

or modification of warranties.

NRS 104A.2215      Cumulation

and conflict of warranties express or implied.

NRS 104A.2216      Third-party

beneficiaries of express and implied warranties.

NRS 104A.2217      Identification.

NRS 104A.2218      Insurance

and proceeds.

NRS 104A.2219      Risk

of loss.

NRS 104A.2220      Effect

of default on risk of loss.

NRS 104A.2221      Casualty

to identified goods.

 

Part 3

Effect of Lease Contract

NRS 104A.2301      Enforceability

of lease contract.

NRS 104A.2302      Title

to and possession of goods.

NRS 104A.2303      Alienability

of party’s interest under lease contract or of lessor’s residual interest in

goods; delegation of performance; transfer of rights.

NRS 104A.2304      Subsequent

lease of goods by lessor.

NRS 104A.2305      Sale

or sublease of goods by lessee.

NRS 104A.2306      Priority

of certain liens arising by operation of law.

NRS 104A.2307      Priority

of liens arising by attachment or levy on, security interests in and other

claims to goods.

NRS 104A.2308      Special

rights of creditors.

NRS 104A.2309      Lessor’s

and lessee’s rights when goods become fixtures.

NRS 104A.2310      Lessor’s

and lessee’s rights when goods become accessions.

NRS 104A.2311      Priority

subject to subordination.

 

Part 4

Performance of Lease Contract: Repudiated, Substituted and

Excused

NRS 104A.2401      Insecurity:

Adequate assurance of performance.

NRS 104A.2402      Anticipatory

repudiation.

NRS 104A.2403      Retraction

of anticipatory repudiation.

NRS 104A.2404      Substituted

performance.

NRS 104A.2405      Excused

performance.

NRS 104A.2406      Procedure

on excused performance.

NRS 104A.2407      Irrevocable

promises: Finance leases.

 

Part 5

Default

NRS 104A.2501      Default:

Procedure.

NRS 104A.2502      Notice

after default.

NRS 104A.2503      Modification

or impairment of rights and remedies.

NRS 104A.2504      Liquidation

of damages.

NRS 104A.2505      Cancellation

and termination, and effect of cancellation, termination, rescission or fraud

on rights and remedies.

NRS 104A.2506      Statute

of limitations.

NRS 104A.2507      Proof

of market rent: Time and place.

NRS 104A.2508      Lessee’s

remedies.

NRS 104A.2509      Lessee’s

rights on improper delivery; rightful rejection.

NRS 104A.2510      Installment

lease contracts: Rejection and default.

NRS 104A.2511      Merchant

lessee’s duties as to rightfully rejected goods.

NRS 104A.2512      Lessee’s

duties as to rightfully rejected goods.

NRS 104A.2513      Cure

by lessor of improper tender or delivery; replacement.

NRS 104A.2514      Waiver

of lessee’s objections.

NRS 104A.2515      Acceptance

of goods.

NRS 104A.2516      Effect

of acceptance of goods; notice of default; burden of establishing default after

acceptance; notice of claim or litigation to person answerable over.

NRS 104A.2517      Revocation

of acceptance of goods.

NRS 104A.2518      Cover;

substitute goods.

NRS 104A.2519      Lessee’s

damages for nondelivery, repudiation, default and breach of warranty in regard

to accepted goods.

NRS 104A.2520      Lessee’s

incidental and consequential damages.

NRS 104A.2521      Lessee’s

right to specific performance or replevin.

NRS 104A.2522      Lessee’s

right to goods on lessor’s insolvency.

NRS 104A.2523      Lessor’s

remedies.

NRS 104A.2524      Lessor’s

right to identify goods to lease contract.

NRS 104A.2525      Lessor’s

right to possession of goods.

NRS 104A.2526      Lessor’s

stoppage of delivery in transit or otherwise.

NRS 104A.2527      Lessor’s

rights to dispose of goods.

NRS 104A.2528      Lessor’s

damages for nonacceptance, failure to pay, repudiation or other default.

NRS 104A.2529      Lessor’s

action for the rent.

NRS 104A.2530      Lessor’s

incidental damages.

NRS 104A.2531      Standing

to sue third parties for injury to goods.

NRS 104A.2532      Lessor’s

rights to residual interest.

ARTICLE 4A

FUNDS TRANSFERS

Part 1

Subject Matter and Definitions

NRS 104A.4101      Short

title.

NRS 104A.4102      Subject

matter.

NRS 104A.4103      Payment

order: Definitions.

NRS 104A.4104      Funds

transfer: Definitions.

NRS 104A.4105      Other

definitions.

NRS 104A.4106      Time

payment order is received.

NRS 104A.4107      Federal

Reserve regulations and operating circulars.

NRS 104A.4108      Exclusion

of certain consumer transactions governed by federal law; resolution of

inconsistencies between federal law and state law.

 

Part 2

Issue and Acceptance of Payment Order

NRS 104A.4201      Security

procedure.

NRS 104A.4202      Authorized

and verified payment orders.

NRS 104A.4203      Unenforceability

of certain verified payment orders.

NRS 104A.4204      Refund

of payment and duty of customer to report with respect to unauthorized payment

order.

NRS 104A.4205      Erroneous

payment orders.

NRS 104A.4206      Transmission

of payment order through funds-transfer or other communication system.

NRS 104A.4207      Misdescription

of beneficiary.

NRS 104A.4208      Misdescription

of intermediary bank or beneficiary’s bank.

NRS 104A.4209      Acceptance

of payment order.

NRS 104A.4210      Rejection

of payment order.

NRS 104A.4211      Cancellation

and amendment of payment order.

NRS 104A.4212      Liability

and duty of receiving bank regarding unaccepted payment order.

 

Part 3

Execution of Sender’s Payment Order by Receiving Bank

NRS 104A.4301      Execution

and execution date.

NRS 104A.4302      Obligation

of receiving bank in execution of payment order.

NRS 104A.4303      Erroneous

execution of payment order.

NRS 104A.4304      Duty

of sender to report erroneously executed payment order.

NRS 104A.4305      Liability

for late or improper execution or failure to execute payment order.

 

Part 4

Payment

NRS 104A.4401      Payment

date.

NRS 104A.4402      Obligation

of sender to pay receiving bank.

NRS 104A.4403      Payment

by sender to receiving bank.

NRS 104A.4404      Obligation

of beneficiary’s bank to pay and give notice to beneficiary.

NRS 104A.4405      Payment

by beneficiary’s bank to beneficiary.

NRS 104A.4406      Payment

by originator to beneficiary; discharge of underlying obligation.

 

Part 5

Miscellaneous Provisions

NRS 104A.4501      Variation

by agreement and effect of funds-transfer system rule.

NRS 104A.4502      Creditor’s

process served on receiving bank; setoff by beneficiary’s bank.

NRS 104A.4503      Injunction

or restraining order with respect to funds transfer.

NRS 104A.4504      Order

in which items and payment orders may be charged to account; order of

withdrawals from account.

NRS 104A.4505      Preclusion

of objection to debit of customer’s account.

NRS 104A.4506      Rate

of interest.

NRS 104A.4507      Choice

of law.

_________

APPLICABILITY OF LAWS

      NRS 104A.010  Applicability of and references to Uniform Commercial Code.

      1.  The provisions of Article 1 of the

Uniform Commercial Code apply to this chapter as if the provisions of this

chapter were included in chapter 104 of NRS.

      2.  Unless limited by specific statute, a

reference in NRS to the Uniform Commercial Code or to chapter 104 of NRS shall be deemed to refer to chapter 104 of NRS together with this chapter.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 340; A 1989, 721; 2005, 876)

      NRS 104A.200  Law applicable to transactions entered into before January 1,

1990.  Transactions validly entered

into before January 1, 1990, and the rights, duties and interests flowing

therefrom remain valid thereafter and may be terminated, completed, consummated

or enforced as required or permitted by rules of law in effect before that

date.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 340; A 1989, 721)

ARTICLE 2A

LEASES

Part 1

General Provisions

      NRS 104A.2101  Short title.  This

article shall be known and may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code—Leases.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 340; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2102  Scope.  This article

applies to any transaction, regardless of form, that creates a lease.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 340; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2103  Definitions and index of definitions.

      1.  In this Article unless the context

otherwise requires:

      (a) “Buyer in ordinary course of business” means

a person who, in good faith and without knowledge that the sale to him or her

is in violation of the ownership, rights or security interest or leasehold

interest of a third party in the goods buys in ordinary course from a person in

the business of selling goods of that kind but does not include a pawnbroker.

“Buying” may be for cash or by exchange of other property or on secured or

unsecured credit and includes acquiring goods or documents of title under a

preexisting contract for sale but does not include a transfer in bulk or as

security for or in total or partial satisfaction of a money debt.

      (b) “Cancellation” occurs when either party puts

an end to the lease contract for default by the other party.

      (c) “Commercial unit” means such a unit of goods

as by commercial usage is a single whole for purposes of lease and division of

which materially impairs its character or value on the market or in use. A

commercial unit may be a single Article, as a machine, or a set of Articles, as

a suite of furniture or a line of machinery, or a quantity, as a gross or

carload, or any other unit treated in use or in the relevant market as a single

whole.

      (d) “Conforming” goods or performance under a

lease contract means goods or performance that are in accordance with the

obligations under the lease contract.

      (e) “Consumer lease” means a lease that a lessor

regularly engaged in the business of leasing or selling makes to a lessee who

is a natural person and who takes under the lease primarily for a personal,

family or household purpose.

      (f) “Fault” means wrongful act, omission, breach

or default.

      (g) “Finance lease” means a lease with respect to

which:

             (1) The lessor does not select,

manufacture or supply the goods;

             (2) The lessor acquires the goods or the

right to possession and use of the goods in connection with the lease; and

             (3) One of the following occurs:

                   (I) The lessee receives a copy of

the contract by which the lessor acquired the goods or the right to possession

and use of the goods before signing the lease contract;

                   (II) The lessee’s approval of the

contract by which the lessor acquired the goods or the right to possession and

use of the goods is a condition to effectiveness of the lease contract;

                   (III) The lessee, before signing the

lease contract, receives an accurate and complete statement designating the

promises and warranties, and any disclaimers of warranties, limitations or modifications

of remedies, or liquidated damages, including those of a third party, such as

the manufacturer of the goods, provided to the lessor by the person supplying

the goods in connection with or as part of the contract by which the lessor

acquired the goods or the right to possession and use of the goods; or

                   (IV) If the lease is not a consumer

lease, the lessor, before the lessee signs the lease contract, informs the

lessee in writing of the identity of the person supplying the goods to the

lessor, unless the lessee has selected that person and directed the lessor to

acquire the goods or the right to possession and use of the goods from that

person, that the lessee is entitled under this Article to the promises and

warranties, including those of any third party, provided to the lessor by the

person supplying the goods in connection with or as part of the contract by

which the lessor acquired the goods or the right to possession and use of the

goods, and that the lessee may communicate with the person supplying the goods

to the lessor and receive an accurate and complete statement of those promises

and warranties, including any disclaimers and limitations of them or of

remedies.

      (h) “Goods” means all things that are movable at

the time of identification to the lease contract, or are fixtures (NRS 104A.2309), but the term does not include money,

documents, instruments, accounts, chattel paper, general intangibles, or

minerals or the like, including oil and gas, before extraction. The term also

includes the unborn young of animals.

      (i) “Installment lease contract” means a lease

contract that authorizes or requires the delivery of goods in separate lots to

be separately accepted, even though the lease contract contains a clause “each

delivery is a separate lease” or its equivalent.

      (j) “Lease” means a transfer of the right to

possession and use of goods for a term in return for consideration, but a sale,

including a sale on approval or a sale or return, or retention or creation of a

security interest is not a lease. Unless the context clearly indicates

otherwise, the term includes a sublease.

      (k) “Lease agreement” means the bargain, with

respect to the lease, of the lessor and the lessee in fact as found in their

language or by implication from other circumstances including course of dealing

or usage of trade or course of performance as provided in this Article. Unless

the context clearly indicates otherwise, the term includes a sublease

agreement.

      (l) “Lease contract” means the total legal

obligation that results from the lease agreement as affected by this Article

and any other applicable rules of law. Unless the context clearly indicates

otherwise, the term includes a sublease contract.

      (m) “Leasehold interest” means the interest of

the lessor or the lessee under a lease contract.

      (n) “Lessee” means a person who acquires the

right to possession and use of goods under a lease. Unless the context clearly

indicates otherwise, the term includes a sublessee.

      (o) “Lessee in ordinary course of business” means

a person who in good faith and without knowledge that the lease to him or her

is in violation of the ownership rights or security interest or leasehold

interest of a third party in the goods leases in ordinary course from a person

in the business of selling or leasing goods of that kind but does not include a

pawnbroker. “Leasing” may be for cash or by exchange of other property or on

secured or unsecured credit and includes acquiring goods or documents of title

under a preexisting lease contract but does not include a transfer in bulk or

as security for or in total or partial satisfaction of a money debt.

      (p) “Lessor” means a person who transfers the

right to possession and use of goods under a lease. Unless the context clearly

indicates otherwise, the term includes a sublessor.

      (q) “Lessor’s residual interest” means the

lessor’s interest in the goods after expiration, termination or cancellation of

the lease contract.

      (r) “Lien” means a charge against or interest in

goods to secure payment of a debt or performance of an obligation, but the term

does not include a security interest.

      (s) “Lot” means a parcel or a single Article that

is the subject matter of a separate lease or delivery, whether or not it is

sufficient to perform the lease contract.

      (t) “Merchant lessee” means a lessee that is a

merchant with respect to goods of the kind subject to the lease.

      (u) “Present value” means the amount as of a date

certain of one or more sums payable in the future, discounted to the date

certain. The discount is determined by the interest rate specified by the

parties if the rate was not manifestly unreasonable at the time the transaction

was entered into; otherwise, the discount is determined by a commercially

reasonable rate that takes into account the facts and circumstances of each

case at the time the transaction was entered into.

      (v) “Purchase” includes taking by sale, lease,

mortgage, security interest, pledge, gift or any other voluntary transaction

creating an interest in goods.

      (w) “Sublease” means a lease of goods the right

to possession and use of which was acquired by the lessor as a lessee under an

existing lease.

      (x) “Supplier” means a person from whom a lessor

buys or leases goods to be leased under a finance lease.

      (y) “Supply contract” means a contract under

which a lessor buys or leases goods to be leased.

      (z) “Termination” occurs when either party

pursuant to a power created by agreement or law puts an end to the lease

contract otherwise than for default.

      2.  Other definitions applying to this

Article and the sections in which they appear are:

 

“Accessions.” NRS 104A.2310.

“Construction mortgage.” NRS 104A.2309.

“Encumbrance.” NRS 104A.2309.

“Fixtures.” NRS

104A.2309.

“Fixture filing.” NRS 104A.2309.

“Purchase money lease.” NRS 104A.2309.

 

      3.  The following definitions in other

Articles apply to this Article:

 

“Account.” NRS 104.9102.

“Between merchants.” NRS 104.2104.

“Buyer.” NRS 104.2103.

“Chattel paper.” NRS 104.9102.

“Consumer goods.” NRS 104.9102.

“Document.” NRS 104.9102.

“Entrusting.” NRS 104.2403.

“General intangible.” NRS 104.9102.

“Instrument.” NRS 104.9102.

“Merchant.” NRS 104.2104.

“Mortgage.” NRS 104.9102.

“Pursuant to commitment.” NRS 104.9102.

“Receipt.” NRS 104.2103.

“Sale.” NRS 104.2106.

“Sale on approval.” NRS 104.2326.

“Sale or return.” NRS 104.2326.

“Seller.” NRS 104.2103.

 

      4.  In addition, Article 1 contains general

definitions and principles of construction and interpretation applicable

throughout this Article.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 340; A 1989, 721; 1991, 413; 1999, 380; 2005, 876)

      NRS 104A.2104  Leases subject to other law.

      1.  A lease, although subject to this

Article, is also subject to any applicable:

      (a) Certificate of title statute of this State,

including any applicable provision of chapters

482, 488, 489

and 490 of NRS;

      (b) Certificate of title statute of another

jurisdiction (NRS 104A.2105); or

      (c) Consumer protection statute of this State,

including any applicable provision of NRS

97.297, 97.299, 97.301 and 100.095 to 100.175, inclusive, and a final decision

of a court of this State concerning the protection of consumers rendered before

January 1, 1990.

      2.  In case of conflict between this

Article, other than NRS 104A.2105, subsection 3

of NRS 104A.2304 and subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2305, and a statute or decision referred to

in subsection 1, the statute or decision controls.

      3.  Failure to comply with an applicable

law has only the effect specified therein.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 343; A 1989, 721; 1991, 416; 2009, 3104;

2011, 292)

      NRS 104A.2105  Territorial application of article to goods covered by

certificate of title.  Subject to

the provisions of subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2304

and subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2305, with respect

to goods covered by a certificate of title issued under a statute of this State

or of another jurisdiction, compliance and the effect of compliance or

noncompliance with a certificate of title statute are governed by the law

(including the conflict of laws rules) of the jurisdiction issuing the

certificate until the earlier of:

      1.  Surrender of the certificate; or

      2.  Four months after the goods are removed

from that jurisdiction,

Ê and

thereafter until a new certificate of title is issued by another jurisdiction.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 343; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2106  Limitation on power of parties to consumer lease to choose

applicable law and judicial forum.

      1.  If the law chosen by the parties to a

consumer lease is that of a jurisdiction other than a jurisdiction in which the

lessee resides at the time the lease agreement becomes enforceable or within 30

days thereafter or in which the goods are to be used, the choice is not

enforceable.

