Advanced Search

The Bank of England Act 1998 (Macro-prudential Measures) (No.2) Order 2015


Published: 2015-03-25

Subscribe to a Global-Regulation Premium Membership Today!

Key Benefits:

Subscribe Now for only USD$40 per month.
Statutory Instruments
2015 No. 905

Financial Services And Markets
The Bank of England Act 1998 (Macro-prudential Measures) (No.2) Order 2015

Made
25th March 2015

Coming into force

for the purpose of article 4(b)
1st January 2019

for the remainder
6th April 2015

The Treasury make the following Order in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 9I(2) and 9L of the Bank of England Act 1998(1).
In accordance with section 9L(2) of the Bank of England Act 1998, the Treasury has consulted with the Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England.

In accordance with section 9N of the Bank of England Act 1998(2), a draft of this Order has been laid before Parliament and approved by a resolution of each House.

Citation and Commencement

1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Bank of England Act 1998 (Macro-prudential Measures) (No.2) Order 2015.

(2) Articles 1 to 3, 4(a), 4(c) to 4(d) and 5 come into force on 6th April 2015.

(3) Article 4(b) comes into force on 1st January 2019.

Interpretation

2.—(1) In this Order—

“capital requirements directive” means Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26th June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49EC(3);

“Common Equity Tier 1 capital” has the meaning given by Article 50 of the capital requirements regulation;

“consolidated basis” has the meaning given by Article 4(1)(48) of the capital requirements regulation;

“cost benefit analysis” means—

(a)
an analysis of the costs and benefits of any change in rules made pursuant to Part 9A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000(4) to give effect to a subsequent direction; and

(b)
where the costs and benefits can reasonably be estimated and it is reasonably practicable to produce an estimate, an estimate of those costs and of those benefits;

“countercyclical capital buffer rate” has the meaning given in Article 128(7) of the capital requirements directive;

“Financial Policy Committee” has the meaning given by section 9B of the Bank of England Act 1998(5);

“G-SII” means a global systemically important institution, as identified by the PRA pursuant to Part 4 of the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) Regulations 2014(6);

“G-SII additional leverage ratio” means a leverage ratio calculated by reference to the rate of the G-SII buffer which the PRA requires a G-SII to maintain;

“G-SII buffer” has the meaning given by Article 128(3) of the Capital Requirements Directive;

“individual basis” in relation to a macro-prudential measure applicable to an institution, means the application of that measure in respect of that institution only;

“investment firm” has the meaning given by section 424A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;

“leverage ratio” means an institution’s Tier 1 capital divided by its total exposure measure, with this ratio expressed as a percentage;

“PRA” means the Prudential Regulation Authority;

“PRA-authorised person” has the meaning given by section 2B of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000(7);

“SRB institution” has the meaning given by regulation 34D of the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) Regulations 2014(8);

“SRB institution additional leverage ratio” means a leverage ratio calculated by reference to the rate of the systemic risk buffers which the PRA requires an SRB institution to maintain pursuant to Part 5A of the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measure) Regulations 2014(9);

“systemic risk buffer” has the meaning given by regulation 2 of the Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) Regulations 2014(10);

“Tier 1 capital” has the meaning given by Article 25 of the capital requirements regulation;

“total exposure measure” has the meaning given by Article 429 (4) of the Capital Requirements Regulation;

“UK bank” means a UK institution which has permission under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to carry on the regulated activity of accepting deposits, but excludes—

(a)
a credit union within the meaning of section 31 of the Credit Unions Act 1979(11), or

(b)
a person with permission under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000(12) to effect or carry out contracts of insurance as principal;

“UK institution” means an institution which is established in the United Kingdom and is incorporated, or formed under the law of any part of the United Kingdom; and

“UK investment firm” means a UK institution which—

(a)
has permission under Part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000;

(b)
is a PRA-authorised person by virtue of a designation under article 3 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (PRA-regulated Activities) Order 2013(13); and

(c)
is an investment firm.

Macro-prudential measures

3.  Each of the measures set out in article 4 may be applied on, or by reference to, an individual basis or a consolidated basis.

Macro-prudential measures

4.—(1) For the purposes of section 9H(1) and 9L of the Bank of England Act 1998, the following measures (and any measures falling within a listed measure) are prescribed in relation to the PRA—

(a)a measure to require UK banks and UK investment firms to hold sufficient Tier 1 capital to satisfy a minimum leverage ratio specified by the Financial Policy Committee;

(b)a measure to secure that SRB institutions ordinarily hold sufficient Tier 1 capital to satisfy an SRB institution additional leverage ratio specified by the Financial Policy Committee;

(c)a measure to secure that G-SIIs ordinarily hold sufficient Tier 1 capital to satisfy a G-SII additional leverage ratio specified by the Financial Policy Committee;

(d)a measure to secure that UK banks and UK investment firms ordinarily hold sufficient Tier 1 capital to satisfy a countercyclical leverage ratio buffer specified by the Financial Policy Committee.

(2) The Financial Policy Committee may also specify a minimum proportion of Common Equity Tier 1 capital that shall be held in relation to a measure specified in paragraph (1).

(3) The Financial Policy Committee may include in a direction relating to the countercyclical leverage ratio buffer a method of calculating the countercyclical leverage ratio buffer by reference to the prevailing countercyclical capital buffer rates.

