ACTION:
Direct final rule; delegation of authority.
SUMMARY:
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has submitted updated regulations for receiving delegation of EPA authority for implementation and enforcement of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources). These regulations apply to certain NESHAPs promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 63, as amended between April 13, 2004 and April 24, 2013. The delegation of authority under this action does not apply to sources located in Indian Country. EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAPs to TCEQ.
DATES:
This rule is effective on January 26, 2015 without further notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by December 26, 2014. If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES:
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0074, by one of the following methods:
• www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.
• Email: Mr. Rick Barrett at barrett.richard@epa.gov. Please also send a copy by email to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
• Mail or delivery: Mr. Rick Barrett, Air Permits Section (6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0074. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information through http://www.regulations.gov or email, if you believe that it is CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an “anonymous access” system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment along with any disk or CD-ROM submitted. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location ( e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location ( e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at (214) 665-7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Rick Barrett (6PD-R), Air Permits Section, telephone (214) 665-7227; email: barrett.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document “we,” “us,” and “our” refers to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What does this action do?
II. What is the authority for delegation?
III. What criteria must Texas' program meet to be approved?
IV. How did TCEQ meet the Subpart E approval criteria?
V. What is being delegated?
VI. What is not being delegated?
VII. How will applicability determinations under Section 112 be made?
VIII. What authority does EPA have?
IX. What information must TCEQ provide to EPA?
X. What is EPA's oversight of this delegation to TCEQ?
XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or TCEQ?
XII. How will unchanged authorities be delegated to TCEQ in the future?
XIII. Final Action
XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What does this action do?
EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAPs to TCEQ. With this delegation, TCEQ has the primary responsibility to implement and enforce the delegated standards. See sections V and VI, below, for a discussion of which standards are being delegated and which are not being delegated.
II. What is the authority for delegation?
Section 112(l) of the CAA, and 40 CFR part 63, subpart E, authorizes EPA to delegate authority to any State or local agency which submits adequate regulatory procedures for implementation and enforcement of emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. The hazardous air pollutant standards are codified at 40 CFR part 63.
III. What criteria must Texas' program meet to be approved?
Section 112(l) of the CAA enables EPA to approve State air toxics programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxics program or rules. 40 CFR part 63, subpart E (subpart E) governs EPA's approval of State rules or programs under section 112(l).
EPA will approve an air toxics program if we find that:
(1) The State program is “no less stringent” than the corresponding Federal program or rule;
(2) The State has adequate authority and resources to implement the program;
(3) The schedule for implementation and compliance is sufficiently expeditious; and
(4) The program otherwise complies with Federal guidance.
In order to obtain approval of its program to implement and enforce Federal section 112 rules as promulgated without changes (straight delegation), only the criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d) must be met. 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3) provides that interim or final Title V program approval will satisfy the criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d) for part 70 sources.
IV. How did TCEQ meet the Subpart E approval criteria?
As part of its Title V submission, TCEQ stated that it intended to use the mechanism of incorporation by reference to adopt unchanged Federal section 112 into its regulations. This applied to both existing and future standards as they applied to part 70 sources ((60 FR 30444 (June 7, 1995) and 61 FR 32699 (June 25, 1996)). On December 6, 2001, EPA promulgated final full approval of the State's operating permits program effective November 30, 2001 (66 FR 63318). The TCEQ was originally delegated the authority to implement certain NESHAPs effective May 17, 2005 (70 FR 13108). Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a State has satisfied up-front approval criteria, it needs only to reference the previous demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria for any subsequent submittals. TCEQ has affirmed that it still meets the up-front approval criteria.
V. What is being delegated?
By letter dated January 16, 2008, TCEQ requested EPA to update its existing NESHAP delegation. The TCEQ requests delegation of certain Part 63 NESHAPs for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources). TCEQ's request included newly incorporated NESHAPs promulgated by EPA and amendments to existing standards currently delegated, as amended between April 13, 2004 and October 29, 2007. These NESHAP were adopted by the TCEQ on December 5, 2007.