      2.  If the judicial forum chosen by the

parties to a consumer lease is a forum that would not otherwise have

jurisdiction over the lessee, the choice is not enforceable.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 343; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2107  Waiver or renunciation of claim or right after default.  Any claim or right arising out of an alleged

default or breach of warranty may be discharged in whole or in part without

consideration by a written waiver or renunciation signed and delivered by the

aggrieved party.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 344; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2108  Unconscionability.

      1.  If the court as a matter of law finds a

lease contract or any clause of a lease contract to have been unconscionable at

the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the lease contract, or it

may enforce the remainder of the lease contract without the unconscionable

clause, or it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to

avoid any unconscionable result.

      2.  With respect to a consumer lease, if

the court as a matter of law finds that a lease contract or any clause of a

lease contract has been induced by unconscionable conduct or that

unconscionable conduct has occurred in the collection of a claim arising from a

lease contract, the court may grant appropriate relief.

      3.  Before making a finding of

unconscionability under subsection 1 or 2, the court, on its own motion or that

of a party, shall afford the parties a reasonable opportunity to present

evidence as to the setting, purpose and effect of the lease contract or a

clause thereof, or of the conduct.

      4.  In an action in which the lessee claims

unconscionability with respect to a consumer lease:

      (a) If the court finds unconscionability under

subsection 1 or 2, the court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees to the

lessee.

      (b) If the court does not find unconscionability

and the lessee claiming unconscionability has brought or maintained an action

the lessee knew to be groundless, the court shall award reasonable attorney’s

fees to the party against whom the claim is made.

      (c) In determining attorney’s fees, the amount of

the recovery on behalf of the claimant under subsections 1 and 2 is not

controlling.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 344; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2109  Option to accelerate at will.

      1.  A term providing that one party or his

or her successor in interest may accelerate payment or performance or require

collateral or additional collateral “at will” or “when he or she deems himself

or herself insecure” or in words of similar import must be construed to mean

that he or she has power to do so only if he or she in good faith believes that

the prospect of payment or performance is impaired.

      2.  With respect to a consumer lease, the

burden of establishing good faith under subsection 1 is on the party who

exercised the power; otherwise the burden of establishing lack of good faith is

on the party against whom the power has been exercised.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 344; A 1989, 721)

Part 2

Formation and Construction of Lease Contract

      NRS 104A.2201  Statute of frauds.

      1.  A lease contract is not enforceable by

way of action or defense unless:

      (a) The total payments to be made under the lease

contract, excluding payments for options to renew or buy, are less than $1,000;

or

      (b) There is a writing, signed by the party

against whom enforcement is sought or by that party’s authorized agent,

sufficient to indicate that a lease contract has been made between the parties

and to describe the goods leased and the lease term.

      2.  Any description of leased goods or of

the lease term is sufficient and satisfies paragraph (b) of subsection 1,

whether or not it is specific, if it reasonably identifies what is described.

      3.  A writing is not insufficient because

it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon, but the lease contract is

not enforceable under paragraph (b) of subsection 1 beyond the lease term and

the quantity of goods shown in the writing.

      4.  A lease contract that does not satisfy

the requirements of subsection 1, but which is valid in other respects, is

enforceable:

      (a) If the goods are to be specially manufactured

or obtained for the lessee and are not suitable for lease or sale to others in

the ordinary course of the lessor’s business, and the lessor, before notice of

repudiation is received and under circumstances that reasonably indicate that

the goods are for the lessee, has made either a substantial beginning of their

manufacture or commitments for their procurement;

      (b) If the party against whom enforcement is

sought admits in that party’s pleading, testimony or otherwise in court that a

lease contract was made, but the lease contract is not enforceable under this

provision beyond the quantity of goods admitted; or

      (c) With respect to goods that have been received

and accepted by the lessee.

      5.  The lease term under a lease contract

referred to in subsection 4 is:

      (a) If there is a writing signed by the party

against whom enforcement is sought or by that party’s authorized agent

specifying the lease term, the term so specified;

      (b) If the party against whom enforcement is

sought admits in that party’s pleading, testimony or otherwise in court a lease

term, the term so admitted; or

      (c) A reasonable lease term.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 344; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2202  Final written expression: Parol or extrinsic evidence.  Terms with respect to which the confirmatory

memoranda of the parties agree or which are otherwise set forth in a writing

intended by the parties as a final expression of their agreement with respect

to such terms as are included therein may not be contradicted by evidence of

any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement but may be explained

or supplemented:

      1.  By course of dealing or usage of trade

or by course of performance; and

      2.  By evidence of consistent additional

terms,

Ê unless the

court finds the writing to have been intended also as a complete and exclusive

statement of the terms of the agreement.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 345; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2203  Seals inoperative.  The

affixing of a seal to a writing evidencing a lease contract or an offer to

enter into a lease contract does not render the writing a sealed instrument and

the law with respect to sealed instruments does not apply to the lease contract

or offer.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 345; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2204  Formation in general.

      1.  A lease contract may be made in any

manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which

recognizes the existence of a lease contract.

      2.  An agreement sufficient to constitute a

lease contract may be found although the moment of its making is undetermined.

      3.  Although one or more terms are left

open, a lease contract does not fail for indefiniteness if the parties have

intended to make a lease contract and there is a reasonably certain basis for

giving an appropriate remedy.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 345; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2205  Firm offers.  An

offer by a merchant to lease goods to or from another person in a signed

writing that by its terms gives assurance it will be held open is not

revocable, for lack of consideration, during the time stated or, if no time is

stated, for a reasonable time, but in no event may the period of irrevocability

exceed 3 months. Any such term of assurance on a form supplied by the offeree

must be separately signed by the offeror.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 346; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2206  Offer and acceptance in formation of lease contract.

      1.  Unless otherwise unambiguously

indicated by the language or circumstances, an offer to make a lease contract

must be construed as inviting acceptance in any manner and by any medium reasonable

in the circumstances.

      2.  If the beginning of a requested

performance is a reasonable mode of acceptance, an offeror who is not notified

of acceptance within a reasonable time may treat the offer as having lapsed

before acceptance.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 346; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2208  Modification, rescission and waiver.

      1.  An agreement modifying a lease contract

needs no consideration to be binding.

      2.  A signed lease agreement that excludes

modification or rescission except by a signed writing may not be otherwise

modified or rescinded, but, except as between merchants, such a requirement on

a form supplied by a merchant must be separately signed by the other party.

      3.  Although an attempt at modification or

rescission does not satisfy the requirements of subsection 2, it may operate as

a waiver.

      4.  A party who has made a waiver affecting

an executory portion of a lease contract may retract the waiver by reasonable

notification received by the other party that strict performance will be

required of any term waived, unless the retraction would be unjust in view of a

material change of position in reliance on the waiver.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 346; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2209  Lessee under finance lease as beneficiary of supply contract.

      1.  The benefit of the supplier’s promises

to the lessor under the supply contract and of all warranties, whether express

or implied, including those of any third party provided in connection with or

as part of the supply contract, extends to the lessee to the extent of the

lessee’s leasehold interest under a finance lease related to the supply

contract, but subject to the terms of the warranty and of the supply contract

and all defenses or claims arising therefrom.

      2.  The extension of the benefit of a

supplier’s promises and of warranties to the lessee (subsection 1) does not:

      (a) Modify the rights and obligations of the

parties to the supply contract, whether arising therefrom or otherwise; or

      (b) Impose any duty or liability under the supply

contract on the lessee.

      3.  Any modification or rescission of the

supply contract by the supplier and the lessor is effective between the

supplier and the lessee unless, before the modification or rescission, the

supplier has received notice that the lessee has entered into a finance lease

related to the supply contract. If the modification or rescission is effective

between the supplier and the lessee, the lessor is deemed to have assumed, in

addition to his or her obligations to the lessee under the lease contract,

promises of the supplier to the lessor and warranties that were so modified or

rescinded as they existed and were available to the lessee before modification

or rescission.

      4.  In addition to the extension of the

benefit of the supplier’s promises and of warranties to the lessee under

subsection 1, the lessee retains all rights that the lessee may have against

the supplier which arise from an agreement between the lessee and the supplier

or under other law.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 346; A 1989, 721; 1991, 417)

      NRS 104A.2210  Express warranties.

      1.  Express warranties by the lessor are

created as follows:

      (a) Any affirmation of fact or promise made by

the lessor to the lessee which relates to the goods and becomes part of the

basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods will conform to

the affirmation or promise.

      (b) Any description of the goods which is made

part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods

will conform to the description.

      (c) Any sample or model that is made part of the

basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the whole of the goods

will conform to the sample or model.

      2.  It is not necessary to the creation of

an express warranty that the lessor use formal words, such as “warrant” or “guarantee,”

or that the lessor have a specific intention to make a warranty, but an

affirmation merely of the value of the goods or a statement purporting to be

merely the lessor’s opinion or commendation of the goods does not create a

warranty.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 347; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2211  Warranties against interference and against infringement;

lessee’s obligation against infringement.

      1.  There is in a lease contract a warranty

that for the lease term no person holds a claim to or interest in the goods

that arose from an act or omission of the lessor, other than a claim by way of

infringement or the like, which will interfere with the lessee’s enjoyment of

its leasehold interest.

      2.  Except in a finance lease there is in a

lease contract by a lessor who is a merchant regularly dealing in goods of the

kind a warranty that the goods are delivered free of the rightful claim of any

person by way of infringement or the like.

      3.  A lessee who furnishes specifications

to a lessor or a supplier shall hold the lessor and the supplier harmless

against any claim by way of infringement or the like that arises out of

compliance with the specifications.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 347; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2212  Implied warranty of merchantability.

      1.  Except in a finance lease, a warranty

that the goods will be merchantable is implied in a lease contract if the

lessor is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind.

      2.  Goods to be merchantable must be at

least such as:

      (a) Pass without objection in the trade under the

description in the lease agreement;

      (b) In the case of fungible goods, are of fair

average quality within the description;

      (c) Are fit for the ordinary purposes for which

goods of that type are used;

      (d) Run, within the variation permitted by the

lease agreement, of even kind, quality and quantity within each unit and among

all units involved;

      (e) Are adequately contained, packaged and

labeled as the lease agreement may require; and

      (f) Conform to any promises or affirmations of

fact made on the container or label.

      3.  Other implied warranties may arise from

course of dealing or usage of trade.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 347; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2213  Implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose.  Except in a finance lease, if the lessor at

the time the lease contract is made has reason to know of any particular

purpose for which the goods are required and that the lessee is relying on the

lessor’s skill or judgment to select or furnish suitable goods, there is in the

lease contract an implied warranty that the goods will be fit for that purpose.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 348; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2214  Exclusion or modification of warranties.

      1.  Words or conduct relevant to the

creation of an express warranty and words or conduct tending to negate or limit

a warranty must be construed wherever reasonable as consistent with each other;

but, subject to the provisions of NRS 104A.2202

on parol or extrinsic evidence, negation or limitation is inoperative to the

extent that the construction is unreasonable.

      2.  Subject to subsection 3, to exclude or

modify the implied warranty of merchantability or any part of it the language

must mention “merchantability,” be by a writing and be conspicuous. Subject to

subsection 3, to exclude or modify any implied warranty of fitness the exclusion

must be by a writing and be conspicuous. Language to exclude all implied

warranties of fitness is sufficient if it is in writing, is conspicuous and

states, for example, “There is no warranty that the goods will be fit for a

particular purpose.”

      3.  Notwithstanding subsection 2, but

subject to subsection 4:

      (a) Unless the circumstances indicate otherwise,

all implied warranties are excluded by expressions like “as is,” or “with all

faults,” or by other language that in common understanding calls the lessee’s

attention to the exclusion of warranties and makes plain that there is no

implied warranty, if in writing and conspicuous;

      (b) If the lessee before entering into the lease

contract has examined the goods or the sample or model as fully as desired or

has refused to examine the goods, there is no implied warranty with regard to

defects that an examination ought in the circumstances to have revealed; and

      (c) An implied warranty may also be excluded or

modified by course of dealing, course of performance or usage of trade.

      4.  To exclude or modify a warranty against

interference or against infringement (NRS 104A.2211)

or any part of it, the language must be specific, be by a writing and be

conspicuous, unless the circumstances, including course of performance, course

of dealing or usage of trade, give the lessee reason to know that the goods are

being leased subject to a claim or interest of any person.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 348; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2215  Cumulation and conflict of warranties express or implied.  Warranties, whether express or implied, must

be construed as consistent with each other and as cumulative, but if that

construction is unreasonable, the intention of the parties determines which

warranty is dominant. In ascertaining that intention the following rules apply:

      1.  Exact or technical specifications

displace an inconsistent sample or model or general language of description.

      2.  A sample from an existing bulk

displaces inconsistent general language of description.

      3.  Express warranties displace

inconsistent implied warranties other than an implied warranty of fitness for a

particular purpose.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 349; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2216  Third-party beneficiaries of express and implied warranties.  A warranty to or for the benefit of a lessee

under this article, whether express or implied, extends to any natural person

who is in the family or household of the lessee or who is a guest in the

lessee’s home if it is reasonable to expect that such person may use, consume

or be affected by the goods and who is injured in person by breach of the

warranty. This section does not displace principles of law and equity that

extend a warranty to or for the benefit of a lessee to other persons. The

operation of this section may not be excluded, modified or limited, but an

exclusion, modification or limitation of the warranty, including any with

respect to rights and remedies, effective against the lessee is also effective

against any beneficiary designated under this section.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 349; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2217  Identification.  Identification

of goods as goods to which a lease contract refers may be made at any time and

in any manner explicitly agreed to by the parties. In the absence of explicit

agreement, identification occurs:

      1.  When the lease contract is made if the

lease contract is for a lease of goods that are existing and identified;

      2.  When the goods are shipped, marked or

otherwise designated by the lessor as goods to which the lease contract refers,

if the lease contract is for a lease of goods that are not existing and

identified; or

      3.  When the young are conceived, if the

lease contract is for a lease of unborn young of animals.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 349; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2218  Insurance and proceeds.

      1.  A lessee obtains an insurable interest

when existing goods are identified to the lease contract even though the goods

identified are nonconforming and the lessee has an option to reject them.

      2.  If a lessee has an insurable interest

only by reason of the lessor’s identification of the goods, the lessor, until

default or insolvency or notification to the lessee that identification is

final, may substitute other goods for those identified.

      3.  Notwithstanding a lessee’s insurable

interest under subsections 1 and 2, the lessor retains an insurable interest

until an option to buy has been exercised by the lessee and risk of loss has

passed to the lessee.

      4.  Nothing in this section impairs any

insurable interest recognized under any other statute or rule of law.

      5.  The parties by agreement may determine

that one or more parties have an obligation to obtain and pay for insurance

covering the goods and by agreement may determine the beneficiary of the

proceeds of the insurance.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 349; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2219  Risk of loss.

      1.  Except in the case of a finance lease,

risk of loss is retained by the lessor and does not pass to the lessee. In the

case of a finance lease, risk of loss passes to the lessee.

      2.  Subject to the provisions of this

Article on the effect of default on risk of loss (NRS

104A.2220), if risk of loss is to pass to the lessee and the time of

passage is not stated, the following rules apply:

      (a) If the lease contract requires or authorizes

the goods to be shipped by carrier and it does not require delivery at a

particular destination, the risk of loss passes to the lessee when the goods

are duly delivered to the carrier, but if it does require delivery at a particular

destination and the goods are there duly tendered while in the possession of

the carrier, the risk of loss passes to the lessee when the goods are there

duly so tendered as to enable the lessee to take delivery.

      (b) If the goods are held by a bailee to be

delivered without being moved, the risk of loss passes to the lessee on

acknowledgment by the bailee of the lessee’s right to possession of the goods.

      (c) In any case not within paragraph (a) or (b),

the risk of loss passes to the lessee on the lessee’s receipt of the goods if

the lessor, or, in the case of a finance lease, the supplier, is a merchant;

otherwise the risk passes to the lessee on tender of delivery.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 349; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2220  Effect of default on risk of loss.

      1.  Where risk of loss is to pass to the

lessee and the time of passage is not stated:

      (a) If a tender or delivery of goods so fails to

conform to the lease contract as to give a right of rejection, the risk of

their loss remains with the lessor, or, in the case of a finance lease, the

supplier, until cure or acceptance.

      (b) If the lessee rightfully revokes acceptance,

the lessee, to the extent of any deficiency in his or her effective insurance

coverage, may treat the risk of loss as having remained with the lessor from

the beginning.

      2.  Whether or not risk of loss is to pass

to the lessee, if the lessee as to conforming goods already identified to a

lease contract repudiates or is otherwise in default under the lease contract,

the lessor, or, in the case of a finance lease, the supplier, to the extent of

any deficiency in his or her effective insurance coverage may treat the risk of

loss as resting on the lessee for a commercially reasonable time.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 350; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2221  Casualty to identified goods.  If

a lease contract requires goods identified when the lease contract is made, and

the goods suffer casualty without fault of the lessee, the lessor or the

supplier before delivery, or the goods suffer casualty before risk of loss

passes to the lessee pursuant to the lease agreement or NRS 104A.2219, then:

      1.  If the loss is total, the lease

contract is avoided; and

      2.  If the loss is partial or the goods

have so deteriorated as to no longer conform to the lease contract, the lessee

may nevertheless demand inspection and at his or her option either treat the

lease contract as avoided or, except in a finance lease that is not a consumer

lease, accept the goods with due allowance from the rent payable for the

balance of the lease term for the deterioration or the deficiency in quantity

but without further right against the lessor.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 350; A 1989, 721)

Part 3

Effect of Lease Contract

      NRS 104A.2301  Enforceability of lease contract.  Except

as otherwise provided in this article, a lease contract is effective and

enforceable according to its terms between the parties, against purchasers of

the goods and against creditors of the parties.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 350; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2302  Title to and possession of goods.  Except

as otherwise provided in this article, each provision of this article applies

whether the lessor or a third party has title to the goods, and whether the

lessor, the lessee or a third party has possession of the goods,

notwithstanding any statute or rule of law that possession or the absence of

possession is fraudulent.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 350; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2303  Alienability of party’s interest under lease contract or of

lessor’s residual interest in goods; delegation of performance; transfer of

rights.

