Advanced Search

§135. Validity


Published: 2015

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
§135. Validity






A working waterfront covenant is valid and enforceable notwithstanding any of the
following conditions. [2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).]








1. Not appurtenant to interest in real property. 
The working waterfront covenant is not appurtenant and does not run with an interest
in real property.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








2. Assignable to another holder. 
The working waterfront covenant can be or has been assigned to another qualified
holder.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








3. Not recognized at common law. 
The working waterfront covenant is not of a character traditionally recognized at
common law.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








4. Imposes negative burden. 
The working waterfront covenant imposes a negative burden.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








5. Imposes affirmative obligations. 
The working waterfront covenant imposes affirmative obligations upon the owner of
an interest in the burdened property or upon the qualified holder.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








6. Benefit does not touch or concern real property. 
The benefit of the working waterfront covenant is held by a qualified holder who
has not retained property that would benefit from enforcement of the working waterfront
covenant, or the benefit does not touch or concern real property in any other way.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








7. No privity of estate or contract. 
There is no privity of estate or privity of contract.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








8. Does not run to successors or assigns. 
The working waterfront covenant does not run to the successors or assigns of the
qualified holder.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








9. Unreasonable restraint on alienability. 
The working waterfront covenant may be considered to be an unreasonable restraint
on alienability.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]








10. In violation of rule against perpetuities. 
The working waterfront covenant may violate the rule against perpetuities.


[
2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW)
.]





SECTION HISTORY

2005, c. 574, §1 (NEW).