By letter dated August 28, 2013, EPA received a second request from TCEQ to update its existing NESHAP delegation. The TCEQ requests delegation of certain Part 63 NESHAPs for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources). TCEQ's request included newly incorporated NESHAPs promulgated by EPA and amendments to existing standards that are currently delegated, as amended between October 30, 2007 and April 24, 2013. These NESHAP were adopted by the TCEQ on July 26, 2013.
VI. What is not being delegated?
EPA cannot delegate to a State any of the Category II Subpart A authorities set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(g) (2). These include the following provisions: § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring; and § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting. In addition, some Part 63 standards have certain provisions that cannot be delegated to the States. Therefore, any Part 63 standard that EPA is delegating to TCEQ that provides that certain authorities cannot be delegated are retained by EPA and not delegated. Furthermore, no authorities are delegated that require rulemaking in the Federal Register to implement, or where Federal overview is the only way to ensure national consistency in the application of the standards or requirements of CAA section 112. Finally, section 112(r), the accidental release program authority, is not being delegated by this approval.
All of the inquiries and requests concerning implementation and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State of Texas should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office.
In addition, this delegation to TCEQ to implement and enforce certain NESHAPs does not extend to sources or activities located in Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Under this definition, EPA treats as reservations, trust lands validly set aside for the use of a Tribe even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as a reservation. Consistent with previous federal program approvals or delegations, EPA will continue to implement the NESHAPs in Indian country because TCEQ has not submitted information to demonstrate authority over sources and activities located within the exterior boundaries of Indian reservations and other areas in Indian country.
VII. How will applicability determinations under Section 112 be made?
In approving this delegation, TCEQ will obtain concurrence from EPA on any matter involving the interpretation of section 112 of the CAA or 40 CFR part 63 to the extent that implementation, administration, or enforcement of these sections have not been covered by EPA determinations or guidance.
VIII. What authority does EPA have?
We retain the right, as provided by CAA section 112(l)(7), to enforce any applicable emission standard or requirement under section 112. EPA also has the authority to make certain decisions under the General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63. We are granting TCEQ some of these authorities, and retaining others, as explained in sections V and VI above. In addition, EPA may review and disapprove of State determinations and subsequently require corrections. ( See 40 CFR 63.91(g) and 65 FR 55810, 55823, September 14, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 59887, October 13, 2005; 72 FR 27443, May 16, 2007.)
Furthermore, we retain any authority in an individual emission standard that may not be delegated according to provisions of the standard. Also, listed in the footnotes of the part 63 delegation table at the end of this rule are the authorities that cannot be delegated to any State or local agency which we therefore retain.
IX. What information must TCEQ provide to EPA?
TCEQ must provide any additional compliance related information to EPA, Region 6, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance within 45 days of a request under 40 CFR 63.96(a).
In receiving delegation for specific General Provisions authorities, TCEQ must submit to EPA Region 6 on a semi-annual basis, copies of determinations issued under these authorities. For part 63 standards, these determinations include: Section 63.1, Applicability Determinations; Section 63.6(e), Operation and Maintenance Requirements—Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Section 63.6(f), Compliance with Non-Opacity Standards—Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Section 63.6(h), Compliance with Opacity and Visible Emissions Standards—Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Sections 63.7(c)(2)(i) and (d), Approval of Site-Specific Test Plans; Section 63.7(e)(2)(i), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Intermediate Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(iii), Approval of Shorter Sampling Times and Volumes When Necessitated by Process Variables or Other Factors; Sections 63.7(e)(2)(iv), (h)(2), and (h)(3), Waiver of Performance Testing; Sections 63.8(c)(1) and (e)(1), Approval of Site-Specific Performance Evaluation (Monitoring) Test Plans; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Monitoring; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Intermediate Alternatives to Monitoring; Section 63.9 and 63.10, Approval of Adjustments to Time Periods for Submitting Reports; Section 63.10(f), Approval of Minor Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; Section 63.7(a)(4), Extension of Performance Test Deadline.