      1.  As used in this section, “creation of a

security interest” includes the sale of a lease contract that is subject to

Article 9, Secured Transactions, by reason of paragraph (c) of subsection 1 of NRS 104.9109.

      2.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 3 and NRS 104.9407, a

provision in a lease agreement which:

      (a) Prohibits the voluntary or involuntary

transfer, including a transfer by sale, sublease, creation or enforcement of a

security interest, or attachment, levy, or other judicial process, of an

interest of a party under the lease contract or of the lessor’s residual

interest in the goods; or

      (b) Makes such a transfer an event of default,

Ê gives rise

to the rights and remedies provided in subsection 4, but a transfer that is

prohibited or is an event of default under the lease agreement is otherwise

effective.

      3.  A provision in a lease agreement which

prohibits a transfer of a right to damages for default with respect to the

whole lease contract or of a right to payment arising out of the transferor’s

due performance of his or her entire obligation, or makes such a transfer an

event of default, is not enforceable, and such a transfer is not a transfer

that materially impairs the prospect of obtaining return performance by,

materially changes the duty of, or materially increases the burden or risk

imposed on, the other party to the lease contract within the purview of

subsection 4.

      4.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 3 and NRS 104.9407:

      (a) If a transfer is made which is made an event

of default under a lease agreement, the party to the lease contract not making

the transfer, unless that party waives the default or otherwise agrees, has the

rights and remedies described in subsection 2 of NRS

104A.2501.

      (b) If paragraph (a) is not applicable and if a

transfer is made that is prohibited under a lease agreement or materially

impairs the prospect of obtaining return performance by, materially changes the

duty of, or materially increases the burden or risk imposed on, the other party

to the lease contract, unless the party not making the transfer agrees at any

time to the transfer in the lease contract or otherwise, then, except as

limited by contract, the transferor is liable to the party not making the

transfer for damages caused by the transfer to the extent that the damages

could not reasonably be prevented by the party not making the transfer and a

court having jurisdiction may grant other appropriate relief, including

cancellation of the lease contract or an injunction against the transfer.

      5.  A transfer of “the lease” or of “all my

rights under the lease,” or a transfer in similar general terms, is a transfer

of rights, and, unless the language or the circumstances, as in a transfer for

security, indicate the contrary, the transfer is a delegation of duties by the

transferor to the transferee. Acceptance by the transferee constitutes a

promise by the transferee to perform those duties. The promise is enforceable

by either the transferor or the other party to the lease contract.

      6.  Unless otherwise agreed by the lessor

and the lessee, a delegation of performance does not relieve the transferor as

against the other party of any duty to perform or of any liability for default.

      7.  In a consumer lease, to prohibit the

transfer of an interest of a party under the lease contract or to make a

transfer an event of default, the language must be specific, by a writing, and

conspicuous.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 351; A 1989, 721; 1991, 417; 1999, 383)

      NRS 104A.2304  Subsequent lease of goods by lessor.

      1.  Subject to the provisions of NRS 104A.2303, a subsequent lessee from a lessor of

goods under an existing lease contract obtains, to the extent of the lease-hold

interest transferred, the leasehold interest in the goods that the lessor had

or had power to transfer, and except as provided in subsection 2 of this

section and subsection 4 of NRS 104A.2527, takes

subject to the existing lease contract. A lessor with voidable title has power

to transfer a good leasehold interest to a good faith subsequent lessee for

value, but only to the extent set forth in the preceding sentence. When goods

have been delivered under a transaction of purchase the lessor has that power

even though:

      (a) The lessor’s transferor was deceived as to

the identity of the lessor;

      (b) The delivery was in exchange for a check

which is later dishonored;

      (c) It was agreed that the transaction was to be

a “cash sale;” or

      (d) The delivery was procured through fraud

punishable as larcenous under the criminal law.

      2.  A subsequent lessee in the ordinary

course of business from a lessor who is a merchant dealing in goods of that

kind to whom the goods were entrusted by the existing lessee from that lessor

before the interest of the subsequent lessee became enforceable against the

lessor obtains, to the extent of the leasehold interest transferred, all of the

lessor’s and the existing lessee’s rights to the goods, and takes free of the

existing lease contract.

      3.  A subsequent lessee from the lessor of

goods that are subject to an existing lease contract and are covered by a

certificate of title issued under a statute of this State or of another

jurisdiction takes no greater rights than those provided both by this section

and by the certificate of title statute.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 351; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2305  Sale or sublease of goods by lessee.

      1.  Subject to the provisions of NRS 104A.2303, a buyer or sublessee from the lessee

of goods under an existing lease contract obtains, to the extent of the

interest transferred, the leasehold interest in the goods that the lessee had

or had power to transfer, and except as provided in subsection 2 of this

section and subsection 4 of NRS 104A.2511, takes

subject to the existing lease contract. A lessee with a voidable leasehold

interest has power to transfer a good leasehold interest to a good faith buyer

for value or a good faith sublessee for value, but only to the extent set forth

in the preceding sentence. When goods have been delivered under a transaction

of lease the lessee has that power even though:

      (a) The lessor was deceived as to the identity of

the lessee;

      (b) The delivery was in exchange for a check

which is later dishonored; or

      (c) The delivery was procured through fraud

punishable as larcenous under the criminal law.

      2.  A buyer in the ordinary course of

business or a sublessee in the ordinary course of business from a lessee who is

a merchant dealing in goods of that kind to whom the goods were entrusted by

the lessor obtains, to the extent of the interest transferred, all of the

lessor’s and lessee’s rights to the goods, and takes free of the existing lease

contract.

      3.  A buyer or sublessee from the lessee of

goods that are subject to an existing lease contract and are covered by a

certificate of title issued under a statute of this State or of another

jurisdiction takes no greater rights than those provided both by this section

and by the certificate of title statute.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 352; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2306  Priority of certain liens arising by operation of law.  If a person in the ordinary course of his or

her business furnishes services or materials with respect to goods subject to a

lease contract, a lien upon those goods in the possession of that person given

by statute or rule of law for those materials or services takes priority over

any interest of the lessor or lessee under the lease contract or this Article

unless the lien is created by statute and the statute provides otherwise or

unless the lien is created by a rule of law and the rule of law provides

otherwise.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 352; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2307  Priority of liens arising by attachment or levy on, security

interests in and other claims to goods.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 104A.2306, a creditor of a lessee takes subject

to the lease contract.

      2.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 3 and in NRS 104A.2306 and 104A.2308, a creditor of a lessor takes subject to

the lease contract unless the creditor holds a lien that attached to the goods

before the lease contract became enforceable.

      3.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 104.9317, 104.9321 and 104.9323, a lessee takes a leasehold

subject to a security interest held by a creditor of the lessor.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 352; A 1989, 721; 1991, 419; 1999, 384)

      NRS 104A.2308  Special rights of creditors.

      1.  A creditor of a lessor in possession of

goods subject to a lease contract may treat the lease contract as void if as

against the creditor retention of possession by the lessor is fraudulent under

any statute or rule of law, but retention of possession in good faith and

current course of trade by the lessor for a commercially reasonable time after

the lease contract becomes enforceable is not fraudulent.

      2.  Nothing in this article impairs the

rights of creditors of a lessor if the lease contract:

      (a) Becomes enforceable, not in current course of

trade but in satisfaction of or as security for a preexisting claim for money,

security or the like; and

      (b) Is made under circumstances which under any

statute or rule of law apart from this article would constitute the transaction

a fraudulent transfer or voidable preference.

      3.  A creditor of a seller may treat a sale

or an identification of goods to a contract for sale as void if as against the

creditor retention of possession by the seller is fraudulent under any statute

or rule of law, but retention of possession of the goods pursuant to a lease

contract entered into by the seller as lessee and the buyer as lessor in

connection with the sale or identification of the goods is not fraudulent if

the buyer bought for value and in good faith.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 353; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2309  Lessor’s and lessee’s rights when goods become fixtures.

      1.  In this section:

      (a) Goods are “fixtures” when they become so

related to particular real estate that an interest in them arises under real

estate law;

      (b) A “fixture filing” is the filing, in the

office where a mortgage on the real estate would be filed or recorded, of a

financing statement covering goods that are or are to become fixtures and

conforming to the requirements of subsections 1 and 2 of NRS 104.9502;

      (c) A lease is a “purchase money lease” unless

the lessee has possession or use of the goods or the right to possession or use

of the goods before the lease agreement is enforceable;

      (d) A mortgage is a “construction mortgage” to

the extent it secures an obligation incurred for the construction of an

improvement on land including the acquisition cost of the land, if the recorded

writing so indicates; and

      (e) “Encumbrance” includes real estate mortgages

and other liens on real estate and all other rights in real estate that are not

ownership interests.

      2.  Under this Article a lease may be of

goods that are fixtures or may continue in goods that become fixtures, but no

lease exists under this Article of ordinary building materials incorporated

into an improvement on land.

      3.  This Article does not prevent creation

of a lease of fixtures pursuant to real estate law.

      4.  The perfected interest of a lessor of

fixtures has priority over a conflicting interest of an encumbrancer or owner

of the real estate if:

      (a) The lease is a purchase money lease, the

conflicting interest of the encumbrancer or owner arises before the goods

become fixtures, the interest of the lessor is perfected by a fixture filing

before the goods become fixtures or within 10 days thereafter, and the lessee

has an interest of record in the real estate or is in possession of the real

estate; or

      (b) The interest of the lessor is perfected by a

fixture filing before the interest of the encumbrancer or owner is of record,

the lessor’s interest has priority over any conflicting interest of a

predecessor in title of the encumbrancer or owner, and the lessee has an

interest of record in the real estate or is in possession of the real estate.

      5.  The interest of a lessor of fixtures,

whether or not perfected, has priority over the conflicting interest of an

encumbrancer or owner of the real estate if:

      (a) The fixtures are readily removable factory or

office machines, readily removable equipment that is not primarily used or

leased for use in the operation of the real estate, or readily removable

replacements of domestic appliances that are goods subject to a consumer lease,

and before the goods become fixtures the lease contract is enforceable;

      (b) The conflicting interest is a lien on the

real estate obtained by legal or equitable proceedings after the lease contract

is enforceable;

      (c) The encumbrancer or owner has consented in

writing to the lease or has disclaimed an interest in the goods as fixtures; or

      (d) The lessee has a right to remove the goods as

against the encumbrancer or owner. If the lessee’s right to remove terminates,

the priority of the interest of the lessor continues for a reasonable time.

      6.  Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of

subsection 4 but otherwise subject to subsections 4 and 5, the interest of a

lessor of fixtures, including the lessor’s residual interest, is subordinate to

the conflicting interest of an encumbrancer of the real estate under a

construction mortgage recorded before the goods become fixtures if the goods

become fixtures before the completion of the construction. To the extent given

to refinance a construction mortgage, the conflicting interest of an

encumbrancer of the real estate under a mortgage has this priority to the same

extent as the encumbrancer of the real estate under the construction mortgage.

      7.  In cases not within the preceding

subsections, priority between the interest of a lessor of fixtures, including

the lessor’s residual interest, and the conflicting interest of an encumbrancer

or owner of the real estate who is not the lessee is determined by the priority

rules governing conflicting interests in real estate.

      8.  If the interest of a lessor of

fixtures, including the lessor’s residual interest, has priority over all

conflicting interests of all owners and encumbrancers of the real estate, the

lessor or the lessee may:

      (a) On default, expiration, termination or

cancellation of the lease agreement but subject to the lease agreement and this

Article; or

      (b) If necessary to enforce his or her other

rights and remedies under this Article,

Ê remove the

goods from the real estate, free and clear of all conflicting interests of all

owners and encumbrancers of the real estate, but he or she must reimburse any

encumbrancer or owner of the real estate who is not the lessee and who has not

otherwise agreed for the cost of repair of any physical injury, but not for any

diminution in value of the real estate caused by the absence of the goods

removed or by any necessity of replacing them. A person entitled to

reimbursement may refuse permission to remove until the party seeking removal

gives adequate security for the performance of this obligation.

      9.  Even though the lease agreement does

not create a security interest, the interest of a lessor of fixtures, including

the lessor’s residual interest, is perfected by filing a financing statement as

a fixture filing for leased goods that are or are to become fixtures in

accordance with the relevant provisions of Article 9 on secured transactions.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 353; A 1989, 721; 1991, 420; 1999, 385)

      NRS 104A.2310  Lessor’s and lessee’s rights when goods become accessions.

      1.  Goods are “accessions” when they are

installed in or affixed to other goods.

      2.  The interest of a lessor or a lessee

under a lease contract entered into before the goods became accessions is

superior to all interests in the whole except as stated in subsection 4.

      3.  The interest of a lessor or a lessee

under a lease contract entered into at the time or after the goods became

accessions is superior to all subsequently acquired interests in the whole

except as stated in subsection 4 but is subordinate to interests in the whole

existing at the time the lease contract was made unless the holders of such

interests in the whole have in writing consented to the lease or disclaimed an interest

in the goods as part of the whole.

      4.  The interest of a lessor or a lessee

under a lease contract described in subsection 2 or 3 is subordinate to the

interest of:

      (a) A buyer in the ordinary course of business or

a lessee in the ordinary course of business of any interest in the whole acquired

after the goods became accessions; or

      (b) A creditor with a security interest in the

whole perfected before the lease contract was made to the extent that the

creditor makes subsequent advances without knowledge of the lease contract.

      5.  When under subsections 2 or 3 and 4 a

lessor or a lessee of accessions holds an interest that is superior to all

interests in the whole, the lessor or the lessee may:

      (a) On default, expiration, termination or

cancellation of the lease contract by the other party but subject to the

provisions of the lease contract and this Article; or

      (b) If necessary to enforce his or her other

rights and remedies under this Article,

Ê remove the

goods from the whole, free and clear of all interests in the whole, but he or

she must reimburse any holder of an interest in the whole who is not the lessee

and who has not otherwise agreed for the cost of repair of any physical injury

but not for any diminution in value of the whole caused by the absence of the

goods removed or by any necessity for replacing them. A person entitled to

reimbursement may refuse permission to remove until the party seeking removal

gives adequate security for the performance of this obligation.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 353; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2311  Priority subject to subordination.  Nothing

in this article prevents subordination by agreement by any person entitled to

priority.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 422)

Part 4

Performance of Lease Contract: Repudiated, Substituted and

Excused

      NRS 104A.2401  Insecurity: Adequate assurance of performance.

      1.  A lease contract imposes an obligation

on each party that the other’s expectation of receiving due performance will

not be impaired.

      2.  If reasonable grounds for insecurity

arise with respect to the performance of either party, the insecure party may

demand in writing adequate assurance of due performance. Until the insecure

party receives that assurance, if commercially reasonable the insecure party

may suspend any performance for which the insecure party has not already

received the agreed return.

      3.  A repudiation of the lease contract

occurs if assurance of due performance adequate under the circumstances of the

particular case is not provided to the insecure party within a reasonable time,

not to exceed 30 days after receipt of a demand by the other party.

      4.  Between merchants, the reasonableness

of grounds for insecurity and the adequacy of any assurance offered must be

determined according to commercial standards.

      5.  Acceptance of any nonconforming

delivery or payment does not prejudice the aggrieved party’s right to demand

adequate assurance of future performance.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 356; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2402  Anticipatory repudiation.  If

either party repudiates a lease contract with respect to a performance not yet

due under the lease contract, the loss of which performance will substantially

impair the value of the lease contract to the other, the aggrieved party may:

      1.  For a commercially reasonable time,

await retraction of repudiation and performance by the repudiating party;

      2.  Make demand pursuant to NRS 104A.2401 and await assurance of future

performance adequate under the circumstances of the particular case; or

      3.  Resort to any right or remedy upon

default under the lease contract or this Article, even though the aggrieved

party has notified the repudiating party that the aggrieved party would await

the repudiating party’s performance and assurance and has urged retraction.

Ê In addition,

whether or not the aggrieved party is pursuing one of the foregoing remedies,

the aggrieved party may suspend performance or, if the aggrieved party is the

lessor, proceed in accordance with the provisions of this Article on the

lessor’s right to identify goods to the lease contract notwithstanding default

or to salvage unfinished goods (NRS 104A.2524).

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 356; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2403  Retraction of anticipatory repudiation.

      1.  Until the repudiating party’s next

performance is due, the repudiating party can retract the repudiation unless,

since the repudiation, the aggrieved party has cancelled the lease contract or

materially changed the aggrieved party’s position or otherwise indicated that

the aggrieved party considers the repudiation final.

      2.  Retraction may be by any method that

clearly indicates to the aggrieved party that the repudiating party intends to

perform under the lease contract and includes any assurance demanded under NRS 104A.2401.

      3.  Retraction reinstates a repudiating

party’s rights under a lease contract with due excuse and allowance to the

aggrieved party for any delay occasioned by the repudiation.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 356; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2404  Substituted performance.

      1.  If without fault of the lessee, the

lessor and the supplier, the agreed berthing, loading or unloading facilities

fail or the agreed type of carrier becomes unavailable or the agreed manner of

delivery otherwise becomes commercially impracticable, but a commercially

reasonable substitute is available, the substitute performance must be tendered

and accepted.

