(B) the climatic factors of the area; and
(C) the volume and physical and chemical characteristics of the leachate; or
(c) Alternative Design.
(i) The owner or operator may use, as approved by the Director, an alternative design.
(ii) The owner or operator must demonstrate that the ground water quality protection standard of Subsection R315-303-2(1) can be met. The demonstration must be approved by the Director, and must be based upon:
(A) the hydrogeologic characteristics of the facility and the surrounding land;
(B) the climatic factors of the area;
(C) the volume and physical and chemical characteristics of the leachate;
(D) predictions of contaminate fate and transport in the subsurface that maximize contaminant migration and consider impacts on human health and the environment; and
(E) predictions of leachate flow from the base of the waste to the uppermost aquifer; or
(d) Stringent Design. When conditions of location, hydrogeology, or waste stream justify, the Director may require that the liner of a landfill be constructed to meet standards more stringent than the liner designs of Subsection R315-303-3(3)(a).
(e) Small Landfill Design.
(i) The small landfill design applies only to a Class II Landfill.
(ii) Each new Class II Landfill and any existing Class II Landfill seeking facility expansion shall meet the location standards of Section R315-302-1.
(iii) Each new and existing Class II Landfill shall meet the performance standards of Section R315-303-2.
(iv) A Class II Landfill, which meets the requirements of Subsection R315-303-3(3)(e)(v), is exempt from the liner, leachate collection system, and ground water monitoring requirements of Rule R315-303.
(v) A Class II Landfill will be approved only if:
(A) there is no evidence of existing ground water contamination;
(B) the landfill serves a community that has no practicable waste management alternative as determined by the Director;
(C) the landfill is located in an area which receives less than 25 inches of annual precipitation;
(D) the landfill receives, on a yearly average, no more than 20 tons of waste per day, or if a tonnage cannot be determined, serves a population of no more than 8,900; and
(E) the landfill meets all the requirements in Rules R315-301 through 320 applicable to Class II landfills.
(vi) A Class II Landfill may lose the exemptions of the small landfill design if at any time the landfill receives more than 20 tons of solid waste per day, based on an annual average, or has caused ground water contamination.
(4) Closure. At closure, an owner or operator of a Class I, II, IIIa, IVa, and V Landfill shall use one of the following designs for the final cover.
(a) Standard Design. The standard design of the final cover shall consist of two layers:
(i) a layer to minimize infiltration, consisting of at least 18 inches of compacted soil, or equivalent, with a permeability of 1 x 10-5 cm/sec or less, or equivalent, shall be placed upon the final lifts;
(A) in no case shall the cover of the final lifts be more permeable than the bottom liner system or natural subsoils present in the unit; and
(B) the grade of surface slopes shall not be less than 2%, nor the grade of side slopes more than 33%, except where construction integrity and the integrity of erosion control can be demonstrated at steeper slopes; and
(ii) a layer to minimize erosion, consisting of:
(A) at least 6 inches of soil capable of sustaining vegetative growth placed over the compacted soil cover and seeded with grass, other shallow rooted vegetation or other native vegetation; or
(B) other suitable material, approved by the Director.
(b) Requirements for any Earthen Final Cover at a Landfill.
(i) Markers or other benchmarks shall be installed in any final earthen cover to indicate the thickness of the final cover. These markers shall be observed during each quarterly inspection and the earthen cover shall be raised to the appropriate thickness as necessary.
(ii) Erosion channels deeper than 10% of the total cover thickness shall be repaired as soon as possible following their discovery.
(c) Alternative Final Cover Design. The Director may approve an alternative final cover design, on a site specific basis, if it can be documented that:
(i) the alternative final cover achieves an equivalent reduction in infiltration as achieved by the standard design in Subsection R315-303-3(4)(a)(i); and
(ii) the alternative final cover provides equivalent protection from wind and water erosion as achieved by the standard design in Subsection R315-303-3(4)(a)(ii).
(d) The expected performance of an alternative final cover design shall be documented by the use of an appropriate mathematical model.
(i) The input for the modeling shall include the climatic conditions at the specific landfill site and the soil types that will make up the final cover.
(ii) The model shall:
(A) be run to show the expected performance of the final cover at normal precipitation for a period of time until stability has been reached; and