X. What is EPA's oversight of this delegation to TCEQ?
EPA must oversee TCEQ's decisions to ensure the delegated authorities are being adequately implemented and enforced. We will integrate oversight of the delegated authorities into the existing mechanisms and resources for oversight currently in place. If, during oversight, we determine that TCEQ made decisions that decreased the stringency of the delegated standards, then TCEQ shall be required to take corrective actions and the source(s) affected by the decisions will be notified, as required by 40 CFR 63.91(g)(1)(ii). We will initiate withdrawal of the program or rule if the corrective actions taken are insufficient.
XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or TCEQ?
For the NESHAPs being delegated and included in the table below, all of the information required pursuant to the general provisions and the relevant subpart of the Federal NESHAP (40 CFR part 63) should be submitted by sources located outside of Indian country, directly to the TCEQ at the following address: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Office of Permitting, Remediation and Registration, Air Permits Division (MC 163), P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087. The TCEQ is the primary point of contact with respect to delegated NESHAPs. Sources do not need to send a copy to EPA. EPA Region 6 waives the requirement that notifications and reports for delegated standards be submitted to EPA in addition to TCEQ in accordance with 40 CFR 63.9(a)(4)(ii) and 63.10(a)(4)(ii). For those standards that are not delegated, sources must continue to submit all appropriate information to EPA.
XII. How will unchanged authorities be delegated to TCEQ in the future?
In the future, TCEQ will only need to send a letter of request to EPA, Region 6, for NESHAP regulations that TCEQ has adopted by reference. The letter must reference the previous up-front approval demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the up-front approval criteria. We will respond in writing to the request stating that the request for delegation is either granted or denied. A Federal Register action will be published to inform the public and affected sources of the delegation, indicate where source notifications and reports should be sent, and to amend the relevant portions of the Code of Federal Regulations showing which NESHAP standards have been delegated to TCEQ.
XIII. Final Action
The public was provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed approval of the program and mechanism for delegation of section 112 standards, as they apply to part 70 sources, on June 7, 1995, for the proposed interim approval of TCEQ's Title V operating permits program; and on October 11, 2001, for the proposed final approval of TCEQ's Title V operating permits program. In EPA's final full approval of Texas' Operating Permits Program on December 6, 2001 (66 FR 63318), the EPA discussed the public comments on the proposed final delegation of the Title V operating permits program. In today's action, the public is given the opportunity to comment on the approval of TCEQ's request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce certain section 112 standards for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources) which have been adopted by reference into Texas' state regulations. However, the Agency views the approval of these requests as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. Therefore, EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal. However, in the “Proposed Rules” section of today's Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the program and delegation of authority described in this action if adverse comments are received. This action will be effective January 26, 2015 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by December 26, 2014.
If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive relevant adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of a relevant adverse comment.
XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. ). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
The delegation is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state request to receive delegation of certain Federal standards, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 “Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks” (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing delegation submissions, EPA's role is to approve submissions provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a delegation submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA to use VCS in place of a delegation submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register . A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register . This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 26, 2015. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 12, 2014.
Bill Luthans,
Acting Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, Region 6.
40 CFR part 63 is amended as follows:
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority:
42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart E—Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal Authorities
2. Section 63.99 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(44)(i) to read as follows:
§ 63.99
(a) * * *
(44) Texas. (i) The following table lists the specific part 63 standards that have been delegated unchanged to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for all sources. The “X” symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been delegated. The delegations are subject to all of the conditions and limitations set forth in Federal law, regulations, policy, guidance, and determinations. Some authorities cannot be delegated and are retained by EPA. These include certain General Provisions authorities and specific parts of some standards. Any amendments made to these rules after April 24, 2013 are not delegated.