      2.  If the agreed means or manner of

payment fails because of domestic or foreign governmental regulation:

      (a) The lessor may withhold or stop delivery or

cause the supplier to withhold or stop delivery unless the lessee provides a

means or manner of payment that is commercially a substantial equivalent; and

      (b) If delivery has already been taken, payment

by the means or in the manner provided by the regulation discharges the

lessee’s obligation unless the regulation is discriminatory, oppressive or

predatory.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 357; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2405  Excused performance.  Subject

to NRS 104A.2404 on substituted performance, the

following rules apply:

      1.  Delay in delivery or nondelivery in

whole or in part by a lessor or a supplier who complies with subsections 2 and

3 is not a default under the lease contract if performance as agreed has been

made impracticable by the occurrence of a contingency the nonoccurrence of

which was a basic assumption on which the lease contract was made or by

compliance in good faith with any applicable foreign or domestic governmental

regulation or order, whether or not the regulation or order later proves to be

invalid.

      2.  If the causes mentioned in subsection 1

affect only part of the lessor’s or the supplier’s capacity to perform, the

lessor or supplier shall allocate production and deliveries among his or her

customers but at his or her option may include regular customers not then under

contract for sale or lease as well as his or her own requirements for further

manufacture. The lessor or supplier may so allocate in any manner that is fair

and reasonable.

      3.  The lessor seasonably shall notify the

lessee and in the case of a finance lease the supplier seasonably shall notify

the lessor and the lessee, if known, that there will be delay or nondelivery

and, if allocation is required under subsection 2, of the estimated quota thus

made available for the lessee.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 357; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2406  Procedure on excused performance.

      1.  If the lessee receives notification of

a material or indefinite delay or an allocation justified under NRS 104A.2405, the lessee may by written

notification to the lessor as to any goods involved, and with respect to all of

the goods if under an installment lease contract the value of the whole lease

contract is substantially impaired (NRS 104A.2510):

      (a) Terminate the lease contract (subsection 2 of

NRS 104A.2505); or

      (b) Except in a finance lease that is not a

consumer lease, modify the lease contract by accepting the available quota in

substitution, with due allowance from the rent payable for the balance of the

lease term for the deficiency but without further right against the lessor.

      2.  If, after receipt of a notification

from the lessor under NRS 104A.2405, the lessee

fails so to modify the lease agreement within a reasonable time not exceeding

30 days, the lease contract lapses with respect to any deliveries affected.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 357; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2407  Irrevocable promises: Finance leases.

      1.  In the case of a finance lease that is

not a consumer lease the lessee’s promises under the lease contract become

irrevocable and independent upon the lessee’s acceptance of the goods.

      2.  A promise that has become irrevocable

and independent under subsection 1:

      (a) Is effective and enforceable between the

parties, and by or against third parties including assignees of the parties;

and

      (b) Is not subject to cancellation, termination,

modification, repudiation, excuse or substitution without the consent of the

party to whom the promise runs.

      3.  This section does not affect the

validity under any other law of a covenant in any lease contract making the

lessee’s promises irrevocable and not dependent upon his or her acceptance of

the goods.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 358; A 1989, 721; 1991, 422)

Part 5

Default

      NRS 104A.2501  Default: Procedure.

      1.  Whether the lessor or the lessee is in

default under a lease contract is determined by the lease agreement and this

Article.

      2.  If the lessor or the lessee is in

default under the lease contract, the party seeking enforcement has rights and

remedies as provided in this Article and, except as limited by this Article, as

provided in the lease agreement.

      3.  If the lessor or the lessee is in

default under the lease contract, the party seeking enforcement may reduce the

party’s claim to judgment, or otherwise enforce the lease contract by self-help

or any available judicial procedure or nonjudicial procedure, including an

administrative proceeding, arbitration or the like, in accordance with this Article.

      4.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 1 of NRS 104.1305 or this

Article or the lease agreement, the rights and remedies referred to in

subsections 2 and 3 are cumulative.

      5.  If the lease agreement covers both real

property and goods, the party seeking enforcement may proceed under this part

as to the goods, or under other applicable law as to both the real property and

the goods in accordance with his or her rights and remedies in respect of the

real property, in which case this part does not apply.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 358; A 1989, 721; 1991, 422; 2005, 880)

      NRS 104A.2502  Notice after default.  Except

as otherwise provided in this article or the lease agreement, the lessor or

lessee in default under the lease contract is not entitled to notice of default

or notice of enforcement from the other party to the lease agreement.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 358; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2503  Modification or impairment of rights and remedies.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in this

article, the lease agreement may include rights and remedies for default in

addition to or in substitution for those provided in this article and may limit

or alter the measure of damages recoverable under this article.

      2.  Resort to a remedy provided under this

article or in the lease agreement is optional unless the remedy is expressly

agreed to be exclusive. If circumstances cause an exclusive or limited remedy

to fail of its essential purpose, or provision for an exclusive remedy is

unconscionable, remedy may be had as provided in this article.

      3.  Consequential damages may be liquidated

under NRS 104A.2504, or may otherwise be limited,

altered or excluded unless the limitation, alteration or exclusion is

unconscionable. Limitation, alteration or exclusion of consequential damages

for injury to the person in the case of consumer goods is prima facie

unconscionable but limitation, alteration or exclusion of damages where the

loss is commercial is not prima facie unconscionable.

      4.  Rights and remedies on default by the

lessor or the lessee with respect to any obligation or promise collateral or

ancillary to the lease contract are not impaired by this article.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 358; A 1989, 721; 1991, 422)

      NRS 104A.2504  Liquidation of damages.

      1.  Damages payable by either party for

default, or any other act or omission, including indemnity for loss or

diminution of anticipated tax benefits or loss or damage to lessor’s residual

interest, may be liquidated in the lease agreement but only at an amount or by

a formula that is reasonable in light of the then anticipated harm caused by

the default or other act or omission.

      2.  If the lease agreement provides for

liquidation of damages, and such provision does not comply with subsection 1,

or such provision is an exclusive or limited remedy that circumstances cause to

fail of its essential purpose, remedy may be had as provided in the Article.

      3.  If the lessor justifiably withholds or

stops delivery of goods because of the lessee’s default or insolvency (NRS 104A.2525 or 104A.2526),

the lessee is entitled to restitution of any amount by which the sum of his or

her payments exceeds:

      (a) The amount to which the lessor is entitled by

virtue of terms liquidating the lessor’s damages in accordance with subsection

1; or

      (b) In the absence of those terms, 20 percent of

the then present value of the total rent the lessee was obligated to pay for

the balance of the lease term, or, in the case of a consumer lease, the lesser

of such amount or $500.

      4.  A lessee’s right to restitution under

subsection 3 is subject to offset to the extent the lessor establishes:

      (a) A right to recover damages under the

provisions of this Article other than subsection 1; and

      (b) The amount or value of any benefits received

by the lessee directly or indirectly by reason of the lease contract.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 359; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2505  Cancellation and termination, and effect of cancellation,

termination, rescission or fraud on rights and remedies.

      1.  On cancellation of the lease contract,

all obligations that are still executory on both sides are discharged, but any

right based on prior default or performance survives, and the cancelling party

also retains any remedy for default of the whole lease contract or any

unperformed balance.

      2.  On termination of the lease contract,

all obligations that are still executory on both sides are discharged but any

right based on prior default or performance survives.

      3.  Unless the contrary intention clearly

appears, expressions of “cancellation,” “rescission” or the like of the lease

contract may not be construed as a renunciation or discharge of any claim in

damages for an antecedent default.

      4.  Rights and remedies for material

misrepresentation or fraud include all rights and remedies available under this

article for default.

      5.  Neither rescission nor a claim for

rescission of the lease contract nor rejection or return of the goods may bar

or be deemed inconsistent with a claim for damages or other right or remedy.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 359; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2506  Statute of limitations.

      1.  An action for default under a lease

contract, including breach of warranty or indemnity, must be commenced within 4

years after the cause of action accrued. In a lease that is not a consumer

lease, by the original lease contract the parties may reduce the period of

limitation to not less than one year.

      2.  A cause of action for default accrues

when the act or omission on which the default or breach of warranty is based is

or should have been discovered by the aggrieved party, or when the default

occurs, whichever is later. A cause of action for indemnity accrues when the

act or omission on which the claim for indemnity is based is or should have

been discovered by the indemnified party, whichever is later.

      3.  If an action commenced within the time

limited by subsection 1 is so terminated as to leave available a remedy by

another action for the same default or breach of warranty or indemnity, the

other action may be commenced after the expiration of the time limited and

within 6 months after the termination of the first action unless the

termination resulted from voluntary discontinuance or from dismissal for

failure or neglect to prosecute.

      4.  This section does not alter the law on

tolling of the statute of limitations nor does it apply to causes of action

that have accrued before January 1, 1990.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 359; A 1989, 720, 721)

      NRS 104A.2507  Proof of market rent: Time and place.

      1.  Damages based on market rent (NRS 104A.2519 or 104A.2528)

are determined according to the rent for the use of the goods concerned for a

lease term identical to the remaining lease term of the original lease

agreement and prevailing at the time of the default.

      2.  If evidence of rent for the use of the

goods concerned for a lease term identical to the remaining lease term of the

original lease agreement and prevailing at the times or places described in

this article is not readily available, the rent prevailing within any

reasonable time before or after the time described or at any other place or for

a different lease term which in commercial judgment or under usage of trade

would serve as a reasonable substitute for the one described may be used,

making any proper allowance for the difference, including the cost of transporting

the goods to or from the other place.

      3.  Evidence of a relevant rent prevailing

at a time or place or for a lease term other than the one described in this

article offered by one party is not admissible unless and until the party has

given the other party notice the court finds sufficient to prevent unfair

surprise.

      4.  If the prevailing rent or value of any

goods regularly leased in any established market is in issue, reports in

official publications or trade journals or in newspapers or periodicals of

general circulation published as the reports of that market are admissible in

evidence. The circumstances of the preparation of the report may be shown to

affect its weight but not its admissibility.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 360; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2508  Lessee’s remedies.

      1.  If a lessor fails to deliver the goods

in conformity to the lease contract (NRS 104A.2509)

or repudiates the lease contract (NRS 104A.2402),

or a lessee rightfully rejects the goods (NRS

104A.2509) or justifiably revokes acceptance of the goods (NRS 104A.2517), then with respect to any goods

involved, and with respect to all of the goods if under an installment lease

contract the value of the whole lease contract is substantially impaired (NRS 104A.2510), the lessor is in default under the

lease contract and the lessee may:

      (a) Cancel the lease contract (subsection 1 of NRS 104A.2505);

      (b) Recover so much of the rent and security as

has been paid and is just under the circumstances;

      (c) Cover and recover damages as to all goods

affected whether or not they have been identified to the lease contract (NRS 104A.2518 and 104A.2520),

or recover damages for nondelivery (NRS 104A.2519

and 104A.2520); and

      (d) Exercise any other rights or pursue any other

remedies provided in the lease contract.

      2.  If a lessor fails to deliver the goods

in conformity to the lease contract or repudiates the lease contract, the

lessee may also:

      (a) If the goods have been identified, recover

them (NRS 104A.2522); or

      (b) In a proper case, obtain specific performance

or replevy the goods (NRS 104A.2521).

      3.  If a lessor is otherwise in default

under a lease contract, the lessee may exercise the rights and pursue the

remedies provided in the lease contract, which may include a right to cancel

the lease, and in subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2519.

      4.  If a lessor has breached a warranty,

whether express or implied, the lessee may recover damages (subsection 4 of NRS 104A.2519).

      5.  On rightful rejection or justifiable

revocation of acceptance, a lessee has a security interest in goods in the

lessee’s possession or control for any rent and security that has been paid and

any expenses reasonably incurred in their inspection, receipt, transportation

and care and custody and may hold those goods and dispose of them in good faith

and in a commercially reasonable manner, subject to the provisions of

subsection 5 of NRS 104A.2527.

      6.  Subject to the provisions of NRS 104A.2407, a lessee, on notifying the lessor of

the lessee’s intention to do so, may deduct all or any part of the damages

resulting from any default under the lease contract from any part of the rent

still due under the same lease contract.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 360; A 1989, 721; 1991, 423)

      NRS 104A.2509  Lessee’s rights on improper delivery; rightful rejection.

      1.  Subject to the provisions of NRS 104A.2510 on default in installment lease

contracts, if the goods or the tender or delivery fail in any respect to

conform to the lease contract, the lessee may reject or accept the goods or

accept any commercial unit or units and reject the rest of the goods.

      2.  Rejection of goods is ineffective

unless it is within a reasonable time after tender or delivery of the goods and

the lessee seasonably notifies the lessor.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 361; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2510  Installment lease contracts: Rejection and default.

      1.  Under an installment lease contract a

lessee may reject any delivery that is nonconforming if the nonconformity

substantially impairs the value of that delivery and cannot be cured or the

nonconformity is a defect in the required documents; but if the nonconformity

does not fall within subsection 2 and the lessor or the supplier gives adequate

assurance of its cure, the lessee must accept that delivery.

      2.  Whenever nonconformity or default with

respect to one or more deliveries substantially impairs the value of the

installment lease contract as a whole there is a default with respect to the

whole. But, the aggrieved party reinstates the installment lease contract as a

whole if the aggrieved party accepts a nonconforming delivery without

seasonably notifying of cancellation or brings an action with respect only to

past deliveries or demands performance as to future deliveries.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 361; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2511  Merchant lessee’s duties as to rightfully rejected goods.

      1.  Subject to any security interest of a

lessee (subsection 5 of NRS 104A.2508), if a

lessor or a supplier has no agent or place of business at the market of

rejection, a merchant lessee, after rejection of goods in his or her possession

or control, shall follow any reasonable instructions received from the lessor

or the supplier with respect to the goods. In the absence of those instructions

a merchant lessee shall make reasonable efforts to sell, lease or otherwise

dispose of the goods for the lessor’s account if they threaten to decline in

value speedily. Instructions are not reasonable if on demand indemnity for expenses

is not forthcoming.

      2.  If a merchant lessee (subsection 1) or

any other lessee (NRS 104A.2512) disposes of

goods, he or she is entitled to reimbursement either from the lessor or the

supplier or out of the proceeds for reasonable expenses of caring for and

disposing of the goods and, if the expenses include no disposition commission,

to such commission as is usual in the trade, or if there is none, to a

reasonable sum not exceeding 10 percent of the gross proceeds.

      3.  In complying with this section or NRS 104A.2512, the lessee is held only to good

faith. Good faith conduct hereunder is neither acceptance or conversion nor the

basis of an action for damages.

      4.  A purchaser who purchases in good faith

from a lessee pursuant to this section or NRS

104A.2512 takes the goods free of any rights of the lessor and the supplier

even though the lessee fails to comply with one or more of the requirements of

this Article.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 361; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2512  Lessee’s duties as to rightfully rejected goods.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided with

respect to goods that threaten to decline in value speedily (NRS 104A.2511) and subject to any security interest

of a lessee (subsection 5 of NRS 104A.2508):

      (a) The lessee, after rejection of goods in the

lessee’s possession, shall hold them with reasonable care at the lessor’s or

supplier’s disposition for a reasonable time after the lessee’s seasonable

notification of rejection;

      (b) If the lessor or the supplier gives no

instructions within a reasonable time after notification of rejection, the

lessee may store the rejected goods for the lessor’s or the supplier’s account

or ship them to the lessor or the supplier or dispose of them for the lessor’s

or the supplier’s account with reimbursement in the manner provided in NRS 104A.2511; but

      (c) The lessee has no further obligations with

regard to goods rightfully rejected.

      2.  Action by the lessee pursuant to

subsection 1 is not acceptance or conversion.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 362; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2513  Cure by lessor of improper tender or delivery; replacement.

      1.  If any tender or delivery by the lessor

or the supplier is rejected because nonconforming and the time for performance

has not yet expired, the lessor or the supplier may seasonably notify the

lessee of the lessor’s or the supplier’s intention to cure and may then make a

conforming delivery within the time provided in the lease contract.

      2.  If the lessee rejects a nonconforming

tender that the lessor or the supplier had reasonable grounds to believe would

be acceptable with or without money allowance, the lessor or the supplier may

have a further reasonable time to substitute a conforming tender if he or she

seasonably notifies the lessee.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 362; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2514  Waiver of lessee’s objections.

      1.  In rejecting goods, a lessee’s failure

to state a particular defect that is ascertainable by reasonable inspection

precludes the lessee from relying on the defect to justify rejection or to

establish default:

      (a) If, stated seasonably, the lessor or the

supplier could have cured it (NRS 104A.2513); or

      (b) Between merchants if the lessor or the

supplier after rejection has made a request in writing for a full and final

written statement of all defects on which the lessee proposes to rely.

      2.  A lessee’s failure to reserve rights

when paying rent or other consideration against documents precludes recovery of

the payment for defects apparent in the documents.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 362; A 1989, 721; 2005, 880)

      NRS 104A.2515  Acceptance of goods.

      1.  Acceptance of goods occurs after the

lessee has had a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods and:

      (a) The lessee signifies or acts with respect to

the goods in a manner that signifies to the lessor or the supplier that the

goods are conforming or that the lessee will take or retain them in spite of

their nonconformity; or

      (b) The lessee fails to make an effective

rejection of the goods (subsection 2 of NRS 104A.2509).

      2.  Acceptance of a part of any commercial

unit is acceptance of that entire unit.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 363; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2516  Effect of acceptance of goods; notice of default; burden of

establishing default after acceptance; notice of claim or litigation to person

answerable over.

      1.  A lessee must pay rent for any goods

accepted in accordance with the lease contract, with due allowance for goods

rightfully rejected or not delivered.

      2.  A lessee’s acceptance of goods

precludes rejection of the goods accepted. In the case of a finance lease, if

made with knowledge of a nonconformity, acceptance cannot be revoked because of

it. In any other case, if made with knowledge of a nonconformity, acceptance cannot

be revoked because of it unless the acceptance was on the reasonable assumption

that the nonconformity would be seasonably cured. Acceptance does not of itself

impair any other remedy provided by this Article or the lease agreement for

nonconformity.