Procedural requirements

5.—(1) Paragraph (2) applies if—

(a)the Financial Policy Committee has given a direction to the PRA under section 9H of the Bank of England Act 1998 which specifies a value for a counter-cyclical leverage ratio buffer, and which includes a method of calculating the value of the countercyclical leverage ratio buffer by reference to the prevailing countercyclical capital buffer rates pursuant to paragraph 4(3) (“the first direction”);

(b)the Financial Policy Committee subsequently revokes the first direction; and

(c)within a reasonable period after the revocation of the first direction, the Financial Policy Committee gives another direction to the PRA under section 9H of the Bank of England Act 1998 (“the subsequent direction”) which is in substance identical to the first direction except in relation to the value specified in the direction.

(2) To the extent that the PRA is implementing the subsequent direction by way of rules pursuant to Part 9A of the Financial Services and Markets Act—

(a)sections 138J and 138K of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 do not apply; and

(b)the PRA must undertake a cost benefit analysis of the measure and publish it at the same time as it publishes the rules which give effect to the subsequent direction.

Mark Lancaster
Gavin Barwell
Two of the Lords Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Treasury
25th March 2015

EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Order)

The Financial Policy Committee is responsible for monitoring and addressing systemic risks which threaten the stability of the United Kingdom’s financial system. One tool available to the FPC is the power to issue directions to the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority (together the regulators). The Financial Policy Committee can only issue directions in relation to macro-prudential measures which have been prescribed by HM Treasury.

The Basel III accord included proposals for capital adequacy standards based on an assessment of financial institutions leverage position (which treats all exposures equally, regardless of their estimated risk). These leverage requirements are designed to strengthen the capital position of financial institutions and to mitigate the risk of future financial crises. The Basel proposals included a minimum standard for all financial institutions with the possibility of additional “buffers” for particular classes of financial institutions, in particular those which are systemically important. These proposals are designed to ensure that financial institutions maintain a minimum amount of capital to absorb losses regardless of the risk profile of their assets.

This Order prescribes four macro-prudential measures for the purposes of section 9H of the Bank of England Act 1998 (c.11) (“the 1998 Act”) (power of the Financial Policy Committee of the Bank of England to direct the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority).

The first measure allows the Financial Policy Committee to give a direction to specify a minimum leverage ratio which will apply to all UK banks and PRA regulated UK investment firms (“investment firms”). This will mean that UK banks and investment firms will need to maintain a minimum amount of capital which will be calculated by reference to the amount of their assets and certain off-balance sheet items.

The second measure allows the Financial Policy Committee to give a direction which will secure that institutions which are subject to a systemic risk buffer will ordinarily maintain an additional capital buffer. This requirement will only be engaged if the PRA has set a strategic risk buffer for individual institutions pursuant to Chapter 2 of Part 5A of Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) Regulations 2014, which does not come in to force until 1st January 2019. Accordingly article 4(b) of this Order, which contains the measure for specifying the SRB leverage ratio, also comes into force on 1st January 2019.

The third measure allows the Financial Policy Committee to give a direction that will secure that globally systemically important institutions will ordinarily hold sufficient capital necessary to maintain a G-SII additional leverage buffer.

Finally, the fourth measure allows the Financial Policy Committee to give a direction which will secure that UK banks and UK investment firms will ordinarily hold sufficient capital to maintain a countercyclical leverage buffer. The countercyclical leverage ratio buffer will ensure that UK banks and UK investment firms will ordinarily maintain sufficient capital to satisfy the specified ratio during the upturn in the economic cycle, ensuring that they are not over-extended during a stressed period. The Financial Policy Committee may specify that the countercyclical leverage buffer can be calculated by reference to the countercyclical capital buffer rates

Article 5 provides that where the Financial Policy Committee gives a direction which secures that that UK banks and investment firms ordinarily hold an amount of capital to satisfy a countercyclical leverage ratio buffer and this buffer is to be calculated by reference to countercyclical capital buffer rates and subsequently gives another direction which is identical in substance to the first direction except that it changes a specified value, and where this change is implemented by the PRA by way of new rules issued pursuant to Part 9A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, then if the rules are issued by the PRA then it need not comply with the obligations under sections 138J and 138Kof the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. However, Article 5 does require the PRA to undertake, and publish alongside any new rules, a cost-benefit analysis of any change in rules.

A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available on the HM Treasury website and is annexed to the Explanatory Memorandum which is available alongside the instrument on the OPSI website.

(1)
Inserted by section 4 of the Financial Services Act 2012.

(2)
1998 c.11. Inserted by section 4 of the Financial Services Act 2012 (c.21).

(3)
OJ L 176/338, 27.06.2013.

(4)
Inserted by section 24 of the Financial Services Act 2012.

(5)
Inserted by section 4 of the Financial Services Act 2012.

(6)
SI 2014/894, amended by SI 2015/19.

(7)
Inserted by section 6(1) of the Financial Services Act 2012.

(8)
Inserted by SI 2015/19.

(9)
SI 2014/894, inserted by SI 2015/19.

(10)
Inserted by SI 2015/19.

(11)
1979 c.34.

(12)
Inserted by section 11(2) of the Financial Services Act 2012 (c.21).

(13)
SI 2013/556.