Delegation Status for Part 63 Standards—State of Texas 1
Subpart
Source category
TCEQ 2
A
General Provisions
X
F
Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON)—Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI)
X
G
HON—SOCMI Process Vents, Storage Vessels, Transfer Operations and Wastewater
X
H
HON—Equipment Leaks
X
I
HON—Certain Processes Negotiated Equipment Leak Regulation
X
J
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production
( 3 )
K
(Reserved)
L
Coke Oven Batteries
X
M
Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning
X
N
Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks
X
O
Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers
X
P
(Reserved)
Q
Industrial Process Cooling Towers
X
R
Gasoline Distribution
X
S
Pulp and Paper Industry
X
T
Halogenated Solvent Cleaning
X
U
Group I Polymers and Resins
X
V
(Reserved)
W
Epoxy Resins Production and Non-Nylon Polyamides Production
X
X
Secondary Lead Smelting
X
Y
Marine Tank Vessel Loading
X
Z
(Reserved)
AA
Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing Plants
X
BB
Phosphate Fertilizers Production Plants
X
CC
Petroleum Refineries
X
DD
Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations
X
EE
Magnetic Tape Manufacturing
X
FF
(Reserved)
GG
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities
X
HH
Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities
X
II
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities
X
JJ
Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations
X
KK
Printing and Publishing Industry
X
LL
Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants
X
MM
Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfide, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills
X
NN
(Reserved)
OO
Tanks-Level 1
X
PP
Containers
X
QQ
Surface Impoundments
X
RR
Individual Drain Systems
X
SS
Closed Vent Systems, Control Devices, Recovery Devices and Routing to a Fuel Gas System or a Process
TT
Equipment Leaks—Control Level 1
X
UU
Equipment Leaks—Control Level 2 Standards
X
VV
Oil—Water Separators and Organic—Water Separators
X
WW
Storage Vessels (Tanks)—Control Level 2
X
XX
Ethylene Manufacturing Process Units Heat Exchange Systems and Waste Operations
X
YY
Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards
X
ZZ-BBB
(Reserved)
CCC
Steel Pickling—HCI Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration
X
DDD
Mineral Wool Production
X
EEE
Hazardous Waste Combustors
X
FFF
(Reserved)
GGG
Pharmaceuticals Production
X
HHH
Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facilities
X
III
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production
X
JJJ
Group IV Polymers and Resins
X
KKK
(Reserved)
LLL
Portland Cement Manufacturing
X
MMM
Pesticide Active Ingredient Production
X
NNN
Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
X
OOO
Amino/Phenolic Resins
X
PPP
Polyether Polyols Production
X
QQQ
Primary Copper Smelting
X
RRR
Secondary Aluminum Production
X
SSS
(Reserved)
TTT
Primary Lead Smelting
X
UUU
Petroleum Refineries—Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units and Sulfur Recovery Plants
X
VVV
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
X
WWW
(Reserved)
XXX
Ferroalloys Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese
X
AAAA
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
X
CCCC
Nutritional Yeast Manufacturing
X
DDDD
Plywood and Composite Wood Products
X 4
EEEE
Organic Liquids Distribution
X
FFFF
Misc. Organic Chemical Production and Processes (MON)
X
GGGG
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production
X
HHHH
Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat Production
X
IIII
Auto & Light Duty Truck (Surface Coating)
X
JJJJ
Paper and other Web (Surface Coating)
X
KKKK
Metal Can (Surface Coating)
X
MMMM
Misc. Metal Parts and Products (Surface Coating)
X
NNNN
Surface Coating of Large Appliances
X
OOOO
Fabric Printing Coating and Dyeing
X
PPPP
Plastic Parts (Surface Coating)
X
QQQQ
Surface Coating of Wood Building Products
X
RRRR
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture
X
SSSS
Surface Coating for Metal Coil
X
TTTT
Leather Finishing Operations
X
UUUU
Cellulose Production Manufacture
X
VVVV
Boat Manufacturing
X
WWWW
Reinforced Plastic Composites Production
X
XXXX
Tire Manufacturing
X
YYYY
Combustion Turbines
X
ZZZZ
Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE)
X
AAAAA
Lime Manufacturing Plants
X
BBBBB
Semiconductor Manufacturing
X
CCCCC
Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching and Battery Stacks
X
DDDDD
Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters Major Sources