      3.  If a tender has been accepted:

      (a) Within a reasonable time after the lessee

discovers or should have discovered any default, the lessee shall notify the

lessor and the supplier, if any, or be barred from any remedy against the party

not notified;

      (b) Except in the case of a consumer lease,

within a reasonable time after the lessee receives notice of litigation for

infringement or the like (NRS 104A.2211) the

lessee shall notify the lessor or be barred from any remedy over for liability

established by the litigation; and

      (c) The burden is on the lessee to establish any

default.

      4.  If a lessee is sued for breach of a

warranty or other obligation for which a lessor or a supplier is answerable

over the following apply:

      (a) The lessee may give the lessor or the

supplier written notice of the litigation. If the notice states that the person

notified may come in and defend and that if the person does not do so the

person will be bound in any action against him or her by the lessee by any

determination of fact common to the two litigations, then unless the person

notified after seasonable receipt of the notice does come in and defend the

person is so bound.

      (b) The lessor or the supplier may demand in

writing that the lessee turn over control of the litigation including

settlement if the claim is one for infringement or the like (NRS 104A.2211) or else be barred from any remedy

over. If the demand states that the lessor or the supplier agrees to bear all

expense and to satisfy any adverse judgment, then unless the lessee after

seasonable receipt of the demand does turn over control the lessee is so

barred.

      5.  Subsections 3 and 4 apply to any

obligation of a lessee to hold the lessor or the supplier harmless against

infringement or the like (NRS 104A.2211).

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 363; A 1989, 721; 1991, 424)

      NRS 104A.2517  Revocation of acceptance of goods.

      1.  A lessee may revoke acceptance of a lot

or commercial unit whose nonconformity substantially impairs its value to the

lessee if the lessee has accepted it:

      (a) Except in the case of a finance lease, on the

reasonable assumption that its nonconformity would be cured and it has not been

seasonably cured; or

      (b) Without discovery of the nonconformity if the

lessee’s acceptance was reasonably induced either by the lessor’s assurances

or, except in the case of a finance lease, by the difficulty of discovery

before acceptance.

      2.  Except in the case of a finance lease

that is not a consumer lease, a lessee may revoke acceptance of a lot or

commercial unit if the lessor defaults under the lease contract and the default

substantially impairs the value of that lot or commercial unit to the lessee.

      3.  If the lease agreement so provides, the

lessee may revoke acceptance of a lot or commercial unit because of other

defaults by the lessor.

      4.  Revocation of acceptance must occur

within a reasonable time after the lessee discovers or should have discovered

the ground for it and before any substantial change in condition of the goods

which is not caused by the nonconformity. Revocation is not effective until the

lessee notifies the lessor.

      5.  A lessee who so revokes has the same

rights and duties with regard to the goods involved as if the lessee had

rejected them.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 364; A 1989, 721; 1991, 425)

      NRS 104A.2518  Cover; substitute goods.

      1.  After default by a lessor under a lease

contract of the type described in subsection 1 of NRS

104A.2508, or, if agreed after other default by the lessor, the lessee may

cover by making any purchase or lease of or contract to purchase or lease goods

in substitution for those due from the lessor.

      2.  Except as otherwise provided with

respect to damages liquidated in the lease agreement (NRS

104A.2504) or otherwise determined pursuant to agreement of the parties (NRS 104.1302 and 104A.2503),

if a lessee’s cover is by lease agreement substantially similar to the original

lease agreement and the lease agreement is made in good faith and in a

commercially reasonable manner, the lessee may recover from the lessor as

damages:

      (a) The present value, as of the date of the

commencement of the term of the new lease agreement, of the rent under the new

lease agreement applicable to that period of the new lease term which is

comparable to the then remaining term of the original lease agreement minus the

present value as of the same date of the total rent for the remaining lease

term of the original lease agreement; and

      (b) Any incidental or consequential damages less

expenses saved in consequence of the lessor’s default.

      3.  If a lessee’s cover is by lease

agreement that for any reason does not qualify for treatment under subsection

2, or is by purchase or otherwise, the lessee may recover from the lessor as if

the lessee had elected not to cover and NRS 104A.2519

governs.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 364; A 1989, 721; 1991, 425; 2005, 880)

      NRS 104A.2519  Lessee’s damages for nondelivery, repudiation, default and

breach of warranty in regard to accepted goods.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided with

respect to damages liquidated in the lease agreement (NRS

104A.2504) or otherwise determined pursuant to agreement of the parties (NRS 104.1302 and 104A.2503),

if a lessee elects not to cover or a lessee elects to cover and the cover is by

lease agreement that for any reason does not qualify for treatment under

subsection 2 of NRS 104A.2518, or is by purchase

or otherwise, the measure of damages for nondelivery or repudiation by the

lessor or for rejection or revocation of acceptance by the lessee is the

present value, as of the date of the default, of the then market rent minus the

present value as of the same date of the original rent, computed for the remaining

lease term of the original lease agreement, together with incidental and

consequential damages, less expenses saved in consequence of the lessor’s

default.

      2.  Market rent is to be determined as of

the place for tender or, in cases of rejection after arrival or revocation of

acceptance, as of the place of arrival.

      3.  Except as otherwise agreed, if the

lessee has accepted goods and given notification (subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2516), the measure of damages for

nonconforming tender or delivery or other default by a lessor is the loss

resulting in the ordinary course of events from the lessor’s default as

determined in any manner that is reasonable together with incidental and

consequential damages, less expenses saved in consequence of the lessor’s

default.

      4.  Except as otherwise agreed, the measure

of damages for breach of warranty is the present value at the time and place of

acceptance of the difference between the value of the use of the goods accepted

and the value if they had been as warranted for the lease term, unless special

circumstances show proximate damages of a different amount, together with

incidental and consequential damages, less expenses saved in consequence of the

lessor’s default or breach of warranty.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 364; A 1989, 721; 1991, 426; 2005, 881)

      NRS 104A.2520  Lessee’s incidental and consequential damages.

      1.  Incidental damages resulting from a

lessor’s default include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt,

transportation, and care and custody of goods rightfully rejected or goods the

acceptance of which is justifiably revoked, any commercially reasonable

charges, expenses or commissions in connection with effecting cover, and any

other reasonable expense incident to the default.

      2.  Consequential damages resulting from a

lessor’s default include:

      (a) Any loss resulting from general or particular

requirements and needs of which the lessor at the time of contracting had

reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or

otherwise; and

      (b) Injury to person or property proximately

resulting from any breach of warranty.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 365; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2521  Lessee’s right to specific performance or replevin.

      1.  Specific performance may be decreed if

the goods are unique or in other proper circumstances.

      2.  A decree for specific performance may

include any terms and conditions as to payment of the rent, damages or other

relief that the court deems just.

      3.  A lessee has a right of replevin,

detinue, sequestration, claim and delivery, or the like for goods identified to

the lease contract if after reasonable effort the lessee is unable to effect

cover for those goods or the circumstances reasonably indicate that the effort

will be unavailing.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 365; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2522  Lessee’s right to goods on lessor’s insolvency.

      1.  Subject to subsection 2 and even though

the goods have not been shipped, a lessee who has paid a part or all of the

rent and security for goods identified to a lease contract (NRS 104A.2217) on making and keeping good a tender

of any unpaid portion of the rent and security due under the lease contract may

recover the goods identified from the lessor if the lessor becomes insolvent

within 10 days after receipt of the first installment of rent and security.

      2.  A lessee acquires the right to recover

goods identified to a lease contract only if they conform to the lease

contract.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 365; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2523  Lessor’s remedies.

      1.  If a lessee wrongfully rejects or revokes

acceptance of goods or fails to make a payment when due or repudiates with

respect to a part or the whole, then, with respect to any goods involved, and

with respect to all of the goods if under an installment lease contract the

value of the whole lease contract is substantially impaired (NRS 104A.2510), the lessee is in default under the

lease contract and the lessor may:

      (a) Cancel the lease contract (subsection 1 of NRS 104A.2505);

      (b) Proceed respecting goods not identified to

the lease contract (NRS 104A.2524);

      (c) Withhold delivery of the goods and take

possession of goods previously delivered (NRS

104A.2525);

      (d) Stop delivery of the goods by any bailee (NRS 104A.2526);

      (e) Dispose of the goods and recover damages (NRS 104A.2527), or retain the goods and recover

damages (NRS 104A.2528), or in a proper case

recover rent (NRS 104A.2529); and

      (f) Exercise any other rights or pursue any other

remedies provided in the lease contract.

      2.  If a lessor does not fully exercise a

right or obtain a remedy to which the lessor is entitled under subsection 1,

the lessor may recover the loss resulting in the ordinary course of events from

the lessee’s default as determined in any reasonable manner, together with

incidental damages, less expenses saved in consequence of the lessee’s default.

      3.  If a lessee is otherwise in default

under a lease contract, the lessor may exercise the rights and pursue the

remedies provided in the lease contract which may include a right to cancel the

lease. In addition, unless otherwise provided in the lease contract:

      (a) If the default substantially impairs the

value of the lease contract to the lessor, the lessor may exercise the rights

and pursue the remedies provided in subsections 1 and 2; or

      (b) If the default does not substantially impair

the value of the lease contract to the lessor, the lessor may recover as

provided in subsection 2.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 365; A 1989, 721; 1991, 426)

      NRS 104A.2524  Lessor’s right to identify goods to lease contract.

      1.  After default by the lessee under the

lease contract of the type described in subsection 1 or paragraph (a) of

subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2523 or, if agreed,

after other default by the lessee, the lessor may:

      (a) Identify to the lease contract conforming

goods not already identified if at the time the lessor learned of the default

they were in the lessor’s or the supplier’s possession or control; and

      (b) Dispose of goods (subsection 1 of NRS 104A.2527) that demonstrably have been intended

for the particular lease contract even though those goods are unfinished.

      2.  If the goods are unfinished, in the

exercise of reasonable commercial judgment for the purposes of avoiding loss

and of effective realization, an aggrieved lessor or the supplier may either

complete manufacture and wholly identify the goods to the lease contract or

cease manufacture and lease, sell or otherwise dispose of the goods for scrap

or salvage value or proceed in any other reasonable manner.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 366; A 1989, 721; 1991, 427)

      NRS 104A.2525  Lessor’s right to possession of goods.

      1.  If a lessor discovers the lessee to be

insolvent, the lessor may refuse to deliver the goods.

      2.  After a default by the lessee under the

lease contract of the type described in subsection 1 or paragraph (a) of

subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2523 or, if agreed,

after other default by the lessee, the lessor has the right to take possession

of the goods. If the lease contract so provides, the lessor may require the

lessee to assemble the goods and make them available to the lessor at a place

to be designated by the lessor which is reasonably convenient to both parties.

Without removal, the lessor may render unusable any goods employed in trade or

business, and may dispose of goods on the lessee’s premises (NRS 104A.2527).

      3.  The lessor may proceed under subsection

2 without judicial process if it can be done without breach of the peace or the

lessor may proceed by action.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 366; A 1989, 721; 1991, 427)

      NRS 104A.2526  Lessor’s stoppage of delivery in transit or otherwise.

      1.  A lessor may stop delivery of goods in

the possession of a carrier or other bailee if the lessor discovers the lessee

to be insolvent and may stop delivery of carload, truckload, planeload or

larger shipments of express or freight if the lessee repudiates or fails to

make a payment due before delivery, whether for rent, security or otherwise

under the lease contract, or for any other reason the lessor has a right to

withhold or take possession of the goods.

      2.  In pursuing its remedies under

subsection 1, the lessor may stop delivery until:

      (a) Receipt of the goods by the lessee;

      (b) Acknowledgment to the lessee by any bailee of

the goods, except a carrier, that the bailee holds the goods for the lessee; or

      (c) Such an acknowledgment to the lessee by a

carrier via reshipment or as a warehouse.

      3.  To stop delivery, a lessor shall so

notify as to enable the bailee by reasonable diligence to prevent delivery of

the goods. After notification, the bailee shall hold and deliver the goods

according to the directions of the lessor, but the lessor is liable to the

bailee for any ensuing charges or damages. A carrier who has issued a

nonnegotiable bill of lading is not obliged to obey a notification to stop

received from a person other than the consignor.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 366; A 1989, 721; 2005, 881)

      NRS 104A.2527  Lessor’s rights to dispose of goods.

      1.  After a default by a lessee under the

lease contract of the type described in subsection 1 or paragraph (a) of

subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2523 or after the lessor

refuses to deliver or takes possession of goods (NRS

104A.2525 or 104A.2526), or, if agreed, after

other default by the lessee, the lessor may dispose of the goods concerned or

the undelivered balance thereof by lease, sale or otherwise.

      2.  Except as otherwise provided with

respect to damages liquidated in the lease agreement (NRS

104A.2504) or otherwise determined pursuant to agreement of the parties (NRS 104.1302 and 104A.2503),

if the disposition is by lease agreement substantially similar to the original

lease agreement and the lease agreement is made in good faith and in a

commercially reasonable manner, the lessor may recover from the lessee as

damages:

      (a) Accrued and unpaid rent as of the date of the

commencement of the term of the new lease agreement;

      (b) The present value, as of the same date, of

the total rent for the then remaining lease term of the original lease

agreement minus the present value, as of the same date, of the rent under the

new lease agreement applicable to that period of the new lease term which is

comparable to the then remaining term of the original lease agreement; and

      (c) Any incidental damages allowed under NRS 104A.2530,

Ê less

expenses saved in consequence of the lessee’s default.

      3.  If the lessor’s disposition is by lease

agreement that for any reason does not qualify for treatment under subsection

2, or is by sale or otherwise, the lessor may recover from the lessee as if the

lessor had elected not to dispose of the goods and NRS

104A.2528 governs.

      4.  A subsequent buyer or lessee who buys

or leases from the lessor in good faith for value as a result of a disposition

under this section takes the goods free of the original lease contract and any

rights of the original lessee even though the lessor fails to comply with one

or more of the requirements of this Article.

      5.  The lessor is not accountable to the

lessee for any profit made on any disposition. A lessee who has rightfully

rejected or justifiably revoked acceptance shall account to the lessor for any

excess over the amount of the lessee’s security interest (subsection 5 of NRS 104A.2508).

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 367; A 1989, 721; 1991, 427; 2005, 882)

      NRS 104A.2528  Lessor’s damages for nonacceptance, failure to pay, repudiation

or other default.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided with

respect to damages liquidated in the lease agreement (NRS

104A.2504) or otherwise determined pursuant to agreement of the parties (NRS 104.1302 and 104A.2503),

if a lessor elects to retain the goods or a lessor elects to dispose of the

goods and the disposition is by lease agreement that for any reason does not

qualify for treatment under subsection 2 of NRS

104A.2527, or is by sale or otherwise, the lessor may recover from the

lessee as damages for a default of the type described in subsection 1 or

paragraph (a) of subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2523,

or, if agreed, for other default of the lessee:

      (a) Accrued and unpaid rent as of the date of

default if the lessee has never taken possession of the goods, or, if the

lessee has taken possession of the goods, as of the date the lessor repossesses

the goods or an earlier date on which the lessee makes a tender of the goods to

the lessor;

      (b) The present value as of the date determined

under paragraph (a) of the total rent for the then remaining lease term of the

original lease agreement minus the present value as of the same date of the

market rent at the place where the goods are located computed for the same

lease term; and

      (c) Any incidental damages allowed under NRS 104A.2530, less expenses saved in consequence of

the lessee’s default.

      2.  If the measure of damages provided in

subsection 1 is inadequate to put a lessor in as good a position as performance

would have, the measure of damages is the present value of the profit,

including reasonable overhead, the lessor would have made from full performance

by the lessee, together with any incidental damages allowed under NRS 104A.2530, due allowance for costs reasonably

incurred and due credit for payments or proceeds of disposition.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 367; A 1989, 721; 1991, 428; 2005, 882)

      NRS 104A.2529  Lessor’s action for the rent.

      1.  After default by the lessee under the

lease contract of the type described in subsection 1 or paragraph (a) of

subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2523 or, if agreed,

after other default by the lessee, if the lessor complies with subsection 2,

the lessor may recover from the lessee as damages:

      (a) For goods accepted by the lessee and not

repossessed by or tendered to the lessor, and for conforming goods lost or

damaged within a commercially reasonable time after risk of loss passes to the

lessee (NRS 104A.2219):

             (1) Accrued and unpaid rent as of the date

of entry of judgment in favor of the lessor;

             (2) The present value as of the same date

of the rent for the then remaining lease term of the lease agreement; and

             (3) Any incidental damages allowed under NRS 104A.2530,

Ê less

expenses saved in consequence of the lessee’s default; and

      (b) For goods identified to the lease contract if

the lessor is unable after reasonable effort to dispose of them at a reasonable

price or the circumstances reasonably indicate that effort will be unavailing:

             (1) Accrued and unpaid rent as of the date

of entry of judgment in favor of the lessor;

             (2) The present value as of the same date

of the rent for the then remaining lease term of the lease agreement; and

             (3) Any incidental damages allowed under NRS 104A.2530,

Ê less

expenses saved in consequence of the lessee’s default.

      2.  Except as provided in subsection 3, the

lessor shall hold for the lessee for the remaining lease term of the lease

agreement any goods that have been identified to the lease contract and are in

the lessor’s control.

      3.  The lessor may dispose of the goods at

any time before collection of the judgment for damages obtained pursuant to

subsection 1. If the disposition is before the end of the remaining lease term

of the lease agreement, the lessor’s recovery against the lessee for damages is

governed by NRS 104A.2527 or 104A.2528, and the lessor will cause an appropriate

credit to be provided against a judgment for damages to the extent that the

amount of the judgment exceeds the recovery available pursuant to NRS 104A.2527 or 104A.2528.

      4.  Payment of the judgment for damages

obtained pursuant to subsection 1 entitles the lessee to the use and possession

of the goods not then disposed of for the remaining lease term of and in

accordance with the lease agreement.

