SECTION .0700 - INFORMATION ABOUT LEGAL SERVICES
27 NCAC Rule 7.1 Communications Concerning a Lawyer's
Services
(a) A lawyer shall not make a false or misleading
communication about the lawyer or the lawyer's services. A communication is
false or misleading if it:
(1) contains a material misrepresentation of
fact or law, or omits a fact necessary to make the statement considered as a whole
not materially misleading;
(2) is likely to create an unjustified
expectation about results the lawyer can achieve, or states or implies that the
lawyer can achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional
Conduct or other law; or
(3) compares the lawyer's services with other
lawyers' services, unless the comparison can be factually substantiated.
(b) A communication by a lawyer that contains a
dramatization depicting a fictional situation is misleading unless it complies
with paragraph (a) above and contains a conspicuous written or oral statement,
at the beginning and the end of the communication, explaining that the
communication contains a dramatization and does not depict actual events or
real persons.
Comment
[1] This Rule governs all communications about a lawyer's
services, including advertising permitted by Rule 7.2. Whatever means are used
to make known a lawyer's services, statements about them must be truthful.
[2] Truthful statements that are misleading are also
prohibited by this Rule. A truthful statement is misleading if it omits a fact
necessary to make the lawyer's communication considered as a whole not
materially misleading. A truthful statement is also misleading if there is a
substantial likelihood that it will lead a reasonable person to formulate a
specific conclusion about the lawyer or the lawyer's services for which there
is no reasonable factual foundation.
[3] An advertisement that truthfully reports a lawyer's
achievements on behalf of clients or former clients may be misleading if
presented so as to lead a reasonable person to form an unjustified expectation
that the same results could be obtained for other clients in similar matters
without reference to the specific factual and legal circumstances of each
client's case. Similarly, an unsubstantiated comparison of the lawyer's
services or fees with the services or fees of other lawyers may be misleading
if presented with such specificity as would lead a reasonable person to
conclude that the comparison can be substantiated. The inclusion of an
appropriate disclaimer or qualifying language may preclude a finding that a
statement is likely to create unjustified expectations or otherwise mislead the
public.
[4] See also Rule 8.4(e) for the prohibition against
stating or implying an ability to influence improperly a government agency or
official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional
Conduct or other law.
History Note: Authority G.S. 84-23;
Adopted July 24, 1997;
Amended Eff. October 2, 2014; March 1, 2003.