X 5
EEEEE
Iron Foundries
X
FFFFF
Integrated Iron and Steel
X
GGGGG
Site Remediation
X
HHHHH
Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing
X
IIIII
Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants
X
JJJJJ
Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing
( 6 )
KKKKK
Clay Ceramics Manufacturing
( 6 )
LLLLL
Asphalt Roofing and Processing
X
MMMMM
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operation
X
NNNNN
Hydrochloric Acid Production, Fumed Silica Production
X
OOOOO
(Reserved)
PPPPP
Engine Test Facilities
X
QQQQQ
Friction Products Manufacturing
X
RRRRR
Taconite Iron Ore Processing
X
SSSSS
Refractory Products Manufacture
X
TTTTT
Primary Magnesium Refining
X
UUUUU
Coal and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
X 7
VVVVV
(Reserved)
WWWWW
Hospital Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers Area Sources
X
XXXXX
(Reserved)
YYYYY
Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities Area Sources
X
ZZZZZ
Iron and Steel Foundries Area Sources
X
AAAAAA
(Reserved)
BBBBBB
Gasoline Distribution Bulk Terminals, Bulk Plants, and Pipeline Facilities Area Sources
X
CCCCCC
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Area Sources
X
DDDDDD
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production Area Sources
X
EEEEEE
Primary Copper Smelting Area Sources
X
FFFFFF
Secondary Copper Smelting Area Sources
X
GGGGGG
Primary Nonferrous Metals Area Sources: Zinc, Cadmium, and Beryllium
X
HHHHHH
Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources
X
IIIIII
(Reserved)
JJJJJJ
Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers Area Sources
X
KKKKKK
(Reserved)
LLLLLL
Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers Production Area Sources
X
MMMMMM
Carbon Black Production Area Sources
X
NNNNNN
Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources: Chromium Compounds
X
OOOOOO
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production and Fabrication Area Sources
X
PPPPPP
Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing Area Sources
X
QQQQQQ
Wood Preserving Area Sources
X
RRRRRR
Clay Ceramics Manufacturing Area Sources
X
SSSSSS
Glass Manufacturing Area Sources
X
TTTTTT
Secondary Nonferrous Metals Processing Area Sources
X
UUUUUU
(Reserved)
VVVVVV
Chemical Manufacturing Area Sources
X
WWWWWW
Plating and Polishing Operations Area Sources
X
XXXXXX
Metal Fabrication and Finishing Area Sources
X
YYYYYY
Ferroalloys Production Facilities Area Sources
X
ZZZZZZ
Aluminum, Copper, and Other Nonferrous Foundries Area Sources
X
AAAAAAA
Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing Area Sources
X
BBBBBBB
Chemical Preparations Industry Area Sources
X
CCCCCCC
Paints and Allied Products Manufacturing Area Sources
X
DDDDDDD
Prepared Feeds Manufacturing Area Sources
X
EEEEEEE
Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production Area Sources
FFFFFFF-GGGGGGG
(Reserved)
HHHHHHH
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production Major Sources
X
1 Program delegated to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).
2 Authorities which may not be delegated include: § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Emission Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring; § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; and all authorities identified in the subparts ( e.g., under “Delegation of Authority”) that cannot be delegated.
3 The TCEQ was previously delegated this subpart on May 17, 2005 ( 70 FR 13018 ). The subpart was vacated and remanded to EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d 1232 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Court's holding, this subpart is not delegated to TCEQ at this time.
4 This subpart was issued a partial vacatur on October 29, 2007 (72 FR 61060) by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
5 Final rule. See 78 FR 7138 (January 31, 2013).
6 TCEQ was previously delegated this subpart on May 2, 2006 (71 FR 25753). This subpart was vacated and remanded to EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, Sierra Club v. EPA, 479 F. 3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 2007). Because of the D.C. Court's holding, this subpart is not delegated to TCEQ at this time.
7 Initial Final Rule. See 77 FR 9304 (February 16, 2012). Final on reconsideration of certain new source issues. See 78 FR 24073 (April 24, 2013). Portions of this subpart are in proposed reconsideration pending final action. See 78 FR 38001 (June 25, 2013).
[FR Doc. 2014-27909 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P