      5.  After default by the lessee under the

lease contract of the type described in subsection 1 or paragraph (a) of

subsection 3 of NRS 104A.2523 or, if agreed,

after other default by the lessee, a lessor who is held not entitled to rent

under this section must nevertheless be awarded damages for nonacceptance under

NRS 104A.2527 or 104A.2528.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 368; A 1989, 721; 1991, 429)

      NRS 104A.2530  Lessor’s incidental damages.  Incidental

damages to an aggrieved lessor include any commercially reasonable charges,

expenses or commissions incurred in stopping delivery, in the transportation,

care and custody of goods after the lessee’s default, in connection with return

or disposition of the goods, or otherwise resulting from the default.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 368; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2531  Standing to sue third parties for injury to goods.

      1.  If a third party so deals with goods

that have been identified to a lease contract as to cause actionable injury to

a party to the lease contract:

      (a) The lessor has a right of action against the

third party; and

      (b) The lessee also has a right of action against

the third party if the lessee:

             (1) Has a security interest in the goods;

             (2) Has an insurable interest in the

goods; or

             (3) Bears the risk of loss under the lease

contract or has since the injury assumed that risk as against the lessor and

the goods have been converted or destroyed.

      2.  If at the time of the injury the party

plaintiff did not bear the risk of loss as against the other party to the lease

contract and there is no arrangement between them for disposition of the

recovery, the party plaintiff’s suit or settlement, subject to his or her own

interest, is as a fiduciary for the other party to the lease contract.

      3.  Either party with the consent of the

other may sue for the benefit of whom it may concern.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 369; A 1989, 721)

      NRS 104A.2532  Lessor’s rights to residual interest.  In

addition to any other recovery permitted by this article or other law, the

lessor may recover from the lessee an amount that will fully compensate the

lessor for any loss of or damage to the lessor’s residual interest in the goods

caused by the default of the lessee.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 430)

ARTICLE 4A

FUNDS TRANSFERS

Part 1

Subject Matter and Definitions

      NRS 104A.4101  Short title.  This

article may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code—Funds Transfers.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 430)

      NRS 104A.4102  Subject matter.  Except

as otherwise provided in NRS 104A.4108, this

article applies to funds transfers defined in NRS

104A.4104.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 430)

      NRS 104A.4103  Payment order: Definitions.

      1.  In this article:

      (a) “Payment order” means an instruction of a

sender to a receiving bank, transmitted orally, electronically or in writing,

to pay, or to cause another bank to pay, a fixed or determinable amount of

money to a beneficiary if:

             (1) The instruction does not state a

condition to payment to the beneficiary other than time of payment;

             (2) The receiving bank is to be reimbursed

by debiting an account of, or otherwise receiving payment from, the sender; and

             (3) The instruction is transmitted by the

sender directly to the receiving bank or to an agent, funds-transfer system, or

communication system for transmittal to the receiving bank.

      (b) “Beneficiary” means the person to be paid by

the beneficiary’s bank.

      (c) “Beneficiary’s bank” means the bank

identified in a payment order in which an account of the beneficiary is to be

credited pursuant to the order or which otherwise is to make payment to the

beneficiary if the order does not provide for payment to an account.

      (d) “Receiving bank” means the bank to which the

sender’s instruction is addressed.

      (e) “Sender” means the person giving the

instruction to the receiving bank.

      2.  If an instruction complying with

paragraph (a) of subsection 1 is to make more than one payment to a

beneficiary, the instruction is a separate payment order with respect to each

payment.

      3.  A payment order is issued when it is

sent to the receiving bank.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 430)

      NRS 104A.4104  Funds transfer: Definitions.

      1.  “Funds transfer” means the series of transactions,

beginning with the originator’s payment order, made for the purpose of making

payment to the beneficiary of the order. The term includes any payment order

issued by the originator’s bank or an intermediary bank intended to carry out

the originator’s payment order. A funds transfer is completed by acceptance by

the beneficiary’s bank of a payment order for the benefit of the beneficiary of

the originator’s payment order.

      2.  “Intermediary bank” means a receiving

bank other than the originator’s bank or the beneficiary’s bank.

      3.  “Originator” means the sender of the

first payment order in a funds transfer.

      4.  “Originator’s bank” means the receiving

bank to which the payment order of the originator is issued if the originator

is not a bank, or the originator if the originator is a bank.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 431)

      NRS 104A.4105  Other definitions.

      1.  In this Article:

      (a) “Authorized account” means a deposit account

of a customer in a bank designated by the customer as a source of payment of

payment orders issued by the customer to the bank. If a customer does not so

designate an account, any account of the customer is an authorized account if

payment of a payment order from that account is not inconsistent with a

restriction on the use of that account.

      (b) “Bank” means a person engaged in the business

of banking and includes a savings bank, savings and loan association, credit

union, and trust company. A branch or separate office of a bank is a separate

bank for purposes of this Article.

      (c) “Customer” means a person, including a bank,

having an account with a bank or from whom a bank has agreed to receive payment

orders.

      (d) “Funds-transfer business day” of a receiving

bank means the part of a day during which the receiving bank is open for the

receipt, processing and transmittal of payment orders and cancellations and

amendments of payment orders.

      (e) “Funds-transfer system” means a wire transfer

network, automated clearing house, or other communication system of a clearing

house or other association of banks through which a payment order by a bank may

be transmitted to the bank to which the order is addressed.

      (f) “Prove” with respect to a fact means to meet

the burden of establishing the fact (paragraph (h) of subsection 2 of NRS 104.1201).

      2.  Other definitions applying to this

Article and the sections in which they appear are:

 

“Acceptance.” NRS 104A.4209.

“Beneficiary.” NRS 104A.4103.

“Beneficiary’s bank.” NRS 104A.4103.

“Executed.” NRS

104A.4301.

“Execution date.” NRS 104A.4301.

“Funds transfer.” NRS 104A.4104.

“Funds-transfer system rule.” NRS 104A.4501.

“Intermediary bank.” NRS 104A.4104.

“Originator.” NRS 104A.4104.

“Originator’s bank.” NRS 104A.4104.

“Payment by beneficiary’s bank to

beneficiary.” NRS 104A.4405.

“Payment by originator to

beneficiary.” NRS 104A.4406.

“Payment by sender to receiving

bank.” NRS 104A.4403.

“Payment date.” NRS 104A.4401.

“Payment order.” NRS 104A.4103.

“Receiving bank.” NRS 104A.4103.

“Security procedure.” NRS 104A.4201.

“Sender.” NRS

104A.4103.

 

      3.  The following definitions in Article 4

apply to this Article:

 

“Clearing house.” NRS 104.4104.

“Item.” NRS 104.4104.

“Suspends payments.” NRS 104.4104.

 

      4.  In addition Article 1 contains general

definitions and principles of construction and interpretation applicable

throughout this Article.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 431; A 2005, 883)

      NRS 104A.4106  Time payment order is received.

      1.  The time of receipt of a payment order

or communication cancelling or amending a payment order is determined by the

rules applicable to receipt of a notice stated in NRS 104.1202. A receiving bank may fix a

cutoff time or times of a funds-transfer business day for the receipt and

processing of payment orders and communications cancelling or amending payment

orders. Different cutoff times may apply to payment orders, cancellations or

amendments, or to different categories of payment orders, cancellations or

amendments. A cutoff time may apply to senders generally or different cutoff

times may apply to different senders or categories of payment orders. If a

payment order or communication cancelling or amending a payment order is

received after the close of a funds-transfer business day or after the

appropriate cutoff time on a funds-transfer business day, the receiving bank

may treat the payment order or communication as received at the opening of the

next funds-transfer business day.

      2.  If this Article refers to an execution

date or payment date or states a day on which a receiving bank is required to

take action, and the date or day does not fall on a funds-transfer business

day, the next day that is a funds-transfer business day is treated as the date

or day stated, unless the contrary is stated in this Article.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 432; A 2005, 884)

      NRS 104A.4107  Federal Reserve regulations and operating circulars.  Regulations of the Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System and operating circulars of the Federal Reserve banks

supersede any inconsistent provision of this article to the extent of the

inconsistency.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 432)

      NRS 104A.4108  Exclusion of certain consumer transactions governed by federal

law; resolution of inconsistencies between federal law and state law.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 2, this article does not apply to a funds transfer any part of which

is governed by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act of 1978 (Title XX, Public Law

95-630, 92 Stat. 3728, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1693 et seq.) as amended from time to time.

      2.  This article applies to a funds

transfer that is a remittance transfer as defined in section 919 of the

Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693o-1, as amended from time to

time, unless the remittance transfer is an electronic fund transfer as defined

in section 903 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693a, as

amended from time to time.

      3.  In a funds transfer to which this

article applies, in the event of an inconsistency between an applicable

provision of this article and an applicable provision of the Electronic Fund

Transfer Act, the provision of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act governs to the

extent of the inconsistency.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 432; A 2013, 255)

Part 2

Issue and Acceptance of Payment Order

      NRS 104A.4201  Security procedure.

      1.  “Security procedure” means a procedure

established by agreement of a customer and a receiving bank to:

      (a) Verify that a payment order or communication

amending or cancelling a payment order is that of the customer; or

      (b) Detect error in the transmission or the

content of the payment order or communication.

      2.  A security procedure may require the

use of algorithms or other codes, identifying words or numbers, encryption,

callback procedures or similar security devices.

      3.  Comparison of a signature on a payment

order or communication with an authorized specimen signature of the customer is

not by itself a security procedure.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 432)

      NRS 104A.4202  Authorized and verified payment orders.

      1.  A payment order received by the

receiving bank is the authorized order of the person identified as sender if

the person authorized the order or is otherwise bound by it under the law of

agency.

      2.  If a bank and its customer have agreed

that the authenticity of payment orders issued to the bank in the name of the

customer as sender will be verified pursuant to a security procedure, a payment

order received by the receiving bank is effective as the order of the customer,

whether or not authorized, if the security procedure is a commercially

reasonable method of providing security against unauthorized payment orders,

and the bank proves that it accepted the payment order in good faith and in

compliance with the security procedure and any written agreement or instruction

of the customer restricting acceptance of payment orders issued in the name of

the customer. The bank is not required to follow an instruction that violates a

written agreement with the customer or notice of which is not received at a

time and in a manner affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to act on it

before the payment order is accepted.

      3.  Commercial reasonableness of a security

procedure is a question of law to be determined by considering the wishes of

the customer expressed to the bank, the circumstances of the customer known to

the bank, including the size, type and frequency of payment orders normally

issued by the customer to the bank, alternative security procedures offered to

the customer, and security procedures in general use by customers and receiving

banks similarly situated. A security procedure is deemed to be commercially

reasonable if:

      (a) The security procedure was chosen by the

customer after the bank offered, and the customer refused, a security procedure

that was commercially reasonable for that customer; and

      (b) The customer expressly agreed in writing to

be bound by any payment order, whether or not authorized, issued in its name

and accepted by the bank in compliance with the security procedure chosen by

the customer.

      4.  The term “sender” in this article

includes the customer in whose name a payment order is issued if the order is

the authorized order of the customer under subsection 1, or it is effective as

the order of the customer under subsection 2.

      5.  This section applies to amendments and

cancellations of payment orders to the same extent it applies to payment

orders.

      6.  Except as otherwise provided in this

section and in paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of NRS

104A.4203, rights and obligations arising under this section or NRS 104A.4203 may not be varied by agreement.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 433)

      NRS 104A.4203  Unenforceability of certain verified payment orders.

      1.  If an accepted payment order is not,

under subsection 1 of NRS 104A.4202, an

authorized order of a customer identified as sender, but is effective as an

order of the customer pursuant to subsection 2 of NRS

104A.4202, the following rules apply:

      (a) By express written agreement, the receiving

bank may limit the extent to which it is entitled to enforce or retain payment

of the payment order.

      (b) The receiving bank is not entitled to enforce

or retain payment of the payment order if the customer proves that the order

was not caused, directly or indirectly, by a person:

             (1) Entrusted at any time with duties to

act for the customer with respect to payment orders or the security procedure;

or

             (2) Who obtained access to transmitting

facilities of the customer or who obtained, from a source controlled by the

customer and without authority of the receiving bank, information facilitating

breach of the security procedure, regardless of how the information was

obtained or whether the customer was at fault.

Ê Information

includes any access device, computer software, or the like.

      2.  This section applies to amendments of

payment orders to the same extent it applies to payment orders.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 433)

      NRS 104A.4204  Refund of payment and duty of customer to report with respect to

unauthorized payment order.

      1.  If a receiving bank accepts a payment

order issued in the name of its customer as sender which is not authorized and

not effective as the order of the customer under NRS

104A.4202, or not enforceable, in whole or in part, against the customer

under NRS 104A.4203, the bank shall refund any

payment of the payment order received from the customer to the extent the bank

is not entitled to enforce payment and shall pay interest on the refundable

amount calculated from the date the bank received payment to the date of the

refund. However, the customer is not entitled to interest from the bank on the

amount to be refunded if the customer fails to exercise ordinary care to

determine that the order was not authorized by the customer and to notify the

bank of the relevant facts within a reasonable time not exceeding 90 days after

the date he or she received notification from the bank that the order was

accepted or that his or her account was debited with respect to the order. The

bank is not entitled to any recovery from the customer on account of a failure

by the customer to give notification as stated in this section.

      2.  Reasonable time under subsection 1 may

be fixed by agreement as stated in subsection 2 of NRS 104.1302, but the obligation of a

receiving bank to refund payment as stated in subsection 1 may not otherwise be

varied by agreement.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 434; A 2005, 884)

      NRS 104A.4205  Erroneous payment orders.

      1.  If an accepted payment order was

transmitted pursuant to a security procedure for the detection of error and the

payment order erroneously instructed payment to a beneficiary not intended by

the sender, erroneously instructed payment in an amount greater than the amount

intended by the sender, or was an erroneously transmitted duplicate of a

payment order previously sent by the sender, the following rules apply:

      (a) If the sender proves that the sender or a

person acting on his or her behalf pursuant to NRS

104A.4206 complied with the security procedure and that the error would

have been detected if the receiving bank had also complied, the sender is not

obliged to pay the order to the extent stated in paragraphs (b) and (c).

      (b) If the funds transfer is completed on the

basis of a payment order erroneous for the first or third reason described in

subsection 1, the sender is not obliged to pay the order and the receiving bank

is entitled to recover from the beneficiary any amount paid to the beneficiary

to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.

      (c) If the funds transfer is completed on the

basis of a payment order erroneous for the second reason described in

subsection 1, the sender is not obliged to pay the order to the extent the

amount received by the beneficiary is greater than the amount intended by the

sender. In that case, the receiving bank is entitled to recover from the

beneficiary the excess amount received to the extent allowed by the law

governing mistake and restitution.

      2.  If the sender of an erroneous payment

order described in subsection 1 is not obliged to pay all or part of the order,

and the sender receives notification from the receiving bank that the order was

accepted by the bank or that the sender’s account was debited with respect to

the order, the sender has a duty to exercise ordinary care, on the basis of

information available to him or her, to discover the error with respect to the

order and to advise the bank of the relevant facts within a reasonable time,

not exceeding 90 days, after the bank’s notification was received by him or

her. If the bank proves that the sender failed to perform that duty, the sender

is liable to the bank for the loss the bank proves it incurred as a result of

the failure, but the liability of the sender may not exceed the amount of his

or her order.

      3.  This section applies to amendments to

payment orders to the same extent it applies to payment orders.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 434)

      NRS 104A.4206  Transmission of payment order through funds-transfer or other

communication system.

      1.  If a payment order addressed to a

receiving bank is transmitted to a funds-transfer system or other third-party

communication system for transmittal to the bank, the system is deemed to be an

agent of the sender for the purpose of transmitting the payment order to the

bank. If there is a discrepancy between the terms of the payment order

transmitted to the system and the terms of the payment order transmitted by the

system to the bank, the terms of the payment order of the sender are those

transmitted by the system. This section does not apply to a funds-transfer

system of the Federal Reserve banks.

      2.  This section applies to cancellations

and amendments of payment orders to the same extent it applies to payment

orders.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 435)

      NRS 104A.4207  Misdescription of beneficiary.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 2, if, in a payment order received by the beneficiary’s bank, the

name, bank account number or other identification of the beneficiary refers to

a nonexistent or unidentifiable person or account, no person has rights as a

beneficiary of the order and acceptance of the order cannot occur.

      2.  If a payment order received by the

beneficiary’s bank identifies the beneficiary both by name and by an

identifying or bank account number and the name and number identify different

persons, the following rules apply:

      (a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3,

if the beneficiary’s bank does not know that the name and number refer to

different persons, it may rely on the number as the proper identification of

the beneficiary of the order. The beneficiary’s bank need not determine whether

the name and number refer to the same person.

      (b) If the beneficiary’s bank pays the person

identified by name or knows that the name and number identify different

persons, no person has rights as beneficiary except the person paid by the

beneficiary’s bank if that person was entitled to receive payment from the

originator of the funds transfer. If no person has rights as beneficiary,

acceptance of the order cannot occur.

      3.  If a payment order described in

subsection 2 is accepted, the originator’s payment order described the

beneficiary inconsistently by name and number, and the beneficiary’s bank pays

the person identified by number as permitted by paragraph (a) of subsection 2,

the following rules apply:

      (a) If the originator is a bank, the originator

is obliged to pay its order.

      (b) If the originator is not a bank and proves

that the person identified by number was not entitled to receive payment from

the originator, the originator is not obliged to pay its order unless the

originator’s bank proves that the originator, before acceptance of the

originator’s order, had notice that payment of a payment order issued by the

originator might be made by the beneficiary’s bank on the basis of an

identifying or bank account number even if it identified a person different

from the named beneficiary. Proof of notice may be made by any admissible

evidence. The originator’s bank satisfies the burden of proof if it proves that

the originator, before the payment order was accepted, signed a writing stating

the information to which the notice relates.

