Advanced Search

§23-17-25  Privileges and immunities for peer review activities. –


Published: 2015

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
TITLE 23

Health and Safety

CHAPTER 23-17

Licensing of Health Care Facilities

SECTION 23-17-25



   § 23-17-25  Privileges and immunities for

peer review activities. –

(a) Neither the proceedings nor the records of peer review boards as defined in

§ 5-37-1 shall be subject to discovery or be admissible in evidence in any

case save litigation arising out of the imposition of sanctions upon a

physician. However, any imposition or notice of a restriction of privileges or

a requirement of supervision imposed on a physician for unprofessional conduct

as defined in § 5-37-5.1 shall be subject to discovery and be admissible

in any proceeding against the physician for performing, or against any health

care facility or health care provider which allows the physician to perform the

medical procedures which are the subject of the restriction or supervision

during the period of the restriction or supervision or subsequent to that

period. Nothing contained in this section shall apply to records made in the

regular course of business by a hospital or other provider of health care

information. Documents or records otherwise available from original sources are

not to be construed as immune from discovery or used in any civil proceedings

merely because they were presented during the proceedings of the committee.



   (b) There shall be no monetary liability on the part of, and

no cause of action for damages shall arise against, any member of a duly

appointed peer review board operated pursuant to written by-laws, for any act

or proceeding undertaken or performed within the scope of the functions of any

peer review board.



   (c) There shall be no monetary liability on the part of, and

no cause of action for damage shall arise against, any person on account of the

communication of information in the possession of the person to any peer review

board or the board of medical licensure and discipline, when the communication

is intended to aid in the evaluation of the qualifications, fitness, or

character of a practitioner of the healing arts, and does not represent as true

any matter not reasonably believed to be true.



   (d) Any peer review processes authorized by statute and

carried out in good faith shall have the benefit of the state action exemption

to the state antitrust law.



History of Section.

(P.L. 1976, ch. 244, § 5; G.L. 1956, § 23-16-23; P.L. 1979, ch. 39,

§ 1; G.L. 1956, § 23-17-25; P.L. 1986, ch. 350, § 12.)