      4.  In a case governed by paragraph (a) of

subsection 2, if the beneficiary’s bank rightfully pays the person identified

by number and that person was not entitled to receive payment from the

originator, the amount paid may be recovered from that person to the extent

allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution as follows:

      (a) If the originator is obliged to pay its

payment order as stated in subsection 3, the originator has the right to

recover.

      (b) If the originator is not a bank and is not

obliged to pay its payment order, the originator’s bank has the right to

recover.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 435)

      NRS 104A.4208  Misdescription of intermediary bank or beneficiary’s bank.

      1.  If a payment order identifies an

intermediary bank or the beneficiary’s bank only by an identifying number, the

following rules apply:

      (a) The receiving bank may rely on the number as

the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank and need

not determine whether the number identifies a bank.

      (b) The sender is obliged to compensate the

receiving bank for any loss and expenses incurred by the receiving bank as a

result of its reliance on the number in executing or attempting to execute the

order.

      2.  If a payment order identifies an

intermediary bank or the beneficiary’s bank both by name and an identifying

number and the name and number identify different persons, the following rules

apply:

      (a) If the sender is a bank, the receiving bank

may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or

beneficiary’s bank if the receiving bank, when it executes the sender’s order,

does not know that the name and number identify different persons. The

receiving bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same

person or whether the number refers to a bank. The sender is obliged to

compensate the receiving bank for any loss and expenses incurred by the

receiving bank as a result of its reliance on the number in executing or

attempting to execute the order.

      (b) If the sender is not a bank and the receiving

bank proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, had notice

that the receiving bank might rely on the number as the proper identification

of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank even if it identifies a person

different from the bank identified by name, the rights and obligations of the

sender and the receiving bank are governed by paragraph (a), as though the

sender were a bank. Proof of notice may be made by any admissible evidence. The

receiving bank satisfies the burden of proof if it proves that the sender,

before the payment order was accepted, signed a writing stating the information

to which the notice relates.

      (c) Whether or not the sender is a bank, the

receiving bank may rely on the name as the proper identification of the

intermediary or beneficiary’s bank if the receiving bank, at the time it

executes the sender’s order, does not know that the name and number identify

different persons. The receiving bank need not determine whether the name and

number refer to the same person.

      (d) If the receiving bank knows that the name and

number identify different persons, reliance on either the name or the number in

executing the sender’s payment order is a breach of the obligation stated in

paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of NRS 104A.4302.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 436)

      NRS 104A.4209  Acceptance of payment order.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 4, a receiving bank other than the beneficiary’s bank accepts a

payment order when it executes the order.

      2.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsections 3 and 4, a beneficiary’s bank accepts a payment order at the

earliest of the following times:

      (a) When the bank pays the beneficiary as stated

in subsection 1 or 2 of NRS 104A.4405, or

notifies the beneficiary of receipt of the order or that the account of the

beneficiary has been credited with respect to the order unless the notice

indicates that the bank is rejecting the order or that funds with respect to

the order may not be withdrawn or used until receipt of payment from the sender

of the order;

      (b) When the bank receives payment of the entire

amount of the sender’s order pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection 1

of NRS 104A.4403; or

      (c) The opening of the next funds-transfer

business day of the bank following the payment date of the order if, at that

time, the amount of the sender’s order is fully covered by a withdrawable

credit balance in an authorized account of the sender or the bank has otherwise

received full payment from the sender, unless the order was rejected before

that time or is rejected within 1 hour after that time, or 1 hour after the

opening of the next business day of the sender following the payment date if

that time is later. If notice of rejection is received by the sender after the

payment date and the authorized account of the sender does not bear interest,

the bank is obliged to pay interest to the sender on the amount of the order

for the number of days elapsing after the payment date to the day the sender

receives notice or learns that the order was not accepted, counting that day as

an elapsed day. If the withdrawable credit balance during that period falls

below the amount of the order, the amount of interest payable is reduced accordingly.

      3.  Acceptance of a payment order cannot

occur before the order is received by the receiving bank. Acceptance does not

occur under paragraph (b) or (c) of subsection 2 if the beneficiary of the

payment order does not have an account with the receiving bank, the account has

been closed, or the receiving bank is not permitted by law to receive credits

for the beneficiary’s account.

      4.  A payment order issued to the

originator’s bank cannot be accepted until the payment date if the bank is the

beneficiary’s bank, or the execution date if the bank is not the beneficiary’s

bank. If the originator’s bank executes the originator’s payment order before

the execution date or pays the beneficiary of the originator’s payment order

before the payment date and the payment order is subsequently cancelled

pursuant to subsection 2 of NRS 104A.4211, the

bank may recover from the beneficiary any payment received to the extent

allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 437)

      NRS 104A.4210  Rejection of payment order.

      1.  A payment order is rejected by the

receiving bank by a notice of rejection transmitted to the sender orally,

electronically or in writing. A notice of rejection need not use any particular

words and is sufficient if it indicates that the receiving bank is rejecting the

order or will not execute or pay the order. Rejection is effective when the

notice is given if transmission is by a means that is reasonable in the

circumstances. If notice of rejection is given by a means that is not

reasonable, rejection is effective when the notice is received. If an agreement

of the sender and receiving bank establishes the means to be used to reject a

payment order, any means complying with the agreement is reasonable and any

means not complying is not reasonable unless no significant delay in receipt of

the notice resulted from the use of the noncomplying means.

      2.  If a receiving bank other than the

beneficiary’s bank fails to execute a payment order despite the existence on

the execution date of a withdrawable credit balance in an authorized account of

the sender sufficient to cover the order, the following rules apply:

      (a) If the sender does not receive notice of

rejection of the order on the execution date and the authorized account of the

sender does not bear interest, the bank is obliged to pay interest to the

sender on the amount of the order for the number of days elapsing after the

execution date to the earlier of the day the order is cancelled pursuant to

subsection 4 of NRS 104A.4211 or the day the

sender receives notice or learns that the order was not executed, counting the

final day of the period as an elapsed day.

      (b) If the withdrawable credit balance during

that period falls below the amount of the order, the amount of interest is

reduced accordingly.

      3.  If a receiving bank suspends payments,

all unaccepted payment orders issued to it are deemed rejected at the time the

bank suspends payments.

      4.  Acceptance of a payment order precludes

a later rejection of the order. Rejection of a payment order precludes a later

acceptance of the order.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 438)

      NRS 104A.4211  Cancellation and amendment of payment order.

      1.  A communication of the sender of a

payment order cancelling or amending the order may be transmitted to the

receiving bank orally, electronically or in writing. If a security procedure is

in effect between the sender and the receiving bank, the communication is not

effective to cancel or amend the order unless the communication is verified

pursuant to the security procedure or the bank agrees to the cancellation or

amendment.

      2.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 1, a communication by the sender cancelling or amending a payment

order is effective to cancel or amend the order if notice of the communication

is received at a time and in a manner affording the receiving bank a reasonable

opportunity to act on the communication before the bank accepts the payment

order.

      3.  After a payment order has been

accepted, cancellation or amendment of the order is not effective unless the

receiving bank agrees or a funds-transfer system rule allows cancellation or

amendment without agreement of the bank. The following rules also apply:

      (a) With respect to a payment order accepted by a

receiving bank other than the beneficiary’s bank, cancellation or amendment is

not effective unless a conforming cancellation or amendment of the payment

order issued by the receiving bank is also made.

      (b) With respect to a payment order accepted by

the beneficiary’s bank, cancellation or amendment is not effective unless the

order was issued in execution of an unauthorized payment order, or because of a

mistake by a sender in the funds transfer which resulted in the issuance of a

payment order that is a duplicate of a payment order previously issued by the

sender, that orders payment to a beneficiary not entitled to receive payment

from the originator, or that orders payment in an amount greater than the

amount the beneficiary was entitled to receive from the originator. If the

payment order is cancelled or amended, the beneficiary’s bank is entitled to

recover from the beneficiary any amount paid to the beneficiary to the extent

allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.

      4.  An unaccepted payment order is

cancelled by operation of law at the close of the fifth funds-transfer business

day of the receiving bank after the execution date or payment date of the

order.

      5.  A cancelled payment order cannot be

accepted. If an accepted payment order is cancelled, the acceptance is

nullified and no person has any right or obligation based on the acceptance.

Amendment of a payment order is deemed to be cancellation of the original order

at the time of amendment and issue of a new payment order in the amended form

at the same time.

      6.  Unless otherwise provided in an

agreement of the parties or in a funds-transfer system rule, if the receiving

bank, after accepting a payment order, agrees to cancellation or amendment of

the order by the sender or is bound by a funds-transfer system rule allowing

cancellation or amendment without the bank’s agreement, the sender, whether or

not cancellation or amendment is effective, is liable to the bank for any loss

and expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by the bank as a

result of the cancellation or amendment or attempted cancellation or amendment.

      7.  A payment order is not revoked by the

death or legal incapacity of the sender unless the receiving bank knows of the

death or of an adjudication of incapacity by a court of competent jurisdiction

and has reasonable opportunity to act before acceptance of the order.

      8.  A funds-transfer system rule is not

effective to the extent it conflicts with paragraph (b) of subsection 3.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 438)

      NRS 104A.4212  Liability and duty of receiving bank regarding unaccepted

payment order.  If a receiving bank

fails to accept a payment order that it is obliged by express agreement to

accept, the bank is liable for breach of the agreement to the extent provided

in the agreement or in this article, but does not otherwise have any duty to

accept a payment order or, before acceptance, to take any action, or refrain

from taking action, with respect to the order except as provided in this

article or by express agreement. Liability based on acceptance arises only when

acceptance occurs as stated in NRS 104A.4209, and

liability is limited to that provided in this article. A receiving bank is not

the agent of the sender or beneficiary of the payment order it accepts, or of

any other party to the funds transfer, and the bank owes no duty to any party

to the funds transfer except as otherwise provided in this article or by express

agreement.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 439)

Part 3

Execution of Sender’s Payment Order by Receiving Bank

      NRS 104A.4301  Execution and execution date.

      1.  A payment order is “executed” by the

receiving bank when it issues a payment order intended to carry out the payment

order received by the bank. A payment order received by the beneficiary’s bank

can be accepted but cannot be executed.

      2.  “Execution date” of a payment order

means the day on which the receiving bank may properly issue a payment order in

execution of the sender’s order. The execution date may be determined by

instruction of the sender but cannot be earlier than the day the order is

received and, unless otherwise determined, is the day the order is received. If

the sender’s instruction states a payment date, the execution date is the

payment date or an earlier date on which execution is reasonably necessary to

allow payment to the beneficiary on the payment date.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 440)

      NRS 104A.4302  Obligation of receiving bank in execution of payment order.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsections 2, 3 and 4, if the receiving bank accepts a payment order pursuant

to subsection 1 of NRS 104A.4209, the bank has

the following obligations in executing the order:

      (a) The receiving bank is obliged to issue, on

the execution date, a payment order complying with the sender’s order and to

follow the sender’s instructions concerning any intermediary bank or

funds-transfer system to be used in carrying out the funds transfer, or the

means by which payment orders are to be transmitted in the funds transfer. If

the originator’s bank issues a payment order to an intermediary bank, the

originator’s bank is obliged to instruct the intermediary bank according to the

instruction of the originator. An intermediary bank in the funds transfer is

similarly bound by an instruction given to it by the sender of the payment

order it accepts.

      (b) If the sender’s instruction states that the

funds transfer is to be carried out telephonically or by wire transfer or

otherwise indicates that the funds transfer is to be carried out by the most

expeditious means, the receiving bank is obliged to transmit its payment order

by the most expeditious available means, and to instruct any intermediary bank

accordingly. If a sender’s instruction states a payment date, the receiving

bank is obliged to transmit its payment order at a time and by means reasonably

necessary to allow payment to the beneficiary on the payment date or as soon

thereafter as is feasible.

      2.  Unless otherwise instructed, a

receiving bank executing a payment order may use any funds-transfer system if

use of that system is reasonable in the circumstances, and issue a payment

order to the beneficiary’s bank or to an intermediary bank through which a

payment order conforming to the sender’s order can expeditiously be issued to

the beneficiary’s bank if the receiving bank exercises ordinary care in the

selection of the intermediary bank. A receiving bank is not required to follow

an instruction of the sender designating a funds-transfer system to be used in

carrying out the funds transfer if the receiving bank, in good faith,

determines that it is not feasible to follow the instruction or that following

the instruction would unduly delay completion of the funds transfer.

      3.  Unless paragraph (b) of subsection 1

applies or the receiving bank is otherwise instructed, the bank may execute a

payment order by transmitting its payment order by first-class mail or by any

means reasonable in the circumstances. If the receiving bank is instructed to

execute the sender’s order by transmitting its payment order by a particular

means, the receiving bank may issue its payment order by the means stated or by

any means as expeditious as the means stated.

      4.  Unless instructed by the sender:

      (a) The receiving bank may not obtain payment of

its charges for services and expenses in connection with the execution of the

sender’s order by issuing a payment order in an amount equal to the amount of

the sender’s order less the amount of the charges; and

      (b) May not instruct a subsequent receiving bank

to obtain payment of its charges in the same manner.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 440)

      NRS 104A.4303  Erroneous execution of payment order.

      1.  A receiving bank that executes the

payment order of the sender by issuing a payment order in an amount greater

than the amount of the sender’s order, or issues a payment order in execution

of the sender’s order and then issues a duplicate order, is entitled to payment

of the amount of the sender’s order under subsection 3 of NRS 104A.4402 if that subsection is otherwise

satisfied. The bank is entitled to recover from the beneficiary of the

erroneous order the excess payment received to the extent allowed by the law

governing mistake and restitution.

      2.  A receiving bank that executes the

payment order of the sender by issuing a payment order in an amount less than

the amount of the sender’s order is entitled to payment of the amount of the

sender’s order under subsection 3 of NRS 104A.4402

if that subsection is otherwise satisfied and the bank corrects its mistake by

issuing an additional payment order for the benefit of the beneficiary of the

sender’s order. If the error is not corrected, the issuer of the erroneous

order is entitled to receive or retain payment from the sender of the order it

accepted only to the extent of the amount of the erroneous order. This

subsection does not apply if the receiving bank executes the sender’s payment

order by issuing a payment order in an amount less than the amount of the

sender’s order for the purpose of obtaining payment of its charges for services

and expenses pursuant to instruction of the sender.

      3.  If a receiving bank executes the

payment order of the sender by issuing a payment order to a beneficiary

different from the beneficiary of the sender’s order and the funds transfer is

completed on the basis of that error, the sender of the payment order that was

erroneously executed and all previous senders in the funds transfer are not

obliged to pay the payment orders they issued. The issuer of the erroneous

order is entitled to recover from the beneficiary of the order the payment

received to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 441)

      NRS 104A.4304  Duty of sender to report erroneously executed payment order.  If the sender of a payment order that is

erroneously executed as stated in NRS 104A.4303

receives notification from the receiving bank that the order was executed or

that the sender’s account was debited with respect to the order, the sender has

a duty to exercise ordinary care to determine, on the basis of information

available to the sender, that the order was erroneously executed and to notify

the bank of the relevant facts within a reasonable time not exceeding 90 days

after the notification from the bank was received by the sender. If the sender

fails to perform that duty, the bank is not obliged to pay interest on any

amount refundable to the sender under subsection 4 of NRS

104A.4402 for the period before the bank learns of the execution error. The

bank is not entitled to any recovery from the sender on account of a failure by

the sender to perform the duty stated in this section.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 441)

      NRS 104A.4305  Liability for late or improper execution or failure to execute

payment order.

      1.  If a funds transfer is completed but

execution of a payment order by the receiving bank in breach of NRS 104A.4302 results in delay in payment to the

beneficiary, the bank is obliged to pay interest to either the originator or

the beneficiary of the funds transfer for the period of delay caused by the

improper execution. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3, additional damages

are not recoverable.

      2.  If execution of a payment order by a

receiving bank in breach of NRS 104A.4302 results

in noncompletion of the funds transfer, failure to use an intermediary bank

designated by the originator, or issuance of a payment order that does not

comply with the terms of the payment order of the originator, the bank is

liable to the originator for its expenses in the funds transfer and for

incidental expenses and interest losses, to the extent not covered by

subsection 1, resulting from the improper execution. Except as otherwise

provided in subsection 3, additional damages are not recoverable.

      3.  In addition to the amounts payable

under subsections 1 and 2, damages, including consequential damages, are

recoverable to the extent provided in an express written agreement of the

receiving bank.

      4.  If a receiving bank fails to execute a

payment order it was obliged by express agreement to execute, the receiving

bank is liable to the sender for its expenses in the transaction and for

incidental expenses and interest losses resulting from the failure to execute.

Additional damages, including consequential damages, are recoverable to the

extent provided in an express written agreement of the receiving bank, but are

not otherwise recoverable.

      5.  Reasonable attorney’s fees are

recoverable if demand for compensation under subsection 1 or 2 is made and

refused before an action is brought on the claim. If a claim is made for breach

of an agreement under subsection 4 and the agreement does not provide for

damages, reasonable attorney’s fees are recoverable if demand for compensation

under subsection 4 is made and refused before an action is brought on the

claim.

      6.  Except as stated in this section, the

liability of a receiving bank under subsections 1 and 2 may not be varied by

agreement.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 442)

Part 4

Payment

      NRS 104A.4401  Payment date.  “Payment

date” of a payment order means the day on which the amount of the order is

payable to the beneficiary by the beneficiary’s bank. The payment date may be

determined by instruction of the sender but cannot be earlier than the day the

order is received by the beneficiary’s bank and, unless otherwise determined,

is the day the order is received by the beneficiary’s bank.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 442)

      NRS 104A.4402  Obligation of sender to pay receiving bank.

      1.  This section is subject to NRS 104A.4205 and 104A.4207.

      2.  With respect to a payment order issued

to the beneficiary’s bank, acceptance of the order by the bank obliges the

sender to pay the bank the amount of the order, but payment is not due until

the payment date of the order.

      3.  This subsection is subject to

subsection 5 and to NRS 104A.4303. With respect

to a payment order issued to a receiving bank other than the beneficiary’s

bank, acceptance of the order by the receiving bank obliges the sender to pay

the bank the amount of his or her order. Payment by the sender is not due until

the execution date of his or her order. The obligation of a sender to pay his

or her payment order is excused if the funds transfer is not completed by

acceptance by the beneficiary’s bank of a payment order instructing payment to

the beneficiary of that sender’s payment order.

      4.  If the sender of a payment order pays

the order and was not obliged to pay all or part of the amount paid, the bank

receiving payment is obliged to refund payment to the extent the sender was not

obliged to pay. Except as otherwise provided in NRS

104A.4204 and 104A.4304, interest is payable

on the refundable amount from the date of payment.

      5.  If a funds transfer is not completed as

stated in subsection 3 and an intermediary bank is obliged to refund payment as

stated in subsection 4 but is unable to do so because not permitted by

applicable law or because the bank suspends payments, a sender in the funds

transfer that executed a payment order in compliance with an instruction, as

stated in paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of NRS

104A.4302, to route the funds transfer through that intermediary bank is

entitled to receive or retain payment from the sender of the payment order that

it accepted. The first sender in the funds transfer that issued an instruction

requiring routing through that intermediary bank is subrogated to the right of

the bank that paid the intermediary bank to refund as stated in subsection 4.

      6.  The right of the sender of a payment

order to be excused from the obligation to pay the order as stated in

subsection 3 or to receive refund under subsection 4 may not be varied by

agreement.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 442)

      NRS 104A.4403  Payment by sender to receiving bank.

      1.  Payment of the sender’s obligation

under NRS 104A.4402 to pay the receiving bank

occurs as follows:

      (a) If the sender is a bank, payment occurs when

the receiving bank receives final settlement of the obligation through a

Federal Reserve bank or through a funds-transfer system.

      (b) If the sender is a bank and the sender

credited an account of the receiving bank with the sender, or caused an account

of the receiving bank in another bank to be credited, payment occurs when the

credit is withdrawn or, if not withdrawn, at midnight of the day on which the

credit is withdrawable and the receiving bank learns of that fact.

      (c) If the receiving bank debits an account of

the sender with the receiving bank, payment occurs when the debit is made to

the extent the debit is covered by a withdrawable credit balance in the

account.

      2.  If the sender and receiving bank are

members of a funds-transfer system that nets obligations multilaterally among

participants, the receiving bank receives final settlement when settlement is

complete in accordance with the rules of the system. The obligation of the

sender to pay the amount of a payment order transmitted through the

funds-transfer system may be satisfied, to the extent permitted by the rules of

the system, by setting off and applying against the sender’s obligation the

right of the sender to receive payment from the receiving bank of the amount of

any other payment order transmitted to the sender by the receiving bank through

the funds-transfer system. The aggregate balance of obligations owed by each

sender to each receiving bank in the funds-transfer system may be satisfied, to

the extent permitted by the rules of the system, by setting off and applying

against that balance the aggregate balance of obligations owed to the sender by

other members of the system. The aggregate balance is determined after the

right of setoff stated in the second sentence of this subsection has been

exercised.

      3.  If two banks transmit payment orders to

each other under an agreement that settlement of the obligations of each bank

to the other under NRS 104A.4402 will be made at

the end of the day or other period, the total amount owed with respect to all

orders transmitted by one bank shall be set off against the total amount owed

with respect to all orders transmitted by the other bank. To the extent of the

setoff, each bank has made payment to the other.

      4.  In a case not covered by subsection 1,

the time when payment of the sender’s obligation under subsection 2 or 3 of NRS 104A.4402 occurs is governed by applicable

principles of law that determine when an obligation is satisfied.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 443)

      NRS 104A.4404  Obligation of beneficiary’s bank to pay and give notice to

beneficiary.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 5 of NRS 104A.4211 and subsections 4

and 5 of NRS 104A.4405, if a beneficiary’s bank

accepts a payment order, the bank is obliged to pay the amount of the order to

the beneficiary of the order. Payment is due on the payment date of the order,

but if acceptance occurs on the payment date after the close of the

funds-transfer business day of the bank, payment is due on the next

funds-transfer business day. If the bank refuses to pay after demand by the

beneficiary and receipt of notice of particular circumstances that will give

rise to consequential damages as a result of nonpayment, the beneficiary may recover

damages resulting from the refusal to pay to the extent the bank had notice of

the damages, unless the bank proves that it did not pay because of a reasonable

doubt concerning the right of the beneficiary to payment.

      2.  If a payment order accepted by the

beneficiary’s bank instructs payment to an account of the beneficiary, the bank

is obliged to notify the beneficiary of receipt of the order before midnight of

the next funds-transfer business day following the payment date. If the payment

order does not instruct payment to an account of the beneficiary, the bank is

required to notify the beneficiary only if notice is required by the order.

Notice may be given by first-class mail or any other means reasonable in the

circumstances. If the bank fails to give the required notice, the bank is

obliged to pay interest to the beneficiary on the amount of the payment order

from the day notice should have been given until the day the beneficiary

learned of receipt of the payment order by the bank. No other damages are

recoverable. Reasonable attorney’s fees are also recoverable if demand for

interest is made and refused before an action is brought on the claim.

      3.  The right of a beneficiary to receive

payment and damages as stated in subsection 1 may not be varied by agreement or

a funds-transfer system rule. The right of a beneficiary to be notified as

stated in subsection 2 may be varied by agreement of the beneficiary or by a

funds-transfer system rule if the beneficiary is notified of the rule before initiation

of the funds transfer.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 444)

      NRS 104A.4405  Payment by beneficiary’s bank to beneficiary.

      1.  If the beneficiary’s bank credits an

account of the beneficiary of a payment order, payment of the bank’s obligation

under subsection 1 of NRS 104A.4404 occurs when

and to the extent the beneficiary is notified of the right to withdraw the

credit, the bank lawfully applies the credit to a debt of the beneficiary, or

funds with respect to the order are otherwise made available to the beneficiary

by the bank.

      2.  If the beneficiary’s bank does not

credit an account of the beneficiary of a payment order, the time when payment

of the bank’s obligation under subsection 1 of NRS

104A.4404 occurs is governed by principles of law that determine when an

obligation is satisfied.

      3.  Except as stated in subsections 4 and

5, if the beneficiary’s bank pays the beneficiary of a payment order under a

condition to payment or agreement of the beneficiary giving the bank the right

to recover payment from the beneficiary if the bank does not receive payment of

the order, the condition to payment or agreement is not enforceable.

      4.  A funds-transfer system rule may

provide that payments made to beneficiaries of funds transfers made through the

system are provisional until receipt of payment by the beneficiary’s bank of

the payment order it accepted. A beneficiary’s bank that makes a payment that

is provisional under the rule is entitled to refund from the beneficiary if the

rule requires that both the beneficiary and the originator be given notice of

the provisional nature of the payment before the funds transfer is initiated,

the beneficiary, the beneficiary’s bank and the originator’s bank agreed to be

bound by the rule, and the beneficiary’s bank did not receive payment of the

payment order that it accepted. If the beneficiary is obliged to refund payment

to the beneficiary’s bank, acceptance of the payment order by the beneficiary’s

bank is nullified and no payment by the originator of the funds transfer to the

beneficiary occurs under NRS 104A.4406.

      5.  This subsection applies to a funds

transfer that includes a payment order transmitted over a funds-transfer system

that nets obligations multilaterally among participants, and has in effect a

loss-sharing agreement among participants for the purpose of providing funds

necessary to complete settlement of the obligations of one or more participants

that do not meet their settlement obligations. If the beneficiary’s bank in the

funds transfer accepts a payment order and the system fails to complete

settlement pursuant to its rules with respect to any payment order in the funds

transfer:

      (a) The acceptance by the beneficiary’s bank is

nullified and no person has any right or obligation based on the acceptance;

      (b) The beneficiary’s bank is entitled to recover

payment from the beneficiary;

      (c) No payment by the originator to the

beneficiary occurs under NRS 104A.4406; and

      (d) Subject to subsection 5 of NRS 104A.4402, each sender in the funds transfer is

excused from its obligation to pay its payment order under subsection 3 of NRS 104A.4402 because the funds transfer has not

been completed.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 444)

      NRS 104A.4406  Payment by originator to beneficiary; discharge of underlying

obligation.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in

subsection 5 of NRS 104A.4211 and subsections 4

and 5 of NRS 104A.4405, the originator of a funds

transfer pays the beneficiary of the originator’s payment order at the time a

payment order for the benefit of the beneficiary is accepted by the

beneficiary’s bank in the funds transfer and in an amount equal to the amount

of the order accepted by the beneficiary’s bank, but not more than the amount

of the originator’s order.

      2.  If payment under subsection 1 is made

to satisfy an obligation, the obligation is discharged to the same extent

discharge would result from payment to the beneficiary of the same amount in

money, unless:

      (a) The payment under subsection 1 was made by a

means prohibited by the contract of the beneficiary with respect to the

obligation;

      (b) The beneficiary, within a reasonable time

after receiving notice of receipt of the order by the beneficiary’s bank,

notified the originator of the beneficiary’s refusal of the payment;

      (c) Funds with respect to the order were not

withdrawn by the beneficiary or applied to a debt of the beneficiary; and

      (d) The beneficiary would suffer a loss that

could reasonably have been avoided if payment had been made by a means

complying with the contract.

Ê If payment

by the originator does not result in discharge under this section, the

originator is subrogated to the rights of the beneficiary to receive payment

from the beneficiary’s bank under subsection 1 of NRS

104A.4404.

      3.  For the purpose of determining whether

discharge of an obligation occurs under subsection 2, if the beneficiary’s bank

accepts a payment order in an amount equal to the amount of the originator’s

payment order less charges of one or more receiving banks in the funds

transfer, payment to the beneficiary is deemed to be in the amount of the

originator’s order unless upon demand by the beneficiary the originator does

not pay the beneficiary the amount of the deducted charges.

      4.  Rights of the originator or of the

beneficiary of a funds transfer under this section may be varied only by

agreement of the originator and the beneficiary.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 445)

Part 5

Miscellaneous Provisions

      NRS 104A.4501  Variation by agreement and effect of funds-transfer system rule.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in this

article, the rights and obligations of a party to a funds transfer may be

varied by agreement of the affected party.

      2.  “Funds-transfer system rule” means a

rule of an association of banks governing transmission of payment orders by

means of a funds-transfer system of the association or rights and obligations

with respect to those orders, or to the extent the rule governs rights and

obligations between banks that are parties to a funds transfer in which a

Federal Reserve bank, acting as an intermediary bank, sends a payment order to

the beneficiary’s bank. Except as otherwise provided in this article, a

funds-transfer system rule governing rights and obligations between

participating banks using the system may be effective even if the rule conflicts

with this article and indirectly affects another party to the funds transfer

who does not consent to the rule. A funds-transfer system rule may also govern

rights and obligations of parties other than participating banks using the

system to the extent stated in subsection 3 of NRS

104A.4404, subsection 4 of NRS 104A.4405, and

subsection 3 of NRS 104A.4507.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 446)

      NRS 104A.4502  Creditor’s process served on receiving bank; setoff by

beneficiary’s bank.

      1.  As used in this section, “creditor’s

process” means levy, attachment, garnishment, notice of lien, sequestration, or

similar process issued by or on behalf of a creditor or other claimant with

respect to an account.

      2.  If creditor’s process with respect to

an authorized account of the sender of a payment order is served on the

receiving bank, and the receiving bank accepts the payment order, the balance

in the authorized account available for satisfaction of the creditor’s process

is deemed to be reduced by the amount of the payment order to the extent the

bank did not otherwise receive payment of the order, unless the creditor’s

process is served at a time and in a manner affording the bank a reasonable

opportunity to act on it before the bank accepts the payment order.

      3.  If a beneficiary’s bank has received a

payment order for payment to the beneficiary’s account in the bank, the

following rules apply:

      (a) The bank may credit the beneficiary’s

account. The amount credited may be set off against an obligation owed by the

beneficiary to the bank or may be applied to satisfy creditor’s process served

on the bank with respect to the account.

      (b) The bank may credit the beneficiary’s account

and allow withdrawal of the amount credited unless creditor’s process with

respect to the account is served at a time and in a manner affording the bank a

reasonable opportunity to act to prevent withdrawal.

      (c) If creditor’s process with respect to the beneficiary’s

account has been served and the bank has had a reasonable opportunity to act on

it, the bank may not reject the payment order except for a reason unrelated to

the service of process.

      4.  Creditor’s process with respect to a

payment by the originator to the beneficiary pursuant to a funds transfer may

be served only on the beneficiary’s bank with respect to the debt owed by that

bank to the beneficiary. Any other bank served with the creditor’s process is

not obliged to act with respect to the process.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 446)

      NRS 104A.4503  Injunction or restraining order with respect to funds transfer.

      1.  For proper cause and in compliance with

applicable law, a court may restrain:

      (a) A person from issuing a payment order to

initiate a funds transfer;

      (b) An originator’s bank from executing the

payment order of the originator; or

      (c) The beneficiary’s bank from releasing funds

to the beneficiary or the beneficiary from withdrawing the funds.

      2.  A court may not otherwise restrain a

person from issuing a payment order, paying or receiving payment of a payment

order, or otherwise acting with respect to a funds transfer.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 447)

      NRS 104A.4504  Order in which items and payment orders may be charged to account;

order of withdrawals from account.

      1.  If a receiving bank has received more

than one payment order of the sender or one or more payment orders and other

items that are payable from the sender’s account, the bank may charge the

sender’s account with respect to the various orders and items in any sequence.

      2.  In determining whether a credit to an

account has been withdrawn by the holder of the account or applied to a debt of

the holder of the account, credits first made to the account are first withdrawn

or applied.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 447)

      NRS 104A.4505  Preclusion of objection to debit of customer’s account.  If a receiving bank has received payment from

its customer with respect to a payment order issued in the name of the customer

as sender and accepted by the bank, and the customer received notification

reasonably identifying the order, the customer is precluded from asserting that

the bank is not entitled to retain the payment unless the customer notifies the

bank of his or her objection to the payment within 1 year after the

notification was received by him or her.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 447)

      NRS 104A.4506  Rate of interest.

      1.  If, under this article, a receiving

bank is obliged to pay interest with respect to a payment order issued to the

bank, the amount payable may be determined:

      (a) By agreement of the sender and receiving

bank; or

      (b) By a funds-transfer system rule if the

payment order is transmitted through a funds-transfer system.

      2.  If the amount of interest is not

determined by an agreement or rule as stated in subsection 1, the amount is

calculated by multiplying the applicable Federal Funds rate by the amount on

which interest is payable, and then multiplying the product by the number of

days for which interest is payable. The applicable Federal Funds rate is the

average of the Federal Funds rates published by the Federal Reserve bank of New

York for each of the days for which interest is payable divided by 360. The

Federal Funds rate for any day on which a published rate is not available is

the same as the published rate for the next preceding day for which there is a

published rate. If a receiving bank that accepted a payment order is required

to refund payment to the sender of the order because the funds transfer was not

completed, but the failure to complete was not due to any fault by the bank,

the interest payable is reduced by a percentage equal to the reserve

requirement on deposits of the receiving bank.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 448)

      NRS 104A.4507  Choice of law.

      1.  The following rules govern choice of

law unless the affected parties otherwise agree or subsection 3 applies:

      (a) The rights and obligations between the sender

of a payment order and the receiving bank are governed by the law of the

jurisdiction in which the receiving bank is located.

      (b) The rights and obligations between the

beneficiary’s bank and the beneficiary are governed by the law of the

jurisdiction in which the beneficiary’s bank is located.

      (c) The issue of when payment is made pursuant to

a funds transfer by the originator to the beneficiary is governed by the law of

the jurisdiction in which the beneficiary’s bank is located.

      2.  If the parties described in each

paragraph of subsection 1 have made an agreement selecting the law of a

particular jurisdiction to govern rights and obligations between each other,

the law of that jurisdiction governs those rights and obligations, whether or

not the payment order or the funds transfer bears a reasonable relation to that

jurisdiction.

      3.  A funds-transfer system rule may select

the law of a particular jurisdiction to govern rights and obligations between

participating banks with respect to payment orders transmitted or processed

through the system, or the rights and obligations of some or all parties to a

funds transfer any part of which is carried out by means of the system. A

choice of law concerning rights and obligations between participating banks is

binding on participating banks. A choice of law concerning rights and

obligations of parties generally is binding on the originator, other sender, or

a receiving bank having notice that the funds-transfer system might be used in

the funds transfer and of the choice of law by the system when the originator,

other sender, or receiving bank issued or accepted a payment order. The

beneficiary of a funds transfer is bound by the choice of law if, when the funds

transfer is initiated, the beneficiary has notice that the funds-transfer

system might be used in the funds transfer and of the choice of law by the

system. The law of a jurisdiction selected pursuant to this subsection may

govern, whether or not that law bears a reasonable relation to the matter in

issue.

      4.  In the event of inconsistency between

an agreement under subsection 2 and a choice-of-law rule under subsection 3,

the agreement under subsection 2 prevails.

      5.  If a funds transfer is made by use of

more than one funds-transfer system and there is inconsistency between

choice-of-law rules of the systems, the matter in issue is governed by the law

of the selected jurisdiction that has the most significant relationship to the

matter in issue.

      (Added to NRS by 1991, 448)